|
|||||||
Quantitative Analysis of Spermatogonial Cell Population Following Radiation and Cadmium Chloride on Mouse Testis | |||||||
Paper Id :
16622 Submission Date :
2022-10-06 Acceptance Date :
2022-10-21 Publication Date :
2022-10-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/resonance.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
The quantitative study showed that the percentage of type A spermatogonia reduced significantly up to day 4 and 7 in combined exposure to radiation and cadmium chloride as compared to individual exposure. The percentage of spermatogonia A recovered to a certain extent up to day 28 in all the experimental groups.
Spermatogonia type I and B were reduced to a great extent quantitatively up to day 2, remained negligible up to day 7 and recovered considerably up to day 28 in all the experimental groups. The percentage of all types of spermatocytes decreased in all the experimental groups. The percentage of resting and leptotene spermatocytes reduced more rapidly than the zygotene and pachytene spermatocytes. All these types recovered quantitatively on day 28. The percentage of spermatids decreased gradually up to day 28 in all the experimental groups but this decrease was comparatively more rapid in combined exposure. This was an indication of the synergistic effect. The quantitative study of tubular diameter showed decreasing trends. However, tubular diameter recovered to a certain extent on day 28 in all the experimental groups.
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Radiation, Cadmium, Testis, Seminiferous Epithelium. | ||||||
Introduction |
Risk management of substances is typically an outcome of risk assessments which generally take data from studies on individual substances. However, humans are simultaneously exposed to a large number of chemicals in everyday life. It is necessary to consider whether combined exposures to some substances could induce toxic effects when they appear at the same time. Therefore, the research hotspots of environmental pollutants are gradually turning from individual to joint action. Numerous substances may co-exist in the environment, when they enter the body simultaneously, they may produce interaction to affect their biological effects.
|
||||||
Objective of study | The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of radiation and cadmium individually as well as simultaneously on the spermatogenic cell population kinetics of seminiferous epithelium of mouse testis. |
||||||
Review of Literature | Cadmium is
a heavy metal which is an important industrial raw material and is widely used
in batteries, pigments, electroplating, semiconductor and pesticide
(Ramos-Treviño M L et al., 2018 and Sall M.L et al., 2020). It is accumulated
in the human body with a half-life exceeding 10 years and has been linked with
a number of health problems including marked damage to the testes and fertility
reduction (Kelley, 1999; Bench et al., 1999).
Many cadmium-induced changes are similar to those caused by other harmful factors, especially by ionizing radiation. The most striking effects of ionizing radiation include the inhibition of DNA and protein synthesis (Verma et al., 2009). Therefore, with increasing levels of cadmium and radiation in the environment, the biological effects of these agents should be considered in the context of combined exposure of an organism to multiply agents. In the present study, therefore, quantitative analysis of the spermatogonial cell population was investigated in mice testis after administration of cadmium chloride and gamma irradiation alone or after combined treatment. |
||||||
Methodology | The main objective of the present investigation was quantitative changes induced by radiation and cadmium individually and simultaneously on the testis of Swiss albino mice. For this purpose, adult male Swiss albino mice (6-8 weeks old) were divided into four groups. Group I (sham-irradiated), Group II (treated with CdCl2 solution 20 ppm), Group III (irradiated with 1.25 Gy (IIIa), 2.5 Gy (IIIb) and 5.0 Gy (IIIc) and Group IV (both irradiated with 1.25 Gy + CdCl2 (IVa), 2.5 Gy + CdCl2 (IVb) and 5.0 Gy + CdCl2 (IVc). The animals were autopsied after 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 14 and 28 days of treatment. Testis was removed immediately, kept in bouins solution for 24 hrs, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. Transverse sections 5 μm thick were cut and stained with PAS-haematoxylin.
Quantitative studies- Approximately circular cross sections at stage III were selected for counting of the intermediate type spermatogonia and at stage V for the B type spermatogonia. Identification of tubular stages and spermatogonia I and B was based on the classification of Oakberg (1956). The cell was counted only if the greater part of the nucleus was included in the sections. The count was corrected by the formula of Aberchrombie (1946) to eliminate the error due to variation in the nuclear diameters.
Tubular diameter - The tubular diameter of the seminiferous tubules was measured in the testes of each group at each interval with the help of an ocular micrometre. Hundred circular tubules, randomly selected from the cross sections of the testis were measured at their two points. Averages of the measurement were taken separately to get the actual diameter.
Diameter of Leydig cell nuclei - Leydig cell nuclei diameter was measured with the help of an ocular micrometre. Hundred Leydig cells were randomly selected from the cross sections of every interval. Two perpendicular diameters of each Leydig cell nuclei were measured, averaged and expressed in terms of mean Leydig cell nuclei diameter.
After obtaining the mean values of the control and experimental groups, the standard error (S.E) of the mean was calculated. |
||||||
Result and Discussion |
In the present
findings, after cadmium chloride treatment (Group II), the spermatogonia A
counts decline up to day 4, then start increasing up to day 28 reaching up to
79.12 percent of the normal counts. This is a similar type of depletion as in
the irradiated group, which may be due to cell killing, which leads to an
initial rapid decrease in the population of spermatogonia A. Therefore, a
gradual decline in their number is found, which continues further due to the
death of the damaged cells and more over by spermatogonial differentiation to
the more mature types. Similar types of depletions in the population of
spermatogonia A were also observed after combined treatment of cadmium chloride
and radiation (Group IV) but there was found depletion as compared to
respective doses of radiation and cadmium chloride individually. These results
have shown an “additive synergistic” type of nature of cadmium chloride with
the increased dose of radiation. Graph I -
Variation in the percentage of Spermatogonia 'A' Graph 2 -
Variation in the percentage of Spermatogonia I Graph 3 -
Variation in the percentage of Spermatogonia B The response of
spermatogonia to various doses of radiation has been investigated by several
investigators (Oakberg, 1955a, b; 1959; Oakberg and Diminno, 1960; Monesi,
1962; Oakberg and Clark, 1964). It was evident from all these studies that
intermediate and type B spermatogonia in mice were very sensitive to radiation.
These were reduced to approximately 0.5 per cent of normal value following 1000
R of x-rays (Oakberg, 1957). It has been observed that type I in stage III and
type B in the stage V tubules depleted rapidly and very few could survive after
irradiation (Oakberg, 1955a; Monesi 1962b; Parington et al., 1962), cadmium
chloride and by the treatment of combined exposure of both. After 48 hours both
of these cell types are found to be absent from the tubules at stage III and V
respectively in all the experimental groups in our present study. This
indicates that irradiation and cadmium chloride inhibit or delay the mitotic
division to yield the primary spermatocytes. Both of these spermatogonial types
restore a fine percentage of their original number at day 28 in all the
experimental groups. This profound recovery in their counts must be due to the
re-establishment of cell renewal activity in the stem cell compartment and is a
sign of progressing maturation differentiation process. Oakberg (1968)
summarised the comparative radio-sensitivity of various germ cells in the
seminiferous epithelium. Oakberg considered spermatogonia B, the most sensitive
element of the germinal epithelium. Spermatogonia I possess a comparable
radio sensitivity with spermatogonia B. These findings are almost similar to
that observed in the present study. All the types of spermatocytes were also
found to be decreased in number after exposure to radiation, cadmium chloride
and with combined exposure of both. The number of resting and leptotene
spermatocytes decreased at a faster rate than zygotene and pachytene
spermatocytes. All these types recovered quantitatively on day 28. Similar
observations are made by Sharma (1984) after radiation exposure. Resting and
leptotene spermatogonia are highly prone to immediate cadmium and radiation
death. Direct damage of
resting spermatogonia of rats was reported in the dose range of 81-2996 R
(Jones, 1960). Casarett and Casarett (1957 a, b) found direct damage to the
resting spermatocytes after 283 and 350 R. Death of a small number of resting
spermatocytes at 300 R is also noticed by Parington et al. (1962). The division
and further differentiation of spermatogonia form the resting primary spermatocytes.
So the number of resting primary spermatocytes is directly affected by the
damage to the spermatogonia B population. The resting spermatocytes were noted
to be the most affected by irradiation after spermatogonia B. They were reduced
to zero levels on day 4 and 7 in all the experimental groups in the present
study. Depletion in the number of leptotene, zygotene and pachytene
spermatocytes was also noted. Attempts were made by several workers like Monesi (1962), Jaimala and Bhartiya (1985) and Gasinska et al. (1987) to explain the depletion in the number of B type spermatogonia and resting spermatocytes after irradiation. According to them, the decrease is either due to radiation-induced cell death or a lowered output from their precursor compartment. It is evident from graph 2, 3 and 4 the number of spermatogonia I, B and primary resting spermatocytes is significantly lower in the combined sub-groups (IVa, IVb and IVc) as compared to respective irradiated sub-group (IIIa, IIIb and IIIc). This depicts that the cadmium chloride provides synergistic additive action to the spermatogonia I, B and primary resting spermatocytes towards immediate cell killing or radiation injury. The spermatid counts after irradiation (group III) from stage II and III tubules show gradual reduction towards the end of experiments and were found to be dose-dependent. Similar observations were made by other workers (Erickson, 1978; Sharma, 1984; Pinon-Lataillade and Maas, 1985; Jyothi et al., 1998 and Hacker-klom, 2000). Treatment of cadmium chloride and combined action of radiation and cadmium chloride also showed a consistent decline in the percentage of spermatids. Graph 4 -
Variation in the percentage of Resting Spermatocyes Graph 5 -
Variation in the percentage of Leptotene Spermatocytes
Graph 6 - Showing
Variation of Percentage of Spermatids |
||||||
Findings | This study shows that the number of spermatogonia I, B and primary quiescent spermatocytes is significantly lower in the combined subgroups (IVa, IVb and IVc) compared to the respective irradiated subgroup (IIIa, IIIb and IIIc). This indicates that cadmium chloride provides a synergistic additive effect on I, B spermatogonia and primary quiescent spermatocytes towards radiation damage. | ||||||
Conclusion |
The present study reveals that the number of spermatogonia I, B and primary resting spermatocytes is significantly lower in the combined sub-groups (IVa, IVb and IVc) as compared to respective irradiated sub-group (IIIa, IIIb and IIIc). This depicts that the cadmium chloride provides synergistic additive action to the spermatogonia I, B and primary resting spermatocytes towards radiation injury. |
||||||
References | 1. Ramos-Treviño, J.; Bassol-Mayagoitia, S.(2018): Hernández-Ibarra, J.A.; Ruiz-Flores, P.; Nava-Hernández, M.P. Toxic effect of cadmium, lead, and arsenic on the Sertoli cell: Mechanisms of damage involved. DNA Cell Biol., 37: 600–608.
2. Sall, M.L.; Diaw, A.K.D.; Gningue-Sall, D.; Aaron, S.E.; Aaron, J.J. (2020): Toxic heavy metals: Impact on the environment and human health, and treatment with conducting organic polymers, a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 27: 29927–29942.
3. Kelley, C. (1999): Cadmium therapeutic agents. [Review]. Curr Pharm Des, 5: 229-240
4. Bench, G., Corzett, M.H., Martinelli, R., Balhorn, R. (1999): Cadmium concentrations in the testes,sperm and spermatids of mice subjected to long-term cadmium chloride exposure. Cytometry, 35: 30-36.
5. C. L. Verma, R. K. Purohit and M. L. Gupta (2009): synergistic effect of radiation and cadmium chloride on mouse testis. Pharmacologyonline, 1: 462-468
6. Oakberg, E. F. (1956a): A description of spermatogenesis in the mouse and its use in the analysis of the cycle of seminiferous epithelium and germ cell renewal. Am. J. Anat., 99: 391.
7. Casarett, A.P. and Casarett, G.W. (1957a): Histological investigations of mechanisms of x-ray effects on spermatogenesis in the rat. I. Introduction, purposes, methods and preliminary experiments. University of Rochester, Atomic Energy Project Report, UR-496, P.119.
8. Casarett, A.P. and Casarett, G. W. (1957b): Histological investigations of mechanism of x-ray effects on spermatogenesis in the rat. II. Studies comparing effects of acute and chronic irradiation. University of Rochester, Atomic Energy Project Report, UR-497, P.131.
9. Erickson, B.H. (1978): Effect of continuous gamma irradiation on the stem and differentiating spermatogonia of the adult rat. Mutat. Res., 52: 117.
10. Gasinska, A., Deruiter-bootsma, A., Davids, J.A.G., Folkard, M. and Fowler, J.F. (1987) : Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 52: 237.
11. Hacker-Klom, U.B., Kohnlein, W., Kronholz, H.L. and Gohde, W. (2000) : The relative biological effectiveness of low doses of 14 Mev neutrons in steady state murine spermatogenesis as determined by flow cytometry. Radiat. Res., 153: 734.
12. Jaimala and Bharitya, H.C. (1985) : Modification of radioresponse of intermediate and B-type spermatogonia by a phosphoro- thioate. The Brit. J. Radiol., 58: 1224.
13. Jones, E.A. (1960): Number of spermatogonia after x-irradiation of the adult rat. Int. J. Rad. Biol., 2: 157.
14. Jyothi, P., Jagetia, G.C. and Krishnamurthy, H. (1998): Influence of teniposide (VM-26) on radiation-induced damage to mouse spermatogenesis : a flowcytometric evaluation. Reprod. Toxicol., 12 : 601.
15. Monesi, V. (1962): Autoradiographic study of DNA synthesis and the cell cycle in spematogonia and spermatocytes of mouse testis using tritiated thymidine. J. Cell Biol.,14: 1.
16. Monesi, V. (1962b): Relation between x-ray sensitivity and stages of the cell cycle in spermatogonia of the mouse. Radiat. Res., 17: 809.
17. Oakberg, E. F. (1955a): Degeneration of the spermatogonia of the mouse following exposure to x-rays and stages in the mitotic cycle at which cell death occurs. J. Morphol., 97: 39.
18. Oakberg, E. F. (1955b): Sensitivity and time of degeneration of spermatogenic cells irradiated in various stages of maturation in mouse. Rediat. Res., 2: 369.
19. Oakberg, E. F. (1959): Initial depletion and subsequent recovery of spermatogonia of the mouse after 20 R of gamma rays and 100, 300 and 600 R of x-rays. Radiat. Res., 11: 700.
20. Oakberg, E. F. (1957): Gamma ray sensitivity of spermatogonia of the mouse. J. Exptl. Zool., 134: 343.
21. Oakberg, E. F. and Clark, E. (1964): Species comparison of radiation response of gonads. In “ Effects of ionizing radiation on the reproductive system” (W.D. Carlson and F.X. Gassner eds.) Pergamon press, London.
22. Oakberg, E. F. (1968) : Mammalian gametogenesis and species comparisons in radiation response of the gonads. In “Effects of Radiation on Meiotic systems”. P.1, IAEA, Vienna.
23. Partington, M., Craig , A.W. and Jackson, H. (1962): The effect of radiation on spermatogenic cells in the rat and mouse. Brit. J. Radiol., 35: 713.
24. Pinon-Lataillade, G. and Maas, J. (1985): Continuous gamma irradiation of rat : Dose rate effects on loss and recovery of spermatogenesis. Strahlentherapie, 7: 421.
25. Sharma, J. (1984): Radioprotective effect of WR-2721 on functional morphology of testis of Swiss albino mouse against gamma radiation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur (India). |