|
|||||||
Consequences of Migration: A Comparative Study of Arid and Semi Arid Districts of Western Rajasthan | |||||||
Paper Id :
17194 Submission Date :
2023-01-07 Acceptance Date :
2023-01-23 Publication Date :
2023-01-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/resonance.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
Migration is one of the three major factors which affect growth and distribution of population and other two are fertility and mortality. Migration have come to be regarded as the most pressing population problem in the almost all the developing countries even more pressing than high fertility and natural population growth rates ( United Nations 2013). Migration is a key to understanding the evolution of modern world. It has been a one of the serious problems emerging during the last few decades. The objective of this study is to analyse the consequences of migration in arid Bikaner and semi arid Nagaur districts of Western Rajasthan, India. This study is based on primary as well as on secondary data. Primary data were collected by field survey. Samples were collected with stratified systematic sampling techniques. The Data is analysed with statistical software and presented by cartographical techniques in the light of literature and field observation. Positive consequences push the area to grow up towards higher order of development while negative consequences pull the area towards backwardness.
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Migration, Consequences of Migration, Urbanisation, Transportation, Industrialisation, Communications. | ||||||
Introduction |
Migration is the third variable after birth and death which have a capacity to change the size and structure of any population quite drastically at any point of time, especially when large numbers move into or out of a particular area. Migration may change the socio-economic and political milieu of population. Thus migration also acts as a protection or against the existing socio-economic arrangements as well as on development at place of origin and place of destination. Such changes create the questions like; why do people move, in which direction they move, what are the patterns of their movement and concentration, and what are the causes and consequences. The different theoretical views enrich the understanding of the issues of migration related with the process of migration. Economic perspective reveals the empirically generalised patterns of migration, the situation-specific push-pull factors, the cost and the return while sociological view shows the relation of migration to the culture, caste, education, social development, poverty, family marriage and urbanization etc.
In reference to migration the urbanisation, transportation, industrialisation, communications, education, medical facilities, electrification and water supply etc. are positive consequences of historical development. On another side there are existences of crime such as prostitution, murder, theft, child labour, and other aspects like pollution, alcohol consumption and slum etc, which are negative consequences of migration. The migration creates the balance or imbalance in economic and social development. Thus migration is itself cause and consequences.
|
||||||
Objective of study | The objective of this study is to analyse the consequences of migration in the study area of arid and semi arid districts of Western Rajasthan, especially in the districts of Bikaner and Nagaur. |
||||||
Review of Literature | Migration is a process of changing the usual place of
residence. It started with the beginning of the humankind. It is evident that
people move from the place of origin to destination in search of means of
subsistence, betterment of life and to grapes the higher order of socio-
economic development. According to Debnath and Ray (2017) migration is a
major demographic process by which human civilization has spread out enriching
culture, disseminating ideas and generating social, political and economic
changes at the place of origin and destination. |
||||||
Methodology | This study is based on secondary as well as primary data. Secondary data sources include Census of India 1951-2011, Government of India and District Statistical Hand Book, DE &S, Jaipur. The primary data has been collected by conducting the field survey at arid district of Bikaner and semi arid district of Nagaur, Rajasthan state of India. The field survey includes the basic household survey, main household survey, in depth interview of some persons (sirpanches, secretaries, elderly etc.). The samples were collected from all urban area of both the districts and selected villages through stratified and systematic sampling. These villages were selected on the basis of composite index (based on development Indicators). The collected data were analysed with the help of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Data are represented through cartographic techniques. |
||||||
Analysis | Urbanisation is itself an indicator of population change either by
migration or natural growth. In Bikaner district the urban population shows
growth over the period in numbers but shows decline in percentage due to the
more pace of rural population. Bikaner city got an opportunity after the
independence to be a divisional headquarters for administration. Many
government establishments were developed in due course of time along with being
an important army headquarter and railway division. This leads to increase the
facilities here i.e. hospitals, education institutes from school to college and
recently university level, industry (especially food and agriculture) and
recreation etc. These resources attracted the people not only from surrounding
villages but also from outside the district and the states i.e. from Punjab and
Haryana also. People also move for job opportunity (Mondal and Tripathy,
2022). Here it is also noticeable that rural population were also increasing in Bikaner district because of Indira Gandhi Canal Project which had increased the facility for drinking and irrigation in rural area especially near to international boarder which is much more desert. This high rural growth supersedes the urban population in terms of percentage. But semi arid
district Nagaur shows continuous increase in urban population in terms of
number and percentage share. Nagaur does not have any such urban area where
facility is at high order. So, people migrate from rural area to urban and outside
the district especially for employment, medical and education services. Nagaur
district has been large rural population which depends upon monsoon rainfall
and that rainfall is not sufficient for earnings. Here, agriculture depends
upon nature’s juggling, while some of the area is based on tube wells for
irrigation. Such conditions create a push factor along with low industrial and
service sector employment. Thus people have to move another area for betterment
of life.
Urbanization comes along with change in occupational structure. It is
very much apparent in the table of Bikaner and Nagaur district of occupational
structure. As urbanization increases, people move from agriculture sector to
industry and service sector. In Bikaner district, rural population is showing
slightly low percentage share in cultivation over the period but this slow
change is due to Indira Gandhi Canal Project which maintained it by inmigration
in particular rural canal area of Bikaner. Percentage share of population is
increasing in service sector in rural area. It shows that people, who are
moving to urban area, are mostly occupying the place in industry and service sector. In Nagaur
district, population is bound to change their occupation due to limited
facility and opportunity in agriculture. Such population is either changing
their occupation at their own village level or at urban area within district or
outside the district for betterment of life. The above table shows this
scenario very clearly. The population which is moving from rural to urban are
adopting the occupation from agriculture to industry and service
sector.
Gosal and Krishan (1975) says that ‘spatial perspective
inmigration has been characteristic of the following types of areas: urban-
industrial concentration, plantation, new developed agricultural lands,
multipurpose project sites and other areas with development activities, mining
areas’. As it is clear that agriculture based country depends upon
irrigation facility very much. The Indira Gandhi canal is playing a very
important role for the migration in both the districts. In Bikaner district it
has changed the demographic and agricultural landscape. This canal is providing
irrigation and drinking water supply to the Bikaner district while in Nagaur
district it only provides the drinking water. Thus canal is a prominent factor
to attract the population in Bikaner district due to drinking and irrigation facility while Nagaur gets only drinking
water supply in particular areas so it is not able to slow down the pace of out
migration from Nagaur district. Where irrigation and drinking water availability are
prominent facilities in agriculture based developing country, at the same time
educational institutions are also play very crucial role in migration. It is
visible that educational institutions are continuously increasing in both
districts. Comparatively Nagaur district is having more number of schools in
compare to Bikaner district. Bikaner district have more high education
institutes than Nagaur district i.e. Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Agriculture
University, Veterinary and Animal Science University, 30 colleges and 10 other
technical colleges and one medical college. These higher learning institutes
are attracting student from all over the Rajasthan which shows in migration
trend in Bikaner. While in Nagaur district higher education institutes are very
limited so people have to out migrate for higher learning. Mahendra K. Premi (1980) also argues that ‘it is well
established that people with higher educational attainment have higher
achievement motivation and they become mobile, both socially and spatially’.
Medical facility is also a prominent aspect for migration of
people as well as education. Number of primary level medical facility is higher
in Nagaur district than Bikaner district. But higher or advanced medical
facility is available at Bikaner district than Nagaur. So Bikaner attracts
people from not only nearby districts but also from nearby states like Punjab
and Haryana. Bikaner has a medical college as well as Government hospital with super
speciality facility. Cancer department is famous for cheap and better treatment
at Bikaner. Train comes from Punjab is known as cancer train due to higher number of cancer patients in the
passenger of that train. Nagaur district does not have higher order medical
facility so people have to move nearby districts for such facility. Migration also
has negative consequences. Here in Bikaner and Nagaur districts some negative
consequences have been observed i.e. child labour, alcohol consumption,
environment pollution, street children problem, over use of public place,
prostitution, murder and theft. Srivastva (1998) in the study of labour
migration says that ‘uneven development between town and country has resulted
in the movement of large labour migrants from one area to another’. Such
movement open the ways for child labour also. In Bikaner district about 75
percent (rural) inmigrants are not observing child labour but rural
outmigrants, urban migrants observe more than 60 percent. On the other hand in
Nagaur district about 60 percent rural migrants are not observing while 60
percent of urban migrants are observing child labour. The above
logistic regression analysis has been carried out to examine the predicting
factors of being a child-labour in Bikaner and Nagaur districts of Rajasthan.
Result shows that prevalence of child-labour is found to be more among educated
persons. Business and agriculture are the purpose of migration in Bikaner
district. In Nagaur district, persons with good income have accepted child
labour. It is clear that level of education reduce the chances of being
child-labours. In both the districts, result reveals that as the level of
education increases, the probability of being child labour decreases But in Bikaner district, it has been found that persons with education
level ‘graduate and above’ are 21% more likely to experience child labour in
comparison to illiterate persons. Agriculture and business are the occupations
for existence of child labour and other places which promote child labour are
industries, shops, hotels, construction sites, cattle rearing, and agriculture
field. Illiterate person are most vulnerable to child labour practices. Mostly
poor family promotes children to earn very early so that family can earn livelihood.
High educated person are more aware about the child labour and society.
Interestingly, in both the districts, OBC and general caste are found to
experience more child labour in comparison to the scheduled caste. Persons who
reported employment or landholdings with employment at the place of origins are
found to experience more child labour in comparison to the persons who reported
landholdings as the economic conditions at the place of origin in both Bikaner
and Nagaur districts. Type of migration has different effects on child labour
in Bikaner and Nagaur districts. In Bikaner, out-migrants are found to be
slightly more likely to experience child labour than inmigrants but in Nagaur
district, outmigrants are found to be 49% less likely to experience child
labour in comparison to inmigrants.
Further it is also observed when people move from one place
to another then it is not possible for each of them to get a quality of area to
settle down initially. They also suffer the different type of pollution while
moving, working and dwelling. The initial settlement may be a squatter without
basic amenities, sewage and some time without ventilation. Working place be
with full of construction work. Such observation makes a perception about
pollution of that area. By these perception migrants of Bikaner shows less
pollution and Nagaur district migrants perceive more pollution around them. In
both districts rural area is facing less this problem than urban area because
urban area have more industry, vehicle and population. Migrants also
create a squatter as mentioned above at place of destination. All migrants have
no such purchasing or hiring capacity for higher standards houses. So they try
to occupy public place where they can build their semi permanent houses. After
few years these area convert into ghettos. Such phenomena are very common in
urban area. Thus urban inmigrants lives such life. They accept the over use of
public places where rural area do not face such problems at large scale. Although youth
population always has dominance in migration but sometimes also move with
family. These families have children who are get engagement in agriculture for
small works (animal rearing, cutting and collection of fodder etc.) in rural
area. But at the same time it is not possible for urban area. Where, parents work at construction site,
factory etc. and they are not able to send their children either at school or
at work place. So these children roam around the streets and commit a crime
which spoils their life as well as parents. In rural area, more than 60 percent
of migrants are not observing street children in both districts. In urban area,
Bikaner district migrants observe less than 40 percent and Nagaur district
migrants observe more than 60 percent.
Migration not only suffers the problem of child labour, environment pollution, street children, alcohol consumption but also migration creates distance from their family and on another side low income prompts them to indulge in pity thing like prostitution, theft and murder for more income to get facility in life. But such acts never help them to come out from that situation and to get better facility in life. Above mention acts come under crime in India so people easily never accept these acts publicly. Although during the survey some women admitted about the practices of prostitution. But they were not ready to provide detail about that due to the pressure of family and society. Such things are always concealed by the society. Murder cases were also accepted by the migrants in both the districts. These cases are higher in urban area rather than rural area. In compare the both districts in urban area, Nagaur district migrants accept higher than the Bikaner district migrants. The incidence of theft is also common in both the districts. Bikaner has more common in urban area than rural area while Nagaur have similar condition in rural and urban area. |
||||||
Conclusion |
There are positive and negative consequences of migration which are drawn by the analysing of the migration of Bikaner and Nagaur district population. It is very evident that irrigation facility in rural area reduces the percentage share of urban population to the total population. The same effect is also visible in occupational structure. Irrigation facility is also restraining the population to change their occupation from agriculture to service sector. Migration itself works as guiding force to enhance the facility of rail and road in two ways i.e. out migration creates a compulsion to develop the area so that out migration may not take place smoothly and another side inmigration also paves the way to enhance the rail and road facility by growing demand of population to fetch the opportunity from outside of their particular area.. It is also very clear that irrigation and drinking water availability reduce the out migration and attract the in migration. Further it is also noticeable that medical and education facility attract the in migration and reduce the out migration. The problems of child labour, street children, over use of public place and pollution are higher in urban area rather than rural area. Migration paves the way to the cosmopolitan culture which sometimes creates negative aspects also like alcohol consumption, murder and theft. Thus positive consequences and negative consequences create the environment in society according their nature. |
||||||
References | 1. Census of India (1951-2011). Census of India. Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
2. Economic and Statistical Directorate (2009). Zila Shankyakia Rooparekha 2009. District Nagaur, Economic and Statistical Directorate, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Economic and Statistical Directorate (2009). Zila Shankyakia Rooparekha 2009. District Bikaner, Economic and Statistical Directorate, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. Debnath, M. and Ray, S. (2017). Population move on Rajasthan: Regional analysis. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 12(3), 43-51.
5. Gupta, Manash Ranjan (1984). Migration, Unemployment and Development: A dynamics of two Sector Analysis. Economics Letters, 16 (1,2).
6. Gosal, G.S. and Krishan, G. (1975). Pattern of Internal Migration in India, in L.A. Koisnski and R.M. Prothero( eds), People on the Move, Methuen and Co. Ltd, London.
7. Haq, Ehsanul (2007). Sociology of Population in India. Macmillan India Ltd, Delhi.
8. Irving, J. and Mohapatra.S. (2005). Migration Remittance Flows, Findings from a global survey of central banks. World Bank.
9. Jodha, N.S. (1985). Population growth and the decline of common property resources in Rajasthan, India. Population and Development Review, Population Council, 11(2), 247-264.
10. Mondal, T. and Tripathy, B. (2022). A brief study of causes and consequences of migration in India with reference on Sunderban region,West Bengal. Education and Society, 47(1), 34-49.
11. Premi, M.K. (1980). Urban Out Migration: A study of its Nature, Causes and Consequences. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.
12. Robbins, P. (1998). Nomadization in Rajasthan, India: Migration, Institutions, and Economy. Human Ecology. Springer, 26(1), 87-112.
13. Srivastav, S.L. (1998). Five Year Plan and Economic Growth. Deep and Deep Publication, New Delhi.
|