Abstract
Uttar
Pradesh, as well as India patterns are noted in the development of the
micro-finance programme utilizing secondary details. The analysis of secondary
data showed that the scheme, as regards its customer outreach, has quickly
spread in India, and is already the largest microfinance programme in the
world. NABARD's SHG-bank linkage model represents over 75% of the country's
overall microfinance customers, a large number in the whole country. In this
model, loans are made available to SHGs through the network of different
commercial private and public banks, rural regional banks and cooperative
banks. As regards the amount of SHGs that these private, provincial rural and
cooperative banks fund in India, the overall share is 55%, 31% and 14%
respectively. Some issues with this software have been identified in India.
These concerns limit in different forms the effects of microfinance. One of the
main problems is that the curriculum is not sufficiently wide. About 60 million
citizens in India have been insured by microfinance, but these are just 22 per
cent of the country's overall poor. Just 1,16,545 microfinance customers live
in Uttar Pradesh. The microfinance programme in Uttar Pradesh is therefore just
0.20% and the program's penetration in population and in poverty is very poor.
Another significant issue with microfinance in India is that the microfinance
programme is not widely distributed. The main focus of the paper is to know the
role of micro finance with SLF in poverty.
Key Words: Microfinance Poverty Penetration Index (MPPI), National Capital Region (NCR),
Self Help Groups (SHGs), HCI (Headcount index), Microfinance Programme.
I. Introduction
Microfinance
is described as any hobby consisting in providing economic business, including
credit, financial savings and coverage to low-income people just above the
nationally determined poverty line and negative people below that poverty line.
to achieve a social price. The advent of the social prize consists of poverty
alleviation and the broader impact of improving livelihoods through the
provision of capital for micro-enterprises, and coverage and financial savings
to mitigate threats and smooth absorption. In India, numerous sectors offer
microfinance using a range of microfinance methods. From the ICICI Bank in
India, numerous actors have endeavoured to provide access to economic offers up
to and including rejection in innovative ways.
Governments
have also launched pilot programs across the country, NGOs have taken up the
hobby of raising donor funds to make loans, and some banks have partnered with
public groups or made small strides in submitting such offers. This has led to
a changing broad definition of microfinance as any hobby aimed at negative and
low-income people in order to offer cheap deals. The variety of sports done in
microfinance consists of institutional loans,
loans for men or women, offering financial savings and coverage, and capacity
building. , and farm improvement offers. Regardless of the form of However, the
general purpose that unites all actors in the delivery of microfinance is the
introduction of the social price.
I (a) Microfinance
Meaning
Muhammad Yunus is frequently taken into consideration the father of
microfinance. In 2006, he received the Nobel Prize for his "efforts thru microcredit
to create monetary and social improvement from below." In this TED talk, Yunus
describes his revel in with microfinance. Microfinance is a banking provider furnished to
unemployed or low-profits people or businesses who in any other
case could haven't any different get entry to monetary services. Microfinance permits humans to tackle affordable small commercial enterprise loans safely, and in a way this is steady with moral lending practices Microfinance consists of
microcredit, the supply of small loans to terrible clients; financial savings and checking accounts;
microinsurance and price systems, amongst different services.
I
(b) Impact of Microfinance on Poverty
Two separate processes have been used to evaluate wage changes. In the primary
procedure, the contributors' earning are as compared with the earning of the equal contributors after coming
into the microfinance program (post-SHG) (pre-SHG), in the 2nd procedure,
the contributors' earning are as compared with the ones of non-contributors for the reason that they entered the microfinance venture have occurred. It changed into observed that the earnings of the contributors has extended 2.five instances for the reason that they joined
the microfinance venture. The overall person earnings of the contributors for the month after SHG is Rs 725 as compared to Rs
718 for the month earlier than SHG. A contrast among contributors and non-contributors indicates that the common earnings of the contributors is 2.00. Seven instances greater than the common earnings of non-contributors. Non-contributors have a median month-to-month earnings of simply Rs 638 as compared to Rs
725 in keeping with month for contributors. This enabled contributors to boom their contribution to family earnings via the
microfinance program. Total studying for collaborating families in Uttar Pradesh is Rs five,905 in keeping with month probable earlier than SHG and
Rs 6,912 in months after SHG. This suggests a month-to-month development of
Rs.1007. For example, family earnings in Uttar Pradesh extended via way of means of 17% after coming into the
microfinance software. The difference additionally indicates that the earnings of collaborating families is 18% better than that of non-collaborating families. and
the own circle of relatives earnings of software contributors extended thanks to the microfinance software. SHGs have been divided into 3 companies primarily based totally on organization age to
estimate the effect of pattern adulthood on player earnings. These 3 lessons are referred to as Youth (under three years), Intermediate (three to six) and Adult (three to six years and over) lessons.
In
comparison with previous SHGs the total rise in income in young classes was Rs.
625 per month, in medium ages 924 per month, and in maturity in groups of
participants Rs. 1745 per month. Therefore, the addition of income increases as
the group reaches maturity over the years. Study of the methodology of variance
reveals that the variance is significant at a stage of one per cent. The growth
in revenue is attributed largely to the reality that the participants of a
mature community take advantage of repeated loans in income-generating
operations.
For
the BPL families, the influence of the microfinance initiative was individually
evaluated. In order to classify the BPL families, the absolute poverty line
established by the Uttar Pradesh government at Rs 2500 per month per Family has
been used. It was observed that very fewer participants in the BPL Family were
chosen when the SHGs had been created. Just 19 percent of Family participating
in Uttar Pradesh are BPL, while the other 81 percent are over the poor, as identified
in the poverty line. Both BPL Family were prevented from crossing the poverty
line after profit from the initiative and nine percent of the overall Family
were still BPL. The study indicates that the income growth of these poor people
is only 13%, and just 12% of their loans were used for production. This may be
because the salary of these disadvantaged citizens was considerably smaller,
and the loans were used for consumption and to satisfy other specific and
urgent needs. The other 10% of BPL Family used 66% of their loans for positive
reasons and reached the poverty line with a 63% rise in their income when they
completed the initiative. These deprived Family are the main microfinance
beneficiaries. It has thus been shown that families with very poor incomes that
are far below the poverty line could not cross the poverty line.
I (c) Influence of
Micro-finance on empowerment of women
The microfinance
programme has been shown to improve beneficiaries' economic opportunities that
assist them in obtaining and managing domestic economic capital, such as home
ownership, land ownership of gold and jewelry. This changes the status of women
altogether; they get financially independent; and they participate in each of
their family's financial decisions. Microfinance programme increases women's
status from a mere customer to a producer and from economic to an independent.
When women continue to contribute to Family revenue, the study indicates that
they take part in different Family decisions, such as planning of Family
budgets, making small and big shopping, selling properties etc. It has been
shown that, relative to 11 percent of non-participants, 21 percent of
participants control Family financial decisions. However, both husband and wife
take Family decisions together in most situations. Members of SHG contribute
regularly to the community savings fund by means of fixed installments. The
habit of thrift and banking is then established. 54% of participants have
deposit accounts with banks, although only 37% of those who have not
participated. 30% of the participants routinely invest money in their savings
bank accounts relative to 18% of the non-participants.
The SHG microfinance
software is a joint project of the community members. The participants discuss
various members of community and often participate in their joint party
sessions with members of other parties. They would be able to come out and
encounter other representatives of community that contribute to socio-cultural
and family liberation from the four walls of their homes. The curriculum
frequently raises the consciousness of participants and their physical
mobility. Program participants became more optimistic than non-participants as
they explore other cities and towns. It was noted that 46 and 79% of
participants are more interested in visiting a city and the closest city than
14 and 69% of non-participants. The participating women who begin their small
businesses would visit the market for the procurement and occasionally even for
the distribution of the raw material. This raises the participants' morale and
can quickly go into the store to buy merchandise. The research indicates that
85% of participants are more interested in visiting and buying products than
71% of non-participants. In this survey, respondents were asked to lift their
voice against societal issues such as dowry, female feticide, addiction to
drugs, inequality, domestic abuse and more. 74% and just 27% of
non-participants are more optimistic that they can raise their voice against
these societal evils. The research indicates that participants' family members
have already been assisting them with their homework. Seventy-three% and 55% of
non-participants showed that their spouses and other family members actively
assist them in many Family jobs. This shows the participants' improved social
and family empowerment.
It was noticed that
the microfinance initiative has contributed to the political empowerment of the
woman participants in addition to the socio-economic empowerment. The effect is
calculated by contrasting the degree of political knowledge and the
participation of programme participants and non-participants in the village's
political activities. The research indicates that the local authority is known
to both participants and non-participants. The research also attempted to
detect the position and decisions made in the village growth of women at
panchayat meetings. The panchayat meetings account for 58% of the delegates,
along with 43% of all non-participants.
II. Literature Review
Rahman (2010) disclosed that most
of the customers in microfinance are women. The analysis also indicates that
geographical position is not a relevant consideration either. It functions in
urban and rural areas. However, the spread of MFIs in Nigeria is impeded by
variables, such as caste, ethnic origin, and political affiliation.
Varghese
(2011)
In Sohar area of the sultanate of Oman,
performed an analytical analysis on motivating women. This observational
research is focused on a collection 150 women which was primary data. This
study assessed the equality of women by defining Family decision making skills,
measuring women's capacity to make economic choices and evaluating women's
freedom of movement. The author notes that women's empowerment, economic,
Family and social, is three dimensional. A female empowering indice has been
calculated according to the UNDP methodology used in the Human Development
Index measurement for each dimension. Finally, the author measured the Women's
Empowerment Index using the basic average of these axis variables (WEI).
Babandi,
G. (2011) In his research, explores the impact of microfinance
institutions in Nigeria on their outreach and sustainability. The thesis
employed 400 samples. Analyzing the data has been done using ANOVA, t-test and
informative statistics. The results of the analysis show that microfinance
programmes include all types of work. Gender in the provision of microfinance
services is also not an important consideration.
Sahoo
(2013)
In the Cuttack District of Odisha, explores
the role and success of HGS in fostering women's empowerment. The thesis was
principal and secondary. 150 women were included in the report as a group.
Sample representatives from 15 SHG groups from ten Cuttack district villages
have been picked. Questions regarding their age, family system and amount of
dependents in family, respectively, were gathered via a questionnaire. Records
of working parties, NGOs and government agencies with the benefit of primary
data are known as secondary data. The study showed that most participants of
the survey will raise their income per month.
Vansiya
(2015)
takes BPL data as calculated by the Government of India's Ministry of Rural
Development. The methodology is focused on 13 socio-economic indicators which
indicate the quality of life and the score of all family. The analysis analyzed
the relative location of various geographical differences in the Tapi district
of Gujarat. Furthermore, there has been a difference in poverty between the
various caste classes, class groups, and their relationship with the
educational level in the Tapitaluka. The report included statistics on the number
of families listed as bad and very poor below the poverty line (BPL). According
to the Gujarat BPL study, the rate of poverty is 38.04%. The number of severe
disadvantaged citizens is 50.53%. The report finds that the BPL in south
Gujarat accounts for 41.43% and that the low intense BPL is 55.57%. 44.82% of
BPL families in the district of Tapi are extremely poverty-stricken and 22.00%
in this family. The overall poor and weak BPL family in the Tapi district has
higher incidences of poverty compared with other districts in southern Gujarat
and Gujarat.
Sayed
Samer Samer (2015) As
an important mechanism for poverty reduction and socio economic growth in
credit markets, microfinance has become a buzzword. However, the effect is also
disputed and differs between countries and between the cities and the
countryside. It aimed to investigate AmanahIkhtiar Malaysia (AIM position)'s in
Family income in the role of Malaysian micro-finance. 780 respondents in
Malaysia were interviewed a cross-sectional poll. Random stratified data
collection from urban and rural neighborhoods was used. A multinomial logistics
result shows the Target has good consequences for the Family revenue of woman
lenders who have invested three years in the programme, relative to fresh
lenders who haven't been cured.
C.
Maindargi Shivganga (2016) In a wider sense, the main problem for a sustainable
micro-finance programme targeted at women must be viewed as a family heart,
essential for society's development and change. The microfinance programme
focuses on empowering women, especially in rural areas, who give their
companies but who also provide them and their families with a competitive
environment. The massive change of family organisation, culture, the economy
and urban life of women across the world over the last three decades has
brought about dramatic transformations. The success and skill of women
influences and builds self-confidence in working conditions in the home.
Microfinance then provided vulnerable women with a stronger forum to explore
their skills and know-how to improve their social empowerment levels This
article illustrates how SHG has affected women's empowerment after membership,
the function and role model of the Self Help Community, the performance of SHG
in Shoapur Region, and how the challenges and future model for developing the
SHG through microfinance in Sholapur city, through increasing the empowerment
of women are acknowledged.
Chatterjee,
Gupta and Upadhyay (2018) on the empowerment of women through SHGs, the writers
elaborate the cause of SHG empowerment in India. This paper was about the
literature of the Indian SHGs. Given the historical history of self help groups
in the Indian context, it is anticipated that scholars who conduct studies in
this field would find it useful. This paper also analysed research on the
empowerment of the self-help community. They also take the view that SHGs
constitute an integral part of India's emancipation.
Jie
Yu Jie Yu (2020) The
micro-credit programme on poverty reduction is one of China's most notable
financial poverty reduction policy in recent years. However, it is
controversial whether this programme would really raise the revenues of poor
family. We studied the process of poverty micro-credit relief in low Family
incomes to assess the enforcement impact of the scheme. The paper then used
micro-survey results for the analytical research using the tool for the
propensity score matching to analyse its impact on these poor family output profits.
The findings demonstrate that microcredit reduction in poverty positively
impacts the income from development of poor homes, including poor people due to
lack of funds and poor families with women. We should also continue the
strategy of micro-credit poverty reduction and establish support mechanisms
that would be important to us, such as strengthening subsidies for agricultural
production, increase insurance for agricultural production, further enhancing
the implementation efficiency of the microcredit mitigation policy, and
increasing Family incomes for poor people.
PK Bhura and AK Jha
(2019)
said in their paper of role of microfinance in eradication of poverty in India:
an Overview that many government and non government organization tried to remove
the poverty form India. Microfinance is one of the key that help in removing
the poverty. Loan facility through microfinance is easy available to the poor
family and they can improve the life standard and make them self reliant.
III. Objectives of the
Study
1.
To understand the connection among SHG’s
members, micro finance banks and entrepreneurs
2.
To
analyze the pattern or structure of microfinance programme in rural Indian by
the MFIs, NBFCs in reduction of poverty.
IV. Research
Methodology
The
current paper would used qualitative and quantitative analysis methods. Data
are both primary and secondary in nature obtained for this analysis. Primary details
was gathered using questionnaires. The secondary data was derived from
different outlets such as newspapers, magazines, official accounts, etc.
IV (a) Study Area
The
most populous state in India is Uttar Pradesh. The Taj Mahal is one of the
seven wonders of the world. Uttar Pradesh was one of the most ancient countries
in the world and represents India's life and community in any way. The
government is split into four economic zones, namely the Western, Central,
Eastern, and Bundlekhand regions. The condition is between 24°-31°N latitude
and 77°-84°E longitude. In a wise way, it is India's fourth largest county.
Three quarters of the state are in the Gangetic Plain. In 2000, a new state of
Uttar Pradesh was formed, which now covers approximately 7% of the total India
area. Uttar Pradesh's total area is 240,928 km. Uttar Pradesh's density is 829
km and over the national average 382 km."
IV (b) Selection of Sample
In
the third level, 5% of the loan-linked SHGs are chosen in the three districts.
Thus 30, 25 and 9 SHGs are respectively chosen from the districts of Bulandshahr,
Ghaziabad and Meerut. These SHGs shall be taken according to the total number
of the chosen blocks in this block. Three SHG participants will be randomly
chosen and questioned during the last process. Thus, the chosen blocks of Bulandshahr,
Ghaziabad and Meerut respectively for survey.
IV(c) Microfinance
and Frequency of Poverty
The HCI is the maximum extensively hired technique to estimation of poverty frequency. It checks the awful percent of the residents. This
is the percentage of the
population whose sales are below the poverty line of Rs. 2,500 per month in grant
document. The popularity of the BPL player and non-player family may be contained in table 1.1. The table shows that before entering the micro
currency program, all
individuals were no longer BPL. It can be withdrawn from all elected meeting
of the SHG, but now it is no longer necessary to have a poverty line to run a microfinance program.
A well-known study shows that in Bulandshahr, Meerut and Ghaziabad
districts, 18%, 22% and 19% of BPL households are most effectively equipped with microfinance in the study area. As this initiative is targeted, the authorities and
implementing companies therefore also cover all people in need. BPL families are
also not to be included
in the program. Another reason to protect
residents who are less in need could be to avoid grid losses in the event of an outage due to negative repayments of loans from financial institutions. The lack
of a monthly financial
savings decision is another obstacle to designating people with exceptional needs
as community units. In Navajase et al. document
(2000), there is evidence that MFIs favor people above the poverty line.
Table 1.1
BPL Family based on HCI (Numbers with percent)
District
|
Number of Participants and Non-
participants
|
|
Reduction in BPL Family
|
Number
of BPL Family
|
Participants
|
Non-
participants
|
Pre- and Post- SHG
|
Participant and Non- Participant
|
Pre- SHG
|
Post-
SHG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis
|
Analysis
|
Bulandshahr
|
80
|
14 (17)
|
08 (10)
|
14
(17)
|
06 [43]
|
07 [43]
|
Ghaziabad
|
79
|
17 (21)
|
08 (10)
|
18
(23)
|
09 [49]
|
10 [55]
|
Meerut
|
31
|
06 (18)
|
-
|
05
(17)
|
05 [99]
|
05 [99]
|
Uttar
Pradesh
|
190
|
37 (19)
|
16 (08)
|
37
(19)
|
20 [54]
|
21 [56]
|
The pre- and post-SHG evaluation via way of means of programme students exhibits that, earlier than becoming a member of the
microfinance system, 19% of the collaborating Family had been BPLs in
Uttar Pradesh, however that once having access to the advantages of the undertaking they bolstered their monetary fame and the wide
variety of BPL families became decreased to 8%. Thus, the wide variety of BPL families has fallen on common via way of means of 54%. 43% of collaborating BPL families from Bulandshahr and Ghaziabad districts have
reached the poverty line following
their initiative, compared to 99% in Meerut districts.
Table 1.2
Impact of Microfinance Programme on BPL
Change in
Poverty Status from Pre- to Post-SHG
|
Number of
Participants
|
Family
Income in Pre-SHG
|
Family
Income in Post-SHG
|
Difference
in Income
|
Percentage
Increase in Income
|
Bulandshahr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPL to BPL
|
09
|
(11)
|
1,817
|
1,869
|
52
|
2.9
|
BPL to APL
|
07
|
(09)
|
2,159
|
3,719
|
1,560
|
72.3
|
APL to APL
|
64
|
(80)
|
6,378
|
7,305
|
927
|
14.6
|
Total
|
80
|
(100)
|
5,588
|
6,477
|
889
|
15.9
|
Ghaziabad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPL to BPL
|
07
|
(9)
|
1,558
|
1,958
|
400
|
25.7
|
BPL to APL
|
09
|
(11)
|
2,228
|
3,631
|
1,403
|
62.9
|
APL to APL
|
63
|
(80)
|
6,511
|
7,730
|
1,219
|
18.7
|
Total
|
79 (100)
|
5,511
|
6,659
|
1,148
|
20.8
|
Meerut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPL to BPL
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BPL to APL
|
06
|
(20)
|
2,279
|
3,499
|
1,220
|
53.6
|
APL to APL
|
24
|
(80)
|
9,439
|
10,431
|
992
|
10.5
|
Total
|
31 (100)
|
8,059
|
9,089
|
1,030
|
12.8
|
Uttar
Pradesh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPL to BPL
|
16
|
(08)
|
1,699
|
1,921
|
222
|
13.1
|
BPL to APL
|
19
|
(10)
|
2,219
|
3,629
|
1,410
|
63.6
|
APL to APL
|
155
|
(82)
|
6,849
|
7,896
|
1,047
|
15.3
|
Total
|
190
|
(100)
|
5,911
|
6,910
|
999
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
table 1.2 above shows that in their post-SHG condition, several BPL Family
crossed the line of hardship. In post-SHG 9% of the participants reached the
poverty line in Bulandshahr city, 11% in Ghaziabad district, 20% in Meerut
district and 10% of Uttar Pradesh. The wealth of these BPL families indicates
that before they entered the initiative, they were near to the poverty line.
For Bulandshahr, Ghaziabad, Meerut and Uttar Pradesh, the revenue of these BPL family
was 2,159, 2,228, 2,279 and Rs, respectively, 2219 per month. The Microfinance
Scheme has contributed to a large rise in sales and moved it beyond the poverty
line. Wage rises for Bulandshahr, Ghaziabad, Meerut and Uttar Pradesh
respectively are 72.3 percent, 62.9 percent, 53.6 percent and 63.6 percent.
V.
Results and Discussion of the Primary Study
Primary
details from participants and non-participants in the microfinance programme
was compiled for this analysis. Here are the key findings:
1.
The study found that there is strong connection
among SHG’s
members, micro finance banks and entrepreneurs.
2.
The
socio-economic profile of respondents indicates that, in an age ranges between
26 and 40 years, the bulk of participants and non-participants are married
people.
3.
The
majority of respondents are told and fall into the expected groups of castes.
4.
The
respondents' residential status indicates that nearly all are home-owned.
5.
Many respondents have drainage facilities in
their homes, but almost 50% do not have a toilet. 77% and 85% do not own farm
property by the participants and the non-participants.
6.
The
groups of 9 to 20 members in the subject region and 13 members on average in
each party.
7.
Both
participants of the Community save and donate to the Group Saving Fund an
average of Rs. 100 every month.
8.
The
loans are mostly issued by commercial banks and usually divided according to
their individual criteria by community members.
9.
It
was established that only 42.8% of the sample community loans are used for
productive reasons, whereas most of the loans are used for other purposes, such
as usage, building, marriage, Family consumer durables etc.
Bibliography
1.
Meher,
S.(2007), ‘Impact of Micro-Finance on Poverty A study of Self-Help Groups in
Orissa’, Journal of Rural Development, NIRD, Hyderabad, Vol. 26 (3), pp.
315-333.
2. Mehra., R (1997), ‘The
Role Of NGOs: Charity and Empowerment: Women, Empowerment, and Economic
Development’, The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social
Science, Vol. 554, pp. 136-193.
3. Molhotra,
A. and M. Mather (1997), ‘Do Schooling and Work Empower Women in Developing
Countries? Gender and Domestic Decision in Sri Lanka’, Sociological Forum, Vol.
12(4), PP. 559-630.
4.
Moser,
C. and A. Moser (2005), ‘Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: a review of
success and limitations in international institutions’, Gender and Development,
Vol. 13(2), pp. 11-21.
5. Oluseye, M.J. (2017). Microfinance banks:
antidote to poverty alleviation in Nigeria: case study of Ekiti state, Nigeria.
European Journal of Economic and Financial Research, 2(6), 24-34.
6.
Onyele, K.O., &Nwokocha, B.E. (2016). The
relationship between capital flight and poverty: the case of Nigeria.
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and
Rural Development, 16(3), 225-236.
7.
Opara, G.C. (2010). Microfinance banks and
poverty alleviation in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa,
12(6), 177-199.
8.
PK Bhura and AK Jha (2019) Role of
microfinance in eradication of poverty in India: an overview. International
Journal of applied research 2019, 5 (5) pg 313-318
9.
Puskar, S. (2016). A study of impact of
microfinance for poverty alleviation in selected District of Uttar Pradesh.
International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 7(4), 292-299.
10.
Samer, S., Majid, I., Rizal, S., Muhamad, M.,
Halim, S., & Rashid, N. (2015). The impact of microfinance on poverty reduction:
Empirical evidence from Malaysian perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 195, 721-728.
11.
Sohn, W., & Ume, L. (2019). Impact of
microfinance on poverty alleviation: a global analysis. Journal of Economics
and Development Studies, 7(2), 82-102.
12.
Thrikawala, S., Locke, S., & Reddy, K.
(2013). Social performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs): does existing
practice imply a social objective? American Journal of Business and Management,
2(2), 173-180.
13.
Usifoh, K.S., & Ezeanyeji, C.I. (2017).
Impact of microfinance banks on poverty alleviation and economic growth in
Nigeria. NG - Journal of Social Development, 6(5), 22-34.