|
|||||||
Wildlife Conservation and Environmental Sustainability in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Alwar, Rajasthan | |||||||
Paper Id :
16712 Submission Date :
2022-11-15 Acceptance Date :
2022-11-21 Publication Date :
2022-11-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/researchtimes.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
Wildlife conservation and protection is a matter of worldwide as well as national importance as a part of biological and ecological diversity management and restoration. Wildlife conservation is the practice of protecting plant and animal species and their habitats. As part of the world's ecosystems, wildlife provides balance and stability to nature's processes. The study area, The Sariska Tiger Project was established in the year 1955-56. It is the national park in Rajasthan situated in the Alawar district. It was declared as the wildlife sanctuary in 1958. It was given the status of a tiger reserve making it a part of India’s Project Tiger in 1978 and declared a National Park in 1982.
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Ecosystem, Diversity, Wildlife, Conservation. | ||||||
Introduction |
The Sariska Tiger Project was established in the year 1955-56. It is the national park in Rajasthan situated in the Alawar district. It was declared as the wildlife sanctuary in 1958. It was given the status of a tiger reserve making it a part of India’s Project Tiger in 1978 and declared a National Park in 1982. The study area Sariska Tiger Project is situated in Alwar district between parallel of 270 14/5 //and 270 52/ 12// N latitude and 760 14/ 20// and 760 32/ 12// E longitude and roughly shaped like jumping Frog. This area bears The Indian biogeographic definition of 4 B-Semi-Arid Gujarat-Rajwada ( Rodger and Panwar, 1988).Wildlife conservation and protection is a matter of worldwide as well as national importance as a part of biological and ecological diversity management and restoration. Wildlife conservation is the practice of protecting plant and animal species and their habitats. As part of the world's ecosystems, wildlife provides balance and stability to nature's processes. Doubleday,K.F.(2018). The researcher has done the study on “human –tiger (re) negotiations”.
1.1. Relation to the SDG
It is an important part of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). It directly falls in the SDG: 15 i.e., related to protect restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystem. Target 15.1 and indicator: 15.1.1 clearly stated that – terrestrial diversity and ecosystem conservation under International Agreement. Indicator: 15.2.–Progress towards sustainable forest management, indicator: 15.7.1. Proportion of traded wildlife that has poached and illicitly trafficked, indicator:15.9.1(a) Official development assistance on conservation and sustainable use of bio-diversity and (b) Reserve generated and finance mobilized from bio-diversity as a relevant economic instrument (National Indicator Framework:2015)
|
||||||
Objective of study | The objectives of the study are:
1. To show the status of the Sariska Tiger project
2. To show the NDVI changes in the last 6 years
3. Try to correlate the forest resource conservation, wild life protection and tourism development as the instrument of sustainable development goal.
Objectives have been set out keeping the view of the national importance of wildlife conservation and environmental sustainability of the Sariska Tiger project and the application of geospatial science and technology to correlate the spatial and aspatial data in a systematic way as it may be useful for the better understanding of the ongoing changes in the study area. |
||||||
Review of Literature | The study mainly focused on how the (re) negotiation between people and tigers is struggle rooted in place and a region, with boundaries co-constructed by human and non -human actors. The study has been shown the relation between human and environmental aspects. Rubino, E. C., & Stamp; Doubleday, K. F. (2021). This study has been shown human vs. wildlife Conflict over time. Bengal tiger, gender, environmental justice and reintroduction of tiger have been discussed in the study. The main objective of the project is to improve the project in harmony with the environment and without harming the people. Sankar, K., Qureshi, Q., Nigam, P., Malik, P. K., Sinha, P. R., Mehrotra, R. N., ... & Stamp; Gupta, S. (2010). The researchers focused on Monitoring of reintroduced tigers in Sariska tiger Reserve, Western India”. Re-introduction, home range and food habit of tiger have been analyzed in the paper. There is a gap in the area of tiger project according to the season. There are also legal measures to ensure that the project is not harmed by human. Herrmann T.M. &Torri M.C. (2010) in his paper “Biodiversity Conservation versus Rural Development: What Kind of Possible Harmonization? The Case Study of Alwar District, Rajasthan, India” has shown concern regarding the creation of protected areas, which often generate people-park conflict. The researchers proposed that the conservation of natural resources should be brought with the integration of conservation objective with local community as the sustainable development of local communities are linked with it. As a result, the conservation of protected areas is not only crucial from an ecological aspect but it should also incorporate a dimension of equality and social justice. Sekhar N.U. (1998) in his paper “Crop and livestock
depredation caused by wild animals in protected areas: the case of Sariska
Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India.” addressed the problem of crop and livestock
depredation suffered by villagers living in and around STR. The crop damage by
wild animals is considered problematic by villagers. Amongst other things,
author also observed the variation in crop losses with distance of the village
from the protected area border. The author suggested that resolution of problem
could be achieved through co-management of conflicts at the local level. The similar research work “Conservation, Relocation and
Social Consequences of Conservation Policies in Protected Areas: Case Study of
the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India” by Torri M.C. (2011) also envisages that
there is need to rethink the conservation measures by adopting a new approach
which integrate conservation and developmental needs. Since the coercive, top
down, approach has created socio-cultural disruption and often failed to
conserve biodiversity in protected areas. The article challenges the existing
conservation paradigm practiced currently by the authorities in most protected
areas in India. Sekhar N.U. (2003) also analyses in his paper “Local people’s attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India” has shown the local people’s attitudes towards wildlife tourism and the impact of benefits from tourism on the local support for Sariska Tiger Reserve (STR), India. He examines that People who benefited from tourism showed a positive attitude and support for tourism development in STR. Overall locals have a positive attitude towards STR. The management should see this as opportunity to facilitate community participation in tourism. Such practical measures can be initiated at the PA level, which would contribute to sustainable development and help direct the local tourism growth for the benefit of locals, a goal envisaged by the Convention of Biological Diversity. Shahabuddin G., Kumar R. and Shrivastava M.(2007) in their paper “Creation of ‘Inviolate Space’ Lives, Livelihoods and Conflict in Sariska Tiger Reserve” advocates the role of village relocation as a management tool for wildlife conservation in the reserve by documenting the forest dependency and livelihood conflicts faced by local residents who will be displaced and identifying the aspirations of the proposed oustees in relation to the proposed displacement. The paper also studies the process of relocation planning and the rehabilitation package. It also suggests more participatory and rational ways to deal with the issue. |
||||||
Main Text |
Relation to the SDG It is an important part of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). It directly falls in the SDG: 15 i.e., related to protect restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystem. Target 15.1 and indicator: 15.1.1 clearly stated that – terrestrial diversity and ecosystem conservation under International Agreement. Indicator: 15.2.–Progress towards sustainable forest management, indicator: 15.7.1. Proportion of traded wildlife that has poached and illicitly trafficked, indicator:15.9.1(a) Official development assistance on conservation and sustainable use of bio-diversity and (b) Reserve generated and finance mobilized from bio-diversity as a relevant economic instrument (National Indicator Framework:2015). Key Map of
Sariska MAP-1 Statement
of the problem Wildlife conservation and sustainability is intimately
related of the environmental sustainability and bio-diversity management and
become a programme of national importance and prestige. The study area, The
Sariska Tiger Project was established in the year 1955-56. It is the national
park in Rajasthan situated in the Alwar district. It was declared as the
wildlife sanctuary in 1958. It was given the status of a tiger reserve making it a part of India’s
Project Tiger in 1978 and declared a National Park in 1982 (enm.wikipedia.org).
The study area Sariska Tiger Project is situated in Alwar district between
parallel of 270 14/5 //and 270 52/
12// N latitude and 760 14/ 20//
and 760 32/ 12// E longitude and roughly
shaped like jumping Frog.This area bears The Indian biogeographic definition of
4 B-Semi-Arid Gujarat-Rajwada ( Rodger and Panwar, 1988). It was a hunting preserve of the Alwar state.[1] The
wildlife of this sanctuary become endangered due to the poaching, overgrazing
and illegal felling of trees local people. The location of the reserve forest
is important in all respects. It is situated in semi-arid part of the
Rajasthan. [2]Therefore, have immense importance from the economic and
environmental perspectives. The livelihood of the tribes like Gurjar, Meena are
highly dependent on the forest (Field survey-2021). It covers a total area of
about 881 km2 (of which 273.8 km2 is the National Park).
It is an important bio-diversity area of Northern Aravalli leopard and wildlife
corridor and Khatiar-Gir dry deciduous forest.[3] The utility of forests are
enormous it becomes the integrated part of the sustainable development goal
(SDG).It was reported that, in 2003, 16 tigers lived in the reserve. In 2004,
it was reported that no tigers were sighted in the reserve, and that no indirect
evidence of tiger presence was found such as pug marks, scratch marks on trees,
scats. [4] The Rajasthan Forest Department explained that "the tigers had
temporarily migrated outside the reserve and would be back after monsoon
season". Project Tiger staff backed this assumption. In January 2005, it
was reported that there were no tigers left in Sariska. [5] [6] In July 2008, two tigers from Ranthambhore National Park
were relocated to Sariska Tiger Reserve. Another female tiger was relocated in
February 2009. [7] In 2012, two tiger cubs and their mother were spotted in
the reserve bringing the total number of tigers to seven with five adults. [8]
In July 2014, two more cubs were spotted, so that there were 11 tigers in total.
[9]As of October 2018, there were 18 tigers including five cubs. [10] By 2020,
the tiger population in the reserve has risen to 20. [11]. Most recently, the
Chief Minister of Rajasthan have declared that the tiger population have risen
to 27 (June, 2022).
Apart from the Bengal tiger, the reserve harbors many wildlife species including Indian leopard, jungle cat, caracal, monkey, langur,striped hyena, golden jackal, chital, sambar deer, nilgai, wild boar, small Indian civet, Javan mongoose, ruddy mongoose, honey badger, Rhesus macaque and Northern plains gray langur and Indian hare,stag, python, water hens.[5] Bird species present include grey partridge, white-throated kingfisher, Indian peafowl, bush quail, sand grouse, tree pie, golden-backed woodpecker, crested serpent eagle and the Indian eagle-owl, green pigeon, peacock. Another important thing is that it is the.
The main idea have derived from the study of literature
and subsequent information have been derived from Rajasthan raj forest portal ,
the data for NDVI mapping have collected from LANDSAT-8 images of USGS-EARTH
EXPLORER PORTAL. The DEM data have also derived and subsequently map generated
from the same. The whole data have been
processed in QGIS and SAGA software. The formula of NDVI for the estimation and
map generation has been adopted after Weiser and Herring (2000). It is a
dimensional index that describes the difference between visible and infra-red
reflectance of vegetation cover and can be used to density estimation on a land
area. Formula for Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)
=NDVI = (NIR-RED)/(NIR+RED) For the calculation of NDVI preprocessing
technique has applied to eradicate atmospheric errors.
Digital elevation models have used as a way of representing surfaces of the study area. A DEM is a quantitative model of a topographic surface in digital form. It becomes helpful to understand the relationship between the elevation and vegetal cover of the study area. According to the locale people the numbers of tourists have increased a lot after the lockdown.The main idea have derived from the study of literature and subsequent information have been derived from Rajasthan raj forest portal , the data for NDVI mapping have collected from LANDSAT-8 images of USGS-EARTH EXPLORER PORTAL. The DEM data have also derived and subsequently map generated from the same. The whole data have been processed in QGIS and SAGA software. The formula of NDVI for the estimation and map generation has been adopted after Weiser and Herring (2000). It is a dimensional index that describes the difference between visible and infra-red reflectance of vegetation cover and can be used to density estimation on a land area. Formula for Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)
=NDVI = (NIR-RED)/(NIR+RED) For the calculation of NDVI preprocessing
technique has applied to eradicate atmospheric errors. Digital elevation models have used as a way of
representing surfaces of the study area. A DEM is a quantitative model of a
topographic surface in digital form. It becomes helpful to understand the
relationship between the elevation and vegetal cover of the study area. According
to the locale people the numbers of tourists have increased a lot after the
lockdown. 5.0. Data Sets Data has been taken from Google search engine, USGS,
BHUVAN,LANDSAT8 IMAGES, [https://forest.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/raj/forest/ForestDepartment/PDFs/news/RAJASTHAN%20ECOTOURISM%20POLICY%202021.pdf.https://forest.rajasthan.gov.in/content/raj/forest/en/home.html].
Data of the tourists visit have been collected from the Department of Tourism,
Rajasthan, and the data regarding the number of tigers retrieved from the
newspaper reports. |
||||||
Result and Discussion |
Form the map that have been derived in QGIS and SAGA software that vegetal cover of the area have improved a lot after ex-situ conservation of tigers in that area. The relocation of the people form the core area have worked well as the man-animal conflicts have been averted in such way. The NDVI of the monsoon season of 2015 and 2021 have taken into considerations. The problem of data availability has prevented the academics for going back further. Vegetal covers of the study area have improved significantly. In 2015 NDVI of the area was 0.653 and it becomes 0.71 that expresses a really remarkable positive change. Tiger populations also have increased. In 2008, the number of tiger was only 07(seven) now it has risen to 27 according to the latest announcement comes from the chief Minister of Rajasthan (June, 2022).As per the records of the Tourism Department of Rajasthan Govt, tourists are again coming to this spot with higher enthusiasm. It is generally observed that the quality and quantity of vegetation are increasing with elevation of the area. Comparative NDVI Map of 2015 and 2021 This is a potential area of immense biomass value and
faunal diversity. It is the place of historical and religious importance. It is
a place of eco-tourism development that is beneficial for the people and
adminitation also. Ecotourism is one of the most viable and non-polluting
economic instruments which contributes to the livelihood for the local
communities by providing immense opportunities for employment. This policy will
address the aspiration of the people by making ecotourism a vibrant sector
contributing towards the livelihood enhancement of the forest dependent and communities.
Some of the historical, religious, tourist places and outside the forest
different hotels and recreation spots have also been growing up as informed by
the locales. According Times of India Report in 2016, the
Source: Report Of Department Of Tourism, Rajasthan, 2021-2022 |
||||||
Conclusion |
The study was targeted to establish a relationship between the Sustainable Development Goals and the forestry and bio-diversity of the study area. Sariska Tiger Reserve is the focal point of the study. So far it has been established from the spatial data and primary information from the academic fraternity and the locals (sons of the soil) that after relocation of the people from the core forest area the man-animal conflicts have been minimized. Number of tourists have been increased in the area as the consequence nearer hotels and recreation centers have grown along with other general stores. Moreover, the incident of crop yield losses due to invasion of animal like wild boars, bisons, deers, nilgai etc have been also checked. It is the direct result of food chain restoration (i.e. producer-consumer relationship like herbivores-carnivores-omnivores food chain) after the ex-situ conservation of tigers of Ranthambhore and the most significant results derived from then NDVI of 2015 and 2021 continuing the positive trends and correlation between the ecosystem development and sustainable growth. |
||||||
References | 1. "Sariska National Park – complete detail – updated". Retrieved 7 February 2017.
2. "Sariska National Park, Sariska Tiger Reserve". Archived from the original on 8 June 2007.
3. "Khathiar-Gir dry deciduous forests". Terrestrial Ecoregions. World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved 29 January 2017.
4. "Illegal mining threatens Sariska". The Times of India. 2010. Archived from the original on 3 November 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
5. Mondal, K.; Gupta, S.; Qureshi, Q.; Sankar, K. (2011). "Prey selection and food habits of leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India". Mammalia. 75 (2): 201–205. doi:10.1515/mamm.2011.011. S2CID 83984484.
6. Sankar, K.; Qureshi, Q.; Nigam, P.; Malik, P. K.; Sinha, P. R.; Mehrotra, R. N.; Gopal, R., Bhattacharjee, S., Mondal, K. and Gupta, S. (2010). "Monitoring of reintroduced tigers in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Western India: preliminary findings on home range, prey selection and food habits". Tropical Conservation Science. 3 (3): 301–318. doi:10.1177/194008291000300305.
7. Sharma, R. (2012). "Sariska reserve gets tiger number 007". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 19 October 2013. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
8. Khati, D. S. (2020). "How the lockdown impacted our tiger reserves | Analysis". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
9. "Rajasthan plots return of big cats". The Times of India. 9 September 2005. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
10. "Sariska on road to recovery, literally". The Times of India. 27 November 2006. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
11. "Sariska to get three tigers". The Times of India. 7 March 2008. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
12. Huggler, J. (2006). "India turns to spy technology to save tigers". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2 August 2009. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
13. Sharma, S. (2015). Sariska: The Tiger Reserve Roars Again. New Delhi: Niyogi Books. ISBN 9789383098712.
14. Mazoomdaar, J. "Now, Who's Crouching?". Open Magazine. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
15. "Sariska Tiger Reserve vetoes road conversion proposal". The Times of India. 2008. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
16. "National : Young tigress at home in Sariska". The Hindu. 2009. Archived from the original on 10 March 2009. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
17. Mazoomdaar, J. "Dispatched to Die". Open Magazine. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
18. "Sariska Tiger Was Poisoned: Forensic Report". Outlook. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
19. Mazoomdaar, J. "Conservation: the New Killer". Open Magazine. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
20. Torri, M. C. (2011). Conservation, relocation and the social consequences of conservation policies in protected areas: Case study of the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Conservation and Society, 9(1), 54-64. |