|
|||||||
Personality and Reputation of Julius Caesar | |||||||
Paper Id :
16916 Submission Date :
2023-01-13 Acceptance Date :
2023-01-22 Publication Date :
2023-01-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/anthology.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
Julius Caesar was a notable Roman statesman and politician who rose to power during the 60s BC. He became an important political as well as military leader and achieved much for the Roman Empire. Caesar was not and is not lovable. Notwithstanding how noble it was, they did not warm to his charity towards his defeated opponents. The triumphs that his cerebral prowess translated into during battle garnered him the loyalty of his warriors. Caesar was and is beautiful and fascinating, even though he is not endearing. His political achievement required ability, in effect amounting to genius, in several different fields, including administration and generalship besides the minor arts of wire pulling and propaganda.
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Scandalous, Prolongation, Campaigns, Civilization. | ||||||
Introduction |
Gaius Julius Caesar was a Roman general and statesman who played a critical role in the end of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. Born in 100 BC, Caesar rose to power as a military leader and eventually became the first Roman Emperor. He is remembered for his military campaigns and political reforms, which helped shape the course of Roman history. At the western end of the Old World, history was unquestionably altered by this cool-headed genius with enthusiasm. He granted the Roman state—and the Greco-Roman culture with it—a reprieve that lasted for more than 600 years in the East and for more than 400 years in the comparatively slow West by putting an end to the scandalous and bankrupt reign of the Roman nobility. Caesar introduced an autocracy that could never be replaced by the oligarchy that ruled Rome. If he hadn't done this at the time that he did, the Parthian Empire in the East and barbarian invasions in the West might have conquered Rome and the Greco-Roman world before the Christian era began. The Greco-Roman civilization's longevity has significant historical repercussions. During another six or seven centuries throughout the reign of the Roman Empire, Hellenism permeated the Near East. But if not for this, the Hellenic influence on Christianity and Islam might not have been strong enough to have a significant effect. If it hadn't been for Caesar's conquest, which kept Gaul connected to the civilised Mediterranean world for more than 500 years, the region would have descended even farther into savagery when the Franks conquered it.
|
||||||
Objective of study | 1. In order to provide a thorough analysis of Caesar's life and career, including military campaigns, political accomplishments, and personal relationships, as well as the impact of his rule on the Roman Empire and the long-term effects of his decisions, it is important to first understand his role in the development of the Roman Empire.
2. Studying the cultural and historical significance of Caesar to trace Caesar's contributions to literature, including his writings on wars and his role as an innovator in the Latin language.
3. To research how it has affected western civilisation and its leaders in the long run.
Research Methodology is a science discipline that provides lecturers with the process of conducting studies. This is used in all of Caesar's studies, allowing him to conduct the study in a thorough manner so that he can obtain clear and precise results. In research methodology, there are always stages in the process of study and we used secondary data techniques. |
||||||
Review of Literature | Julius
Caesar was a Roman general and statesman who is one of the most famous figures
in history. He is best known for his military conquests and his eventual
assassination, which led to the end of the Roman Republic and the rise of the
Roman Empire. Caesar's
personality and reputation have been the subject of much discussion and debate
among historians and scholars. Some view him as a brilliant military strategist
and visionary leader, while others see him as a power-hungry and ambitious
politician who was willing to do whatever it took to achieve his goals. One
aspect of Caesar's personality that is widely agreed upon is his ambition. He
was known to be driven and highly ambitious, and he was willing to take
significant risks in order to achieve his goals. He was also known to be
intelligent and well-educated, and he was skilled at public speaking and
persuasion. In
terms of his reputation, Caesar was both admired and reviled during his
lifetime. He was well-respected for his military accomplishments, and many
people saw him as a strong and capable leader. However, he was also seen as a
controversial figure, and his ambition and desire for power were viewed with
suspicion by some. Overall,
Julius Caesar was a complex and controversial figure whose personality and
reputation continue to be debated by historians and scholars today. Cattell
(1978) and The Big Factor Model - Lewis Goldberg (1990). R.
B. Cattell emphasized sixteen
different basic components of personality (intangibility, apprehension,
dominance, emotional stability, liveliness, openness to change, perfectionism,
secrecy, logic, rule consciousness, self-reliance, sensitivity, social courage,
tension, vigilance, warmth) . He pointed
out that these traits represent the source of all human personality. The Big
Five factors of personality are considered by Goldberg (1990) as broad
categories of personality: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness,
neuroticism, and openness. We used these
personality trait theories because they describe broad areas of
personality. Empirical evidence suggests
that this set of characteristics is found in many people. |
||||||
Main Text |
Early Life and
Military Career Caesar
was born into a patrician family in Rome, the son of Gaius Julius Caesar and
Aurelia Cotta. His family was well-connected, and his father served as praetor,
a high-ranking official in the Roman Republic. However, his father died when
Caesar was only 16, and he was forced to fend for himself in a political
climate that was increasingly hostile to the patricians. According
to Taylor, despite these challenges, Caesar quickly made a name for himself as
a military leader. In 81 BC, he served as a military tribune in Asia Minor,
where he gained valuable experience fighting against the Cilician pirates. In
the following years, he served as a quaestor (financial official) in Spain and
as a praetor in Rome, where he earned a reputation for his administrative
skills and his ability to get things done. In
59 BC, Caesar was elected consul, the highest political office in the Roman
Republic. As consul, he implemented a number of political and economic reforms,
including the introduction of a new calendar and the construction of a network
of roads and aqueducts. According to Wells, However, his reforms also sparked
opposition from other political factions, and he eventually fell out of favor
with the Roman Senate. Political Life Caesar's
first political success came in 63 BC, when he was elected Pontifex Maximus,
the chief religious official of Rome, who also held important political
responsibilities. After this, Caesar was
elected Predator for 62 BC. Caesar soon
used his power to campaign against some of the local tribes in Lusitania, a
Roman province in western Europe. Meanwhile,
his political rivals accused him of inciting or starting a war. In
59 BC Caesar won the election and became ambassador. The Senate quickly put an end to his desire
for military and political power. He
found that he would have to forge alliances to deal with his opponents in the
Senate. The Rise of Caesar In
49 BC, Caesar's political rivals in the Senate ordered him to return to Rome
and disband his army, fearing that he might use his military power to seize
control of the government. Instead of complying, Caesar led his army across the
Rubicon River, a symbolic act of defiance that marked the beginning of a civil
war. Over
the next several years, Caesar campaigned across the Roman Republic, defeating
his opponents and consolidating his power. In 45 BC, he was named dictator for
life, and in 44 BC, he was assassinated by a group of senators who opposed his
rule. Legacy Despite
his short reign, Caesar had a profound impact on the Roman Empire. His military
campaigns expanded the Roman territory, and his political reforms helped to
centralize power and lay the foundations for the Roman Empire. Caesar
is also remembered for his literary works, including his "Commentaries on
the Gallic War," a detailed account of his campaigns in Gaul, and
"The Civil War," a history of the conflict between himself and
Pompey. According
to William Smith, In all these, Caesar was a supreme virtuoso. But if he had
not also been something more than this he would not have been the supremely
great man that he undoubtedly was. Caesar
was great beyond—and even in conflict with—the requirements of his political
ambition.(9) He showed a human spiritual greatness in his generosity to
defeated opponents, which was partly responsible for his assassination. (The
merciless Sulla abdicated and died in his bed.)(10)
Another
field in which Caesar’s genius went far beyond the requirements of his
political ambition was his writings. Of these, his speeches, letters, and
pamphlets are lost. Only his accounts (both incomplete and supplemented by
other hands) of the Gallic War and the civil war survive. Caesar ranked as a
masterly public speaker in an age in which he was in competition first with
Hortensius and then with Cicero.(9) |
||||||
Conclusion |
Caesar made only modest legislative progress. By Chinese or ancient Egyptian standards, its effects were limited to the western portion of the Old World and were relatively brief. The 3rd-century BCE Chinese state that Qin Shi Huang established is still in existence, and its future might even be better than its history. However, even if Caesar turned out to be smaller than this Chinese behemoth, he would still be considered enormous compared to the average person (see also ancient Rome).
In Roman history, Gaius Julius Caesar was a complex and divisive character. His military campaigns and legislative reforms left a long-lasting impression on the Roman Empire, and historians still argue about his legacy today. |
||||||
References | 1. Taylor, Gary (2002),Bardicide, New Casebooks: Julius Caesar. Ed. Richard Wilson. New York: Palgrave, 188-209.
2. Wells, Robin Headlam (2002), Julius Caesar, Machiavelli, and the Uses of History. Shakespeare Survey. 55: 209-18.
3. Wells, Robin Headlam (2002), Julius Caesar, Machiavelli, and the Uses of History. Shakespeare Survey. 55: 209-18.
4. Miller, Anthony (2000), Julius Caesar in the Cold War: The Houseman-Mankiewicz Film. Literature/ Film Quarterly. 28(2): 95-100.
5. William Smith (2022), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities: Flamen Archived at the Wayback Machine.
6. Bucher, Gregory S. (2011),“Caesar: the view from Rome”, The Classical Outlook. 88 (3): 82–87. ISSN 0009-8361. JSTOR 43940076.
7. Garfield, Andrew (2002), "The Offence of Strategic Influence: Making the Case for Perception Management Operations", Journal of Information Warfare 1.1:30-39.
8. Taylor, Gary (1989), Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present, London: Hogarth.
9. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julius-Caesar-Roman-ruler/Personality-and-reputation
10. https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/other/crystalinks/juliuscaesar2.html
|