ISSN: 2456–5474 RNI No.  UPBIL/2016/68367 VOL.- IX , ISSUE- X November  - 2024
Innovation The Research Concept

National Education Policy 2020: Prospects and Challenges

Paper Id :  19436   Submission Date :  2024-11-12   Acceptance Date :  2024-11-22   Publication Date :  2024-11-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.14378236
For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
Amritpal Kaur
Professor
University Institute Of Teachers Training And Research ( Deputy Registrar)
Chandigarh University
Mohali,Punjab, India
Abstract

This research investigates the relevance of the new education policy (NEP) introduced on the 29th of July, 2020, in the dynamic landscape of educational prospects and challenges. It comprehensively covers all aspects of human resources, with a strong emphasis on developing 21st-century skills that aim to revolutionize education in the country. The study uses secondary data from various available sources. This policy highlights the importance of developing learners holistically, providing vocational education, and training teachers. The policy encourages the integration of the arts, sciences, and vocational subjects to create well-rounded individuals. It is highly recommended that a dedicated agency responsible for overseeing the policy execution effectively be established.

Keywords Contemporary challenges, educational landscape, educational relevance, new education policy and potential benefits
Introduction

This National Education Policy envisions an education system rooted in Indian ethos that contributes directly to transforming India, that is, Bharat, sustainably into an equitable and vibrant knowledge society, by providing high-quality education to all, thereby making India a global knowledge superpower. The Policy envisages that the curriculum and pedagogy of our institutions must develop among the students a deep sense of respect towards the Fundamental Duties and Constitutional values, bonding with one’s country, and a conscious awareness of one’s roles and responsibilities in a changing world. The vision of the Policy is to instill in the learners a deep-rooted pride in being Indian, not only in thought, but also in spirit, intellect, and deeds, as well as to develop knowledge, skills, values, and dispositions that support responsible commitment to human rights, sustainable development and living, and global well-being, thereby reflecting a truly global citizen (MHRD,2020). Currently, the world is undergoing rapid transformations in terms of knowledge and employment landscapes. It is essential to create an education system that can impart ethics, character, and reasoning skills while simultaneously generating job opportunities. Despite strong and constant economic growth during the past few decades, India still faces socioeconomic challenges, and improving education is the only way forward to address these challenges and increase the country’s economic growth. However, decoding the education system in India to address the prevailing challenges is a colossal task, as India is a nation of 28 states and 8 Union territories. Since the states have their own elected governments and school education is a state subject per the constitution, the states have complete authority to decide on policies and implement them (Anderson and Lightfoot, 2019). Keeping in mind that India introduced its first education policy in 1968 under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's government. The second education policy was formulated by the Rajiv Gandhi government in 1986. Narasimha Rao's government amended the policy in 1992. Finally, after 34 years, the National Education Policy 2020 was introduced by the government. A committee was formed under the chairmanship of Dr. K.K. Kasturirangan to create a new education policy. This committee drafted the National Education Policy in 2019. The policy was approved by the Central Government in July 2020 and is known as the National Education Policy 2020.

While the policy, focuses on various facets of education, it also aims to bridge the gap between education and technology. The current pandemic circumstances have paved the way for virtual learning replacing the traditional method of schooling, compelling teachers and students to re-reimagine learning and teaching techniques. Under this policy, the National Educational Technology Forum will be established, which will operate as a platform for the free exchange of ideas on the use of technology to enhance learning, assessment planning and administration for schools and higher education (Prasad, 2020). It aims to strengthen the education system by offering a new structure from preschool/Anganwadi to higher education. This policy proposes a revision and revamp of the education structure, including its regulation and governance, to create a new system that aligns with the aspirational goals of 21st-century education. The present 10+2 structure is reformed into a 5+3+3+4 design corresponding to age groups 3–8 years (foundational stage),8–11 years (preparatory), 11–14 years (middle) and 14 - 1814–18 years (secondary). The new policy includes preschool education as part of formal schooling. Its goal is to ensure that every child is enrolled in school by 2030 by addressing social inequalities in access, participation, and learning outcomes. (Singh 2020)

Objective of study

The primary objectives of this research paper are as follows:

  1. To examine the main features and objectives of the new education policy in India.
  2. To evaluate the strengths and limitations of the policy.
  3. To assess the opportunities in the new Education Policy on the Indian education landscape.
  4. To identify the implications and challenges associated with the implementation of the new education policy.
  5. To provide recommendations for improvement and future directions for research.
Review of Literature

Sutar (2024) concluded that NEP is bringing out tremendous positive changes in higher education in India. The changes can be effectively implemented with the help of libraries and library professionals to adapt to course, curriculum, research and infrastructure-related changes. The challenges of the 21st century in the field of higher education are related to personality development, strengthening of Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs), internationalization of higher education, specific skills and values for students, motivation for researchers and teachers as well as for equity and inclusiveness of higher education can be effectively imparted by libraries and it can contribute as a catalyst for overall national development. Sweta (2024) study concluded that how autonomy affects institutional governance and management and also summarized how NEP’s graded autonomy concept aims to encourage healthy competition between Universities and Colleges. Soni (2023) conducted a study from the national educational policy perspective and highlighted that it is a comprehensive framework for education in India, with a focus on holistic and multidisciplinary learning, research, and innovation. Bele (2023) conducted a research paper on National Education Policy 2020: Challenges &       Opportunities in higher education in India. The paper provides valuable insights for researchers, academics, and policymakers interested in NEP policy and analyzes the potential and problems that India's National Education Policy 2020 presents for higher education. Seethalakshmi (2022) conducted a study on the National Education Policy 2020 and highlighted that there are concerns about its implementation, with a need for understanding and support from stakeholders such as teachers and academicians. Saini (2022) conducted a study on the analysis of NEP 2020 in light of NAAC accreditation. This study focused on the opinions of academicians and revealed that the National   Education Policy for 2020 has both positive and negative aspects. The policy is innovative and futuristic but has some drawbacks as well. Jatav (2023) conducted a study on the challenges of the New Education Policy 2020 and highlighted it as the most comprehensive policy for the education sector in the 21st century. Smitha (2020) conducted a study on national education policy and discussed paradigm shifts, opportunities, and challenges in the teacher education sector. Reddy (2020) conducted a study on National Education Policy 2020 - Challenges and Opportunities for the Educational System. He highlighted that one of the most significant features of the NEP 2020 is the creation of the Higher Education Commission of India, which will eventually take over current regulatory agencies, such as the UGC or AICTE, and provide a single set of regulations for higher education institutions. The policy aims to eliminate the current structure of colleges linked with universities and merge small, financially burdened institutions with larger HEIs. The NEP 2020 aims to address several deficiencies in India's educational system, and it is expected that this policy will help India achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal by ensuring universal and equal access to high-quality education.

The aforementioned studies highlighted that the National Education Policy 2020 itself is a very comprehensive policy that covers all aspects of education, from basic to higher education. However, there are still problems with its implementation. In this paper, the main features and objectives of the new education policy, opportunities, implications, challenges and recommendations are discussed. The policy's long-term goal is to abolish the current structure of colleges that are linked with universities and merge numerous small, financially burdensome institutions with larger HEIs. The NEP 2020 seeks to address several deficiencies in India's educational system, and it is anticipated that this policy will help India meet the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal by ensuring comprehensive and equitable access to high-quality education.

Methodology

This research employs a qualitative approach to analyze the national educational policy by collecting and examining data from various existing educational policies. The study involves a comprehensive review of policy documents, academic articles, government reports, and other relevant literature. By employing content analysis, the research identifies and categorizes the benefits, challenges, and gaps within these policies. The gathered data are systematically analyzed to draw comparisons and highlight key themes, which form the basis for providing well-founded recommendations for future policy enhancements.

Result and Discussion

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 holds significant importance because of its comprehensive approach to addressing the unfinished agenda of previous education policies, particularly the National Policy on Education 1986--1992. While previous policies focused on issues of access and equity, the NEP 2020 expanded its scope to encompass principles aimed at nurturing holistic development and ethical values in students. By emphasizing the development of good human beings capable of rational thought, compassion, resilience, and ethical values, the NEP 2020 aligns with the broader vision outlined in the Constitution of India for building an equitable, inclusive, and plural society.

Moreover, the NEP 2020 places emphasis on creating inclusive and welcoming educational institutions that provide a safe and stimulating learning environment for all students. It recognizes the importance of offering a wide range of learning experiences and ensuring access to appropriate resources and infrastructure. This approach reflects a commitment to fostering the holistic development of students and ensuring their well-being. Furthermore, the NEP 2020 underscores the importance of seamless integration and coordination across institutions and education stages. By promoting collaboration and coordination, the policy aims to create a cohesive and interconnected education system that facilitates smooth transitions and enhances overall educational outcomes.

In summary, the significance of the NEP 2020 lies in its holistic approach to education, which not only addresses issues of access and equity but also prioritizes the development of ethical values, holistic development, and inclusive learning environments. Through its principles and objectives, the NEP 2020 seeks to lay the foundation for a transformative education system that empowers individuals and contributes to the development of a just and inclusive society.

Potential Benefits and Concerns

The new education policy can improve the quality of education by promoting critical thinking, creativity, and employability skills, and enhancing learning outcomes. It emphasizes flexibility in curricula and assessments, which can cater to the diverse needs of learners. However, there are concerns regarding the implementation of the policy, resource allocation, and the need for capacity building among teachers and educational institutions.

Main Features and Objectives of NEP 2020

Reforms in School Education

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 introduced significant reforms to ensure universal access to education, emphasizing early years' importance and multilingualism. It replaces the 10+2 structure with a more age-appropriate 5+3+3+4 curriculum and establishes a National Assessment Centre for monitoring learning outcomes. It prioritizes equitable and inclusive education, targeting socially and economically disadvantaged groups, including marginalized communities and children with disabilities. The policy aims to create a more inclusive and accessible educational system, ensuring that every child has the opportunity to learn and excel, regardless of their background or circumstances.

Teacher Recruitment and Career

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has led to significant reforms in teacher recruitment and career progression, emphasizing transparent processes and merit-based promotions. It introduces the National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST) to guide teacher development and performance evaluation.

School Governance

School governance will be strengthened through the establishment of school complexes/clusters to ensure resource availability and foster a professional teacher community. Standard- setting and accreditation for schools are overseen by separate bodies, promoting transparency and accountability. 

Vocational Education and Internship Opportunities

NEP 2020 prioritizes vocational education integration, aiming for at least 50% of learners to be exposed by 2025 and providing internship opportunities and online courses to enhance skill development. These measures collectively aim to improve educational quality and inclusivity, preparing students for diverse career pathways and contributing to national development.

Holistic and Multidisciplinary Education

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 outlines ambitious goals for higher education, aiming to increase the gross enrollment ratio (GER) to 50% by 2035. Emphasizing holistic multidisciplinary education, the policy advocates for undergraduate programs that integrate science, arts, humanities, mathematics, and professional fields.

Multiple Entry and Exit Programs

Undergraduate degrees are 3- or 4-year long, with multiple exit options and appropriate certifications along the way. The establishment of model public universities known as multidisciplinary education and research universities (MERUs) will prioritize multidisciplinary education across India.

Comprehensive Evaluation

To enhance learning environments, institutions have the autonomy to innovate in curricula, pedagogies, and assessments, moving toward criterion-based grading and comprehensive evaluation.

Support Centers for Underrepresented Groups

Support centers and resources will be provided to aid students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, including professional academic and career counseling, ensuring their holistic well-being and success in higher education. Financial support initiatives will incentivize merit among students from marginalized backgrounds, with expanded scholarships and free ships.

Research and Knowledge Hubs

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 proposes a rationalized institutional architecture for higher education, envisioning large, well-resourced, multidisciplinary institutions. Higher education institutions (HEIs) will transform into vibrant universities, colleges, and HEI clusters/ knowledge hubs, each with 3,000 or more students, offering undergraduate and graduate programs with a focus on teaching, research, and community engagement. Affiliation systems will be phased out over 15 years, with colleges gradually gaining graded autonomy through transparent accreditation processes. The establishment of a National Research Foundation (NRF) aims to catalyze research and innovation nationwide, fostering a research culture and providing funding across disciplines.

Promotion of Open and Distance Learning

Open and distance learning will be expanded to increase the gross enrollment ratio, utilizing online courses, digital repositories, and credit-based recognition of MOOCs to ensure quality on par with in-class programs.

Internationalization of Education

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasizes the internationalization of education through institutional collaboration and facilitates student and faculty mobility. It also allows top-ranked international universities to establish campuses in India.

Effective Governance

Effective governance and leadership in higher education institutions (HEIs) will be achieved through graded accreditation and autonomy over 15 years, fostering a culture of innovation and excellence. HEIs have independent governance structures with boards of governors, led by individuals with high academic qualifications and demonstrated leadership capabilities, ensuring institutional autonomy and quality. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 proposes a streamlined regulatory framework for higher education, with the establishment of the Higher Education Commission of India (HECI) overseeing standard-setting, funding, accreditation, and regulation through independent bodies.

In teacher education, the NEP advocates for integrated Bachelor of Education programs and stringent action against substandard Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs). A National Mission for Mentoring will be established to provide professional support to university/college teachers. Professional education will be integrated into the higher education system, with technical, health science, legal, and agricultural universities aiming for multidisciplinary purposes.

Promoting Literacy

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 sets ambitious goals for adult education, aiming to achieve 100% youth and adult literacy by 2030. In terms of financing education, the NEP emphasizes education as a public service and combats commercialization through mechanisms with checks and balances. Public investment in the education sector is targeted to reach 6% of GDP, with the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) strengthened to ensure coordination and focus on quality education. The ministry responsible for education redesigned as the Ministry of Education (MoE) to emphasize its primary focus on education and learning. These measures underscore the NEP's commitment to promoting literacy, preserving linguistic diversity, and ensuring that quality education is accessible to all.

Challenges that will determining the success of NEP 2020

The vision is aspirational. If this promotes employment creation and education for everyone, it will depend on the implementation schedule and level of rigour. Over the next few years, the Government of India appears committed to implementing the vision in terms of curriculum change, teacher training, and equipping schools for ICT-enabled and assessment-driven evaluation. This is critical for India to truly reap the demographic dividend through reskilling, vocational training, and job creation. The objective is noble, and the policy is timely. However, the success and pace of execution will depend on how these opportunities are successfully realized, as the government can scale key challenges. 

Access and Equity:

According to the All-India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2019–20, the gross enrollment ratio (GER) in higher education for the18–23 age group in India was 27.1%, indicating disparities in access.

Quality of Education:

The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) rankings showcase disparities, with only a few Indian institutions consistently ranking high globally, highlighting variations in quality.

Outdated Curriculum:

A 2018 report by the University Grants Commission (UGC) highlighted the need for curriculum revision in many universities to align with industry requirements. The NEP calls for curriculum and pedagogical changes. The boards that conduct examinations need to rethink how they assess students and what the learning content rubric should be. School textbooks will need to change too.

Faculty Shortage and Quality:

According to the AISHE report from 2021, there was a reported faculty shortage of approximately 35% in higher education institutions, impacting the student-to-faculty ratio and overall teaching quality. It is one of the low-paid professions in India, with an average number of teachers reaching approximately Rs 200,000 per year. Given these constraints, experiential learning, and concept-oriented teaching, rather than the currently prevalent printed content-oriented teaching, will be difficult. A comprehensive National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education has also been announced in the NEP in addition to Teacher Eligibility Tests (TETs) to create a talented and curated pool of educators who can provide quality education to the students. However, the current pool of educators needs to be oriented toward these teaching techniques. Until the structural constraints on teacher salary salaries are corrected in the education ecosystem, the NEP implementation in spirit and form will remain challenging.

Research and Innovation:

Among 132 economies, India ranks 46th in the Global Innovation Index 2021 indicating a need for improvement in research and innovation.

Infrastructure and Evaluation Facilities:

The 2019 AISHE report specifies variations in infrastructure, with some institutions lacking essential facilities such as libraries, laboratories, and modern classrooms. To assist students in making the best choices for their futures, exams are encouraged to change to a culture of assessment with ongoing tracking of learning outcomes, an emphasis on foundational and higher-order abilities, and progress tracking powered by AI software. To implement continuous assessment, educators and educational institutions must develop novel assessment strategies and tasks that provoke critical thinking and demand hard work from their students. Compared with theory-based examinations which have unilateral questions and answers that are easier to administer and score, holistic assessments would require educational boards and institutions to invest significantly in creating these assessments and practice assignments.

Funding Challenges:

The Economic Survey 2020-21 acknowledges the financial constraints faced by higher education institutions, which impact their ability to invest in infrastructure and faculty development. According to the National Education Policy 2020, education spending will increase from 4.6% to 6% of GDP annually, or over INR 2.5 lakh crores. This money will be wisely used to establish educational institutions around the nation, hire instructors and professors, and pay for running costs such as feeding schoolchildren for free. The policy's implementation coincides with the economy being severely impacted by lockdowns connected to COVID-19, severely low government tax revenues, and a significant budget imbalance that existed even before COVID-19.

Regulatory Issues:

Complex regulatory processes were highlighted in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which highlights the need for regulatory reforms to promote autonomy and reduce bureaucratic hurdles.

Technology Integration:

The Digital Education in India (2020) report highlights disparities in digital infrastructure and internet accessibility that hinder the seamless integration of technology in education. A digital infrastructure of similar scale requires digital classrooms, teaching models driven by remote expertise, AR/VR tools to bridge the gap in physical education and laboratory setups, and uniform assessment in schools even in remote villages, which will be expensive and take time to achieve the target.

Social and Cultural Factors:

According to data from AISHE, there are disparities in gender and social category enrollment in higher education, reflecting societal and cultural influences on educational choices. One of the key highlights of NEP 2020 is the choice to make the mother tongue or regional language the medium of instruction up to Class 5. While this may have a long-term impact on nation-building, it also ensures the transition from the mother tongue or regional language to the foreign language and helps inculcate human values and emotions and stay connected to their own social and cultural fabric (Narayan, 2020). However, implementing this policy seems to be a challenge, as India is a nation of several languages, with approximately 270 mothers’ tongues as per Census 2011, and classrooms might have children with more than one spoken language (Singh, 2020). Nevertheless, observers argue that imposing the Hindi language on regional states, specifically southern states, would achieve nothing for policymakers other than English and the mother tongue. According to the India Skill Report by CII and Wheebox, English is among the top 3 skills that employers look for, and the three southern states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Telangana attract IT companies and contribute to IT exports, as they constitute a large percentage of the English-speaking population, among other factors (Singh, 2020). Furthermore, the intervention will require the hiring of teachers and high-quality learning resources in many different languages, which will be challenging to develop.

Internationalization:

The number of foreign students enrolled in Indian higher education institutions is relatively low. Encouraging international collaboration is emphasized in policies such as the NEP 2020.

Employability and Skill Gap:

Reports by various industry bodies advocate that a significant percentage of graduates in India are not job-ready, pointing to a gap between academic education and industry requirements. The policy calls for a comprehensive structural revision of the curriculum in schools, which is a positive development. However, we need teachers who are educated about pedagogical requirements to offer this curriculum effectively. Parents and teachers alike must adopt new perspectives on many curriculum modifications. It is not an easy effort to have "exceptions" across the entire higher education system—professors who are experts in one field but also curious about, respectful of, and willing to lean into other fields. Over the next 15 to 20 years, the entire ecosystem of higher education will need to undergo a cultural revolution to achieve this.

Recommendations and Future Outlook

Areas of Improvement

To improve the efficiency of the new education policy, early childhood education, teacher training, and capacity building should receive attention. It is also critical to strengthen infrastructure, ensure equitable access, and monitor the quality of education.

Implementation and Monitoring

To ensure the successful implementation of the policy related to the NEP 2020, it is important to establish a reliable monitoring mechanism. Regular assessments and evaluations should be conducted at all levels, including the national and grassroots levels, to keep track of the implementation progress. It is highly recommended that a dedicated agency responsible for overseeing the policy execution effectively be established.

Infrastructure development

Having adequate infrastructure is crucial for the successful implementation of the NEP 2020. Therefore, the government should invest in the development of schools, colleges, and universities to ensure that they have the necessary facilities and resources. This includes providing classrooms equipped with technology, libraries, laboratories, and sports facilities. Having adequate infrastructure is crucial for the successful implementation of the NEP 2020. Therefore, the government should invest in the development of schools, colleges, and universities to ensure that they have the necessary facilities and resources. This includes providing classrooms equipped with technology, libraries, laboratories, and sports facilities.  

Teacher training and Professional development

Continuous training programs including innovative teaching methods, ICT integration, and assessment techniques should be conducted to enhance the pedagogical skills of teachers.

Technology Integration

The policy acknowledges the importance of technology in education and emphasizes the need to integrate it into classrooms effectively. To harness its potential, several measures should be taken, such as providing digital devices, high-speed internet connectivity, and quality digital content. Moreover, teachers should receive special training to utilize technology for teaching and learning efficiently.

Vocational Education and Skill Development

The NEP highlights the importance of incorporating vocational education and skill development into the standard curriculum. It is crucial to establish well-equipped vocational training centers and collaborate with industries to offer students practical training and internships. Such efforts will help bridge the gap between education and employment.

Inclusion and Equity

NEP advocates for inclusive education and aims to provide equal opportunities to all students. The policy emphasizes the need to pay special attention to marginalized communities, children with disabilities, and those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Measures should be taken to ensure their access to quality education and address any barriers that may hinder their learning. The policy also promotes research and innovation in education. Funding and support should be provided to encourage research activities in educational institutions. Collaboration among academia, industry, and research organizations should be fostered to drive innovation and solve real-world educational challenges.

Global Collaboration

NEP 2020 aims to promote international collaboration and exchange programs for students and teachers to gain a global perspective. It seeks to establish partnerships with renowned educational institutions and organizations worldwide to facilitate knowledge sharing, faculty exchange, and collaborative research. The future outlook for NEP 2020 is promising, as it focuses on a learner-centric approach, holistic development, and the integration of technology and skill development. However, successful implementation requires dedicated efforts, collaboration among stakeholders, and continuous evaluation to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved.

Conclusion

To summarize, the National Education Policy 2020 is exactly what India needs, as it will expand into the world's largest workforce in the coming years. To fulfill these dreams, we must overcome tremendous execution hurdles over many years and decades. With this, I would want to end my session by quoting Benjamin Disraeli, who stated, 'The key to success is to be ready when your moment comes!' For Indian teachers, the time has come to embrace the opportunity and shape their fate. To do this, we must dream and work hard to reach our goals. Develop and become an informed, enthusiastic, and empowered practitioner. Share our thoughts, and learn by testing and studying. Gain insights from our peers' opinions, attitudes, and experiences as well. Enjoy our journey by establishing beautiful relationships with generations of learners who transition via you and continue to study for the rest of their lives. 

References
  1. Anderson, J., & Lightfoot, A. (2019). The school education system in India: An Overview. British Council of India; New Delhi.
  2. Bele, D. M. (2023). National Education Policy 2020: Challenges & Opportunities in Higher               Education in India. International Journal of Humanities Social Science and       Management (IJHSSM), 3(1), 205-207.  https://ijhssm.org/issue_dcp/National%20Education%20Policy%202020%20Challenges%20and%20Opportunities%20in%20Higher%20Education%20in%20India.pdf
  3. Jatav, V. K. (2023). A Study of NEP -2020: Challenges of New Education Policies. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 5(1), https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i01.1527
  4. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2019-20). All India Survey on Higher Education. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetailm.aspx?PRID=1894517
  5. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy. https://www.education.gov.in/
  6. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2021). Report on Faculty Shortage in Higher Education Institutions. https://www.education.gov.in/
  7. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (Year). National Institutional Ranking              Framework. https://www.nirfindia.org/Home
  8. Ministry of Finance, Government of India. (2020-21). Economic Survey. https://doe.gov.in/
  9. Ministry of Human Resources and Development, Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/uploadfiles/mhrd/files/nep/NEP_Final_English.pdf.
  10. National Informatics Centre. (1986). National Education Policy 1986. https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/nep/npe86.pdf
  11. Prasad, H. (2020). National Education Policy 2020: Major Impact on Your Child’s Curriculum          & Future.Univariety.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375187722_National_Education_Policy_2020_and_Social_Justice
  12. Reddy, P. N. (2021). National Education Policy 2020 - Challenges and Opportunities on the Educational System. International Journal of Science and Research, 10(11), 927-930. https://www.bhumipublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NEP-2020-Challenges-and-Opportunities-1.pdf
  13. Saini, P. (2022). Analysis of NEP 2020 in the Light of NAAC Accreditation: An Analytical Study of Academicians' Opinion. International Journal for Research in Applied Science       and Engineering Technology.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366729290_Analysis_of_NEP_2020_in_the_Light_of_NAAC_Accreditation_An_Analytical_Study_of_Academicians_Opinion
  14. Singh, B. (2020). Opinion: The language conundrum of National Education Policy 2020. ET Government, Economic Times. https://government.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/education/opinion-the language-conundrum-of-national-education-policy-2020/78567174
  15. Smitha, S. (2020). National education policy (NEP) 2020 - opportunities and challenges in teacher education. International Journal of Management, 11(11), 1881-1886. https://iaeme.com/Home/article_id/IJM_11_11_178
  16. Soni, M. (2023). A Literature Survey on National Education Policy 2020 (NEP 2020) and Libraries. Journal of Learning and Educational Policy. https://www.scilit.net/publications/a4464be858133f582311d0363075c3a7
  17. Sutar, D.B. (2024). Libraries and National Education Policy (NEP 2020) of India in higher education. Library Hi Tech News, 41(7). 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2024-0085
  18. Sweta, K. (2024). A Review of NEP 2020 and Autonomy in Higher Education in India. (2024). MSW Management Journal, 34(1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.7492/gwtdk559
  19. University Grants Commission (UGC). (2018). Report on Curriculum Revision in Indian   Universities. https://www.ugc.gov.in/page/UGC-Guidelines-2018.aspx
  20. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Global Innovation Index. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4571