For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/anthology.php#8

The principal wellspring of iodine for the climate is the seas. Methyl iodide (CH3I) and other exceptionally brief (VSL) iodocarbons are framed by biotic and photochemical cycles and delivered to the air from supersaturated sea waters (e.g., CH I, C H I, C H I, CH ICl, and CH2IBr) (Woodworker et al., 2012; Saiz-Lopez et al., 2012a). Furthermore, various examinations have exhibited that the response of fluid iodide with surrounding ozone at the ocean surface outcomes in the vaporous emanation of liquid iodine (I2) (Festoon and Curtis, 1981; Sakamoto et al., 2009; Hayase et al., 2010). It has been shown all the more as of late that the fundamental species delivered because of this oxidative response is HOI (Craftsman et al., 2013; MacDonald et al., 2014). Various demonstrating studies and examinations of exploratory information have recommended that to recreate noticed iodine monoxide (IO) estimations over the vast sea climate, the HOI/I2 extra inorganic source should be more grounded than the outflow strength of natural VSL iodocarbons (Jones et al., 2010; Mahajan et al., 2010, 2012; Gómez Martn et al., 2013b; Großmann et al., 2013 Both natural and inorganic iodine intensifies photograph separate rapidly in the lower atmosphere to deliver iodine particles, which then, at that point, essentially join with ozone to shape IO, as per early spearheading work by Chameides and Davis (1980) and Solomon et al. (1994). The fast photolysis of the oxide brings about the foundation of a consistent state among I and IO, and thus, the two species are on the whole alluded to as receptive iodine, or IOx I IO. To create different sorts of natural iodine, the IOx responds with different species (Saiz-Lopez et al., 2012a,

Iodine might assume a critical part in the obliteration of tropospheric ozone, as per box-and one-and two-layered demonstrating studies (Solomon et al., 1994; Davis et al., 1996; Vogt et al., 1999; Calvert and Lindberg, 2004; Saiz-Lopez et al., 2007; Sommariva and von Glasow, 2012; Sommariva et al Ongoing examinations have likewise featured the significance of directing an exhaustive examination of extra factors driving the financial plan of tropospheric ozone and noted contrasts among noticed and displayed O3 overflows in the tropical upper lower atmosphere (Youthful et al., 2013) and northern mid-scope lower atmosphere (Parrish et al., 2014). We present recreations utilizing a science environment model that consolidates geologically scattered VSL iodocarbon sources (CH3I, CH2I2, CH2ICl, and CH2IBr) as well as worldwide inorganic iodine outflows (HOI/I2) from the seas because of the proof of the omnipresent presence of responsive iodine in the lower atmosphere. The model consolidates a state of the art iodine substance conspire that considers IxOy and their photolytic and warm deterioration, as well as tweaked wet-evacuation instruments, ice take-up, and heterogeneous reusing responses over ocean salt spray and ice particles. Here, we stress a portion of the unmistakable highlights of iodine science that oversee the dispersion of natural and inorganic iodine species across the lower atmosphere without precedent for a worldwide model. The IxOy address a significant mass of air iodine that is presently unaccounted for and profoundly sketchy. It is shown that the upper and lower cutoff points of the tropospheric iodine band are unequivocally impacted by the questions encompassing the substance destiny of IxOy species, whose photochemistry and reactivity represent a critical test to how we might interpret the science of iodine and its belongings in the environment. We investigate the ramifications for the vehicle and dividing of iodine species to the free lower atmosphere (FT) and upper lower atmosphere (UT) in light of our discoveries, and we assess its importance on the tropospheric ozone financial plan.

Modelled Distribution of Iodinated Compounds

This study utilized the Local area Earth Framework Model (CESM) engineering and the worldwide three dimensional science environment model CAM-Chem (People group Climatic Model with Science, adaptation 4.0). (Lamar-que et al., 2012). CAM-Chem can be set up with different dynamical settings and framework goals.

Iodine emanations absolute 3.8 Tg (I) each year, with 3.2 Tg (I) each year coming basically from inorganic sources (84%) of iodine. Tantamount to Prados-Roman et al(2015b) .'s gauge of 83% (Sea just, 60oS-60oN). In the jungles, outflows happen most often (56%) (22oS-22oN). The revealed figures of 1.8 Tg yr1 (Saiz-Lopez et al., 2012a) and 2.6 Tg (I) yr1 (Saiz-Lopez et al., 2014), which likewise incorporated an inorganic (fixed) source, are lower than the demonstrated discharges, which additionally incorporate inorganic outflows.

Iodine mixtures' normal vertical and zonal conveyance through the lower atmosphere is portrayed in the figures. The convergence of iodine diminishes with elevation as would be anticipated given the surface source. Across the highest point of the limit layer, this decline is speedy. Beyond the least model levels, the groupings of the fleeting source gases (CH2IX (X=Cl,Br,I) and I2) are negligible, while those of different gases (CH3I and HOI) continue further up the segment. This is on the grounds that CH3I has a drawn out life expectancy of around 4 days. Despite the fact that HOI has a more limited life expectancy (4 min), its industriousness at higher heights is because of optional synthetic sources. The quick convective blending in the jungles causes the Iy profile to be level from the highest point of the limit layer to around 10 km, despite the fact that focuses drop over this blending zone. The inorganic iodine in the tropical (22oS-22oN) upper lower atmosphere (>10 km) is generally delivered by natural iodine photolysis (7.9 Gg yr1), essentially CH3I, and a vertical Iy transition (6.6 Gg yr1). By and large, three IOy species — HOI, IO, and INO3 — overwhelm barometrical iodine, with HOI making up the greater part (around 70%) in the free lower atmosphere (350 hPa to around 900 hPa).

Figure 1– Schematic Representation of Implemented Iodine Chemistry in Simulation “BR+I”

Ozone Tropospheric O₃ Burden

The projected worldwide tropospheric O3 trouble diminishes from 367 to 334 Tg (9.0%) with the expansion of iodine ("Br+I"). The yearly normal tropospheric section, surface, and zonal change in O3. The O3 trouble fell on normal by 19.5% in the oceanic limit layer (900 hPa p), 9.8% in the free lower atmosphere (350 hPa p 900 hPa), and 6.2% in the high lower atmosphere (350 hPa > p > tropopause). The Southern Side of the equator has a drop of 9.5% contrasted with the Northern Half of the globe's 8.5%.

Surface O₃ Concentration

O3 at the surface (most minimal model level) shows a worldwide typical downfall of 3.5 nmol mol1, with huge geographic variety. Over the seas, these downfalls are bigger (by 21%) than ashore (by 7.3%). Despite the fact that there is a predictable decrease in O3 focus with the expansion of iodine, there is no way to see a distinction between the model's capacity to catch irregularity in surface O3 and the Worldwide Barometrical Watch (GAW, GAW 2014) surface O3 estimations.

Similarly as with contrasting estimations, the consideration of iodine doesn't appear to fundamentally lessen the model's capacity to catch yearly surface focuses. A few spots improve, while others deteriorate. O3 estimations south of 60oS, when inclination is exacerbated, address an exemption for this standard.

Combined Impact of Bromine And Iodine

Past exploration has underlined the meaning of halogen get over responses (BrO+IO) for O3 misfortune and observed that they are important to imitate the diurnal surface O3 misfortune in the marine limit layer that has been noticed (Read et al., 2008).

Two additional runs were led to additionally examine these associations. Iodine reenactments regardless of bromine ("IODINE"), and without halogen reproductions ("NOHAL").

The combined effect of the worldwide tropospheric heaps of O3 without incandescent light ("NOHAL"), with just bromine ("BROMINE"), and with just iodine ("IODINE") (Br-I). Iodine alone causes a 8.5% decrease in trouble, bromine alone a 5.9% decrease, and the consolidated impact is 14.5%. At the point when incandescent light are considered independently, the amount of the progressions in O3 load is somewhat lower (0.1%) than when they are considered all the while. The joined everyday surface misfortune pace of O3 brought about by bromine and iodine is displayed in Figure 3.18. (upper board). This is connected with the convergences of IO (Fig. 3.4). Also, Figure 3.18 portrays the fragmentary diurnal partial O3 change at Cape Verde in the far off marine limit layer (lower board). For the reasons for this correlation, information from perceptions (2006 to 2012; Woodworker et al. 2010) and the model were first handled to average fragmentary diurnal change by averaging the qualities by hour of the day, then, at that point, deducting the most extreme typical worth of the diurnal. This fragmentary change was then increased by 100, isolated by the normal greatest worth, and used to contrast recreation runs and different O3 focuses. Iodine significantly works on the reenactment's devotion (Fig. 3.18), in spite of the fact that bromine has little of an impact. The model misjudge of surface Brother is a foundational issue (see Part II, Segment 2.6), so model evaluations of the effect of Br on climatic sythesis portrayed here are reasonable an underrate. Model appraisals of IO fixations at Cape Verde show concurrence with perceptions (Fig. 3.18), however Brother fixations are essentially lower than detailed (2 pmol mol1, Read et al. 2008).

For the recreations without incandescent light ("NOHAL"), with just bromine ("BROMINE"), with just iodine ("IODINE"), and with both iodine and bromine chem-istry ("Br+I"), separately, the worldwide mean tropospheric centralizations of Gracious are 12.80, 12.24, 13.02, and 12.47 x105 atoms cm3. When presented to bromine and iodine science, Goodness responds in an unexpected way. Iodine consideration causes a little expansion in Gracious focuses, as expressed in Organization. 3.5.2. Contrasted with when no incandescent lamp are available, Gracious focuses ascend by 1.8% when just iodine is considered. As per a new report (Parrella et al., 2012), bromine science alone causes a decrease in Goodness (4.3%) on the grounds that expanded creation by HOBr photolysis can't compensate for a decrease in the essential Gracious source (O3+H2O+hv) because of a lower O3 load. Universally, the net impact of halogen consolidation is a 2.6% lessening in Goodness. Again, the impact of bromine on science is by and large closely resembling the blend of iodine and bromine.

The worldwide impacts of Br and I science are essentially added substance in the reproduction "Br+I," with cross responses having an obviously less effect. In spite of the way that the model under-gauges the amounts of Br compounds, the overall effect of iodine gives off an impression of being considerably more prominent than that of bromine. This ought to be the subject of additional exploration. Part IV, which adds a portrayal of tropospheric chlorine and updates the bromine recreation, concentrates on these cooperations between incandescent lamp in more detail.

Atmospheric Chemistry of Iodine

Top to bottom depictions of the science of the bromine and chlorine VSL species in CAM-Chem have recently been distributed (Fernandez et al., 2014; Ordóez et al., 2012). In this review, we broadened the inorganic science of iodine by utilizing similar emanations stock of bromo-(CHBr3, CH2Br2, CH2BrCl, CHBr2Cl, and CHBrCl2) and iodocar-bons as there. In view of parametrizations of chlorophyll-a satellite pictures, the VSL maritime wellsprings of CH2I2, CH2ICl, and CH2IBr incorporate latitudinal variances between 50° N and 50° S, a period subordinate ice-cover for polar seas, and a month to month irregularity (for additional data, see Ordóez et al., 2012). The model's worldwide CH2IX stream is 437 Gg yr-1, where X is Cl, Br, or I. The CH3I outflows are brought from a hierarchical stock that as of now exists (Chime et al., 2002), which included critical maritime sources (213 Gg yr1) as well as some land-based motions from rice paddies, wetlands, consuming of biofuels, and biomass (91 Gg yr1), coming about in a worldwide CH3I transition of 304 Gg yr1. We follow a sun based diurnal profile for most of VSL iodocarbon discharges, with tops in the early evening and no outflows around evening time. The exemption is CH2I2 which, when 1/4 of the absolute discharges happen around evening time, showed further developed concurrence with estimations (Ordóez et al., 2012). Furthermore, in light of late research facility concentrates on that showed the abiotic vaporous discharge of HOI and I2 following the oxidation of watery iodide via air ozone on the sea surface, inorganic iodine maritime sources have been incorporated to the least layer of the model (150 m profound) (Craftsman et al., 2013; MacDon-ald et al., 2014). The inorganic iodine supply is executed in the worldwide model for 1.9 Tg (I) yr1 tropospheric ozone to the sea surface, the ocean surface temperature, and the breeze speed (for additional data, see Prados-Roman et al. 2014). This extra inorganic source is to some degree more noteworthy than the 1.2 Tg (I) yr1 esteem announced by Saiz-Lopez et al. (2012b) and falls inside the scope of values expected to figure IO estimations in the MBL at waterfront locales (10-70) 107 molecules (I) cm2 s1; see Mahajan et al. (2010); Großmann et al. (2013) and related references).

As per prior research (Rattigan et al., 1997; Roehl et al., 1997; Mössinger et al., 1998), the figured existences of CH2ICl, CH2IBr, and CH2I2 territory from minutes to hours, while for CH3I it is in the scope of 5-8 days (Rattigan et al., 1997; Roehl et al., 1997).

Photolysis rates are computed online considering the actinic flux calculation in CAM-Chem. Reaction

CH3I + hν → CH3O2 + I

CH2I2 + hν → 2Ia

CH2IBr + hν → Br + Ia CH2ICl + hν → Cl + Ia I2 + hν → 2I

IO + hν → I + O OIO + hν → I + O2

INO + hν → I + NO b

INO2 + hν → I + NO2

IONO2 + hν → I + NO3 HOI + hν → I + OH

IBr + hν → I + Br

I2O2 + hν → I + OIOc

I2O3 + hν → IO + OIOc

I2O4 + hν → OIO + OIOc

Iodine Burden in the Troposphere and the Role of I_xO_y

Huge amounts of I2O2, I2O3, and I2O4 are created, separately, by the fast responses IO, IO OIO, and OIO. Iodine oxide levels ascend in the climate, turning into the most predominant species in the FT and UT since just warm disintegration and affidavit of iodine oxides are allowed in the Base framework (Fig. 2c). On the off chance that IxOy were not photolabile, they would represent over 70% of the FT and UT and over 30% of the by and large Iy overflow in the MBL. There is right now not an obvious reason for this critical measure of iodine in the air, and the photochemistry of more prominent iodine oxides is very obscure. This represents a central issue for measuring the science of iodine and its effect on the air on the grounds that the molecule nucleating IxOy species, which go about as a proficient sink of air iodine (particularly in the FT and UT where temperatures are excessively low for thermochemical decay to be successful), don't deliver dynamic iodine back into the vaporous stage. We currently present our best gauge of the upper and lower scope of tropospheric iodine stacking and its parceling for the Base and JIxOy plans characterized in Organization. 2.3. This is done on the grounds that there are as yet numerous questions with respect to which photochemical cycles are the prevalent ones influencing IxOy species. The iodine reusing in the genuine environment is doubtlessly constrained by a component in these two prospects, with a portion of the IxOy being eliminated by wet/dry testimony, another piece framing bigger iodine aggre-doors that will likely be lost to spray, and the leftover part being reused to IOx in the gas stage by photolysis.

The essential yearly typical daytime iodine species' upward circulation range for the Base and JIxOy plans is displayed in Figure 3a for the jungles (20 N-20 S). HOI is the essential sunshine io-feast supply from the surface to a distance of around 7-8 km. By and large, 19% (58%) of the complete daytime Iy in the UT for the Base and (JIxOy) plans, separately. As per late boat borne estimations made over distant untamed waters, the surface daytime IO blending proportions over tropical seas change from 0.45 to 0.7 pptv on a yearly normal (Mahajan et al., 2012; Großmann et al., 2013). In concurrence with past perceptions in the FT made over the tropical Atlantic (Puentedura et al., 2012) and Pacific (Dix et al., 2013) oceans, IO vertical profiles over the MBL keep on being in the reach (0.1-0.25) pptv somewhere in the range of 2 and 8 km. The consideration or rejection of the IxOy photolysis brings about two unmistakable vertical morphologies in the tropospheric IO vertical profiles: Because of the huge change of responsive IOx to lifeless IxOy in the UT, the IO fixations in the Base plan plainly decline with height (IO12 km 0.04 pptv), however high IO focuses in the JIxOy plot are kept up with all through the FT and up to the UT (IO12 km 0.16 pptv) (see Faction. 3.4). To keep up with the raised IO levels seen across the mid-and upper FT, Dix et al. (2013) detailed IO vertical profiles all through the Pacific Sea and conjectured the presence of an extra interaction (which they viewed as heterogeneous ocean salt reusing). Because of the insignificant number fixation at those levels, it is very impossible that responses on ocean salt can be a wellspring of iodine toward the upper FT, as per our displaying results, which show that heterogeneous reusing on ocean salt can add to the IO profile up to around 5 km (Fig. 2b). All things being equal, we recommend that the expansion in IOx life expectancy important to make sense of late field estimations in the mid-to upper lower atmosphere can be made sense of by the joined arrival of I molecules from CH3I photolysis and the photolytic reusing of vaporous IxOy inside the JIxOy plot.

1. Butz, A., Bösch, H., Camy-Peyret, C., Chipperfield, M. P., Dorf, M., Kreycy, S., Kritten, L., Prados-Román, C., Schwärzle, J., and Pfeilsticker, K.: Constraints on inorganic gaseous iodine in the tropical upper troposphere and stratosphere inferred from balloon-borne solar occultation observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7229–7242, doi:10.5194/acp-9-7229-2009, 2009. 2. Calvert, J. G. and Lindberg, S. E.: Potential influence of iodine- containing compounds on the chemistry of the troposphere in the polar spring. I. Ozone depletion, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5087– 5104, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.049, 2004. 3. Carpenter, L. J., Archer, S. D., and Beale, R.: Ocean- atmosphere trace gas exchange., Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6473–506, doi:10.1039/c2cs35121h, 2012. 4. Carpenter, L. J., MacDonald, S. M., Shaw, M. D., Kumar, R., Saun- ders, R. W., Parthipan, R., Wilson, J., and Plane, J. M. C.: Atmo- spheric iodine levels influenced by sea surface emissions of in- organic iodine, Nat. Geosci., 6, 108–111, doi:10.1038/ngeo1687, 2013. 5. Chambers, R. M., Heard, A. C., and Wayne, R. P.: Inorganic gas- phase reactions of the nitrate radical: iodine nitrate radical and iodine atom nitrate radical, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 3321–3331, doi:10.1021/j100187a028, 1992. 6. Chameides, W. L., and Davis, D. D.: Iodine: Its possible role in tropospheric photochemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 85(C12), 7383, doi:10.1029/JC085iC12p07383, 1980. 7. Daehlie, G., and Kjekshus, A.: Iodine Oxides, Acta Chem. Scand., 18, 114–156, 1964. 8. Davis, D., Crawford, J., Liu, S., McKeen, S., Bandy, A., Thornton, D., Rowland, F., and Blake, D.: Potential impact of iodine on tro- pospheric levels of ozone and other critical oxidants, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2135, doi:10.1029/95JD02727, 1996. 9. Dillon, T. J., Karunanandan, R., and Crowley, J. N.: The reaction of IO with CH3SCH3: products and temperature dependent rate coefficients by laser induced fluorescence., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8, 847–55, doi:10.1039/b514718b, 2006a. 10. Dillon, T. J., Tucceri, M. E., and Crowley, J. N.: Laser induced fluo- rescence studies of iodine oxide chemistry: Part II. The reactions of IO with CH3O2, CF3O2 and O3, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8, 5185–5198, doi:10.1039/b611116e, 2006b. 11. Dillon, T. J., Tucceri, M. E., Sander, R., and Crowley, J. N.: LIF studies of iodine oxide chemistry. Part 3. Reac- tions IO + NO3 −> OIO + NO2, I + NO3 − > IO + NO2, and 12. CH2I O2 > (products): implications for the chemistry of the marine atmosphere at night., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 1540–54, doi:10.1039/b717386e, 2008. 13. Dix, B., Baidar, S., Bresch, J. F., Hall, S. R., Schmidt, K. S., Wang, S., and Volkamer, R.: Detection of iodine monoxide in the tropi- cal free troposphere., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2035–2040, doi:10.1073/pnas.1212386110, 2013. 14. Dooley, K. S., Geidosch, J. N., and North, S. W.: Ion imaging study of IO radical photodissociation?: Accurate bond dissoci- ation energy determination, Chem. Phys. Lett., 457, 303–306, doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2008.04.009, 2008. 15. Drougas, E., and Kosmas, A. M.: Ab Initio Characterization of (CH3IO3) Isomers and the CH3O2 IO Reaction Pathways, J. Phys. Chem. A, 6, 2007. 16. Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G., Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando, J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.: Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43–67, doi:10.5194/gmd- 3-43-2010, 2010. 17. Enami, S., Yamanaka, T., Hashimoto, S., and Kawasaki, M.: Kinetic Study of IO Radical with RO2 (R CH3, C2H5, and CF3) Using Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. A., 2, 7–12, 2006. 18. Fernandez, R. P., Salawitch, R. J., Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque, J.-F., and Saiz-Lopez, A.: Bromine partitioning in the tropical tropopause layer: implications for stratospheric injection, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 17857–17905, doi:10.5194/acpd-14-17857-2014, 2014. 19. Gálvez, O., Gómez Martín, J. C., Gómez, P. C., Saiz-Lopez, A., and Pacios, L. F.: A theoretical study on the formation of iodine oxide aggregates and monohydrates, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 15572–15583, doi:10.1039/c3cp51219c, 2013. 20. Garland, J. A. and Curtis, H.: Emission of iodine from the sea surface in the presence of ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 3183, doi:10.1029/JC086iC04p03183, 1981. 21. Gilles, M. K., Turnipseed, A. A., Burkholder, J. B., and Ravis- hankara, A. R.: A study of the Br IO I BrO and the reverse reaction, Chem. Phys. Lett., 272, 75–82, doi:10.1016/S0009- 2614(97)00485-5, 1997. 22. Glowacki, D. R., Liang, C.-H., Morley, C., Pilling, M. J., and Robertson, S. H.: MESMER: an open-source master equa- tion solver for multi-energy well reactions., J. Phys. Chem. A, 116(38), 9545–60, doi:10.1021/jp3051033, 2012. 23. Gómez Martín, J. C. and Plane, J. M. C.: Determination of the O– IO bond dissociation energy by photofragment excitation spec- troscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett., 474, 79–83, 2009. 24. Sander, S. P., Friedl, R. R., Barker, J. R., Golden, D. M., Kurylo, M. J., Sciences, G. E., Wine, P. H., Abbatt, J. P. D., Burkholder, 25. J. B., Kolb, C. E., Moortgat, G. K., Huie, R. E., and Orkin, V. L.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in At- mospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 17, JPL_NASA, 10-6, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 2011. 26. Saunders, R. W. and Plane, J. M. C.: Formation Pathways and Com- position of Iodine Oxide Ultra-Fine Particles, Environ. Chem., 2, 299, doi:10.1071/EN05079, 2005. 27. Saunders, R. W., Kumar, R., Gómez Martín, J. C., Mahajan, a. S., Murray, B. J., and Plane, J. M. C.: Studies of the Formation and Growth of Aerosol from Molecular Iodine Precursor, Zeitschr. Phys. Chemie, 224, 1095–1117, doi:10.1524/zpch.2010.6143, 2010. 28. Schwartz, S. E. and Warneck, P.: Units for use in Atmospheric Chemistry, Pure Appl. Chem., 67, 1377–1406, 1995. 29. Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R., and Ravishankara, A. R.: On the role of iodine in ozone depletion, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 20491, doi:10.1029/94JD02028, 1994. 30. Sommariva, R. and von Glasow, R.: Multiphase halogen chem- istry in the tropical Atlantic Ocean., Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 10429–10437, doi:10.1021/es300209f, 2012. 31. Sommariva, R., Bloss, W. J., and von Glasow, R.: Uncertainties in gas-phase atmospheric iodine chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 57, 219–232, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.032, 2012. 32. Spietz, P., Gómez Martín, J. C., and Burrows, J. P.: Spectro- scopic studies of the I2/O3 photochemistry Part 2. Improved spectra of iodine oxides and analysis of the IO absorption spectrum, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., 176, 50–67, doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.08.023, 2005.