|
|||||||
Society and Culture in India during early 19th century | |||||||
Paper Id :
15795 Submission Date :
2022-03-04 Acceptance Date :
2022-03-14 Publication Date :
2022-03-24
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
This paper describes the condition of Hindu society in the first half of the 19th century. Religious narrow-mindedness and superstitions prevalent in the society of that time have been mentioned in this .At this time, religious superstition and intellectual bankruptcy was prevailing in the whole country. Idol worship and religious rituals were dominated by Hinduism. These social beliefs were the main obstacles in the way of progress of science and education .There was a lack of education everywhere and due to this the atmosphere of ignorance was spread. The status of women has also been highlighted and the malpractices related to them have been mentioned so many social evils were prevailed in the society i.e. sati system , female infanticide , witchcraft , polygamy etc. The traditional feature of Hindu society, caste discrimination has also been described in this paper. The society was completely male dominated . The caste and sub caste were not free to choose their occupations due to restrictions of the society .These all features of Hindu society has been described in this paper .
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Religion, Education, Caste, Superstition, Social Evils, Female. | ||||||
Introduction |
To understand the social and cultural condition of Hindu society in the first half of 19th century also analyse the position of reformers and their efforts to improve the condition. Discuss under the four major headings, Religion, Education, caste system and female position .
|
||||||
Objective of study | To analyse the society on the basis of facts and writings. |
||||||
Review of Literature | Meena Gori ,sati and social Reforms, K.K.Dutta,
Social History of Modern India, Suresh chander Gosh, The History of Education
in Modern india. |
||||||
Main Text |
The
social and religious reform movements of the nineteenth century have a special
place in the history of India. In view of its multifaceted nature and
broadness, it can be considered as a struggle movement. After the death
of Aurangzeb, the administrative structure of India began to crumble and was
further weakened by the Britishers. As the British dominance over the country
increased, the pace of exploitation accelerated and the economic base of the
country was shaken. It also had a disastrous effect on the social life of
India. In such a situation, along with economic poverty, social evils,
discrimination and religious superstitions increasing. The result was
that by the end of the 18th century, India had reached the ultimate limit of
poverty and backwardness. “Hinduism was surrounded by idol worship,
polytheism and many other superstitions. But these religious beliefs and
practices were challenged by the many anti-scriptural sects that emerged in
those days almost all over India. All of them condemned polytheism, idolatry
and caste discrimination. Like the reformers of the nineteenth century,
Charandas cited the Vedas for opposing idol worship and caste protests . He
opposed to all kinds of rituals. Major changes were taking place in the
caste system in the nineteenth century, some of which are: fragmentation,
occupational mobility and sanskritisation. Like other periods of Indian history
there was no lack of individual talent in the fields of intellectual
activity .RammohanRoy wrote, 'I have to say with sadness that the present Hindu
system of religion is not well thought out to protect the political interests
of the Hindus. The caste discrimination among the Hindus and their
division into different sections and different sub-castes cannot Hu a sense of
patriotism in them. They are so attached to the rituals of innumerable
religious rituals and rituals of purification that it is impossible to take any
difficult task in their hands. Almost all the intellectuals of the
nineteenth century believed that the social practices and religious beliefs
prevalent in that century were obstacles in the way of progress. Polytheism and
idolatry hindered the development of personality and due to supernaturalism and
the dominance of religious teachers, people were A fearful conservatism
took its roots. Casteism was hated not only on the basis of moral and ethical
principles, but also because it affected society was divided and the feeling of
patriotism could not develop among the people. "The practice of Sati
and infanticide were considered 'murder in every scripture'." Thus the
social and religious practices of nineteenth century India were seen as signs
of a declining society characterized by restrictions, superstitions, social
status. Authority, bigotry and organ fatalism. "In the 19th
century, Indian society was socially and religiously crippled.The custom of the
Hindu family was prevalent that the eldest male member was the head of family,
whose orders were followed by every member of the family and every member work
according to his direction. Sometimes a woman also had the privilege of
becoming the head of the family. This situation existed only when there
was no senior male member to look after the family. By the way, the
society was completely male dominated. Following the tradition and custom was
the specialty of the Hindu family. According to the tradition the members
of the family used to do the same occupation, such as the work of Brahmin was
teachings, farming the work of farmer ,the work of the potter was to make
pottery, and the coming generations did not hesitate to adopt the business of
their ancestors. He used to get the education of this work from other
members of the family, that is, the business that the father used to do, the
son also had to adopt the same profession. Its biggest advantage was that
the problem of unemployment did not arise. But its drawback was that even
if the son's interest was not in the father's business, he had to adopt
it. Thus the characteristic of Hindu society was the varna system, mainly
four varna were Ok, Kshatriyas, Vaishya, Shudras. "Brahmins had the
highest position in the society. He was respected by all sections of the
society. Their work was mainly to educate the people." Due to his
education and knowledge, he had attained high positions in many state
departments. They did not miss to take proper and undue advantage of his
position, marriage, birth and death rites were completed by him. Many
unfair customs were made valid in the society. The orthodox supported them. In
short, the Brahmins had a very special place in the society. The second varna
was that of the Kshatriyas. Their function was to provide security to all the
people of the society. But at that time the Kshatriyas had become
degenerate. Many of them were living a neglected and impoverished life. The
third varna was the Vaishya.there main occupation was business and they
established relationships with Britishers. Their interest was limited to
business only. The fourth varna was that of Shudras. At that time
they were the largest in the society. They had to suffer the most under
the varna system. They did not have the right to study and enters
in the temples. It was the same class in the society that Being fed
up with the traditional customs of Hinduism, theywere getting attracted towards
other religions. "Due to the circumstances of this era, many
classes, sub-classes, castes and sub-castes were formed in these four varnas.
These castes were formed by many people adopting different types of professions
to conduct their livelihood. Such as barber, washerman, tailor, potter ,
Goldsmith, cobbler , Blacksmith and Weaver etc. These castes were also not free
to choose their occupation because there were social restrictions on them.
Despite the formation of many castes and sub-castes in the said Varnas, the
feeling of caste superiority did not end in the modern period. “The
spirit of untouchability was very prevalent in the society at that time.
The people of the lower class could not touch the people of the upper
class. The religion of the upper class was destroyed by the shadow of the
lower class. On this evil of Hindus, Dr.LaxmisagarVarshney has said that
in Hindu religion, the people of the upper class used to tremble at the mere of
taking the life of an insect, but seeing the death of a lower class person,
their heart did not melt , their religion was destroyed just by seeing him. Religion
and Superstitions In
the eighteenth century, economic poverty came but along with it religion was
also badly corrupted. At that time superstitions and religious pomp were
everywhere the same,there was sway and intellectual bankruptcy prevailed
throughout the country. In Hinduism, idol worship and unnecessary
religious rituals were dominated. "In the eighteenth century, India
was in a miserable and pity condition. Hinduism was the religion of a large
population at that time and it was mainly divided into two groups, one who
roamed in public following celibacy and who lived outside the
society. Among the groups of these saints, one was Vaishnava saint and
the other belonged to Shaivism. Vaishnava saints were more numerous and spread
in north and south and they were more homogeneous than Shaive devotees.
Vaishnava saints depict Vishnu as God. and accepted his abode in
everything. Also believed in incarnation and accepted Rama and Krishna as
Vaishnava avatars. Shaive accepted Shiva as God and the deity of all Gods.
A group of Shaivite devotees worshiped Kali and Durga by accepting them as
Shiva's wife. Idol worship was prevalent in both Vaishnavas and Shaivas. But
Shaivites worshiped Shivalinga more. In both the religions Their
respective gurus were worshipped. Both had strict rules and were fully
possessed. were traditional. Both called themselves Vedanti but
both had their own interpretations. "Buddhism,
which came into existence in 525 BC, almost disappeared from its native land,
but by this time (19th century) it had spread to eastern and southern Asia and
it Was trying to take his initiative in India too. Jainism, which came
into existence a little before Buddhism and whose philosophy was that knowledge
of God is inaccessible to human beings, was also trying to consolidate its
roots in India in the 19th century. The Jains were in good economic
condition from the very beginning and this was posing a challenge to the Hindu
religion. The Parsis were also in front of the public in a small
community. Zorothian Persians who came to India from Prussia in the 8th
century had now improved their position and were mainly in Gujarat. But
they were now concentrated in Bombay. To
understand any social institution, it is necessary to know its philosophical
basis. It is difficult to give a precise definition of Hinduism because there
are conflicting opinions on this subject. One view is that the concept of God
and the afterlife, reincarnation. The concept of deity etc. is basically
symbolic and they have been incarnated so that the common people should follow
the laws and social rules. The second opinion is that Hinduism shows the way to
attain happiness and peace in the hereafter and the third world and the third
opinion is that Hindu religion is clearlyspiritual religion. Shaivism,
Vaishnava and Vedanti all confirm this view. Most of the texts of Hindu
religion were written by persons who had superstition in divine powers and who
got inspiration from influential sections of society. Vedas, Puranas and
Smritis made Indians sosuperstitious worshipers of the scriptures. Accepted
Varnashramadharma with faith and believing that a person should
follows his dharma, then he will definitely get salvation. "Dharma had an
influence on the social movements of ancient times. They belonged to the
nature, worship, polytheism, monotheism, theistic totalitarianism or
skepticism. "Many reform movements were carried out in the Hindu society
in the modern era and changes took place in the social life of India.
Indian thinkers opposed the traditional beliefs and started thinking of
religious reform. The most prominent of the new sects was the Brahmo
Samaj. In the second half of the eighteenth century, the country started taking
the reins of renaissance. Hindu thinkers this time wanted to establish a
new type of coordination between Hinduism and Christianity. Brahmo
Samaj propagated monotheism and want to uplift the Hindu society
from various types of superstitions. There were fundamental differences
between the Vaishnava movement and the Brahmo Samaj. Vaishnava movement
was a kind of mass movement within the realm of Puranic religion, but outside
the varna system, in the social sense it was the path of liberation. On
the other hand the Brahmo Samaj was worthy of the faith of educated people. Superstitions In
the early 19th century and in late eighteenth century, Indian society had
become like a stagnant and dirty reservoir due to its superstitions and bad
practices. There were many social evils prevalent in the society.
For example, there were many malpractices in the society like Sati,
femaleinfantide , witchcraft ,slavery system, status of marriage etc.
Female infanticide was more prevalent than the practice of Sati. Girl
infants were killed silently. Apart from Rajputs, this practice was
prevalent in other two, three castes also. Mothers either did not give
milk to the girls or used to apply opium or mild poison on their breasts, due
to which the girl infant would die. "It was a popular belief
that some women are dakinis and they eat children and young brides. Such a
superstition was prevalent that the child or newlyweds fall ill as soon as they
see them. Due to this evil practice many women were considered as
witches. A similar superstition was also prevalent that was childsacrifies
as soon as the child was born, some people used to offer them to the
Ganges, they used to throw them into the Ganges river. To stop
this, in 1801 AD, Lord Wellesley passed a law. According to the
intellectuals of the nineteenth century, the source of all the evils of Indian
society, including religious superstitions and social enrichment, lay in the
ignorance of the common people. That is why the focus of his program was
the dissemination of knowledge. Lack
of Education and Ignorance At
the end of the eighteenth century, Indian society was basically feudal in
nature in which many classes ,castes and tribes were lived.
some financial assistance was onlyprovided to higher that educational
institutionswhose were based on religious grounds.Formal institutions of
education i.e. schools were established for only those people who
received elementary education who required reading and accounting, such
as government servants, businessmen , moneylenders, rich and zamindar
classes etc. Schools were run in temples or mosques. Generally women never went
to school for education. Therefore, due to lack of formal education system,
foreigners propagated that Indians were immersed in darkness. Even
now a large number of people were getting education from the famous
institutions of their time. In Bengal, there was Queen Bhavani of Nadaur
and Krishna Chandra of Nadia as the guardian of education. In 1834-1835,
William Adam wrote in his report about the Rajshahi district that only one
police station contained material related to Hindu University. In which
all aspects of Sanskrit could be studied ", and to attract the learner's
of Sanskrit to this institution, provision of monthly installment was also
made. After the company gained political power in 1765 AD, it
started making changes in the education policy. In 1781 AD company established
a madrasa in Calcutta. Soon after that many students came to this institution,
some students came from Kashmir, Gujarat and some came from Karnataka."
Its main objective was to make Muslims eligible for the work for the
state. Jonathan Duncan established a Sanskrit college in Banaras in 1791
AD. The purpose of its establishment was to discover the law, literature
and religion of the Hindus so that European judges could get qualified Hindu
assistants. When Christian missionaries opened their schools,
discussions on Indian education were taking place in the British
Parliament. Bishop Wilberforce made a resolution in the House of Commons,
according to which the directors of the company had the right to send
missionaries to India to preach Christianity, although this resolution was not
passed, but now the idea started to strengthen that the company should bear the
responsibility of education of Indians. And the Parliament had to accept
the support of this matter and in the charter of 1813 AD, an annual provision
of Rs 1 lakh was made for the education of Indians. Now Christian
missionaries also started coming in more and more numbers to open schools in
India. Thus the foundation of modern education was laid in 1813 AD.
"From time to time, inquiries related to education were conducted. In 1829
AD, the inquiry was conducted by the district judges. According to this, there
were 1705 indigenous schools in Bombay province in which 35153 students
studied." The disputes that arose regarding the charter of 1813 AD
They were - (1) the sense of education policy objectives (2) the medium of
instruction (3) the agencies arranging educational institutions (4) related to
the methods of propagation of education among the general public. There
was a difference of opinion among the high officials of the company regarding
these four questions. Their educational ideas differed from
the colonial rulers both in terms of goals and details. While the
propagation of colonial principles of the British government and the policy
related to administrative education had two goals, the utility of the needs
while the educational program of Indian intellectuals was aimed at reviving the
country. For the Christian missionaries, education was primarily a tool
for the propagation of the gospel. The debate on education in government
circles was not concerned with what is the best way to educate Indians, but its
first concern was how to make education policy most useful for meeting
administrative requirements. Along with this, its second objective was
also how to make foreign principles effective in the minds of Indians.
For this, education was considered the most useful tool. So that the
British institutions and values could be ideally established.
Struggling against the theoretical implications of this system, Indian
intellectuals tried to propose an alternative that was based on science and
mass education through native languages. He also had a basic belief that
the education shoud be traditional and science based as literary education is
not able to meet the demand of the times and Most of the intellectuals
agreed with this view of Rammohun Roy. Social
Evils Towards Women In
the 19th century, the status of women in society continued to decline. In
the society, many social evil practices were strengthened, child
marriage, purdah system, sati system, female infanticide , mismatch marriage
etc. were prevalent in the society, the place of woman was limited only to the
kitchen of the house. The condition of the widow was very bad.
Widow was looked down upon in the society. The stigma of her husband's
death was imposed on her, it was forbidden for her to make up, laugh, talk to
men, participate in any auspicious work. In Bengal the condition of widow
was very bad. When she became a widow, her hairwere cut. She
could wear only white clothes. Child marriages and mismatched marriages
also took place in large numbers. Polygamy was prevalent among men but
women could not remarry under any circumstances. In this way, many evils
prevailed in the society, due to which the condition of women was getting worse
day by day. Sati
Pratha There
was a practice to reflect the plight of women. Although this practice was going
on since ancient times. In ancient times, it was believed that the things of
the deceased should be kept with the dead body.
The details of this practice are also found in Rigveda. There
are two examples of sati in Mahabharata also (1) Madri was
sati along with her husband Pandu (2) Vasudeva's wives were also burnt to death
with her. But whether or not to be sati at that time depended on the wish
of the widow. But with the passage of time, there was a change in
this practice . At the time of Alauddin's invasion, Rani Padmavati and
her attendants adopted the Jauhar practice in groups, although there was
opposition to this practice from time to time. Manu's commentator
Medhatithi, while condemning the practice of Sati, says that doing Sati on the
funeral pyre of a husband is not a religious act. This is the suicide
committed by a helpless weak woman in the memory of her beloved, that is,
because of the traditions, Raja Rammohan Roy is credited for the
prohibition of Sati in 1829A.D "As long as there was no legal force
behind the practice of Sati, but it continued uninterruptedly, from 1815
to 1823, there are many number of widows who committed This
practice The AdiGranth of the Sikhs also opposed the
practice of sati and it has been said that it is not decided that those who
burn with their husbands in the fire, are satis those who live in the world
even with a broken heart are sati . But the status of widows in ancient
times was not the same as that of widows of Bengal in the 19th century.
During this time the widow had to bear many kinds of torture. On
auspicious occasions, it was kept aside as inauspicious. They had to face
many physical tortures and moral difficulties. For this reason she was
compelled to accept religion. Polygamy This
practice is going on since the Vedic age. Pururava's lectures in the
Rigveda show that he had many wives. Similarly, many examples are found
in Ramayana and Mahabharata also. Therefore, while the Indian woman stood
firm on the ideal of restraint of lust for marriage, the same man could not
stick to this ideal and came down to do many marriages .In the 19th century
this practice was in full swing in the society of Bengal. The economic
condition of the people was good when Bengal was a prosperous province.
These rich were called nobles. It was considered an honour to have
multiple wives in a family. "Mismatched marriages were also prevalent. Sometimes
a marriageable girl was married to a boy of 12 years old and sometimes an older
man to a younger girl, depending on the economic situation. The daily newspaper
of Bengal 'DnyaneshwarPatrika' ' (1836) in his statistics stated that 27
nobles had 818 wives and these wives were very young. It is also described in
SamvadKaumudi that a noble can have many wives whose age ranges from 6 to
60. years." So when a nobleman died, many women became widows. In
this way, many social evils in relation to women were prevalent in the 19th
century, apart from this evils like femalefiticideand witchcraft were also
prevalent in the society. Since ancient times, the birth of a girl child
was not considered good. The girl was considered inferior to the
son. For example, Patanjali has written in his Mahabhashya “son is like
light and daughter is the source of trouble.” Similarly, a writer of the
fourteenth century writes - A daughter makes the whole family sad as soon as
she is born and takes away everything at the time of marriage and does not know
what to do at the time of puberty. That is why the birth of a daughter is
considered as a matter of sorrow for the parents. Caste
System At
this time the caste system was present in the country with the dominant castes
and many sub-castes. Caste rules were strict and inter-caste marriage was
prohibited. The superiority of castes was determined by their food. Interaction
between castes was also prohibited and persons of higher castes were lower
castes. They did not eat food from the hands of the castes
considered." The occupation of the people was fixed on the basis of caste,
although there were exceptions at this time. But the people of the upper
castes did not do those works which were fixed for the shudras Social
status was determined on the basis of caste superiority. There were caste
organizations to enforce caste rules on individuals and to exercise effective
social control over them. The job of the institutions in all these parts
of the country was to maintain social order and morality as far as
possible. The caste questions were resolved by the caste committees or
the head of the caste. Those who broke the rules were punished with fine,
penance or caste boycott. The social and religious dominance of the
Brahmins rested on the basis of the caste system. The Company also had a
sharp weapon in the form of caste system by suppressing the Hindu caste,
because caste boycott among Hindus was more dreadful than the death
penalty. In the year 1767, the company established caste courts and these
courts also the right to interfere in soci and family matters also. He
was also given the right to interfere in family life. The Hindus used to
be very frightened by these courts, because the decision against them meant
social death. In order to make judges and lawyers aware of the Brahmanical rules, Warren Hastings, with the help of Brahmin scholars, presented a code of those rules on the basis of Sanskrit texts and got it translated into English. The caste was given distinct economic and political importance. The social reformers were completely unable to eradicate the caste system. The government took the right to decide what is the caste, what are the status and rights of different social groups. The meaning of the government policy of non-interference was the support of the status quo. As the roots of the caste system got fixed, the people of the lower classes in Hindu society became aware of caste and tried to get admission or rise in Hindu society by following the Brahmanical rules. Therefore, like the upper castes, the people of the lower caste also considered it appropriate to follow these rules. There was a complete lack of generosity in the caste system because if there was generosity in it, there would have been no repression of Shudras, neither the talk of untouchability would have arisen, nor the caste system was formed on the basis of birth.so we find that there were so many social problems were in India during this period. |
||||||
Conclusion |
After discussing many features of 19 th century we find that the Indian society was in a pitiable and declining condition at that time .Religious superstitions and lack of education was everywhere . Although many educational institutes were there but these institutes were based on indigenous education and these institutes were run by the local administrators .Government does not take the responsibility of public education. The education was based on the ancient text and Vedas. The society was divided on the basis of caste and sub caste and this was a basic problem for the progress of society .The lower caste faced many challenges in the society .They were not free to work according to their wish .They were not permitted to enter into temples .Females also faced so many problems and social evils but so many social reformers worked for the improvement and progress of the society and Brahmo samaj was one of main among them. Raja Ram Mohan Roy was the founder of Brahmo samaj .He worked for the progress of education , eradication of social evils related to females sati etc. But in spite of all these efforts we found a continue resistant also against all these practices. |
||||||
References | 1. Altekar, A.S. , The position of women in Hindu civilization ,Delhi ,1962
2. A.R.Desai Social Background of Indian Nationalism,Bombay 1959.
3. Bipin chander ,Modern India,New Delhi ,1971.
4. Gori ,Meena ,Sati and Social Reforms , Jaipur ,1989
5. Dutta KK , social History of modern India ,New Delhi ,1985
6. Shiv S. Dua , Society and culture in northern India (1850-1900)
7. R.L.Shukal ,History of Modern India ,Delhi ,1987.
8. J.N.Ferquher , Modern Religious movement in India , reprint New Delhi ,1977.
9. Prasad Narmdeshver Singh , Caste system,Delhi ,1965.
10. Shiv Kumar Gupt , Social and Economic History of Modern India, Jaipur ,1999. |