For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/remarking.php#8

The primary objective of writing on Ancient Tales, Modern Questions: Anand Neelakantan’s Approach to Mythology is to explore how Neelakantan uses mythology as a medium to bridge the past and the present which offers a fresh insights into ancient epics. The study aims to analyze how Neelakantan reinterprets characters and events from mythological texts like the Ramayana and the Mahabharata through alternative, often marginalized perspectives. Anand neelakantan works investigate how his works address contemporary societal issues such as caste inequality, moral ambiguity, and power dynamics by contextualizing them within mythological frameworks.

The aim of this study is to highlight the ways in which Neelakantan’s retellings of mythology question cultural hierarchies and provoke discussions on justice, morality, and empathy. The ultimate goal is to showcase how Neelakantan’s reinterpretations of mythology create a platform for rethinking traditional narratives and addressing pressing questions of societal importance.

The reinterpretation of mythology in contemporary literature has harvested significant scholarly attention, especially in the context of Indian mythological epics like the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. Anand Neelakantan's works stand out for his innovative exploration of these ancient tales through alternative lenses, emphasizing the narratives of marginalized and demonized characters. Scholars have noted that Neelakantan's storytelling aligns with the tradition of subaltern studies, which seeks to amplify voices silenced in dominant historical and cultural discourses (Guha, 1982)

In works like Asura: Tale of the Vanquished, Neelakantan reimagines Ravana’s story, portraying him not as a villain but as a complex character whose motivations are rooted in social and political struggles. Critics have highlighted how this narrative deconstructs the binary notions of good and evil in traditional mythological texts, offering a humanized perspective of the so-called “villains” (Sundararajan, 2014). Similarly, the Ajaya series focuses on Duryodhana, presenting his perspective on the events of the Mahabharata and shedding light on caste oppression and political maneuvering, themes often overshadowed by the dominant narratives of dharma and heroism (Sharma, 2016).

Scholars have also explored how Neelakantan employs mythology to address contemporary societal issues. Ghosh (2019) argues that Neelakantan’s works reflect the enduring relevance of epics as a medium for critiquing modern systems of inequality, including caste hierarchies and power dynamics. His narratives encourage readers to question established cultural norms and challenge traditional moral frameworks.

In addition to his socio-political critique, Neelakantan’s narrative style and world-building have been subjects of academic inquiry. Rao (2020) notes that his use of rich, immersive storytelling creates a sense of empathy for characters who are traditionally vilified, thereby reshaping the reader's understanding of mythological figures. Furthermore, his works demonstrate the fluidity of mythology, showcasing its adaptability in addressing modern concerns without losing its essence as a repository of timeless wisdom.

This review of literature underscores the significance of Anand Neelakantan’s contributions to contemporary mythological retellings. By revisiting epics from alternative perspectives, his works not only challenge dominant cultural narratives but also highlight mythology’s potential as a powerful tool for addressing modern questions about morality, justice, and social structures.

Anand Neelakantan’s approach to mythology is rooted in reinterpreting traditional narratives to give voice to marginalized and demonized characters. His works challenge the conventional storytelling of Indian epics like the Ramayana and the Mahabharata by exploring the perspectives of figures traditionally labeled as villains, such as Ravana and Duryodhana. This approach humanizes these characters, presenting them as multi-dimensional individuals with their own motivations, struggles, and values, rather than mere antagonists. Anand Neelakantan has the following characteristics in this mythological work.

Subversion of Traditional Binaries: Neelakantan disrupts the binary classification of good and evil prevalent in traditional mythological texts. By focusing on the perspectives of characters like Ravana (Asura: Tale of the Vanquished) and Duryodhana (Ajaya series), he questions the fairness and morality of dominant narratives, portraying their actions as responses to social, political, and personal circumstances.

Empathy for the Marginalized: His works emphasize the voices of the oppressed, such as the lower castes and those on the fringes of mythological societies. Through these stories, Neelakantan critiques societal structures like caste hierarchies and privilege, illustrating how these factors shape the destinies of individuals and communities.

Contextualizing Mythology for Contemporary Issues: Neelakantan uses mythology as a framework to address modern concerns, including inequality, justice, and morality. By drawing parallels between ancient societal structures and contemporary issues, he highlights the timeless relevance of these tales and their potential to provoke thought and dialogue.

Humanizing the V illains: Neelakantan’s narratives aim to humanize characters traditionally seen as villains by delving into their emotions, ideologies, and struggles. For instance, Ravana is portrayed not as a demon but as a flawed yet visionary leader with a deep sense of justice for his people. Similarly, Duryodhana is presented as a champion of meritocracy and an opponent of caste-based discrimination.

 

Deconstructing Heroism: Another significant aspect of Neelakantan’s approach is his critique of the glorification of heroes in mythology. By contrasting the perspectives of so called villains with those of celebrated heroes like Rama and the Pandavas, he questions the legitimacy of their actions and the societal values they represent.

Storytelling with Realism and Depth: Neelakantan’s writing style is grounded in realism, emphasizing the human aspects of mythological characters. His portrayal of ancient societies is vivid and layered, depicting not just grand events but also the everyday lives, struggles, and aspirations of ordinary people within those narratives.

In summary, Anand Neelakantan’s approach to mythology is a bold attempt to reinterpret ancient stories for modern audiences, challenging dominant narratives, fostering empathy for marginalized perspectives, and using mythology as a lens to reflect on contemporary societal issues. Through this, he revitalizes mythology, making it relevant and thought-provoking in today’s world.

Ancient tales often grapple with universal themes such as duty, morality, power, love, and justice and that remain relevant today. In Anand Neelakantan’s approach to mythology, he reimagines these tales through contemporary lenses, asking questions that challenge traditional perspectives and resonate with modern dilemmas. Here are some possible modern questions rooted in ancient tales.

Power and Justice

Ancient Tale : Mahabharata’s war of Kurukshetra raises questions about the morality of war and the legitimacy of power.

Modern Question : How do we define justice in a polarized society, and can power ever be exercised without moral compromise?

Answer : Justice should be based on fairness, transparency, and inclusivity, ensuring that the powerful are held accountable. Power can be moral if used to serve collective well-being rather than personal gain, but it requires constant checks and balances.

Perspective and Bias

Ancient Tale : Ravana, the "villain" of the Ramayana, is often portrayed as a tyrant, but Neelakantan explores his motivations and humanity.

Modern Question : How do cultural narratives shape our understanding of good and evil, and can empathy help us see the other side of a story?

Answer : Empathy and critical thinking are key to overcoming biases. By challenging single-sided narratives and exploring diverse viewpoints, we can foster mutual understanding and dismantle entrenched stereotypes of "good" and "evil."

Gender and Agency

Ancient Tale: Draupadi's complex role in the Mahabharata highlights issues of autonomy, dignity, and societal expectations.

Modern Question: How do we address systemic gender inequality and ensure agency for women in modern institutions and traditions?

Answer : Achieving gender equality requires systemic reform, including better education, equitable laws, and a shift in cultural attitudes. Encouraging women's leadership and amplifying their voices in decision-making can ensure agency and empowerment.

Duty and Dissent

Ancient Tale : Karna’s unwavering loyalty to Duryodhana raises questions about allegiance and morality.

Modern Question : When does loyalty become complicity, and how do we balance personal duty with the greater good?

Answer : Duty should align with ethical principles and societal good. Loyalty must not blind us to injustice; dissent is necessary when institutions or relationships perpetuate harm. Balancing duty with critical questioning is vital.

Caste and Inequality

Ancient Tale : Ekalavya’s exclusion from formal education in the Mahabharata underscores societal hierarchies.

Modern Question : How do we dismantle entrenched systems of inequality while preserving cultural identity?

Answer : Systems of inequality can be dismantled through education, affirmative action, and inclusive policymaking. Societal attitudes must evolve, valuing merit and humanity over inherited privilege, while preserving diversity and cultural richness.

Environmental Ethics

Ancient Tale: Stories of gods and nature spirits reflect reverence for the environment in ancient traditions.

Modern Question: How can ancient ecological wisdom guide modern sustainability efforts in an era of climate crisis?

Answer : Ancient ecological practices, such as reverence for nature and sustainable living, can inspire modern policies. Solutions include fostering a culture of conservation, adopting green technologies, and balancing development with environmental stewardship.

Identity and Belonging

Ancient Tale : The exile of Sita in the Ramayana raises questions of identity, belonging, and societal judgment.

Modern Question : How do we reconcile individual identity with societal expectations in a rapidly globalizing world?

Answer : Identity should be fluid and self-defined rather than rigidly dictated by societal norms. Belonging can be nurtured through inclusive practices, accepting diversity, and valuing individual expression over conformity.

By reexamining these ancient tales, Neelakantan not only revisits their moral and philosophical underpinnings but also prompts readers to explore how these age-old dilemmas manifest in the complexities of contemporary life.

Many writers across disciplines and genres have explored the rich domain of mythology, each bringing unique perspectives to its interpretation, analysis, and retelling. Academically, thinkers like Joseph Campbell, renowned for The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949), analyzed myths through the concept of the "monomyth," identifying universal patterns in storytelling. Carl Jung examined myths through psychology, focusing on archetypes and the collective unconscious in works like Man and His Symbols (1964). Similarly, Mircea Eliade, with The Sacred and the Profane (1957) and Myth and Reality (1963), emphasized the spiritual and cultural importance of myths, while Claude Lévi-Strauss used structuralism to reveal universal patterns in his The Structural Study of Myth (1955). Robert Graves, known for The Greek Myths (1955), provided comprehensive interpretations of classical Greek mythology, and E.O. James connected myth with ritual in ancient societies in Myth and Ritual in the Ancient Near East (1958).

In literature, many authors have reimagined mythology for contemporary audiences. Madeline Miller's The Song of Achilles (2011) and Circe (2018) bring Greek myths to life with psychological depth and feminist perspectives, while Neil Gaiman modernizes myths in works like Norse Mythology (2017) and American Gods (2001). Similarly, Margaret Atwood retells The Odyssey from Penelope’s perspective in The Penelopiad (2005), and Jeanette Winterson’s Weight (2005) reinterprets the myth of Atlas and Heracles. Rick Riordan’s Percy Jackson series (beginning in 2005 with The Lightning Thief) makes Greek, Roman, Norse, and Egyptian mythology accessible to younger audiences through engaging narratives. In the Indian context, authors like Anand Neelakantan (Asura: Tale of the Vanquished, 2012; Ajaya series, beginning in 2013) retell the Ramayana and Mahabharata from marginalized perspectives, while Devdutt Pattanaik (Jaya: An Illustrated Retelling of the Mahabharata, 2010) simplifies Indian myths, blending traditional stories with contemporary relevance. Similarly, Amish Tripathi (The Shiva Trilogy, beginning in 2010) and Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni (The Palace of Illusions, 2008; The Forest of

Enchantments, 2019) reimagine epics with modern sensibilities, and Kavita Kane (Karna’s Wife, 2013; Sita’s Sister, 2014) gives a voice to overlooked female characters.

In conclusion, Anand Neelakantan’s approach to mythology is a bold and innovative contribution to contemporary literature. By reinterpreting ancient epics through alternative perspectives, he not only enriches the literary landscape but also opens up new avenues for dialogue about identity, empathy, justice, and the human condition. His works reaffirm the timeless relevance of mythology as a lens through which we can examine both the past and the present, making them essential reading for anyone interested in the intersection of literature, history, and society. Through his unique storytelling, Neelakantan ensures that these ancient tales continue to resonate with modern audiences, offering fresh insights into the complexities of human nature and the world we live in today.

1. Campbell, J. (2014). The Power of Myth. Anchor Books.
2. Guha, R. (1982). Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Oxford University Press.
3. Sundararajan, K. R. (2014). Reimagining Ravana: A Study of Anand Neelakantan's Asura: Tale of the Vanquished. Journal of South Asian Literature, 49(2), 45-60
4. Sharma, R. (2016). Caste and Power in the Mahabharata: A Study of Anand Neelakantan's Ajaya Series. Indian Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(3), 78-95.
5. Ghosh, S. (2019). Mythology as a Tool for Social Critique: A Study of Anand Neelakantan's Works. South Asian Review, 40(4), 112-130.
6. Neelakantan, Aanand. (2012). Asura: Tale of the Vanquished. Platinum Press.
7. Neelakantan, Anand. (2013). Ajaya: Roll of the Dice. Platinum Press.
8. Pattanaik, D. (2010). Jaya: An Illustrated Retelling of the Mahabharata. Penguin Books.
9. Tripathi, A. (2010). The Immortals of Meluha (The Shiva Trilogy, Book 1). Westland Publications.
10. Divakaruni, C. B. (2008). The Palace of Illusions. Doubleday.
11. Kane, Kavita. (2013). Karna's Wife: The Outcast's Queen. Rupa Publications.
12. Miller, M. (2011). The Song of Achilles. Ecco.
13. Gaiman, N. (2017). Norse Mythology. W. W. Norton & Company.
14. Atwood, M. (2005). The Penelopiad. Canongate Books.