|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Review of Rural Development Programmes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper Id :
16555 Submission Date :
2022-10-10 Acceptance Date :
2022-10-18 Publication Date :
2022-10-22
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract |
Rural development refers to providing amenities and uplift the quality of life of rural people. As we know India is a country of villages and more the 1/3rd of the population of the country is living in rural areas and our economy is based on agriculture practices is done by the rural population. So it is necessary to analysis the performance of rural development programme for ensuring participation of rural people in development process. In this study we have taken secondary data source to review and analyse the rural development programme in India especially the MGNEREGA.
Currently, government is running several scheme for rural development programme. Like Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment Guarantee act (2005).PURA (providing urban amenities to rural areas (2004-05), Ajeevika skills (2009), National food security mission (2007), National horticulture mission.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Rural development, MGNREGA, employment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction |
India, since independence has made a significant progress in rural development with an integrated approach towards the betterment of quality of life of the rural people. This is executed by ensuring their equity and participation in the development process. Rural development is dreams of our countries thinkers and leaders. Gandhi, Nehru all have not ignored the value of rural development for India.
The emphasis of rural development programme is to make an attack on poverty through employment generation productive asset transfer through institutional credit and subsidy programmes, programmes for rural housing, providing drinking water facility, irrigation facility, road electricity communication and transportation facility to rural poor.
The core areas on which the rural development programme is centred on Alleviating rural poverty generating employment and removing hunger and malnourishment accompanied by the enrichment of the quality of human life as reflected by significantly improved human index.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Objective of study | 1. To access and inquire new insights for rural development programme, especially on MGNREGA .
2. To give suggestion for better implementation of the rural development programme.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of Literature | Mgnrega: The Present Status: A number of authors have attempted to study the MGNREGA in detail and its related problems. Dreze (2007) looks at the corruption in rural employment programmes in Orissa (India) and how this has continued in a NREGA as well. According to Mathur (2007). a system of regular and continuous flow of authoritative information is essential, as opposed to the random reports and studies dependent on the initiative of individuals and groups. To improve implementation, the government needs to solve problems, modify policy directives, and issue operational guidelines for the district. block and village levels. The government must take the lead, be proactive, mobilise institutions and groups, and use the media effectively. NREGS involves several lakh of government officials, panchayat functionaries, elected representatives, NGOs and community groups. They play a critical role but had little preparation for the challenge. NREGS in fact is a program of national importance which has been marginalised. While the Ministry of Rural Development is the nodal ministry at the centre, every relevant department and agency requires being involved. Ambasta et al. (2008) gave a number of important recommendations. These included deployment of full-time professionals dedicated to MGNREGA at all levels, especially at the block level. Intensive effort at building up a massive cadre of fully trained grass-root workers is required at the gram panchayat level through a nation wide movement for capacity building engaging government and non-government training institutions. Mehotra (2008) a civil servant who has worked In implementation of the scheme, believes that 4 percent of programme costs allocated as administrative costs and professional support is still quite low and does not recognise the fact that a programme al the scale MGNRECA requires serious professional support. Khera (2008) thinks that the successful implementation al the MGNREGA in the Patti block in Orissa (India) state goes beyond the ability of its residents to claim their rights. This is brought out by the high levels, of engagement with the programme in terms of planning, implementation and monitoring. Mathur (2009) states that in social audit undertaken in Andhra Pradesh (India), it was found that in certain villages. some people stated that they had not been paid for the work done. When comparisons were made of the payments as per the pass-book with the payment as per the job card, it was discovered that the job card did not contain the inner pages that record the work done by each person, the job card itself was incomplete. The MGNRIGA needs to be a support system for the desperately poor and should enable. encourage and empower them to stand on their, own feet. In its present format, the MGNREGA could become yet another subsidy programme that runs the risk of becoming a burden on the nation (The Economic times. 2009). Rural development is the need the hour. It not only constitutes the development of rural regions but also aims at improving the well-being and quality of life to the rural poor through collective process. It is clear from the review that though this programme is meant for improving the life conditions of the people in the rural settings but this programme suffers from a number of shortcomings. Thus, the detailed review of literature clearly indicates that there is a need for extensive anthropological research work for understanding the socio-economic impact of MGNREGA programme on rural Indian. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main Text |
Mgnrega: The Historical Perspective: In the post-Independence period, the Government wanted to
uplift the socio- economic condition (SEC) of their people who mainly depended
upon forest products and daily labour. Another important component of the
governmental perspective was to settle the rural population as agriculture
population. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005,
guarantees 100 days of employment in a financial year to any rural household
whose adult members are willing to do unskilled manual work. The Act has come
into force with effect from February, 2006 in 2000 districts initially and
later on, it was extended to all the rural districts of India from the
financial year 2008-09. MGNREGA has come after almost 56 years of experience of
other rural employment programmes which include both Centrally Sponsored
Schemes and those launched by State Governments. These Comprise the National
Rural Employment Programme Guarantee Programme (RLEGP 1983-89; Jawaharlal
Rojgar Yojana (JRY) 1989-1990; Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS) 1993-99.
Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana (JGSY) 1999-2002; Sampoorna Garmin Rojgar Yojana
(SGRY) 2001, National Food for Work Programme (NFFWP) 2004. Among these
programmes, the SGRY and NFFWP have been merged with NREGA in 2005.
The Act was implemented in phased manner 130 districts were added in 2007-08. With its spread over 625 districts across the country, the flagship program of the UPA Government has the potential to increase the purchasing power of rural poor, reduce distress migration and to create useful assets in rural India. Also, it can foster social and gender equality as 23 percent workers under the scheme are Scheduled Castes, 17 percent Scheduled Tribes and 50 percent women. In 2010-11 41 million households were employed on NREGA worksites. This Act was introduced with an aim of improving the purchasing power of the rural people, primarily semi or unskilled work to people living in rural India, whether or not they are below the poverty line. Rural Development
Programmes of India
To reduce poverty and unemployment, the Government of
India Introduced a number of programmes that are Integrated Rural Development
Programme (IRDP), Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS), Prime
Minister's Rojgar Yojana (PMRY), Jawahar Grain Samridhi Yojana (JGSY), Swarna
jayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana to provide employment food security with rural
infrastructure, Pradhan Mantri Gramodaya Yojana (PMGY), National Rural
Employment Guarantee act (NREGA) etc. All these programmes were initiated to
providing wage employment to those people who lives in rural areas. Among all
these programmes NREGA is one of the latest programmes to increase wage base
employment has been implemented in 2006. The difference between these schemes
and MGNREGA is that Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act
provides the "legal right for employment" or "Right to
Work" to rural population and provides unemployment allowance if work is
not provided. There are various schemes are launched under the Ministry of
Rural Development that are: 1. Training
Rural youth for Self- Employment: This scheme was launched in 1979 for the
training of the rural youth who are unemployed and not getting the work. This
scheme provides the self-employment to the rural youth. 2. Integrated
Rural Development Programme: This scheme is implemented in the year 1980 for
the all- over development of the rural poor by providing the self- employment
of the program of asset endowment. 3. National
Rural Employment Programme: This program is integrated in 1980. The main of
this program to provide the employment opportunities to the people who live in
rural areas. 4. Rural Landless
Employment Guarantee programme: In 1983, this program is implemented by the
Indian government for providing employment to landless farmers and rural people
who lives in poorer conditions. 5. Jawahar
Rojgar Yojana: This scheme or Yojana that implemented in 1989 for providing the
employment to rural people who are unemployed. 6. Employment
Assurance Scheme: This scheme is started in 1993 for the aim of the providing
employment of at least 100 days in a year in a village. 7. Swarna Jayanti
Gram Swarozgar Yojana: In 1999, the Ministry of Rural Employment Development
launched the yojana for eliminating rural poverty and unemployment and
promoting self-employment in rural areas such as proper Training, development
of infrastructure, planning of activities, financial aid, Credit from banks,
organizing self-help groups, and subsidies. 8. Sampoorna
Garmin Rojgar Yojana: This yojana is implemented in 2001 for providing wage
employment and food security in rural areas and also create durable economic
and social assets. 9. Pradhan
Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana: This was launched on 25 December 2000 as a fully
funded centrally sponsored programme to provide all-weather road connectivity
in rural areas of the country. The programme envisages connecting all
habitations with a population of 500 persons and above in the plain areas and
250 persons and above in bill States, the tribal and the desert areas. 10. Food for work Programme: In
2001, the one of the programs of providing employment in rural areas to give
food through wage employment in the drought affected areas in eight states.
Wages are paid by the state government partly in cash and partly in food
grains. 11. National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: The NREGA is one of the schemes that enacted in 2006 for providing the hundred day's employment to the rural people. The NREGA is one of the schemes that provide employment to the rural people for the aim of reducing unemployment. Thus, all these schemes that plays an important role for reducing unemployment and poverty in India. But MGNREGA is one of these schemes that provide livelihood security to the rural people by giving hundred days' employment and MGNREGA play an important role for creating the assets. Table:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Methodology | This research paper is mainly based on secondary data. Such as books and journals, Directorate of rural development. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusion |
The launching of various rural development programme has provided on Effective opportunity to utilize rural resources efficiently as well as proper management of resources of the country.
MGNREGA is one of such programmes which has broken the chain of poverty and uplifted the socio-economic status of the beneficiary. But there are some constraints to like unused funds, restricted area implementation, look of coordination between various implementing and monitoring agency and illiterates and unconscious beneficiary.
Despite that, this programme has performed outstanding in employment generation in rural areas. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References | 1. Ambasta, P., Shankar P.S.V. & Shah, M. (2008) Two years of MGNREGA : The road ahead, Economic and Political Weekly, February 2008.
2. Arup, M. 2013, Effect of land acquisition and displacement of education : An anthropological study. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Social Anthropology 1 (1) 45-56.
3. Dey, S. & Bedi, A. (2010). The National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in Birbhum. Economic and Political Weekly, XLV (41), 19-25
4. Dreze J. (2007), MGNREGA : Dismantling the contractor raj. The Hindu, 20th Nov. 2007
5. Khera, R. (2008), Empowerment Guarantee Act. Economic and Political Weekly, August 2008
6. Mathur L. (2007). Employment guarantee : Progress so far. Economic and Political Weekly, December 2007
7. Mathur, L. (2009). Silent But Successful initiative. The Hindu, 1st March, 2009
8. Mehrotra, S. (2008). NREG two years on : Where do we go from here? Economic and Political Weekly, August 2008.
9. Roy, D.S. & Sarnath, D. (2010). Good Governance and Employment Generation through NREGA : A case study of Gram Panchayat in West Bengal. Presented at Conference on “Infrastructure, Finance and Governance : Push for Growth, Organized by Ministry of Rural Development, GOI.
10. Shah, M. (2004). National Rural Employment Guarantee Act : A Historic opportunity. Economic and Political Weekly, XXX (39), 5287-5291
Web References :
1. http://www.gov.in
2. http://www.nrega.net
3. http://www.nrega.nic.in/guidelines.htm.
4. www.nrega.net/pin/reports and to the..../NREGA% 20NFIW.doc
5. planning commission.gov.in/reports/genrep/rep/NREGA.pdf |