P: ISSN No. 2394-0344 RNI No.  UPBIL/2016/67980 VOL.- VII , ISSUE- VI September  - 2022
E: ISSN No. 2455-0817 Remarking An Analisation
Capital Assets Pricing Model: A Study of Indian Automobile Industry Using SandP 500 Index in NSE
Paper Id :  16459   Submission Date :  17/09/2022   Acceptance Date :  23/09/2022   Publication Date :  25/09/2022
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/remarking.php#8
Rajani
Research Scholar
Accountancy And Law
Dayalbagh Educational Institute
Agra,Uttar Pradesh., India
Nidhi Sharma
Professor
Accountancy And Law
Dayalbagh Educational Institute
Agra, Uttar Pradesh., India
Abstract CAPM has been an incredible achievement in resource valuing hypothesis, clarifying the risk return normal for monetary resources. CAPM has been put to test by an enormous number of scholars. In this study, we test the legitimacy of CAPM in India on the stocks recorded on the National Stock Exchange. The focus of this paper is to study the CAPM holds in the area of Indian Stock Market (NSE). The present paper is a true endeavor to discover answers of the inquiries by applying CAPM - Is higher beta yields higher anticipated return? Is there exist linearity between the stock beta and the normal return. For similar destinations, the paper is centering to examine the under and over esteemed supply of three Automobile sector companies.
Keywords Beta, CAPM, NSE, Risk Return.
Introduction
The foundation of the CAPM is that a monetary patron can choose to open himself to a broad proportion of danger through a blend of crediting obtaining and a successfully made portfolio out of dangerous insurances. The model explains that the course of action of this ideal peril portfolio relies absolutely upon the monetary patron's appraisal of things to come prospects of different assurances, and not on the monetary benefactors' own mindsets towards risk. The latter is reflected uniquely in the choice of a blendof a dangerous portfolio and peril free endeavor or obtaining. By virtue of a monetary benefactor who has no phenomenal information, that is favored information over various monetary supporters, there is not any justification to hold a substitute course of action of offers than various monetary patrons, which can be portrayed as the market game plan of offers. The Capital Resource Estimating Model (CAPM) wires a component that is known as the "beta worth" of a deal. The beta of a proposition doles out its insignificant obligation to the risk of the entire market game plan of hazardous insurances. This deduces that offers doled out with high beta coefficient more than 1 is depended upon to ordinarily affect the risk of the outright portfolio while shares with a low beta coefficient under 1 is depended upon to regularly affect the absolute portfolio. In successful market as shown by CAPM, the peril premium and the normal benefit from an asset will contrast in direct degree to the beta worth. The equilibrium esteem advancement on capable capital market delivers these relations. The model is considered as the groundwork of contemporary worth speculation for financial business areas what's more, it furthermore comprehensively used in exploratory assessments, so the abundance of money related quantifiable data can be utilized intentionally and capably. The Public Stock Trade (NSE) is India's driving stock exchange covering different metropolitan regions and towns the country over. NSE was set up by pushing establishments to give a cutting brink, totally automated screen-based trading system with public reach. The Trade has accomplished unparalleled straightforwardness, speed and usefulness, security and market genuineness. It has set up workplaces that fill in as a model for the assurances business to the extent those systems, practices and methodologies.
Aim of study The point of this paper is to consider whether the CAPM holds in Automobile Sector in Indian stock Exchange (NSE) by utilizing auto record. The destinations of the exploration paper are to discover the Answers of the accompanying inquiries: 1. Is higher beta yields higher anticipated return? 2. Does there exist linearity between the stock beta and the normal return? 3. Explore the under and over esteemed supply of three auto organizations utilizing Capital assets Pricing Model.
Review of Literature

S. Baranidharan and N. Dhivya (2019) examined the relationship between the different chose macroeconomic factors and Indian securities exchange and Japanese financial exchange by utilized the enlightening statics and connection test. The scientist got the auxiliary information from April 2013 to Spring 2019. The outcome investigated that macroeconomic factors were essentially related and impacted on both capital market. The financial backers ought to think about macroeconomic factors and furthermore market data while building the speculation independent direction.

Ratna Deepali (2017) examined the fittingness of CAPM in NSE.Shutting expenses of beat ten organizations on the reason of their publicize capitalization from 2012 to 2016 had been thought of. Expert uncovered whether the protections are misjudge or underrated by exploiting CAPM so to help individuals keen on contributing. It was tracked down that the distinction among gauge and genuine addition is very huge at ordinary gamble. This will assist financial backer with determining future development of stocks.

T. Mallikarjunappa and Shaini Naveen (2016) led a review on Similar Investigation of Chance and Return concerning Supplies of CNX Bank Clever. This study examines the gamble and returns in the financial area. They look at the presentation of the 12 recorded banks in the Clever Bank List. The concentrate additionally examinations the presentation of banking stocks fundamentally to comprehend the expected pace of return and chance of a specific stock in view of various risk components winning on the lookout and other monetary elements.

Muhammad Ibrahim Khan (June 2015) surveyed and tried the Capital Asset Pricing Model. The computation of Beta of ten organizations enlisted on KSE, and genuine and expected returns have been looked at. It was tracked down that the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), neglected to give precise outcomes. Toward the finish of conversation of existing writing, it tends to be inferred that the CAPM can be utilized as it has possible degree to tackle the issues and track down the normal outcomes. Anyway some of the investigations discovered erroneous outcomes yet this model is proper for research in finance. This model might be utilized as a device for key arranging by partnerships that own an arrangement of organizations.

Methodology
This investigation has essentially centered on the computation of Beta of two automobile organizations for tracking down the expected return and afterward by contrasting it with the actual return, for testing the CAPM for it’s down to epical application. The research configuration is expressive and logical in the examination as Capital Asset Pricing Model is being tried concerning organizations in Automobile Sector in India. Along these lines, auxiliary information will be utilized. Information will be gathered from the sources accessible. Sites, libraries and the articles from different web search tools like Google, yahoo search and answers are being looked to gather the genuine information so that suitable outcome can be imagined. The example taken for this examination isn't covering all the Automobile area organizations recorded at NSE, as just three organizations have been considered for this examination. 1. Bajaj Auto 2. Mahindra & Mahindra
Tools Used The Capital Asset Pricing Model regularly communicated as CAPM of William Sharpe (1964) and John Litner (1965) focuses the introduction of resource valuing hypothesis. It depicts the connection between hazards what's more, anticipated return and is utilized in the evaluating of unsafe protections. The CAPM is still generally utilized in assessing the exhibition of oversaw portfolio and assessing the expense of capital for firms despite the fact that, it is around four and a half many years old. The Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM accentuates that to ascertain the normal return of a security; two significant things should be known by the financial backers:
1. The danger premium of the general value/portfolio (expecting that the security is just hazardous
resource)
2. The security's beta versus the market.
This can be communicated numerically as:
E [Ri] = Rf+ βi(E[Rm] – Rf) 1
Where: E[Ri] = Expected Return
Rf= sans risk rate
βi= Beta of the security I
E[Rm] = Expected Return available
E[Rm] – Rf= Market premium
The CAPM model presents basic system for financial backers and corporate chiefs to assess their speculations. The model shows that all financial backers and chiefs need to do is an assessment and correlation between anticipated return and required return. On the off chance that the normal result is generally ominous, it is important to cut short aims for expected interest in the specific security.
Data Collection-
This study is completely based on secondary data mainly collected from website of bsehttps://www.bseindia.com/.
Analysis

In order to represent the data analysis two tables (table 1.1 and table 2.1) has been formed for each company. Table 1.1 reveals the data analysis of period from Jan 2019 to Dec 2019. Table 2.1 depicts the data analysis of period from Jan 2020 to Dec 2020. In the same manner the data of each company is represented. This study has been established to investigate the Practical application of CAPM in Automobile sector Listed on National Stock Exchange. It uses monthly stock returns from 2 Automobile Companies listed on the National Stock Exchange ranging from 2019-01-01 to 2020-12-31. The stocks used in the study are considered the most traded on the National Stock Exchange.

Judgment inspecting is utilized to pick test of Automobile Sector organizations. The information investigation apparatus utilized for this examination is the MS (2010). The stock cost or the offer costs of the organizations, considered for this examination, have been taken from the site of NSE and different sites and data release. Then, at that point the return was determined by taking the end costs, deducting the end cost from the initial cost and isolating it by the initial cost. Essentially, the recipe was applied to the market record, for ascertaining the profits. Beta was determined by applying slant β = slope(y,x), where they' addresses the organization returns and 'x' addresses the market returns. The risk free rate utilized in the research was the pace of national saving certificate in Indian post office.

 

TABLE 1.1 BAJAJ AUTO

Date

A.R

M.R

R,F.R.R

BETA

 E.R

AR-ER

VALUATION

1//2019

-0.12

-0.03

0.07

1.56

-0.09

-0.03

UNDERPRICED

2/1/2019

0

-0.02

0.07

1.54

-0.07

0.07

UNDERPRICED

3/1/2019

-0.02

-0.04

0.07

1.54

-0.1

0.08

OVERPRICED

4/1/2019

0.02

0.07

0.07

1.56

0.07

-0.05

UNDERPRICED

5/1/2019

0.03

-0.06

0.07

1.69

-0.15

0.18

UNDERPRICED

6/1/2019

0.12

-0.01

0.07

1.77

-0.07

0.19

UNDERPRICED

7/1/2019

-0.12

0.02

0.07

1.77

-0.02

-0.1

OVERPRICED

8/1/2019

-0.05

-0.02

0.07

1.86

-0.1

0.05

OVERPRICED

9/1/2019

-0.09

-0.02

0.07

1.85

-0.1

0.01

OVERPRICED

10/1/2019

0.02

-0.03

0.07

1.84

-0.11

0.13

UNDERPRICED

11/1/2019

0

-0.03

0.07

1.86

-0.11

0.11

UNDERPRICED

12/1/2019

0

0

0.07

1.87

-0.06

0.06

UNDERPRICED

1/1/2020

0.1

0.09

0.07

1.87

0.11

-0.01

UNDERPRICED

2/1/2020

0.43

0.14

0.07

2.08

0.22

0.21

UNDERPRICED

3/1/2020

-0.26

-0.11

0.07

1.2

-0.15

-0.11

OVERPRICED

4/1/2020

-0.03

-0.04

0.07

0.61

0

-0.03

OVERPRICED

5/1/2020

-0.04

-0.02

0.07

0.62

0.01

-0.05

OVERPRICED

6/1/2020

-0.06

-0.05

0.07

0.63

-0.01

-0.05

OVERPRICED

7/1/2020

0.01

-0.07

0.07

0.6

-0.01

0.02

UNDERPRICED

8/1/2020

0.03

0.04

0.07

0.85

0.04

-0.01

UNDERPRICED

9/1/2020

0

0.03

0.07

0.71

0.04

-0.04

UNDERPRICED

10/1/2020

-0.09

-0.1

0.07

0.17

0.04

-0.13

OVERPRICED

11/1/2020

0.03

.01

0.07

.011

0.04

-0.01

OVERPRICED

12/1/2020

0.04

.002

0.07

.015

0.01

0.03

UNDERPRICED

In the table 1.1 year 2019, as objective of the paper is to check whether high risk stock high yield expected return. In every month there is inverse relation between beta and expected return. With higher the beta, the expected return reduced. In the months of Mar, July, August, Sept. Bajaj auto stock found undervalued. In table 2.1 year 2020, same result about relation about beta and expected return is extracted. In moth of Jan, Feb, July August Sept,Dec, it was undervalued it means there is higher expectancy about rising prices of stock.

TABLE 1.2 and 2.2 for the year 2019 -2020

MAHINDRA &MAHINDRA

Date

M.R

A.R

R.F.R.R

BETA

E.R

AR-ER

VALUATION

1-Jan-19

-0.03

0.05

0.07

2.19

(0.14)

0.20

UNDEPRICED

1-Feb-19

-0.02

-0.04

0.07

2.21

(0.12)

0.08

UNDERPRICED

1-Mar-19

-0.04

0.04

0.07

2.21

(0.17)

0.21

UNDERPRICED

1-Apr-19

0.07

0.00

0.07

2.24

0.07

(0.08)

UNDERPRICED

1-May-19

-0.06

-0.01

0.07

2.47

(0.26)

0.25

UNDERPRICED

1-Jun-19

-0.01

0.19

0.07

2.56

(0.14)

0.33

OVERPRICED

1-Jul-19

0.02

0.03

0.07

2.57

(0.06)

0.09

UNDERPRICED

1-Aug-19

-0.02

-0.03

0.07

2.59

(0.15)

0.12

UNDERPRICED

1-Sep-19

-0.02

-0.10

0.07

2.59

(0.16)

0.06

UNDERPRICED

1-Oct-19

-0.03

0.14

0.07

2.58

(0.19)

0.34

UNDERPRICED

1-Nov-19

-0.03

0.00

0.07

2.65

(0.19)

0.18

UNDERPRICED

1-Dec-19

0.00

-0.06

0.07

2.66

(0.11)

0.05

UNDERPRICED

1-Jan-20

0.09

0.24

0.07

2.68

0.13

0.11

OVERPRICED

1-Feb-20

0.14

0.60

0.07

2.73

0.27

0.33

OVERPRICED

1-Mar-20

-0.11

-0.22

0.07

1.29

(0.17)

(0.06)

UNDERPRICED

1-Apr-20

-0.04

-0.16

0.07

1.11

(0.06)

(0.10)

UNDERPRICED

1-May-20

-0.02

-0.15

0.07

1.03

(0.02)

(0.12)

UNDERPRICED

1-Jun-20

-0.05

-0.16

0.07

1.07

(0.06)

(0.10)

UNDERPRICED

1-Jul-20

-0.07

-0.01

0.07

0.91

(0.05)

0.05

UNDERPRICED

1-Aug-20

0.04

0.00

0.07

1.21

0.03

(0.04)

UNDERPRICED

1-Sep-20

0.03

0.02

0.07

1.37

0.01

0.01

OVERPRICED

1-Oct-20

-0.10

-0.18

0.07

1.32

(0.15)

(0.03)

UNDERPRICED

1-Nov-20

-0.04

0.00

0.07

(0.41)

0.11

(0.11)

UNDERPRICED

1-Dec-20

0.01

-0.04

0.07

0.87

0.02

(0.06)

UNDERPRICED

In the table 1.2 year 2019, after analyzing, it is found that there is no perfect relation between beta and expected return as in months of Apr, Jun, Nov, with rise in beta, expected return. And for the table 2.2 in the year 2020 stocks for the month of mar, April may June, July august are undervalued.

Conclusion The examination can be inferred that every one of the examinations led is an affirmation of the other that the experimental examinations did during this investigation doesn’t completely hold up with CAPM. The information didn't give proof that higher beta yields better yield .The information too gives a contrast between normal risk free rate, market premium and their assessed values. Notwithstanding, a straight connection among beta and return is set up. To a degree, the result of the tests directed on the information with period 2019-01-01 to2020-12-31 gotten from the National Stock Exchange don't appear to totally dismiss CAPM. On the other hand, it could be referenced that the information don't uphold CAPM since there are other factors accessible and equipped for influencing the outcomes. The theory and ramifications of CAPM predicts that there exist a straight connection between anticipated return and beta. It happened that the discoveries from the test are additionally predictable with the suggestions and give proof for CAPM. The consequences of the tests led on example information for the time of January2019 to December 2020 don't appear to unmistakably dismiss the CAPM. In the light of above discoveries, it tends to be reasoned that beta isn't adequate to decide the normal profits from protections/portfolios. The exact discoveries of this paper would be valuable to monetary examiners in Indian capital market. Further exploration on the mixes of market factors, macroeconomic components and firms' particular variables can be done to address the CAPM puzzle.
References
1. Banz, R.W. (1981), “The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 9, Issue1, pp 3-18. 2. Basu, S. (1983), “The Relationship between Earnings Yield, Market Value and the Return for NYSE Common Stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp 126-156. 3. Campbell, J.Y., Lo, A.W. and Mackinlay, A.C., 1997, the econometrics of financial markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 4. Eatzaz and Attiya, (2008), “Testing Multifactor Capital Asset Pricing Model in case of PakistaniMarket”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 25, pp. 114-138. 5. Gomez and Zapatro, (2003), “Asset pricing implications of benchmarking: a two-factor CAPM”, The European Journal of Finance, 9(4), pp. 343-357.International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences ISSN: 2278-6236Vol. 3 | No. 1 | January 2014 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 55 6. Greonewold and Fraser, (1997), “Share prices and macroeconomic factors”, Journal of BusinessFinance and Accounting, 24, pp. 1367-1383. 7. Grigoris and Stravos, (2006), “Testing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM): the case of emerging Greek securities market”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 4, pp 78-91. 8. Hanif, M. (2009), “Testing Application of CAP Modelon KSE-Pakistan: A Case Study on Tobacco Sector.Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1494906. 9. Hanif and Bhatti, (2010), “Validity of Capital Assets Pricing Model: Evidence from KSEPakistan”, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 20, pp 140-153. 10. Harrington, D.R. (1993), The CAPM controversy: An overview, in The CAPM controversy: Policy and strategy implications for investment management, ICFA Continuing Education, edited by D.R.Harrington and R.A. Korajczyk, AIMR, New York. 11. Harrington, D.R., (1987), Modern portfolio theory, the Capital Asset Pricing Model and ArbitragePricing Theory: A user’s guide, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall,Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 12. Hui and Christopher, (2008), “Return Volatility Is Priced in Equities”, Financial ManagementAssociation International, 37(4) pp. 769-790. 13. Jagannathan & Wang, (1993), “CAPM is alive as well”, The Fourth Annual Conference on Financial Economics and Accounting, 23(8), pp. 2-57. 14. Jones, C.P. (1998), Investments: Analysis and management Restricted borrowing”, 6th edition, Journal of Business, Wiley, New York. 15. Internet Database Information