P: ISSN No. 2394-0344 RNI No.  UPBIL/2016/67980 VOL.- VII , ISSUE- VI September  - 2022
E: ISSN No. 2455-0817 Remarking An Analisation
Understanding Disability as Social Problem and Analyzing Legislative Measures
Paper Id :  16403   Submission Date :  2022-09-09   Acceptance Date :  2022-09-12   Publication Date :  2022-09-16
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/remarking.php#8
Sansar Chand
Research Scholar
Social Work
Central University Of Himachal Pradesh
Dehra,H.P., India,
Shveta Sharma
Assistant Professor
Social Work
Central University Of Himachal Pradesh
Dehra, H.P., India
Sankita Sharma
Research Scholar
Social Work
Central University of Himachal Pradesh
Dehra, H.P., India
Abstract
This paper attempts to study and analyze the social construct of disability and legislative actions taken by the government from time to time for the welfare of differently-abled Persons. This research was mixed method research and based on secondary sources of data collection. While analyzing statistical data on employment, education and marital status of differently-abled persons it was found that data is more favorable to differently-abled men as compared to differently-abled women. While studying the Acts and legislations it was found that many efforts were being made on the part of the government from reserving the seats for differently-abled persons from education to employment and for the promotion of their access to public places various changes were proposed which include the inclusion of ramps and disable friendly infrastructure in public as well as private buildings. Even after the incorporation of the proposed changes still, access is somehow not possible because of the societal attitude from going to school for education, from getting a job to getting into the institution of marriage. They are judged because of their unique ability i.e. disability
Keywords Differently-Abled, Divyangjan, Persons With Disabilities, Disability, Social Construct, Disability Laws.
Introduction
“Disability is part of the human condition. Almost everyone will be temporarily or permanently impaired at some point in life, and those who survive to old age will experience increasing difficulties in functions” (WHO & the World Bank, 2011). The Rights of Persons with Disability (RPwD) Act, 2016 define “Persons with Disability include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others". As per the report of the World Health Organisation (WHO), 2011 about 15% of the total population of the world is differently-abled and according to data from the census 2011 in India, 2.21% of the total population is differently-abled i.e. 26,810,557 out of which 11,824,355 females and 14,986,202 males. Out of the total differently-abled population in India, 69.49% live in rural areas whereas the rest 30.5% live in urban areas. The below mentioned table 1.1 included the data on basis of types of disability in India (find table in the main text). Disability is a body feature, but being a part of society it doesn't remain like a body feature. A differently-abled person is treated differently and discriminated against. His participation in day-to-day activities is restricted due to societal and psychological barriers. Disabilities often come with distress and shame for the family and for the individual itself. Disability mostly occurs as a result of accidents, malnutrition, lifestyle, violence, poverty, and conflicts in the family (Sahu & Sahu, 2015). Disability has become a social construct; it has not remained only the physical problem anymore. Disability is the barrier in the interaction of differently-abled persons with their social environment (Birenbaum, 1979). Every coin has two sides, when it comes to the case of disability then it is not only the individual who is differently-abled but it is also the society that is equally part of the difficulties faced by the differently-abled persons in their life. To understand disability as a social problem, we need to understand disability and how society perceives and responds to people who behave in a way different from societal norms. (Barbara J. Dray, 2008) The social construction of disability reflects the ideas, prejudices and stigma associated with disability within society.
Objective of study
1. To study disability as a social problem in the Indian context. 2. To study and analyse the intersectionality of disability with marriage, education and employment. 3. To trace and review the various legislations measures taken by the government of India for differently-abled persons from time to time.
Review of Literature

Review of Literature is done under two major headings which includes Social Construct of Disability and Legislative Measures implemented for the welfare of differently-abled Persons.

Table 1.1: Population of Differently-abled Persons in India

S.No.

Types of Disability

Males

Females

Persons

1

In Movement

3370374

2066230

5436604

2

In Hearing

2677544

2393463

5071007

3

In Seeing

2638516

2393947

5032463

4

Multiple Disability

1162604

953883

2116487

5

In Speech

1122896

875639

1998535

6

Mental Retardation

870708

634916

1505624

7

Mental Illness

415732

307094

722826

8

Any Other

2727828

2199183

4927011

 

Total

12258374

9625172

21883546

Source: Census of India, 2011
1. Understanding Disability As Social Problem
Disability is a physiological problem but the social interpretation and the stigma attached to it have made it a social problem. When researcher think about the social construction of disability, a very famous quote of Easter Seals comes to my mind which is very true in the current scenario "The worst thing about a Disability is they see it before they see you" (Shreshta, 2021). The participation of differently-abled persons shows the extent of inclusion and exclusion they get from society. The participation depends on the percentage of disability and the person with less percentage of disability merely has more chances of being a part of social gatherings and events whereas the person with a higher percentage of disability is mostly the one who stays inside the house. The negative attitude of this society makes them hesitant to be a part of the social events (Chand & Reddy, 2012).
Karna, G.N.(2001) In this book the researcher has given an in-depth analysis about the understanding of disability in  its interaction with society. As humans are social beings and anything associated with them cannot be studied without studying their interaction with the society. Disability is the body feature of an individual but making it a social phenomenon involves the interaction of differently abled persons with the society. Societal perception about the disabled and disability is reflected by the attitude how they perceive disability and the acceptance they give to differently abled persons. Although changes were observed in the perception of disability from time to time, they are still treated as 'misfits' which can be easily seen. We call them "Differently-abled Persons" as "Person with Disability" which clearly means a person who is disadvantaged and lacking some ability. Disability is most often seen as a similar term of social support or needing help and the person who is disabled is seen as a victim. In many situations, the differently abled person is seen as someone who is dependent on others. But similarly the person who are not differently able are also dependent on others in one or another manner. If we see disability as a natural thing not as a tragedy like the Sex, Hair color, Eye color of an individual. Then, there can be the chances that the differently abled persons are seen as normal human beings but not as somebody who is alien or abnormal. If we start seeing differently abled persons as so-called normal human beings then there will not be any stigma prevailing to the disability and their families will not have to face the situation in which they have to abandon their child because of the society which happens in extreme situations sometimes. If we talk about the cultural practices, disability is seen as a result of sin of previous life which leads to the social stigma and people with disability are seen with sympathetic eyes; they are mostly referred to as bechara.
Mehrotra (2006) revealed in her study that marital status varies with extent and type of disability. The life of differently abled women becomes tough after getting married. She is supposed to perform all the roles and responsibilities of a daughter in law even if she is incapable of that. Women with impairments are expected to take care of all domestic duties, engage in sexual activity, and give birth, especially after marriage. In terms of physical and mental problems, women with disabilities do not receive any special attention. Disability is not seen as something that necessitates particular assistance and care in rural life. This study shows marriage is not an easy way to live life for differently abled women. She is ill-treated within the sphere where she has come with the expectations of great love, care and affection. Marriage is not a fairytale for differently abled women.
Gupta & Mishra (2006) have tried to study and analyze the pathetic situation in which the differently abled persons in India are living. For this purpose, they have conducted a study in different states of India and used the disability index for measuring the exclusion being faced by the differently abled persons. After the complete analysis of the whole situation they have found that the condition in which the differently abled persons are living was not favorable for them to live. The government is making efforts but the services provided by them are limited and the major portion of differently able persons is still deprived of basic needs like education, employment and skill development.
D’Mello et al. (2017) attempted to study the psychosocial problems which are being faced by differently-abled persons. In the study, it was found that differently-abled persons want to be independent and perform their tasks by themselves. But the attitude of the society makes them feel alien which is one of the main reasons they feel discriminated and unwanted being part of the society. It is important on the part of society to have a positive attitude towards the differently-abled persons. They need to feel normal being part of the social gatherings. It is the change in the attitude of the society which can help in the inclusion of differently-abled persons in the mainstream of the social and cultural events of society.
Sivanandan (2018) in his article describes that marriage is a challenge for differently abled persons. The marital status of differently abled persons was studied and it was studied through the analysis of the census data 2011. It was found that the people who have mental illness and also related disabilities have more chances of separation. The differently abled persons who went to the relationship of marriage and getting divorced or separated are higher than the unmarried differently abled persons. The proportion of separated or divorced differently abled males are comparatively lesser than that of the differently abled females. This shows the double discrimination of differently abled women in the relationship of marriage.

Main Text

1.1 Intersectionality of Disability with Education, Marriage and Employment

If we are discussing the social construction of disability, it can be best studied by seeing the participation of the differently-abled persons in the social institutions which include Family, Marriage, Education and the Economy. Below mention Figure 1.1 represent the Education status, Figure 1.2 represent the Marital Status and Figure 1.3 represent the Employment Status of differently-abled persons in India.

Source: Census of India, 2011

As per the Census of India (2011),  121,96,641 (43.48%) of the total population of  differently-abled persons are Illiterate in India which includes 65,56,401 (53.75%) females and 56,40,240 (46.24%) are males, and 146,18,353 (54.51%)  of the total are literate which includes 52,70,000 (36.05%) are females and 93,48,353 (64.94%) are males.

Out the total literate persons, 12,46,857 (4.64%) are graduated and above which includes 4,07,155 (32.65%) are females and 8,39,702 (67.34%) are males, 34,48,650 (12.86%) persons completed their matric or secondary which constitutes 11,18,570 (32.43%) are females and 23,30,080 (67.56%) are males, 24,48,070 (9.12%) persons are middle pass which includes 8,31,531 (33.96%) are females and 16,16,539 (66.03%) are males. 35,54,858 (13.25%) were completed their primary education which constitutes 13,58,925 (38.22%) females and 21,95,933 (61.77%) males and the 28,40,345 (10.59%) persons are literate but below primary education which includes 11,33,904 (39.92%) females and 17,06,441(60.07%)  males. From the above-mentioned data, the researcher can easily draw the conclusion that the literacy rate of women or females is less as compared to men or males whether in higher education or in primary education the data is in the favor of men or males.


Sources: Census of India, 2011

As per the Census of India, 2011, differently-abled persons in India, total 125,68,247 persons are married which includes 40.58 percent are Females and 59.41 percent are Males, 111,87,605 persons are unmarried which includes 59.81 percent are males and 40.18 percent are females and 27,58,300 persons are widowed which constitutes 25% are Males and 74.32% are Females in this analysis researcher considered persons above the age group of 14 years. Overall, the data speaks itself that men’s marriage institution is less impacted due to their disability as compared to women with disability. So, on the basis of this particular data, we can draw a conclusion that marriage institutions favor differently-abled men over differently-abled women.


Source: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, 2021

As per report of Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation (2021),  97,44,386 differently-abled persons in India are employment which constitute 36.33% of the total population of differently-abled in India and 1,70,70,608 are unemployed which constitute 63.66% of the total population. Out of the total employed persons most of them are engaged in Agriculture Labour which constitutes 30.60% and 23.36% in cultivators, 4.50% in Household Industries and 41% in other livelihood activities. On the basis of gender, women are more unemployed in India as compared to men in India.

2. Legislations For Differently-Abled Persons in India

2.1 Disability Rights Movements

Disability rights movements grew up like other social movements such as women rights and environment movement in India. At the global level, it was initiated by the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)’ and the ‘United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD)’. In India, the voice of the differently-abled persons was ignored till the beginning 1990’s and it was not given that importance. There was no such legislative Act for the inclusion and upliftment of differently-abled persons. The period of 1983-1992 is considered as the decade of differently-abled persons. During this time, rehabilitation was taken into concern rather than welfare. It was the time when the disabled rights movements were at the peak and these movements were fought for the rights of differently-abled persons. These movements led to the release of acts and policies for the differently-abled persons. During this period, the government passed the first legislation for the rehabilitation of differently-abled persons. The Act was passed under the ‘Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs’ on 1st September 1992 with title ‘The Rehabilitation Council of India Act 1992’. 

2.2 The Rehabilitation Council of India (RCI) Act, 1992

The RCI was founded and initiated in 1986 as a registered society and it came into force as a statutory body in the year 1992 when the RCI Act was passed by the Lok-Sabha and Rajya-Sabha. Later, the Act was amended in the year 2000 by the Parliament of India and more power was given to the RCI for monitoring and regulating services for the rehabilitation of differently-abled persons. This amendment also describes the legal action against ineligible individuals that provide services to differently-abled persons and gives direction to maintain records of qualified individuals in the Central Rehabilitation Register (CRR). The Rehabilitation Council of India was established as a result of the RCI Act, 1992, and it serves the following functions:

1. Regulate the institutions/organisations that are working for rehabilitation of differently-abled persons and ensure standardised training courses and programs for professionals working with differently-abled persons.

2. Recognizing organisations, institutions, and universities that offer certificate course, diploma courses, Post- graduate courses and bachelor’s degree programs in the field of rehabilitation of differently-abled persons.

3. It ensures the uniform minimum standard for institutions across the country that are working on education and training of professionals/individuals working on rehabilitation of differently-abled persons.

4. It was also provided further that council shall register personnel working for the differently-abled persons at the national and apex institutions under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.

5. It collects the information regularly from the organizations/education institutions working on differently-abled persons and promotes the research & development in the field of rehabilitation and special education.

6. Registered and maintain the record of professionals/teachers/instructors work in the vocational rehabilitation centre and acknowledge vocational institutions as workforce development. 

2.3 The National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999

The National Trust Act, 1999 was passed by parliament and final approval was given by the president of India on 30th December 1999. It was passed for the betterment of individuals with Mental Retardation, Cerebral Palsy, Autism and Multiple disabilities under the Ministry of law, Justice and Company affairs. The objectives of the Act were the welfare of people with above mentioned four disabilities. It was the first act that specifically took mental disabilities into consideration. It focuses on providing support and making an effort to solve the problem of those who don’t have their families. It also focuses on providing support to the registered organizations which help in providing need-based services to differently-abled persons who live in the condition of crisis with their families. It focuses on evolving the process for the appointment of guardians for differently abled-persons. It also focuses on providing measures for the protection of differently-abled persons in case of the death of their guardians or parents.

A statutory body was established with the name The National Trust under the ‘Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment’. The major objective of the trust is to create an inclusive society where differently-abled persons live their life with full potential without depending on others. They can enjoy their dignified life with equal rights and opportunities. It works on the empowerment of differently-abled through capacity-building programs at the local as well as national levels. It provides grants to Non-Government Organization (NGO) working for the welfare of any of the four above-mentioned disabilities. The Trust also runs various schemes for differently-abled persons. These schemes are VIKAAS Centre - A Day Care Centre, DISHA - School Readiness and Early Intervention Scheme, SAMBHAV - Aids and Assistive, GYAN PRABHA - Support for Education, GHARAUNDA- Home to Adult Persons, SAMARTH - Respite Care, SAHYOGI- Training gives to Caregiver, BADHTE KADAM- Innovation, Community Integration and Awareness Project and PREENA- Marketing Assistance.

2.4 National Policy for Persons with Disabilities (NPPwD), 2006

National Policy for differently-abled persons was formulated by the Government of India in 2006. The aim of this policy was to make society inclusive and give them the quality of life. It is an attempt to provide them the opportunity to lead a life that they deserve with full dignity and equality. Before the enactment of this policy three legislation were implemented by the government of India which included the ‘Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995’, ‘The National Trust Act, 1999’ and the ‘Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992’. All these legislations were enacted by taking into consideration the current needs and requirements of differently-abled persons. In addition to that, there are various national institutes that specifically focus on the development of differently-abled persons. This policy focuses both on preventive and curative measures to tackle disability, recognizes differently-abled persons as the assets of the nation, and works on making society accessible and inclusive for them.

The rehabilitation of differently abled persons is one of the major focuses of the policy. The rehabilitation which includes physical, educational and economic rehabilitation. The physical rehabilitation focuses on detecting the disability, implementing the intervention accordingly, taking the medical intervention and counselling and also on the development of rehabilitation professionals. Rehabilitation focuses on providing education to persons with disabilities by making the environment friendly and accessible, which also involves providing vocational training to them. Whereas, economic rehabilitation focuses on making livelihood opportunities for them so that they can lead a life of dignity. Economic rehabilitation focuses on the promotion of their participation in both the public and private sectors. It focuses on both self-employment and wage employment in the unorganized sector. Their participation is supported in the public sector by providing them with reservations in jobs in the public sphere. They are given the required vocational training for the enhancement and development of the skills and encourage their livelihood in the private sector.

Women and children with disabilities are two sections of society that are at the edge of exploitation and abuse. This policy focuses on the execution of various programs which should provide support, rehabilitation, education, and implementation of programs to promote their skills for gaining employment. The special attention on education, health and vocational training to children with disabilities will be given to ensure the proper and required development of children with disabilities. The infrastructure can either restrict or support accessibility. It completely depends upon the environment. If access is barrier-free then a person can be independent. It will reduce their dependence on individuals and assistance. The infrastructure of hospitals, banks, schools, and all the shopping complexes must be barrier free. The certificate of disability should be provided to individuals with disabilities without a much complex process and in a transparent manner so that the needy can take the benefits being provided to them by the government of India.

The role of non-government organizations is significant in the life of individuals with disabilities. They work on encouraging opportunities and mobilizing resources to minimize the dependency of people with disabilities. The NGO’s work on the livelihood generation of differently abled individuals by keeping in mind the special care and attention they need in the enhancement of their skills. The survey agencies, i.e., the National Sample Survey Organization and the Census, have been collecting information on the socio-economic conditions of persons with disability on a regular basis over the period of time.  Research in the life of differently abled persons is supported and encouraged with the aim of improving their quality of life. Research in the areas of understanding socio-economic aspects of their lives; challenges and problems in education and employment; and causes of different disabilities will be supported. Technology will be used to make the hardware and software appropriate for the access of differently-abled persons. A website should be made by keeping in mind the accessibility of the visually impaired using screen reading technologies. This policy has recommended the amendment to the PwD Act, 1995, which is now the RPwD Act, 2016.

There are several factors which led to the emergence of the first Act for individuals with disabilities. The PwD Act was passed in 1995. This Act focuses on the prevention and early detection of disability, under which surveys and research should be conducted to understand the reasons for the disability. Under this, preventive measures were taken, which included training of the primary health care staff, education and awareness, and taking measures for the prenatal and postnatal care of child and mother. This Act focuses on the education of differently abled persons. Access to Free Education, making the schools equally accessible for the integration of students with disability, there should be special schools for the Children with special needs with rehabilitation training facilities. The institutes that get their grants from the government have a reservation of 3% seats. It was mentioned in the Act, that the environment should be disabled-friendly and there should be ramps and sound symbols which will make easy access for the individuals who are differently-abled. Age relaxation should be given to differently-abled persons in getting jobs in the public sector. There was a 3% reservation for differently-abled persons in Government employment which reserves the 3% of the total seats in employment for differently-abled persons.

2.5 The Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016

The RPwD Bill, 2014 was passed by the two houses of parliament in December 2016 and signed by the President of India on December 27, 2016. This legislation came into force on the 19th of April 2017. This Act was passed after the period of 21 years of the prior Act, which was passed for differently-abled persons in 1995. The RPwD Act, 2016 was a replacement of the PwD Act, 1995. This Act was given to bring into effect the UNCRPD, which focuses on the principle of empowerment and inclusion of individuals with disabilities. India is a signatory body to the UNCRPD. So, it becomes mandatory for India to implement the act by taking into consideration the equal accessibility of infrastructure for differently-abled persons and many more to support and promote their participation in society without any stigma and challenge. There are 21 types of disabilities mentioned in the Act. These disabilities are Low-vision, Blindness, Parkinson's disease, Hearing impairment, Multiple Disabilities, Leprosy Cured persons, Speech and Language, Intellectual Disability, Dwarfism, Thalassemia, Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Chronic Neurological conditions, Locomotor Disability, Specific Learning Disabilities, Haemophilia, Multiple Sclerosis, Sickle Cell disease, Mental Illness and Acid Attack victim.

This act focuses on equality and Non-discrimination, reproductive rights, right to vote, right to home and family, protection from inhumane treatment and cruelty, exploitation, abuse and violence. The government should adopt appropriate measures. So that no one is discriminated against because of their disability. The government should take proper approaches to protect the differently abled from all kinds of cruelty and abuse, If any person is found facing violence either within the community or in their family. He/She shall be immediately provided with protective custodyor maintenance, whichever he/she wants. There shouldn't be any separation of a child from his family because of his disability, It can only happen after an order from the court for the best interest of differently abled children.

The government should make sure that differently abled persons should not undergo any medical treatment that results in infertility. In the field of education, the government should make sure that any institution that is either recognized or funded by the government should not practice any kind of discrimination against differently-abled persons. The buildings of schools and colleges should be made disabled-friendly to fulfil the goal of full inclusion. If there are students who are blind, deaf or dumb, they should be provided with a special educator who can communicate with them in the appropriate mode of communication which is comfortable for them. They should be given a free education from 6-18 years of age.

In higher education, there should be at least a 5% reservation of seats in higher education (HEI). Differently-abled individuals shall be given an age relaxation of 5 years in the process of admission to higher education. All government offices or government undertakings will have to reserve 4% vacancies for individuals with a benchmark disability of 40% or more.  In the private sector, the local bodies and government sectors should try to provide their employers with incentives and reserve 5% of the total seats of their workforce for differently-abled individuals. It also focuses on self-employment and vocational training, non-discrimination in employment.

Punishment for atrocities, fraud to avail benefits and violations of the provisions of the act were also mentioned. If any person violates the provisions of this Act, He/She shall be punished with either a penalty of 10,000 rupees or imprisonment of 6 months or both. If any individual repeats the violation one after the other, In this case, he/she will be punished with a fine of amount 50,000 to 5,00,000 rupees and imprisonment of 2 years can be awarded.

2.6 The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 received final approval from the President of India on 7th April 2017 and it was implemented on 29 May 2018. This Act replaced the Mental Health Act, 1987. Its motive to regulate and monitor the healthcare services provided to individuals with mental illness and ensure the protection & fulfilment of rights while providing healthcare facilities and related services to individuals. It assures that the free of cost treatment is provided to individuals who fall under the Below Poverty Line (BPL). It makes the services affordable for individuals with mental illness. It also ensures the right to privacy and confidentiality should be maintained with regard to treatment, mental health and mental healthcare of individuals with mental illness. It was done to encourage the patient for treatment by eliminating the social barriers or stigma that restrict or discourage the individuals.

The Act not only covers the medical aspect of the illness but also covers the social, economic, physical and environmental aspect of the individuals with mental illness. The Act mention that the healthcare services must be of good quality, sufficient quantity, affordable and accessible for every individual without any discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, sex, gender, culture, social beliefs, political beliefs, class and disability. The legislation leads to the establishment of a Medical Health Authority at State as well as National level. These bodies' responsibilities include registering, managing, and supervising the institutions and mental health professionals who work with persons who have mental illnesses. It is responsible for receiving complaints regarding service delivery flaws and advising the government on issues relevant to mental health. Cruelty against individuals with mental illness is prohibited and also, chaining is not permitted in any way or by any means. Electro-Convulsive Therapy (ECT) is banned in the case of children. It further states that ECT therapy cannot be administered to someone who suffers from a mental disease without the use of anesthesia and muscle relaxant.

Offences and penalties are described in chapter XI of the act. It mentions that anyone who is operating a mental health facility without registration is subject to a penalty of 5,000 to 5,00,000 rupees depending on the repetition of the violation. If anyone violates the rules and regulations of the Act is subject to punishment with imprisonment of 6 months to 5 years or fine of 5,000 to 5,00,000 rupees or both depending on the repetition of offence. 

Methodology
The methodology used in this research was mixed research; both quantitative and qualitative methods were used. This research was based on secondary sources of data collection which includes review of Journal articles, books, reports and legislative Acts. The Acts were studied and analyzed in chronological order to trace the history of the various legislations passed by the government of India for welfare, empowerment, inclusion and rights of differently-abled persons. In addition to this, various Journal articles, books and reports were also reviewed to analyze the social aspect of the disability and challenges faced by differently-abled persons in the Indian context. This research serves as a resource book for individuals who want to understand the social and legislative aspects of disability in India. This article might be helpful for students, research scholars and teachers who want to carry out their research work in the field of disability and develop a basic understanding of disability.
Conclusion
Researcher analyze the already available quantitative and qualitative data on education, marriage and employment of differently-abled persons. From this data, it is found that differently-abled women are more vulnerable than differently-abled men because all these three indicators are dominated by differently-abled men over differently-abled women in qualitative as well as quantitative analyses. These three indicators are very important to represent the individual in today’s era. It’s been six years past, the last act was amended to promote the inclusion of persons with disability but still for them inclusion is like a dream. Their dependency on others for getting their minor task done is still the same upto some extent because of the inaccessible infrastructure of the public building and public transports. Disability is still seen as a barrier when it comes to their occupation. Not just the government but the Civil Societies need to focus on making society inclusive for them. The government has made many efforts for their inclusion from providing reservations in jobs to introducing various programs for their inclusive education but the point of lapse is on the execution of these plans. Society needs to work cooperatively for the inclusion of differently-abled persons. So that they can earn their bread with dignity without any dependency. 40% benchmark in case of disability is again a point of consideration. The person laying at the margin of the benchmark faces the problem of exclusion from getting the benefits like reservations in education and employment and sometimes they are not even given the jobs on the criteria of being physically fit. They face double exclusion; neither are they treated as differently abled in getting benefits nor they are treated as fit in getting jobs. They face exclusion and stigma in society because they are differently abled. If we particularly talk about the Persons with Intellectual disabilities, the amount of financial assistance given to them is the same as that of Persons with the rest of the disabilities mentioned in the act but the persons with intellectual disabilities face comparatively more problems in getting employment.
References
1. Birenbaum, A. (1979). The social construction of disability. The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 6(1), 89–100. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol6/iss1/9 2. Chand, D., & Reddy, C. R. (2012). Disability and social exclusion: A study on state initiatives towards people with impairments. IASSI Quarterly - Contributions to Indian Social Science, 31(3 & 4), 123–139. 3. Sahu, K. K., & Sahu, S. (2015). Attitudinal barriers experienced by people with disability. Journal of Disability Studies, 1(2), 53–54. http://pubs.iscience.in/journal/index.php/jds/article/view/410 4. Gupta, R., & Mishra, A. K. (2006). A measure of deprivation among Disabled. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(38), 4026-4029. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418722 5. The rights of persons with disabilities act, 2016. (2016). Retrieved from https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A2016-49_1.pdf 6 World health organization & the world bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO library cataloguing. https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf 7. D’Mello, L., Monteiro, M., & B.M., G. (2017). Psycho-Social Problems faced by Persons with Disability. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0019 8. Karna, G. N. (2001). Disability studies in India: Retrospects and prospects. Gyan Publishing House. 9. Shreshta, R., & Basavaraju, D. (2021). It’s dignity, not just a welfare measure which is needed for PWD. Academia Letters. https://doi.org/10.20935/al606 10. Sivanandan, V. (2018). Marital status of persons with disabilities in India: An analysis. Journal of Disability Management and Special Education, 1(2), 25–31. https://jodys.info/journal/july_2018/03_Jodys_July_2018_Vini%20Sivanandan.pdf 11. Annual Report of the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, 2021. (2022). www.disabilityaffairs.gov.in. https://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/upload/uploadfiles/files/MSJE%20Annual%20Report%202022%20English.pdf 12. Census of India. (2011). www.censusindia.gov.in. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/43396 13. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2006). www.un.org. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en 14. The National Trust Act, 1999. (1999). www.thenationaltrust.gov.in. Retrieved June 3, 2022, from https://thenationaltrust.gov.in/content/innerpage/download.php 15. The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. (1995). https://thenationaltrust.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/Persons%20with%20Disability%20Act%201995.pdf 16. The Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992. (1992). www.rehabcouncil.nic.in. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from http://www.rehabcouncil.nic.in/writereaddata/rciact.pdf 17. The Rehabilitation Council of India Act 2000. (2000). www.rehabcouncil.nic.in. Retrieved August 5, 2022, from http://www.rehabcouncil.nic.in/forms/Sublink2.aspx?lid=842 18. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. (2016). www.disabilityaffairs.gov.in. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2155/1/A2016_49.pdf 19. World health organization & the world bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO library cataloguing. Retrieved 03 27, 2021, from https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf 20. Mehrotra, N. (2006). Negotiating gender and disability in rural haryana. Sage publictions, 55(3), 406-426. doi: htttps://ww.jstor.org/stable/23620754