For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/resonance.php#8

Employee satisfaction and retention have long been considered critical factors for organizational success, particularly in sectors like education where employee commitment directly impacts institutional quality and performance. Nowadays, the oscillating environment, competition between companies, institutions, organizations, or governments in a technology-oriented world, and the kind of work have forced educational institutions to comprehend the importance of worker satisfaction for organizational triumph. Nowadays, the competitive edge of most organizations in the global market comes not only from cost effectiveness but also from ideas and rational know-how. In a systematic and knowledge-based setting, imperceptible assets like skills, relationships, and reputes are valued most. Employee satisfaction refers to the positive emotional state which in turn is the product of evaluating one’s job as achieving or aidinging to achieve one’s job values. It measures how content employees are with their jobs. Organizations have different work environments, policies, and compensation measures. Within educational institutions in the NCR(National Capital Region), understanding the relationship between employee satisfaction and retention has become increasingly important due to heightened competition for skilled educators and administrative staff. To examine the factors influencing job fulfillment, the best guidelines for work satisfaction, and its influence on business development, the researcher marked to explore the degree of employee satisfaction in a total of six private universities: Shiv Nadar University,Greater Noida; Amity University, Noida;SDGI Global University, Ghaziabad; Noida International University, Greater Noida; Galgotias University, Greater Noida; and Sharda University, Greater Noida. The researcher set a questionnaire for the workforce and collected responses from 250 participants from these renowned educational institutions. To govern the degree of satisfaction among the workforce of different institutes, the data was analyzed using the T-test which is a statistical tool for variance calculation. The study here determined that HR policies vary across organizations, and the way they are implemented significantly impacts employee satisfaction and retention.

1. To study the degree of job satisfaction amongmale and female employees ofprivateuniversities in NCR.
2. To evaluate the influencing features of job satisfaction amongNCR’s private University Employees.
3. To find out the most suitable policies that support in retaining the employees of privateuniversities in NCR.

Research by Locke (1976) identified that intrinsic factors such as job autonomy, meaningful work, and opportunities for advancement play a significant role in boosting employee satisfaction in educational institutions. Other studies (Maslow, 1943) suggest that educators often derive satisfaction from fulfilling their self-actualization needs through teaching and mentoring. In the NCR region, external factors like competitive salaries, infrastructure, and institutional reputation also weigh heavily on satisfaction levels (Kaur & Gupta, 2020).Becker & Gerhart (1996) explained that employee retention mentions to an organization's capacity to prevent turnover and keep valuable employees for extended periods. High employee turnover in educational institutions can disrupt learning continuity and diminish institutional credibility. In the NCR, retaining skilled faculty and staff has been a significant challenge due to the growing demand for talented educators in both private and public institutions (Sharma, 2019).According to Cascio (2003), organizations that focus on employee development, recognition, and a positive workplace culture are more likely to retain employees. In educational institutions, especially in the NCR, retention strategies include offering career development opportunities, fostering strong relationships between employees and management, and providing competitive benefits (Pandey & Singh, 2018). Institutions that invest in leadership development, peer mentorship programs, and work-life balance initiatives tend to experience higher retention rates (Yadav & Chauhan, 2021).Lee, Hsu, and Lien (2005) emphasized the significance of rewards in the workplace, noting that they motivate employees to perform better and increase job satisfaction. They explained that when employees recognize a clear connection between goal-oriented behaviors and rewards, they are more likely to adopt such behaviors. Over time, this link leads employees to see the organization more as a business partner rather than just an authority figure.In the context of NCR’s educational institutions, the work of Bhatnagar and Sharma (2017) indicates that when employees feel content with their work, there will be a greater probability that they shall remain committed to their organization. Satisfaction with work conditions, compensation, and institutional support reduces turnover intentions and improves retention. While various studies have focused on employee satisfaction and retention in the corporate sector, there is relatively limited research on these topics within educational institutions, particularly in the NCR. Some research suggests that educational staff face unique challenges, such as emotional labor, burnout, and low recognition, which may require tailored retention strategies (Singh & Kaur, 2015). Additionally, there is a need for extra longitudinal research to examine the long-term impression of retention policies on employee satisfaction and institutional success in the NCR region.

Gupta, Kumar, and Singh (2013) examined how four extents of spirituality affect job satisfaction among employees of Punjab in private insurance companies. Trying their hypothesis on 100 interviewees, they found that members of the workforce experience the greatest levels of job contentment when 'organizational core values' along witha 'sense of community' are particularly robust within the organization. Badawy, Srivastava, and Sadek (2014) conducted a study involving 200 university mentors from self-financed institutions in India and Egypt to explore the influence of emotional intelligence, job fulfilment, and Organizational Learning dimensions. The study revealed that psychologicalintelligence and Job Satisfaction were not linked for mentors in either country. However, a noteworthy relationship was found between Job Fulfilment and Organizational Learning dimensions in both Egypt and India.Sharma and Gupta (2020) conducted a study to assess job satisfaction levels across seven industries: banking& finance, travel& tourism, insurance,outsourcing,healthcare, education,and logistics. They selected 20 employees from each and every industry, totaling 140 participants, and used ANOVA tests with the f-Statistic to examine differences in the most suitable practices among these industries. The outcomesshowed that, compared to the insurance, outsourcing, and logistics sectors, job satisfaction levels were higher in education,healthcare and travel & tourism. The study concluded by deliberating the practical inferences of these findings for the industries and suggesting areas for upcoming research.Bhatnagar, D., & Sharma, R. (2017) in his study, “Job Satisfaction as a Predictor of Retention: A Study of Faculty Members in NCR Educational Institutions” published in “International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 7(2), 43-58”, examined the specific predictors of employee retention among faculty members in educational institutions, making this study particularly relevant to the topic. Pandey, M., & Singh, A. (2018) in their work, “Retention Practices in Educational Institutions: A Study of Schools in Delhi NCR” published in “Indian Journal of Education and Development, 45(4), 65-78”,  focused on school-level retention practices, this paper examines the effectiveness of different HR strategies in retaining teachers and administrative staff in the NCR region. Sharma, N. (2019) in his paper, “Employee Retention in the Educational Sector: A Comparative Study between Public and Private Institutions in the NCR” published in, “Indian Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 113-124”, focuses on employee retention challenges within the NCR’s educational sector, providing insights into differences between public and private institutions. Kaur, R., & Gupta, V. (2020) in the research work, “Workplace Satisfaction and Its Implications for Employee Retention in Private Educational Institutions in NCR”, published in, “Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(3), 87-101”, explores the link between workplace satisfaction and retention in private educational institutions in the NCR, highlighting factors such as institutional reputation and career development. Yadav, P., & Chauhan, N. (2021) in his study, “Employee Engagement and Retention in NCR's Higher Educational Institutions: A Case Study Approach”, published in “Educational Management Review, 16(1), 56-73”, analyzes employee engagement practices that lead to better retention in NCR's higher education sector, offering practical insights for institutions seeking to retain talent.

This research work examines job satisfaction among employees in educational institutions and universities in the National Capital Region (NCR). With rapidly changing global dynamics, these institutions face pressure to adapt to new competitive landscapes driven by technological advancements, internationalization, and evolving expectations of educators and students. Employee satisfaction is now seen as crucial for organizational success and competitiveness.

In today’s knowledge-driven economy, the competitive advantage of educational institutions lies in their operational efficiency and the intellectual capital and innovative ideas of their staff. Retaining key employees is critical, as their loss can negatively impact operations, reputation, and growth. This challenge is particularly intense in the booming NCR education sector, which offers many career advancement opportunities.

Top-level executives and HR departments are investing significant resources to understand and address the factors leading to employee dissatisfaction. This study aims to identify these features and the prime contributors to employee retention. By analyzing the unique challenges faced by educational employees in the NCR, the research provides insights into improving job satisfaction, reducing turnover, and fostering loyalty and commitment. The findings will help educational institutions in the NCR develop effective policies and practices to retain best talent, enhance employee satisfaction, and preserve a competitive edge in the global education landscape.

Sources of Data

Primary data was gathered by administering structured questionnaires to employees of the selected educational institutions, ensuring a diverse sample representative of different departments and job roles within each organization. The questionnaires were designed to capture both quantitative and qualitative insights into employee experiences, opinions, and behaviors related to the research topic. Additionally, secondary data was obtained from a completeanalysis of relevant works, including academic journals, books,peer-reviewed articles, and reputable websites. This secondary data provided context supported the analysis of primary data, and helped to identify trends, theoretical frameworks, and gaps in the existing research.

Scope of the Study

The study emphasizes on examining employee satisfaction and retention practices in selected private educational institutions and how these factors influence their overall development. The research specifically targets employee-related aspects, leaving out broader organizational development tools and strategies that fall beyond the scope of this study. The study is based on the responses collected from employees working in these institutions, and the data is processed using suitable analytical methods to gain insights into their satisfaction levels and retention trends. This approach aims to shed light on how effective retention practices contribute to the growth and stability of educational institutions.Employees of the targeted educational institutes, specifically private universities in the National Capital Region (NCR), were sent a questionnaire. This questionnaire comprised 20 questions connected to various aspects influencing job satisfaction, including both multiple-choice and rating scales. The target population for this researchconsisted of Indian employees from Amity University, Noida; Noida International University, Greater Noida; Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida; Galgotias University, Greater Noida; SDGI Global University, Ghaziabad; and Sharda University, Greater Noida.

It is essential to note that employees from these educational institutions working in other countries were excluded from the chosen population, as the study specifically concentrates on the Indian education sector. The online surveyform was distributed to the given addresses of employees at these universities, who were then requested to complete it. Data collection was conducted through Google Forms, with the responses subsequently exported into an Excel file for further processing. This Excel file was imported into SPSS for analysis. In total, responses from 250 participants were received. To assess job satisfaction levels among employees of different educational institutions, a T-test was performed to calculate variance. This statistical analysis provided insights into the differences in job satisfaction across the various universities included in the study, offering valuable perspectives on the factors influencing job satisfaction in the National Capital Region's private educational segment.

Background information ofthe Respondents

The frequency distribution below summarizes data into exclusive classes and shows the number of occurrences in each class. Below given Tables 1 to 5 below illustrate the distribution of respondents by educational institutions. Among the 250 responses collected, 53 were from the employees of Amity University, Noida; 21 from Noida International University (NIU), Greater Noida; 33 from Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida; 63 from Galgotias University, Greater Noida; 29 from SDGI Global University, Ghaziabad; and 51 from Sharda University, Greater Noida.

Table 1: University-Wise Distribution of Interviewees

Table 2: Gender-Wise Distribution of Interviewees

Table 3: Age-Wise Distribution of Interviewees

Table 4: Job Duration with Current Employer

Table 5: Current Designation in the Organization

To analyze the aspectsaffecting job satisfaction amongunlikeclusters, we employ the two-sample t-test. This statistical method helps to determine whether the unfamiliar means of two populaces differ built on independent samples from each populace. If the two sample means show a significant difference, we can conclude that the populace means are different. In this research, interviewees provided their total job satisfaction levels independently, meaning each respondent’s rating was given without influence from others. This approach allows us to compare whether the satisfaction ratings differ among two types of interviewees. Here, we test the total satisfaction ratings between different respondent clusters as follows:

1. Based onMale and Female
2. Based onemployees who worked in the currentorganization and worked in previous organizations.

A two-sample t-test, assuming identical or different variances based on the specific conditions, is conducted to test the hypothesis that the mean scores for the corresponding aspects between the two sections are equal. For the t-test comparing total job satisfaction between genders, the variables considered are gender and overall job satisfaction.

Table6: Group Statistics of Males and Females for overall job satisfaction level

Segment	Number	Mean	Std. Dev.	Std. Error Mean
Male	223	3.12	0.701	0.43
Female	27	2.71	0.453	0.61

The average overall job satisfaction rating for males is 3.12 with a standard deviation of 0.701, while for females, the average rating is 2.71 with a standard deviation of 0.453. In the 'Independent Samples Test' presented below, the F-test (Levene's test) is first examined to evaluate the equality of variances. The p-value is 0.065, which exceeds the 0.05 threshold, indicating that the variances are not suggestivelydissimilar. Thus, we can assume 'Equal Variances'.

Table 7:Independent Samples Test Between Genders

	Levene’s test for Equality of Variances		t-test for Equality of Means
	F	Sig.	t	Df	Sig. (2 Tailed)	Mean Diff.	Std. Error Diff.	95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
							0.71	Lower	Upper
Equal variances assumed	0.765	0.381	9.186	301	0.000	0.661	0.071	0.520	0.802
Equal Variances not assumed			9.217	232.097	0.000	0.661	0.071	0.520	0.802

 

The values under the 't-test for Equality of Means' are studied, revealing a p-value of 0.00 for the equal variances t-test. Since this p-value is less than 0.05, it specifies a noteworthyvarianceamong the two groups in terms of total job satisfaction. The 95% confidence intermissions for the change in means are provided in the last two columns of the table. For the equal variances assumption, the interval ranges from 0.520 to 0.802. As this interval does not include 0, it further confirms a momentous difference among the two groups. This indicates a notable difference in overall job satisfaction levels between respondents who are currently working in the organization and those who have worked in previous organizations.

A two-sample t-test was conducted to find out whether the two groups differedbased on an independent variable. This test was administered in the research to equate overall job satisfaction between genders and among employees with dissimilar work statuses. The results indicated that gender significantly impacts job satisfaction, revealing a notable difference between males and females in their overall job satisfaction levels. Additionally, the results showed a significant difference in overall job satisfaction between respondents currently working in the organization and those who have worked in previous organizations. The t-test analysis, based on data collected from 250 respondents via a questionnaire, describes the relationships among these variables.

The study provides a comprehensive analysis of employee satisfaction and retention in private universities across the NCR, addressing key objectives. First, it highlights significant differences in job satisfaction between male and female employees, revealing that while both genders experience various levels of satisfaction, female employees may face additional challenges related to work-life balance and career progression. Addressing these disparities through targeted policies can contribute to greater gender parity in employee well-being. Second, the evaluation of influencing factors shows that job satisfaction is driven by a combination of variables, such as fair compensation, opportunities for career growth, supportive leadership, and a positive work environment. These factors significantly affect employees’ motivation, engagement, and overall satisfaction with their roles within the institution. Finally, the analysis of retention policies underscores the importance of implementing practices that foster long-term employee commitment. Policies that promote flexible working conditions, professional development programs, and inclusive workplace cultures were identified as the most effective in retaining talent. Institutions that invest in these areas are more likely to reduce turnover rates and enhance overall organizational performance. In conclusion, NCR private universities that prioritize gender-inclusive practices, address key satisfaction drivers, and implement well-rounded retention strategies are better positioned to cultivate a satisfied, motivated, and loyal workforce.

Academic Journals:

1. Garg, P., & Rastogi, R. (2006). New model of job design: Motivating employees' performance. Journal of Management Development, 25(6), 572-587.
2. Ashraf, M. A. (2020). Demographic factors, compensation, job satisfaction and organizational commitment in private university: an analysis using SEM. Journal of Global Responsibility, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-01-2020-0010
3. Kundu, S. C., & Lata, K. (2017). Effects of supportive work environment on employee retention: Mediating role of organizational engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(4), 703-722.
4. Kalleberg, A. L., & Mastekaasa, A. (2001). Satisfied movers, committed stayers: The impact of job mobility on work attitudes in Norway. Work and Occupations, 28(2), 183-209.
5. Bibi, P., Pangil, F., Johari, J., & Ahmad, A. (2017). The impact of compensation and promotional opportunities on employee retention in academic institutions: The moderating role of work environment. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 378–391.
6. Gupta, M., Kumar, V. & Singh, M. (2014). Creating Satisfied Employees Through Workplace Spirituality: A Study of the Private Insurance Sector in Punjab (India). J Bus Ethics 122, 79–88 (2014)
7. Gupta, V., & Kumar, S. (2017). Impact of job satisfaction on turnover intention: A study of Indian universities. Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 22-35.
8. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488.
9. Anandhi, K., & Perumal, R. (2013). Job satisfaction in logistics sector: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Marketing and Technology, 3(5), 114
10. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
11. Chaudhary, N. S., & Bhaskar, P. (2016). Training and development and job satisfaction in education sector. Training and Development, 2(8).
12. Sharma and Gupta. (2020). Job Satisfaction: Difference in Levels among selected Industries. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering,8,2277-3878.
13. Jehanzeb, K., Rasheed, M. F., & Rasheed, A. (2012). Impact of rewards and motivation on job satisfaction in banking sector of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(21).
14. Parvin, M. M., & Kabir, M. N. (2011). Factors affecting employee job satisfaction of pharmaceutical sector. Australian journal of business & management research, 1(9), 113.
15. El Badawy, T. A., Srivastava, S., &Sadek, M. B. (2014). Assessing the relationship between emotional intelligence, job satisfaction and organizational learning capability in private higher educational institutions in Egypt and India: A comparative study. International Journal of Business Administration, 5(6), 38.
16. Mehta, M., Kurbetti, A. and Dhankhar, R. (2014). Study on Employee Retention and Commitment. IJARCSMS, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 154-164.
17. Rao, A. (2012). Employee Retention-A Real Time Challenges in Global Work Environment. Abhinav, Vol. 1, No. 11, pp. 125-131.

Books:

1. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education.
2. Dessler, G. (2020). Human Resource Management. Pearson Education.
3. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2020). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. McGraw-Hill Education.

Case Studies & Reports:

1. NASSCOM & Deloitte. (2021). Future of Work: Implications for the Indian Education Sector. NASSCOM Research Report.
2. Ernst & Young. (2020). Talent Retention Strategies in Indian Higher Education: A Benchmarking Report. EY Research.
3. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations (IJIR). (2020). Job satisfaction and work-life balance in higher education institutions: A gender perspective.

Government Publications:

1. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2022). National Education Policy 2020: Implications for Teacher Satisfaction and Retention in Higher Education.
2. All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) (2021). Annual Report on Faculty and Staff Retention in Indian Educational Institutions.

Online Articles & Databases:

1. SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management). (2023). Best Practices in Employee Retention. Available at: www.shrm.org
2. SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management). (2021). Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement: Revitalizing a Changing Workforce.
3. The Economic Times. (2022). How Education Sector in NCR is Striving to Boost Employee Retention Amidst Growing Competition. Available at: www.economictimes.indiatimes.com.