|
|||||||
Geo Strategic Challange of China Pakistan Economic Corridor on India | |||||||
Paper Id :
16495 Submission Date :
2022-10-02 Acceptance Date :
2022-10-19 Publication Date :
2022-10-22
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/remarking.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) results from Pakistan & China's long-standing friendship. It is an umbrella enterprise suggested as a portion of China's "One Belt, One Road" program. CPEC is an effort to boost the China-Pakistan alliance to pressure India to secure a foothold in the Arabian Sea that will allow China's PLAN to project influence throughout the Indian Ocean. The Strait of Hormuz has been used to import most of Delhi's oil needs from OPEC countries in the Middle East. This oil transportation naval route from the Middle Eastern countries to Indian ports are significant for India. This paper aims to examine, from an Indian viewpoint, the geostrategic obstacles that the CPEC faces. A country's involvement in world affairs is determined by its location. As a result, Pakistan occupies an important strategic position worldwide. It lies at the nexus of nations with abundant and scarce energy resources.
The Persian Gulf includes Pakistan's Gawadar Port, situated on the Arabian Sea. Gawadar, being a large port, may be capable of taking an active part in securing China's future energy security. Through the "One Belt, One Road" initiative, China has established a leadership position in Asia and beyond political and economic cooperation. The development of the CPEC is a major joint initiative between China & Pakistan that links the Chinese city of Kashgar in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region with the port of Gawadar in southern Pakistan. The port of Gawadar, the telecommunications network, power infrastructure, as well as industrial areas are the 4 critical pillars of the CPEC project. This article discusses the geostrategic concerns of the CPEC from the perspectives of both China & Pakistan.
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Geostrategic, China, Pakistan, Economic Corridor, India. | ||||||
Introduction |
China first proposed the CPEC project in May 2013. Pakistan and China announced in April 2015 that their relations would be developed into an all-weather strategic partnership as a result of President Xi Jinping's visit there (Lu, 2015 Chinese President Xi Jinping signed 51 agreements with Pakistan during his visit (BBC, 2015). It is vital to note that the CPEC is a long-term strategy with numerous suggested projects carried out in segments through bilateral agreements where both parties would promote a win-win situation (Khan T.). The New Silk Road may be understood better by researching how Pakistan and its neighbours are affected by CPEC's growth and development (Esteban, 2016). The main parts of the CPEC are the Gawadar port, the telecommunications network, the power infrastructure, as well as the industrial areas, all of which are in Pakistan (Rizvi, 2015). The main goal of the CPEC is to improve the standard of living for people across the nation, while also ensuring long-term socioeconomic and political regional stability (Tiezzi, 2016). Several people are shocked by China's resurgent hostility towards India, as indicated by the latest clash involving Indian & Chinese troops all along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) throughout the Galwan Valley. The Darbuk-Shayok-Dault Beg Oldie pathway in India has just been rebuilt, and the Indian Army is the primary user of the specific path. The path is crucial for connecting the north-eastern Ladakh area with the rest of the world. In remote places like the Depsang Plains that share borders with Aksai Chin, a Chinese-controlled zone, it provides access in all weather conditions. In terms of border infrastructure, India is still lagging behind China, but it is closing the gap faster than China, creating new challenges for it. India, like China, has big ambitions. Attempts to modernize Nepal's map, which encompasses parts of India, have been made with the passage of the Constitution Amendment Bill. Nepal's "artificial enlargement" in the northwest includes areas like Limpiyuadhura, Lipulekh, & Kalapani that India has failed to acknowledge. CPEC was initially suggested in May 2013 by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang during a visit to Pakistan (Bhattacharjee, 2015). Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, was chosen as the location for the CPEC secretariat in Aug 2013 (Hussain). Pakistan's PM discussed the plan with his Chinese counterpart during his visit to China in April 2014 (Bhattacharjee, 2015; Markey and West, 2016)1. On April 20, 2015, Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Pakistan & signed this deal (Cheng and Lim, 2016)2. The political influence of a nation is primarily dictated by its geographical position. It describes the social, economic, and political advantages and disadvantages of a country to other countries.
1 Markey, Daniel and West, James. 2016. “Behind China’s Gambit in Pakistan.” http://www.cfr.org, May 12. Accessed at http://www.cfr.org/pakistan/behind-chinas-gambit-pakistan/p37855. (June 15, 2019).
2 Cheng, Alvin and Lim, Hin. 2016. “The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor One Year On Analysis.” Eurasia Review, May 16. Accessed at http://www.eurasiareview.com/160520-the-chinapakistan-economic-corridor-one-year-on-analysis/.(August 15, 2020).
Pakistan is located strategically in a significant geostrategic area of the world. It is located at the intersection of energy-rich and energy-deficient nations. In terms of its geostrategic relevance, Pakistan's closeness to India & China and Iran & Afghanistan shows its proximity to the world's growing economic superpowers (Mehmood). History demonstrates the importance of a corridor that has fostered growth in numerous parts of the world. This post-World War II era saw the establishment in 1957 of what was initially called the EEC, which was then known as the European Community (EC) from Nov. 1993 until being reorganized in 2009 to become the European Union (EU). It was built on the idea that people, goods, services, and money should move freely. As part of the Greater Mekong Sub-Region Economic Cooperation Programme, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam will each have an "exclusive economic zone (EEZ)". This is similar to the idea of promoting the economic corridor to help commerce as well as individuals contact via communication (Ahmar, 2015). CPEC, as OBOR's flagship project, is critical to both China & Pakistan. It is regarded as favourable not just to China & Pakistan, but also to the whole region & trans-region. Consequently, Pakistan must make sure that it is performed effectively (Rifaat and Maini, 2016).
The Chinese aim of rebuilding the historic Silk Route is a noble objective built on multifaceted collaboration. The CPEC is a US$ 62 billion development project headed by China's Silk Road Fund, and has been hailed as a "game-changer" in South Asia's geopolitical situation between Pakistan & China (Naseer, 2017). It is considered one of the world's important steps to boost regional integration and subsidise infrastructure building (Baruah, 2018).
CPEC's investment is part of China's One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative, which also comprises the old Silk Route Economic Belt as well as the 21st Century Maritime Silk Route (Caixin, 2014). It starts in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Area of China, west of Kashgar, and terminates at the port of Gwadar in Pakistan's Baluchistan Region (Baruah, 2018). Khunjarab Pass, located in the Karakorum Range & spanning nearly 3,000 kilometres, connects Kashgar with Gwadar (Ali, 2015)
3. CPEC seeks to build interconnections across Pakistan via roads, highways, railway lines, electricity, dry ports, commercial zones, industrial parks, and pipeline networks (Markey and 3 Ali, Akber. 2015. “China Pakistan Economic Corridor: Prospects and Challenges for Regional Integration.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 7(1):1-15. West, 2016). In recent times, economic corridors have emerged as a crucial instrument for regional cooperation, inclusion, as well as advancement in a globalized society built on reciprocity. Greater Mekong Regions-inspired projects have been launched across Asia to connect underdeveloped regions to more developed industrial hubs and improve market access through the incorporation of transnational manufacturing systems following the region's success in achieving regional economic integration through the establishment of a network of transnational economic corridors (Ranjan, 2015). The idea of building big projects in Pakistan isn't new. It was put on hold in the late 1990s because of security concerns. The Central Asian Republics (CARs) would have supplied oil and gas to Pakistan's Baluchistan Province via a pipeline that passed through Afghanistan. It demonstrates Baluchistan's capability to play an essential part in the larger economy and in the promotion of Pakistan's national objectives.
Pakistan is trying to enhance the security of its biggest province while keeping the changing geostrategic environment under consideration. In recent years, Russia, which previously had a hostile relationship with Pakistan, has warmed up and expressed strong interest in the economic corridor as well as the development of a natural gas pipeline connecting Karachi & Lahore (Khan T.). The Chinese leadership's strong engagement in the region shows China's unique role in promoting constructive contacts with the neighbouring country. Mr Xi recently visited South Asia, where he presented a series of major investment deals and trade growth initiatives aimed at mutual advantage & regional integration (Ramay).
|
||||||
Objective of study | To examine and analyze the economic and strategic dimensions of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
1.To examine the implications of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) on the national security and strategic interests of India.
2.To examine the factors behind the growing and deepening China-Pakistan nexus and the threat it poses to the stability and peace of the South Asian region.
3. To examine the challenges and prospects of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). |
||||||
Review of Literature | In order to achieve China's foreign policy
objectives of linking infrastructure initiatives through creating a "New Silk Road" (One Belt)
which goes through Central & South Asia and also a "Maritime Silk Road" (One Belt) which
goes through the Indian Ocean, the CPEC is expected to play a vital role (Wagner, 2016)4 . In keeping
with its march toward Westward Policy, China aims to open and develop its landlocked western areas (Wang J., 2015)5 .
President Xi initiated the "Constructive
Engagement" programme, which has given China's foreign policy a new dimension. |
||||||
Methodology | The research study will employ both qualitative as well as quantitative methods. It will be based on primary as well as secondary sources of data. Primary data will include international Treaties and Agreements, International and National data on Trade and on Import and exchanges, and FDI loans. In addition to this, the researcher will conduct interviews and for that concerned academicians, and government officials will be selected. The study will also extensively use various secondary data sources, such textbooks, political journals and newsletters, articles and newspapers and important internet websites |
||||||
Conclusion |
It is important to recognise that the CPEC is the product of a long-standing collaboration between China & Pakistan. It has been said that CPEC), a US$ 62 billion infrastructure plan supported by China's Silk Road Fund, will "alter the game" in South Asian geopolitics. It is widely considered one of the world's greatest initiatives focused on boosting regional connectivity while also offering financial assistance to encourage infrastructure development in developing countries. China rejects India's rise to global leader status. Every week, India has been engaging with its QUAD counterparts — Australia, Japan, as well as the United States. PM Narendra Modi has also improved India's connections with other countries. With the signing of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between India & Australia, the two countries bilateral relations have reached a new level. Indian and American officials have expressed displeasure with the growing closeness of Delhi with Washington, and many other partners. They are dissatisfied with the strength. As a result of these considerations, it is highly improbable that the border dispute is nothing more than a diversionary strategy. To do this, it would have taken a lot of time to plan. With economic incentives and regional integration, CPEC could be a game changer for Pakistan and the whole region. Networks, connectivity, and partnerships are all ways that CPEC could make this happen. For China and Pakistan's national interests, the CPEC as a joint venture between the two countries will be tremendously essential in promoting regional integration and enhancing social, political, as well as economic activity. It's past time to make the most of the new chances presented by CPEC for the benefit of the state. |
||||||
References | 1. Lu, A. (2015, April 20). China Pakistan Lift Ties to All-Weather Strategic Partnership of Cooperation. Retrieved from Xinhua News Agency: http;//news.xinhua.net/english/2015- 04/20/c-134167316.htm
2. BBC. (2015, April 20). China's Xi Jinping agrees to $46 bn superhighway to Pakistan. Retrieved from http;//www.bbc.com/news/worl-Asia-32377088
3. Khan, T. (n.d.). Importance of Pak-China Economic Corridor. Retrieved February 8, 2017, from Global Affairs: http://www.globalaffairs.com.pk/importance-of-pak-china-economic corridor
4. Esteban, M. (2016, July 5). The China-Pakistan Corridor: a transit, economic or development corridor? Retrieved February 9, 2017.
5. Rizvi, D. H. (2015). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Regional Cooperation and Socio-Economic Development. Retrieved from ISSI: http;//issi.org.pk/wp content/uploads/2015/12/Hasan-Askar-Rizvi-3435-SS-41-20142015.pdf.
6. Tiezzi, S. (2016, February 5). Pakistan will provide Special Forces to defend the Chinese Investments. Retrieved from The Diplomat: http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/pakistan-will provide-special-force-to-defend Chinese-investments/.
7. Ahmar, D. M. (2015). Strategic Meaning of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4 & 1, 73.
8. Ranjan, A. (2015). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: India's Options. Institute of Chinese Studies Delhi, ICS Occasional Paper # 10, 1.
9. Ramay, S. A. (n.d.). CPEC: A Chinese Dream Being Martialized Through Pakistan. Sustainable Development Policy Institute, 1.
10. Hussain, S, Rafiq, M, Ahmad, N, Quddus, A, and Tien, P. P. (2021). “Pak Rupee As A Currency And Currency War.” Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(1), 88-9.
11. Mahajan, A. 2015. “Worrying Signals; China’s Growing Investments in Pakistan Could Prove to be a Headache for India.” Business Today, May 24. Accessed at
http://www.businesstoday.in/magazine/focus/china-investments-in-pakistan-rising-headache-for
india/story/218868.html. (June 15, 2019). 12) Hussain, F. 2020. “Geostrategic Imperatives of Gwadar Port for China.” The Korean Journal of International Studies, 18(2):145-167.
13. Deutsch, J. 2015. “China’s Grand Plan for Pakistan’s Infrastructure.” The Diplomat, April 21. Accessed at http: //thediplomat.com/2015/04/chinas-grand-plan-for-pakistans infrastructure. (February 23, 2020).
14. Durrani, SQ, Bilal, M and Kalim, I. 2017. “Pakistan-China Strategic Partnership: Capitalizing the Geo-Political Location of Pakistan.” Global Regional Review (GRR), 2(1):152-165.
15. Baruah, D. 2018. “India’s Answer to the Belt and Road: A Road Map for South Asia.”Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, August. Accessed at http://carnegieEndowment.org. (September 6, 2020).
16. Bhattacharjee, D. 2015. “China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).” Indian Council of World Affairs, May 12. Accessed at http://www.icwa.in/pdfs/IB/2014/CPECIBI20520.pdf. (August 17, 2020).
17. Caixin. 2014. “One Belt, One Road.” http://english.caixin.com, December 10. Accessed at
http: //english.caixin.com/2014-12-10/100761304.html.(June 15, 2019).
18. Naseer, S2017. “CPEC: Past and Future Challenges.” Spearhead Research, October 30. Accessed at http: //www.spearheadresearch.org.(September 14, 2020).
19. Rifaat, H and Maini, TS (2016). “The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Strategic Rationales, External Perspectives, and Challenges to Effective Implementation.” Stimson Centre. Accessed at http://www.stimson.org. (August 18, 2020). |