Research Substance
ISBN: 978-93-93166-22-7
For verification of this chapter, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/books.php#8

The Ballad of the Reading Gaol: An Analysis

 Dr. Vartika Raj
Associate Professor
English
Jwala Devi V.M. P.G. College
Kanpur  Uttar Pradesh 

DOI:
Chapter ID: 16282
This is an open-access book section/chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            T.S. Eliot in his ‘Tradition and Individual Talent’, remarks, “Criticism is as inevitable as breathing”. No sooner does a man experiences a thought than he realizes the contradictory to be true. One finds somewhat same tendency in the Victorian Era, which is loaded with enormous creative activity. The age was primarily dominated by the three faculties of History, Philosophy, and Science (Reason). The growing tendency of development in the field of Science, the publication of Darwin’s Origin of Species shook the faith of the people in Religion as these developments suggested the ‘existentialist’ attitude which was being adopted by these men of ‘Reason’. The establishment of Science as a curriculum forced the writers to identify themselves with one of these faculties. There were poets like Browning who not only hopefully awaited a better future but were also deeply affirmative of these scientific developments. Poets like Arnold, on the other extreme, became pessimistic as they could not even dream of a life which was devoid of their God; to them science was replacing man’s faith in God and they foresaw something hazardous as men was trying to peep into the most intricate aspect of God which he himself  just have hidden. However, there was a third kind also; poets like Tennyson, one of the most representative poets, accepted science and religion after coupling them together. Besides this broad division, there were still left certain writers for whom the choice was very difficult. Standing at the crossroads, they were unable to decide which way to go and kept looking for a mid-way solution throughout their lives.

            Oscar Wilde belongs to that group of writers who were unsure of what they themselves felt. This was one reason why Wilde’s works have been so underrated as well as over-praised. In his Introduction to Oscar Wilde’s Plays, Writings, and Poems, Hesketh Pearson remarks : “In his own life reveals that Wilde was betraying himself as he himself said, “. . . get as much pleasure out of life as possible, most important thing is to enjoy yourself.” It will certainly not be wrong to suggest that Wilde projected himself into his characters. The dilemma in Dorian Gray, his narcissism, his hedonistic belief that one should aim at complete consummation and it was for this this reason that He had gifted man with such fine senses as it was the only way to salvation: God himself wanted man to indulge in ultimate consummation as it was for this reason that He has gifted man with such fine senses, are nothing else but a deep echo of Wilde’s own feelings, perceptions, and personality. Wilde betrayed himself by identifying with ‘Judas’ as well as with ‘Christ’, Judas betrayed Christ after kissing him. For this reason he quite often uses the words ‘kiss’ and ‘kill’ synonymously, He knew that his consummation in life would kill ‘the things he loves’. (It was reported by Wilde’s friends that he had constructed syphilis from a female prostitute at the age of twenty.) Yet not being able to refrain himself from consummation which was the first and foremost thing God wanted out of men, he went on killing all he loved and he hid himself under hedonism. He was a Christ inside as he was sacrificing all that he loved but his hedonistic attitude was ‘Judas’ which betrayed his inner Christ by indulging in sensual pleasures. In fact, it seems that History, Philosophy, and reason of the victorian age were represented himself. He killed the man within himself by elevating himself to the level of a ‘martyr’ and a ‘Christ’and by sacrificing all that he loved.

            It should, however, be pointed out that such a complex nature which Oscar Wilde acquired was not only the product of the social and intellectual of the age in which he lived  but also a precipitate of his own personal life right from the time he was a child. Born on October 16, 1854, at twenty one, westland Row, Dublin, he was the second son in the Wilde’s family. His father was a famous oculist, father of modern Otology, a scientist of high reputation, but his love affairs eventually bought him into the law court, from where he emerged with a somewhat tarnished reputation. Wilde’s mother, a big woman, a writer who wrote under a pseudonym Speranza, who in her time tried to persuade her countrymen to storm Dublin Castle, got into matrimonial alliance only as a temporary break from her busy, and seditions political life. By the time she brought forth her sons, William and Oscar, she became a weak in strength but firm in determination kind of a woman. She projected her image onto her sons and had a firm belief that they would fulfill her unaccomplished. Oscar, who was the quicker of the two brothers as regards their intelligence, understanding, reason and logic was a favourite of his mother. This, however, was a drawback as his mother not only encouraged him for doing things her way but also projected an image of grown-up ‘Wilde’ which was perfect; a task at which Wilde failed but convinced himself of his success by elevating him to the role of Christ. Isola, Wilde’s youngest sister and the family’s sunshine was the only source of inspiration in whom Wilde found some form of relief from the bad reputation his father had earned for the family and his mother’s dominating role.But as his life for Wilde would have had it, Isola leaft for heavenly abode at the time when she was nine and Wilde was only twelve.  Isola had been a much longed-for girl child after two sons, and, therefore, she was literally worshipped by the family. Many Critics have attributed Wilde’s poems like Requiescat, Harlot’s House, etc, to have been composed in the memory of Isola

            Melissa Knox in her book “Oscar Wilde – A Long and Loving Suicide,” remarks, “Though a number of erotically charged poems concerning young girls and, often, their deaths, such as ‘Charmides’, ‘Madonna-Mia’, ‘The Burden of Itys’and ‘The Dole of the King’s Daughter’, Wilde expresses obsessive erotic fantasies about his sister.  He reveals not just that he had incestuous desires but he that he found her behaviour seductive,”

As has already been discussed, Wilde’s parents were so preoccupied with other things that they hardly had enough time to look after their children. To add to the misery of the  house, Mary Travers, a dismissed lover of Dr. Wilde also started harassing the family. To check her from troubling the family, Wilde’s mother ‘Speranza’ wrote a letter to Mary’s father which the latter stole form her father’s drawer and sued a libel against Speranza.

Although Mary won the case, the Wilde’s had to meet the high costs of the court as a result of which the family condition further deteriorated and was on the verge of bankruptcy.

            Melissa Knox further remarks, “In a home dominated by such parents the increasingly tender and fateful attachment between Oscar and Isola blossomed. When he died, a curiously decorated envelope containing a lock of her hair was found in his possession. On it is written ‘She is not dead but sleepeth’ The drawing on the envelope, on which he inscribed ‘My Isola’s hair’, seems to indicate a fantasy of being united in the grave with her. Above the inscription are two wreaths linked by a garland. One wreath surrounds an initial ‘O’ for Oscar the other ‘I’ for Isola. On either side of the inscription are identical graves, each bearing a cross with letters I and O written on either side, in mirror image of the other. The final lines of 'Requiescat’:

               All my life’s buried here,

               Heap earth on it.

                            sum up the meaning of the artwork on the envelope.

            Wilde’s innumerable affairs with  young men like Robert Ross, Alfred Douglas (Bosie). And others earned him the reputation of a homosexual male. Alfred Douglas himself was a shamelessly promiscuous homosexual. In particular Wilde’s relationship with Alfred Duoglas was a source of great inspiration as he himself mentioned in one of his letters to him–

“As for you , you have given me the beauty of life in the past, and in the future if there is any future. That is why I shall be eternally grateful to you for having always inspired me with adoration and love. Those days of pleasure were our dawn. Now, in anguish and pain, in grief and humiliation, I feel that my love for you, your love for me, are the two signs of my life, the divine sentiments which made all bitterness bearable. Never has anyone in my life been dearer than you, never has any love been greater, more sacred, more beautiful.”

                         ‘The two signs of Oscar’s life have been none other than those inscribed on the envelope containing Isola’s lock of hair. It is evident from his letter that he assigned a similar place to Bosie as he did to Isola. He was trying to bring Isola back to life in the form of Bosie as he himself says in The Picture of Dorian Gray: “Romance lives by repition. . . Each time that one loves is the only time he has ever loved . . . . We can have in life but onegreat experience as often as possible.”

            It was Wilde’s intimacy with Bosie that led the latter’s father, Marquess of Queensberry accuse Wilde of posing as a sodomite. In the year 1895, Wilde sued him for his libel but lost the case after two trials. On being found guilty of ‘indecent acts’, Wilde was sentenced to two years of hard labour and was imprisoned in Pentonville, later transferred to Wandsworth and Reading prisons. After his release from Reading Gaol on May 09, 1897 he went to Berneval and started writing The Ballad of Reading Gaol (published 1898). Wilde owes much to Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”as far as the form of the ballad and its depiction of the supernatural are concerned.

            Wilde found a life in each of his affairs and consequently he had to die each time the affair broke. He himself acknowledges the fact that:

For he who lives more lives than one

More deaths than one must die.

Rewording the Shakespearean philosophy (Julius Caesar. II. ii. 32-33)

Cowards die many  before their death:

The valiant never taste of death but once.

Moreover, though Wilde believed that ‘Each man kills the things he loves’, he added that their ways may differ. The’coward does it with a kiss, The brave with a sword.’ Wilde accepts that he was a coward as he himself had been killing ‘the things he loved’ by kissing them and the perpetual fear of being damned for the act haunted him throughout his life. However, he kept on consoling himself by reminding himself that he was not ‘Judas’ but ‘Christ’ as he was not killing all he loved but was sacrificing all that he loved. It was his incestuous desire for Isola which he felt because the causeof the latter’s death, and each time he tried to live this feelings with others, he killed her for another time:

“For he who sins a second time

Wakes a dead soul to pain.”

            His guilt and escape from it in the role of a ‘martyr’or a ‘Christ’ are the two things that become predominanteven in this poem. The ballad may be suitably divided into two parts– in the first part Wilde expresses the fear of  the impending doom that he or his fellow-prisoners experinced;in the second part he discards his fear convincing him that man’s grim justice goes its way slaying the weak as well as the strong but Christ forever acts as Savior.

            The hard labour to which Wilde was subjected does not seem to have changed his belief; on the contrary it only strengthened his hedonism. Wilde must have recieved confirmation for the twin role which he had adopted.Being Judas in the eyes of the people, he had to become one with the other ‘souls in pain’ and like Christ he also suffer and be humiliated at the hands of the ignorant. It appears that Wilde was not content in confining himself the task of a narrator, he steps further and instead of presenting himself merely as a spectator or a fellow prisoner, he identifies himself completely with the suffering of ‘That fellow’ who’s ‘got to swing’. In fact Wilde had given release to his own pent up emotions and feelings by giving life to a character who could show his sufferings on Wilde’s behalf, Wilde is not only the narrator but also the narrated.

            The Wildean dilemma can be noticed as expressed in these lines:

For none can tell to what red Hell

               His sightless soul may stray.

For we did not need, in the holy night,

               But in the shameful day

The world had thrust us from its heart,

               And God from out his care.

            Through the prisoner walked with ‘a step light and gay’, being sure of his innocence; yet there is a feeling of uncertainty whether he would prove innocent in the eyes of God. Wilde, similarly. Could argue that he has been right and innocent throughout his life somewhere inside he was perpetually troubled:

And wondered if each one of us

Would end the self-same way/

            The lack of feeling in man to experience the sufferings of others is beautifully portrayed in these lines:

The Goverrnor was strong upon

               The Regulations Act

The Doctor said that Death was but

               A scientific fact:

And twice a day the Chaplain called,

               And left a little tract.

            Though Wilde and his fellow prisoners were put to hard labour,

We sewed the sacks, we broke the stone,

               ‘We turned the dusty drill:

We banged the tins, and bawled the hymns,

               And sweated on the mill

            They could not, even for a moment forget the impending doom:

But in the heart of every man

               Terror was lying still.