ISSN: 2456–4397 RNI No.  UPBIL/2016/68067 VOL.- VII , ISSUE- X January  - 2023
Anthology The Research
Personality and Reputation of Julius Caesar
Paper Id :  16916   Submission Date :  2023-01-13   Acceptance Date :  2023-01-22   Publication Date :  2023-01-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/anthology.php#8
Ashish Kumar Gupta
Assistant Professor
Department Of English
Nehru (P.G.) College
Chhibramau,Kannauj , U.P., India
Abstract
Julius Caesar was a notable Roman statesman and politician who rose to power during the 60s BC. He became an important political as well as military leader and achieved much for the Roman Empire. Caesar was not and is not lovable. Notwithstanding how noble it was, they did not warm to his charity towards his defeated opponents. The triumphs that his cerebral prowess translated into during battle garnered him the loyalty of his warriors. Caesar was and is beautiful and fascinating, even though he is not endearing. His political achievement required ability, in effect amounting to genius, in several different fields, including administration and generalship besides the minor arts of wire pulling and propaganda.
Keywords Scandalous, Prolongation, Campaigns, Civilization.
Introduction
Gaius Julius Caesar was a Roman general and statesman who played a critical role in the end of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. Born in 100 BC, Caesar rose to power as a military leader and eventually became the first Roman Emperor. He is remembered for his military campaigns and political reforms, which helped shape the course of Roman history. At the western end of the Old World, history was unquestionably altered by this cool-headed genius with enthusiasm. He granted the Roman state—and the Greco-Roman culture with it—a reprieve that lasted for more than 600 years in the East and for more than 400 years in the comparatively slow West by putting an end to the scandalous and bankrupt reign of the Roman nobility. Caesar introduced an autocracy that could never be replaced by the oligarchy that ruled Rome. If he hadn't done this at the time that he did, the Parthian Empire in the East and barbarian invasions in the West might have conquered Rome and the Greco-Roman world before the Christian era began. The Greco-Roman civilization's longevity has significant historical repercussions. During another six or seven centuries throughout the reign of the Roman Empire, Hellenism permeated the Near East. But if not for this, the Hellenic influence on Christianity and Islam might not have been strong enough to have a significant effect. If it hadn't been for Caesar's conquest, which kept Gaul connected to the civilised Mediterranean world for more than 500 years, the region would have descended even farther into savagery when the Franks conquered it.
Objective of study
1. In order to provide a thorough analysis of Caesar's life and career, including military campaigns, political accomplishments, and personal relationships, as well as the impact of his rule on the Roman Empire and the long-term effects of his decisions, it is important to first understand his role in the development of the Roman Empire. 2. Studying the cultural and historical significance of Caesar to trace Caesar's contributions to literature, including his writings on wars and his role as an innovator in the Latin language. 3. To research how it has affected western civilisation and its leaders in the long run. Research Methodology is a science discipline that provides lecturers with the process of conducting studies. This is used in all of Caesar's studies, allowing him to conduct the study in a thorough manner so that he can obtain clear and precise results. In research methodology, there are always stages in the process of study and we used secondary data techniques.
Review of Literature

Julius Caesar was a Roman general and statesman who is one of the most famous figures in history. He is best known for his military conquests and his eventual assassination, which led to the end of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire.

Caesar's personality and reputation have been the subject of much discussion and debate among historians and scholars. Some view him as a brilliant military strategist and visionary leader, while others see him as a power-hungry and ambitious politician who was willing to do whatever it took to achieve his goals.

One aspect of Caesar's personality that is widely agreed upon is his ambition. He was known to be driven and highly ambitious, and he was willing to take significant risks in order to achieve his goals. He was also known to be intelligent and well-educated, and he was skilled at public speaking and persuasion.

In terms of his reputation, Caesar was both admired and reviled during his lifetime. He was well-respected for his military accomplishments, and many people saw him as a strong and capable leader. However, he was also seen as a controversial figure, and his ambition and desire for power were viewed with suspicion by some.

Overall, Julius Caesar was a complex and controversial figure whose personality and reputation continue to be debated by historians and scholars today.

Cattell (1978) and The Big Factor Model - Lewis Goldberg (1990).  R.  B.  Cattell emphasized sixteen different basic components of personality (intangibility, apprehension, dominance, emotional stability, liveliness, openness to change, perfectionism, secrecy, logic, rule consciousness, self-reliance, sensitivity, social courage, tension, vigilance, warmth) .  He pointed out that these traits represent the source of all human personality. The Big Five factors of personality are considered by Goldberg (1990) as broad categories of personality: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness.  We used these personality trait theories because they describe broad areas of personality.  Empirical evidence suggests that this set of characteristics is found in many people.

Main Text

Early Life and Military Career

Caesar was born into a patrician family in Rome, the son of Gaius Julius Caesar and Aurelia Cotta. His family was well-connected, and his father served as praetor, a high-ranking official in the Roman Republic. However, his father died when Caesar was only 16, and he was forced to fend for himself in a political climate that was increasingly hostile to the patricians.

According to Taylor, despite these challenges, Caesar quickly made a name for himself as a military leader. In 81 BC, he served as a military tribune in Asia Minor, where he gained valuable experience fighting against the Cilician pirates. In the following years, he served as a quaestor (financial official) in Spain and as a praetor in Rome, where he earned a reputation for his administrative skills and his ability to get things done.

In 59 BC, Caesar was elected consul, the highest political office in the Roman Republic. As consul, he implemented a number of political and economic reforms, including the introduction of a new calendar and the construction of a network of roads and aqueducts. According to Wells, However, his reforms also sparked opposition from other political factions, and he eventually fell out of favor with the Roman Senate.

Political Life

Caesar's first political success came in 63 BC, when he was elected Pontifex Maximus, the chief religious official of Rome, who also held important political responsibilities.  After this, Caesar was elected Predator for 62 BC.  Caesar soon used his power to campaign against some of the local tribes in Lusitania, a Roman province in western Europe.  Meanwhile, his political rivals accused him of inciting or starting a war.

In 59 BC Caesar won the election and became ambassador.  The Senate quickly put an end to his desire for military and political power.  He found that he would have to forge alliances to deal with his opponents in the Senate.

The Rise of Caesar

In 49 BC, Caesar's political rivals in the Senate ordered him to return to Rome and disband his army, fearing that he might use his military power to seize control of the government. Instead of complying, Caesar led his army across the Rubicon River, a symbolic act of defiance that marked the beginning of a civil war.

Over the next several years, Caesar campaigned across the Roman Republic, defeating his opponents and consolidating his power. In 45 BC, he was named dictator for life, and in 44 BC, he was assassinated by a group of senators who opposed his rule.

Legacy

Despite his short reign, Caesar had a profound impact on the Roman Empire. His military campaigns expanded the Roman territory, and his political reforms helped to centralize power and lay the foundations for the Roman Empire.

Caesar is also remembered for his literary works, including his "Commentaries on the Gallic War," a detailed account of his campaigns in Gaul, and "The Civil War," a history of the conflict between himself and Pompey.

According to William Smith, In all these, Caesar was a supreme virtuoso. But if he had not also been something more than this he would not have been the supremely great man that he undoubtedly was.

Caesar was great beyond—and even in conflict with—the requirements of his political ambition.(9) He showed a human spiritual greatness in his generosity to defeated opponents, which was partly responsible for his assassination. (The merciless Sulla abdicated and died in his bed.)(10)

Another field in which Caesar’s genius went far beyond the requirements of his political ambition was his writings. Of these, his speeches, letters, and pamphlets are lost. Only his accounts (both incomplete and supplemented by other hands) of the Gallic War and the civil war survive. Caesar ranked as a masterly public speaker in an age in which he was in competition first with Hortensius and then with Cicero.(9)

Conclusion
Caesar made only modest legislative progress. By Chinese or ancient Egyptian standards, its effects were limited to the western portion of the Old World and were relatively brief. The 3rd-century BCE Chinese state that Qin Shi Huang established is still in existence, and its future might even be better than its history. However, even if Caesar turned out to be smaller than this Chinese behemoth, he would still be considered enormous compared to the average person (see also ancient Rome). In Roman history, Gaius Julius Caesar was a complex and divisive character. His military campaigns and legislative reforms left a long-lasting impression on the Roman Empire, and historians still argue about his legacy today.
References
1. Taylor, Gary (2002),Bardicide, New Casebooks: Julius Caesar. Ed. Richard Wilson. New York: Palgrave, 188-209. 2. Wells, Robin Headlam (2002), Julius Caesar, Machiavelli, and the Uses of History. Shakespeare Survey. 55: 209-18. 3. Wells, Robin Headlam (2002), Julius Caesar, Machiavelli, and the Uses of History. Shakespeare Survey. 55: 209-18. 4. Miller, Anthony (2000), Julius Caesar in the Cold War: The Houseman-Mankiewicz Film. Literature/ Film Quarterly. 28(2): 95-100. 5. William Smith (2022), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities: Flamen Archived at the Wayback Machine. 6. Bucher, Gregory S. (2011),“Caesar: the view from Rome”, The Classical Outlook. 88 (3): 82–87. ISSN 0009-8361. JSTOR 43940076. 7. Garfield, Andrew (2002), "The Offence of Strategic Influence: Making the Case for Perception Management Operations", Journal of Information Warfare 1.1:30-39. 8. Taylor, Gary (1989), Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present, London: Hogarth. 9. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julius-Caesar-Roman-ruler/Personality-and-reputation 10. https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/other/crystalinks/juliuscaesar2.html