|
|||||||
Social Media and Online Radicalization- A Case Study of Jammu and Kashmir | |||||||
Paper Id :
16226 Submission Date :
2022-06-18 Acceptance Date :
2022-06-20 Publication Date :
2022-06-23
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/remarking.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
The paper tries to elaborate the role of media and how media has been used as an important channel for communication, which includes building public opinion and setting the agenda. According to the World Economic Forum 2013 report on Global Risks, one of the most interesting and dangerous issues our society faces is the virality of false rumours on the social media platforms that leads to serious digital misinformation. The media, in addition to being a public echo forum and assisting in raising awareness of issues and facilitating public consultation, is also used by government and non-government actors to raise awareness regarding various issues and contribute to public perceptions of the truth. The paper attempts to explain how multimedia in general and social media are used primarily to create public perception and to spread malicious propaganda in Jammu and Kashmir especially after 2013, and how it has impacted the nature of militancy in Kashmir.
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Agenda, Communication, Fake news, Media, Non-state actors, Propaganda, Security. | ||||||
Introduction |
Over the past two decades, the world has focused on terrorism, genocide, weapons of mass destruction (WMD), proliferation, and contagious illnesses. The ways to counter these has become a top priority in the international security agenda; when a state fails to tackle it. The idea describes a phenomenon that was mostly disregarded during most of the time of twentieth century. Scholars, authorities, and pundits alike have pointed to the growing threat that such countries offer not just to their own citizens security, but also to the international community. In the age of globalization, building effective and legitimate states is widely seen as the key to preserving international peace and security, winning the war against global poverty, and advancing justice around the world. Of these factors security considerations have usually been top most priorities in the minds of foreign policy makers. The respected Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington, meanwhile, anticipated “a global breakdown of law and order” triggered by “failed states” . Terrorists being attracted to such poorly governed or ungoverned states in which they can hatch plans without scrutiny; recruit and train without hindrances and raise funds through illicit channels, as is the case with Pakistan. Since 1989, the insurgency has ravaged Jammu and Kashmir, which has long been a breeding ground for separatist demands. Though state failure and democracy were at the basis of the early dissatisfaction, Pakistan played a critical role in transforming it into a well-established insurgency. Some militant organisations in Kashmir desire full independence, while others seek Pakistan's acceptance. In Kashmir, democratic growth was limited until the late 1970s, and by 1988, many of the Indian government's democratic reforms had been overturned, and nonviolent means of expressing discontent were insufficient, leading to a dramatic increase in support for insurgents encouraging violent secession from India.
|
||||||
Objective of study | 1. To elaborate the role of media and how media has been used as an important channel for communication.
2. To examine the role of social media in radicalizing youth in Jammu and Kashmir.
3. To explain how social media is used to spread malicious propaganda in Jammu and Kashmir.
4. To evaluate how social media has impacted the nature of militancy in Kashmir.
5. To evaluated different social media tools used by terrorist groups in Jammu and Kashmir. |
||||||
Review of Literature | The
World Wide Web and the Internet have grown to become a worldwide platform for
collaboration and information exchange, giving users the freedom to access and
share information at anytime, anywhere. On the other hand, the emergence of Web
2.0 and its applications has served as a platform for the expansion of
extremist and terrorist groups on online social networking sites. The
widespread use of the Internet has an influence on our daily lives, either
directly or indirectly. Today's increased sociability, improved connectedness, and
improved communication are all benefits of the Internet. The United
Nations Office on Drugs and Crime was requested in March 2012, as part of its
mandate, to develop specialised legal knowledge in the field of
counterterrorism and to assist requesting Member States with regard to criminal
justice responses to terrorism, including, where appropriate, the use of the
Internet for terrorist purposes. This request followed the General Assembly's
adoption of resolution 66/178 (United Nations, 2020). According
to Cornish (Cornish, 2008) Concerns about how the internet encourages online
radicalization have grown. (Behr et. al., 2013; Sageman, 2008; Weiman 2006;
Dodd,2010) as it gives people the means to radicalise themselves by exposing
them to a constant stream of radical ideas. Social media have become a powerful
tool for online membership recruitment as well as the stimulation of radical
ideas. Al-Qaida, according to (Congress, 2007), promotes domestic terrorism and
frequently uses the internet as a tool for finance raising and propaganda
distribution. Insurgents and terrorists throughout the world have come to rely significantly on cyber mobilisation, which is uniquely suited to efficiently carry out psychological warfare. This may have a significant impact without incurring significant resources. Due to the shutdown of real spaces, people in Kashmir frequently go to the cyber world to express their frustrations, which are then mishandled (Batra, 2020). The ease of sharing has to be reconsidered in light of the type of material shared and produced by terror groups or individuals, and greater checks and balances are required (Shah, 2019). |
||||||
Main Text |
Table1: Local and Foreign Militants Killed in Kashmir Today militancy in Kashmir has moved beyond traditional space
and is actively using modern means like social media to spread their
propaganda.With the increased use of the internet and increased global connectivity,
social media has become a double-edged sword.Terrorist organisations are
increasingly efficiently using the same social media channels that have become
one of the most popular communication tools. It is not a new tool for terror
groups to spread propaganda[1],
also there are several factors that have led to increasing attraction of social
media as platform for modern terrorists: Source: Official data collected from news reports(up to 2020). Social Media: An in Expensive Recruitment Tool In today's world of globalizing, social media has such a wide reach that it appears to be a ticking time bomb for everyone. It has contributed significantly in the rise of unrest and violence in the Jammu & Kashmir region. In this regard, the death of Hizbul Commander BurhanWani, who was killed in a security operation in July 2016, is the best example. His death had sparked months of upheaval in Kashmir valley[5].Social media had made him as an ideal poster boy for Kashmiri youths. Now day’ssocial media has given militants a space to directly convey their propaganda to youths in Kashmir, militants are not hiding their identity/image because social media has become an easy available platform for them to spread their ideology and recruit youths through it. They are now no longer faceless. As now militant post images with ammunition (e.g. gun) across their body and post such content on social media to get publicity, that too somewhere sitting in remote forest area. Besides this a new trend has been started by militants in Kashmir, whenever someone joins militancy announcements are made through social media, which has definitely a great impact on young minds of Kashmir.BurhanWani was first who successfully struck chord with people through social media and attracted youngsters, newer militants are trying out the same. People get to know about themthrough videos and pictures; they post on social networking sites.In this modern era militants are not only using physical strength but they also infiltrate in your computers and mobile phones which are quite different from the militancy of the 1990s, when there were no such technologies. Due to the innovation in the technology people are in real time able to spread any event that takes part like few examples like Stone-pelting protester shoot videos of clashes of them with forces and upload them onto social media instantly.Following a confrontation near an encounter site in Kulgam in February, many similar videos were widely disseminated on social media[6]. Attempting to demonstrate how forces were purportedly shooting at protestors and "killing Kashmiris," the videos captured a few terrible moments from the fighting that occurred and added some doctored footage to it, spreading like a fire and unrest in the region was been witnessed.Another was in April 2019; a video came in which groups of Kashmiri youth were heckling the security forces who were returning from the duty from Srinagar on April 9 which has bring about in a huge outrage from all over the India. The video was always been admired for the tolerant capacities of the soldiers. However, a video showing forces using a teenage boy as a human shield against stone-pelters on by-poll day in Srinagar. The security forces were accused for brutality and human rights abuse on civilians. The idea that without internet access valley would be free of street protests was thwarted when both mobile and internet services were seized across Kashmir for by-elections in the Srinagar region - militants shot dead eight protesters that day. Although police officials argued that with the use of the Internet, the level of violence could be higher. So, forces were able to tackle the outrage of violence but it wasn’t that effective then what they thought to be the social media ban turned out to be animmense failure. As many internet users in the region had switched to Virtual Private Network (VPN) apps to overcome the ban, which was a big surprise for the government as many Kashmiris were all leading a busy social media life throughout the ban which wasn’t thought by the government and was a big setback for them. The state had lost both the battles offline and online as they were unable to stop the spreading of the rumor and false news related to ill treatment towards Kashmiris and their presence in the region[7]. Source: ORF Kashmir Tracker, Observer Research Foundation, October 2018. Internet usage in Jammu and Kashmir was higher than the average
of rest of India. There were around 28.62 internet subscribers per 100
populations in the state compared to the all-India figure of 25.37[8]. On the
recommendation of security services, the government appears to be overly
cautious in restricting the use of social media networks such as Facebook,
WhatsApp, Twitter, and Instagram. From the past experience of some minor
incident of instigating the people, has led to the deterioration of law and
order on the ground. Be it the killing of the militant commander, BurhanWani,
or the Amarnath land row. So militant use social sites to trickle the emotion
and belief of youths and try them to adapt their ideology or way of life they
have adopted. There are also various local WhatsApp groups like Pulwamatigers,
whichwere later taken down, formed to create unrest and disruption during
search and cordon operations or even whenever militants got trapped.
|
||||||
Conclusion |
The most effective weapon of the new militancy has emerged as social media. Militants no longer rely on the traditional press, as they did in the 1990s, to gain column space in the press through intimidation. Militants have moved beyond traditional space today, with hundreds of thousands of images and videos of militancy being shared on social media sites every day. New content is frequently encrypted through platforms like Telegram and WhatsApp, such as militant’s dying statements; their last phone call conversations with friends, family, or even with security officials; videos of training in the jungles of South Kashmir; selfies showing camaraderie among the cadre; and pictures of militants playing cricket in the open fields of the Valley. Such content is used by militants to inspire the young Kashmiris to join militancy as the content is mostly consumed by youth because of their greater presence on such platforms.
Internet shutdowns have become common in the valley as part of counter terrorist strategy, as a means of curbing down on propaganda and spread of false and fabricated news. Aside from the security situation on the ground, there are clear gaps in how the state, social media sites, and citizens deal with extremist and violent content online. Furthermore, the state has no policy in place to combat extremist and radical messaging on the internet, other than reporting it to social media companies and waiting for them to take it down. However, the greater problem is not solved by deletion of a few websites or videos, as the content is going quickly viral and videos are downloaded almost instantly.
There could be possible halt in militant recruitment through internet shutdown policy by the government in the valley as the militant groups were not be been able to effectively drive their propaganda as they use to do before. Militant groups, on the other hand has restart their activities on social media the moment the government decides to restore internet service, and will use social media for propaganda and communications. Some reports have even suggested that to overcome restrictions placed by government, militants are even using satellite phones. This means that, while the group’s outreach to the general public may be impacted to some extent by internet shutdown but intergroup communications could be continuing. Militancy will remain resilient in J&K as long as terror groups have local legitimacy, prolonging the conflict[12]. |
||||||
References | 1. Herman, Edward S, and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books, 1988.
2. Foley, M.F. (2010), “Facing social media's growing impact on politics” available at: http://articles.philly.com/2013-04-06/news/38329652_1/social-media-facebook-pagefox-news ( 27 July 2013).
3. India Mobile Association of India (2013) Research report “Internet in India 2013” available at: www.iamai.in ( 11 August 2013).
4. Tabrez Ahmad Neyazi . “Social media and political polarization in India”.
5. Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., & Cho, J. 2016. The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4): 1071–1087.
6. Alarifi, A., Alsaleh, M., & Al-Salman, A. M. 2016. Twitter Turing test: Identifying social machines. Information Sciences, 372: 332–346.
7. Aricat, R. G. 2015. Mobile/Social Media Use for Political Purposes among Migrant Laborers in Singapore. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 12(1): 18–36.
8. Barclay, F. P., Pichandy, C., Venkat, A., & Sudhakaran, S. 2015. India 2014: Facebook “Like” as a Predictor of Election Outcomes. Asian Journal of Political Science, 5377(March): 1–27.
9. Bimber, B. 2014. Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the personalized political communication environment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2): 130–150.
10. Navigating an uncertain world. (2020, September 14). India Today.
11. Batra, K. (2020). Jihadist Radicalisation in Kashmir : an analysis of casual factors. centre for land warfare studies.
12. Bhattacharya, J. (2020). Ties that Bind: India and Southeast Asia Connectivitie. Association for Asian Studies.
13. Flint, C. (2006). Introduction to Geopolitics. Routledge.
14. Haokip, T. (2011). India’s Look East Policy: Its Evolution and Approach. South Asian Survey.
15. Malone, D. M. (2011). Does the Elephant Dance? Contemporary Indian Foreign Policy. Oxford University Press.
16. Mehrotra, L. (2012). India's Look East Policy: Its Origin and Development. Indian Foreign Affair Journal, 75-85.
17. Saha, A. (2017, July 07). (July 07 2017 ) 'Let’s talk about Kashmir: Social media has been a game changer, and militants have a head start', Hindustan Times. India.
18. Scholvin, S. (2016). GEOPOLITICS AN OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTS AND EMPIRICAL EXAMPLES. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
19. Senagupta, J. (2017). India’s cultural and civilisational influence on Southeast Asia. 0RF.
20. Shah, K. T. (2019). The Conflict in Jammu and Kashmir and the Convergence of Technology and Terrorism. RUSI.
21. Tan Tai Yong, S. C. (2009). The Evolution of India–ASEAN Relations. India Review, 20-42.
22. United Nations, U. (2020). Countering the Use of the Internet for Terrorist Purposes. united nations.
23. Yahya, F. (2003). India and Southeast Asia: Revisited. Contemporary Southeast Asia.
|
||||||
Endnote | 1. Khalid Shah, "Kashmir Conflict: Making of Child Soldiers like Burhan Wani in the Time of Social Media", The Print, 2019, p. 5 <https://theprint.in/opinion/kashmir-conflict-making-of-child-soldiers-like-burhan-wani-in-the-time-of-social-media/183241/> [Accessed 24 November 2019]. 2. Jason Bruke, “Kashmir Conflict ebbs as New wave of Militant Emerges”, The Guardian, 2013, available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/11/kashmir-conflict-new-wave-militantats accessed on 8 December 2019. 3. ET Bureau, "Behind the Information Curtain: Kashmir Has Learnt To Work around Social Media Ban", 2020, p. 7. 4. The Indian Express, "Kulgam Encounter: Five Militants Killed; 8 Civilians, 4 CRPF Officers Injured in Clashes", 2019, p. 1 <https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kulgam-encounter-live-updates-jammu-and-kashmir-5576953/> [Accessed 7 November 2019]. 5. Kabir Taneja and Kriti Shah, Global Research Network on Terrorism and Technology, The Conflict in Jammu And Kashmir And The Convergence Of Technology And Terrorism (Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2019), p. 11 <https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/20190807_grntt_paper_11.pdf> [Accessed 6 February 2020]. 6. Khalid Shah, Ideological Shift, Public Support and Social Media: The ‘New’ In Kashmir’s ‘New Militancy (New Delhi: ORF, 2020). 7. Rahul Tripathi, "The Official Twitter Account Of Hafiz Saeed Suspended", The Economic Times, 2016, p. 1 <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/the-official-twitter-account-of-hafiz-saeed-suspended/printarticle/53207063.cms> [Accessed 9 November 2019]. 8. Ayjaz Wani, Life in Kashmir after Article 370 (New Delhi: ORF, 2020), pp. 1-6 <https://www.orfonline.org/research/life-in-kashmir-after-article-370-60785> [Accessed 15 February 2020]. 9. "Revocation of the Special Status of Jammu and Kashmir", Wikipedia (Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopaedia, 2020). 10. Basharat Reshi, "Changing Nature of Insurgency in Kashmir: Its Impact on the Kashmiri Cause of Self-Determination with Special References to 2008 And 2010 Agitations", European Academic Research, 2.11 (2015), 13 <https://doi.org/2286-4822>. |