|
|||||||
Identity-crisis and its Reaffirmation of Transgender in the Autobiography: Red Lipstick | |||||||
Paper Id :
17467 Submission Date :
2023-04-04 Acceptance Date :
2023-04-19 Publication Date :
2023-04-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/shinkhlala.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
Transgender is a person whose gender identity mismatches the gender assigned on the basis of sex at the time of the birth. The Transgender is a community that is excluded and marginalized from the mainstream of the society. All the societies in the world are binary-constituted where male and female are only genders that can have social living and activities. Except binary no one is social being and therefore, transgender is excluded. The transgender suffers trauma with this biased mindset of society. They are mistreated, molested, raped and brutally tortured. They are raising their voices against the sufferings endowed to them by the hetero-normative system of society. In the plight the few are writing their injustice done to them by society in their autobiographies to make the world know about them and compel to think what inhuman treatment they have been encountering for ages. The present research paper entitled ‘Identity-crisis and Its Reaffirmation of Transgender in Red Lipstick’ is an attempt to show that the transgender faces not only the identity conflict inside but also the trauma and misdoings of society towards them. However, identity reaffirmation be their single target to achieve in lives and they achieve their gender by being a beacon light to their community. The purpose of the paper to aware of the society about the struggle of transgender in gaining their real identity they long for. The qualitative approach with content analysis and textual analysis methods would be adopted including the application of the queer theory perspective to the transgender autobiography.
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Transgender, Identity-Crisis, Trauma, Queer. | ||||||
Introduction |
In the Post-modern era, marginalized sections of society are being brought back into centre of discourse to make them part and parcel of the society. Like Dalit and Adivasi identities, the identity of transgender has drawn the attentions of researchers to have a discourse on it in the realm of academia. Transgender can be seen in the red-light area, begging on buses and trains for earning and doing the jobs of sex- working. Transgenders are ostracized from binary society because of biological disorders and social hetero-normative mindset. The identity of transgender is both intrinsic and circumstances born. When the voice is being raised for the marginalized sections in the society for the sake of human rights, the transgenders can’t be deprived of their identity and natural rights to live the life with dignity and self respect in the society. Identity denotes a sense of being of a person, expression of that inwardness, and acceptance of it in the society. In other words, it refers to the self-realization of a person inwardly for his or her existence and acceptance of that existence with respect and dignity in society by its people. Kant states that human is end in itself, he can’t be a means for others. A similar idea opined by Shankracharya is that Brahma is truth and the world is a lie, all creatures are Brahma not differ from Brahma. There is no difference among creatures because of possessing the soul or the presence of God. Transgender can’t be different from males and females in society. Every individual deserves to get value and respect in society to be treated without being discriminated irrespective of gender, caste, color, class, community, religion and nationality etc. Every human being cherishes the hope of equality, liberty, and fraternity. The identity must be of several kinds: individual, gender, family, caste,, class, community, and religion. The identity of Transgender is a hot topic being discussed in the realm of contemporary research and academia. The marginalized sections of society have been pushed back by the main stream of society due to power structure of culture. The Post-Modern age subverts the power of authority and brings into focus the weaker class of society so that the segregated could enjoy equality, fraternity and liberty in society. Transgender refers to a status of non-confirmative being unfit to the heterosexual binary system of society. The transgender constitutes the deviant personality away from male and female genders of social set up. Oxford dictionary defines the term transgender as,” a person whose sense of personal identity and gender does not correspond to that person’s sex at birth, or which does not otherwise conform to conventional notions of sex and gender.”
The transgender is an umbrella term to include several kinds of people who do not conform to their expected gender and are living the gender opposite to their assigned gender at birth. The transgender is associated with transsexual (transition of male to female and female to male through surgery and intake of hormones) and transvestite (transformation of a person by cross-dressing). Transgender includes gay, lesbian, drag queen, drag king, agender, cisgender, butch and femme who are different from their assigned sex at the time of their birth.
The roots of transgender studies are inhibited in feminism. The reason behind it lies is that Feminism talks about sex and gender wherein societal make up in the dominancy of patriarchy regards female as secondary and subsidiary to be oppressed. The second wave of Feminism – the master slogan made by Simon De Beauvoir in her ‘Second Sex’, “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman” brought system, structure of male dominated society into analysis and reevaluated them to reveal androgenic interest out for female liberation The Queer Studies is related to LGBTQIA encompassing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual. The key pinpoint of Queer Study is the study of homosexuality of the non-hetero-normativity of people who are out-casted and on the fringe of society. Fundamentally, the Queer Studies in the light of Post-Structuralism and Deconstruction subverts the traditional establishment of assumption of sexuality and gender identities and refers them by breaking down their very essence. The Queer theory comprises of transgender studies within its periphery but keeps a distinctive difference from it. The queer theory focuses on homosexuality, whereas Transgender Studies on deviant of personality “from one’s socially assigned gender”. (Susan Stryker, 2008). Queer Theory does not seek to make an inclusion of banished group from normal and dominant society but rather attempts to reveal the political agenda of normality out and make abnormal excluded. Michael Foucault’s “The History of Sexuality” proposed that gender and sexuality are constructed by power such as religion, law, and medicine. The homosexual minority identities speak of sexuality. Queer theorists seek to articulate that normative codes of sexuality and gender are neither stable nor natural.
(Foucault, 1976). Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, the influential queer theorist, in his “Between Men” (1985) and “The Epistemology to the Closet” (1991) attempted to disclose writers’ hidden sexuality. Sedgwick showed that literary texts elevate male homo-social relations, homosexual anxiety by converting them to safer topics. Transgender Studies theorists are Susan Stryker, Judith Butler, Joy Prosser, Leslie Feinberg and who made great contribution in this emerging field. Judith Butler’s “Gender Trouble” (1990) proposes the concept of ‘Performativity of gender’ that gender is based on performance. The doing of daily routine in walking, talking, dressing and behaving modeled on gender enters deep into mind and makes the person away from the original sex. Psychologically, he or she becomes the doing or stereotypes. (Butler, 1990) Sex and gender are the two terms that require especial mention to be explored here. Sex is a biological phenomenon and gender is a social construction. By the external genitalia – penis and vagina, sex is determined either male or female. On the other hands, gender denotes both fact and process. It can be understood with an example “When a baby is born, it is termed a girl.” This statement is a piece of information ending the uncertainty of sex, at the same time it is the beginning as well because the parents think about the baby “to become a girl who will someday become a woman… how babies of that category must be dressed, addressed, and engaged with.” (Lee Airton, 2019). Gender is everywhere in visual and verbal form – hairs, clothes, talking and language. Joy Prosser’s ‘Second Skins: The Body Narratives of Transsexuality (Gender and Culture Series) (1998) argues that Queer theory’s usefulness is limited for it is too little concerned with the materiality of the body which transgender often experiences in traumatic ways. Transgender-studies pins the point how gender is experienced. (Prosser, 1998). Leslie Feinberg’s ‘Transgenders Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman’ (1996) seeks to challenge the presumption in the west of naturalness of gender dimorphism by exploring the gendered figures in other societies and historical periods – hijras in India and Native American bendheche Identity by Birth:
Laxmi was born in a Brahmin family in Gorakhpur. She was born as a boy. Normally, it is a common custom that by seeing the genitalia, the gender is confirmed whether the baby born is a male or female. Therefore, Laxmi was the boy by birth determined by the genital. That boy named Raju. There are two terms sex and gender which need to be clarified initially. Sex is a biological phenomenon which is determined by the chromosomes of parents male and female: XY and XX respectively. Therefore, sex is natural and God-gifted. Gender is a social construction over baby what dress he or she is going to wear, which color he or she is going to use and what the way of language and how he or she is going to behave with others. Laxmi says: “When I was born, the doctor checked my genitals and pronounced me a boy.”All these concepts are already existed before the baby takes the birth. The gender in society is binary: male and female. Within this periphery none exists. There is discrimination in gender between a boy or a girl because parents teach different way of talking, separate way of dressing and opposite way of behaving with others to their sons and daughter. Transgender or Third genders is out of this boundary. Hence a boy is supposed to have a learning of dressing, coding of manners and way of talking totally different from a girl. She adds: “What we’re assigned as at birth – male or female – is our gender. And somewhere along the way, we human beings decided that gender would dictate our lives, steer us down certain paths, brand our behavior and inform almost all our choices – from something as trivial as the color of your car to bigger decisions such as choosing a partner for life.”
|
||||||
Objective of study | There are few objectives of the study ascertained which are as followings:
1. To study transgender’s (transwoman) identity-crisis (dysphoria) and reassertion of intrinsic identity in heteronormative and binary society.
2. To assess psychological conflict of transgenders in opposite bodies and antagonistic stereotyped mind of society pressing them. |
||||||
Review of Literature | Transgenders had value
and respect in society in Vedic period when Sanskrit language and Indian Vedic
culture were in practice. Sanskrit Grammar consists of three persons -
PrathamPurush, MadhyamPurush and UttamPurush. Vedic culture accepted
transgenders and possessed three genders: Male, Female and Triti-Prakiriti. The
Vedic culture provided transgenders their identity to live in society with due
respect. If the comparison is made between Sanskrit language and Vedic culture,
and English language and British society, findings are sought that Sanskrit and
Vedic culture consisted of three persons and three genders respectively. In
British period, transgenders lost their pride and respect which they used to
enjoy during Vedic and Mughals Period because Britisher made a law under IPC
377 penal code which treated transgenders as criminal if they are blamed to be
involved in unnatural sex. This law created a trans-phobia in the society and
their respect ended in smoke. They were kept outside the society and lived
miserable life until they have been given the term
‘Third gender’ and rights of citizen by prominent decision of Supreme Court of
India on 14 June, 2014.
Dr Darsha Jain
investigated in her article “Me Hijra, Me Laxmi” (2016) as a heart-rendering
tale of a transgender who craves for and acquires femininity in a male body.
The paper chiefly discusses the early life as Raju, a boy, her announcement as
hijra, her representation of transgender voice on the international level, the
contribution to Hijra community, and key role in re-examining the section 377
of Indian Penal Code. The study mentions that She suffers psychological,
physical, mental, and emotional tribulations in the entire course of journey
from Raju to being Laxmi and ultimately acquires her female identity going
through identity crisis, and voices for the TG community's rights and respects
to enable them independent. The paper pointed out that Her tale of
transformation from anguished soul to a bold activist is a motivation to other
transgenders to live with respect. The scholar has adopted the content analysis
method for the study. Bhardwaj, 2017 The research paper named “On the
Plight of The Third Gender: Quest for Identity in the Narratives Me Hijra Me
Laxmi and The Truth About Me: A Hijra Life Story”analysed that the
third genders encounter the discrimination and marginalization at the hands of
dominant culture of society, at the same time they do the best efforts to make
them recognise to society by gaining their identity. The scholar delved into
the source of queer theory which makes a great contribution to literature and
which is studied in Indian context. The work adopted the textual analysis
method, narrative analysis method, and the literary analysis method as the
tools to conduct the research. The paper explored the identity crisis, pathetic
sufferings, and struggles of transgender community to get the identity.
Furthermore, the paper focused the point of the contribution made by third
genders to queer literature and awakening to TG community as trans-activists as
well. The scholar made a suggestive note to change the social mindset towards
the third gender community and embrace them with dignity and respect in
society. Dasari et al., 2018 The research article entitled “Transgender
Literature in India: A Comparative Study of I Am Vidya and A Gift of Goddess
Lakshami” by Twinkle Dasari and G chenna Reddy examined the
comparative analysis of two trans narratives throwing light on transgenders'
psychological turmoil, social discrimination, efforts to reclaim the gender
identity through sex reassignment. The paper made a key point that in spite of
being marginalised, transgenders showed the bold step by writing down their
heart-rendering sufferings and gaining their identities. Both Vidhya and Manobi
have some similarities and the few differences in respect with their
experiences of trans lives. The scholar adopted the comparative method, textual
analysis method and narrative method to do the work. The study suggested that
society should abandon the discrimination and accept transgenders in the
mainstream and these trans-bios should be incorporated in the syllabus to make
a better understanding about them in society. Singh, B. 2019 B. Singh in the
research paper "The Plight of Transgender in Laxmi Narayan Tripathi's Red
Lipstick" evaluated the problems and sufferings of transgenders on
familial, social, economic and health issues levels. The paper defines
transgenderism and describes its historical background up-to present day in
Indian socio-political condition in which transgenders live in. The study seeks
to elaborate the miserable and painful sufferings of the marginalised
transgender people. The work analyses transgenders' identity crisis, exclusion
from society, joblessness, sex-working and sexual exploitation. The study
suggests that society should change the attitude towards transgenders and due
respect and dignity should be given to them as human beings. Kavitha, 2020 T. A. Kavitha in the
research article entitled “Gender Dysphoria Among Indian Third Gender in
LaxminarayanTripathi’s Autobiographies” evaluated that gender dysphoria refers to
disorder of gender identity among third gender experiencing trouble and
distress due to the mismatch between physical body and psychological one. The
study probed into the matter that the identity crisis among transgenders occurs
owing to the conflict of ideas what their inner mind long for and what their
biological bodies are externally. The inward changes in TG at childhood is
partially perceptible in respect to liking to the female dressing, however, at
large scale, craving for femininity in male TG is observable at the adolescent
period resulting in isolation and depression and leading them for being
discriminated and exploited by the society. The scholar made an argument that
the traces of third gender identity, sub culture, stereotypes and customs
inhibited in ancient culture and they had a great in ancient India. The study
proceeded to look at the identity crisis, craving of a male for opposite sex
female behaviour, struggling for determining her own intrinsic identity with
the support of family, seeking TG's identity, and being a guiding star for her
community. The work suggested that TG should be respected as human beings and
they should be accepted as they are as normal by the society. Jayant, Sonia. 2021 The thesis entitled '
Body Gender and Identity the Eunuch in Indian Narratives' evaluated eunuchs'
incongruous body, their discrimination in the binary based concept society,
their exclusion from the society, their joining to eunuch community and its
subculture and their traumas and sufferings in autobiographies and cinema
narratives in the hands of dominant heteronormative society. The key points the thesis discusses are eunuchs’ psychological agonies, physical and mental
tortures done by social attitudes and their struggles to reclaim their own
selfidentities through intellectual literary products. No especial work has
been attempted on the identity-crisis and it
reaffirmation on the ‘Red Lipstick’ yet. Therefore, the present paper seeks to
find out
the above said theme in Laxmi Narayan Tripathi’s
autobiography
entitled ‘Red lipstick’. |
||||||
Main Text |
Expression of
Femininity in Masculinity During boyhood Raju was
a fragile boy in physique. He was suffering from Asthma which was being cured
by the doctor at the extra care of his father. Raju's father named Chandradev
Chandinath Tripathi had three offsprings including him (Raju). Rukmani Was
the eldest daughter ,second offspring was Raju and the third one Shashi.
Transgnder naturally shows girlish and boyish nature both. A boy feels a girl
inside and a girl a boy inside. If a transgender who is a boy in his boyhood he
is attracted towards girlish activities like sense of dressing, wearing
make-up, love for jewellery, painting, drawing and flowy fabric. Laxmi as Raju
feels femininity in boyish body. He is attracted to the wearing of bangles on
his wrists that look beautiful to him. He likes to use the feminine pronouns
speaking out she or her addressing to him instead of employing the pronouns of
masculine gender. Raju acts like a girl. Laxmi expresses
boldly in the text “But the
problem was that I was feminine despite being a boy. So when I wore bangles
because they looked so good, red and shiny on my wrists…so I felt like girl
too. I would often refer to myself as one – ‘ Main Abhi aati
hoon’.” Raju likes to have long hair like girl because it gives inner satisfaction to him. But as he likes to grow them, he is chided and checked by his father that this way of keeping long hair is a sign of femininity which is unacceptable in the family and society. Therefore raju’s father passes the reprimanding comment: “achche ghar ke ladke aise nahi karte” (Boys from good household do not behave this way). The external body of Raju is of male and internally he feels himself as a female. The internal feeling creates an idea od confusion of his identity because his male organ suggest him to be a male bu his inner feelings rejects his identity of male and tells him that he is a female inside. Laxmi adds further," “The world kept suggesting I was a girl, but my private parts indicated that I was a boy. And then there was the whole question of sexuality. I was attracted to boys – my first inklings and stirrings of lust came from noticing big, strong arms, the hint of a guy’s moustache over his lips, billboards that advertised men’s underwear – and I was puzzled. Was there a woman inside me who couldn’t really express herself…” Passing Through Identity–crisis Gender identity
crisis – dysphasia goes in mind who the person is either male or female or both
boy in girl or girl in a boy. Laxmi also feels the same situation of gender
confusion by birth she was a male but inside a girl exists. Therefore, the
doubt always remains who she is really and what identity she possesses. Vijay was one of her good friends and Laxmi liked him very much. After
Vijay’s death Laxmi’s life was vacant because no one understand her. Different types
of thoughts strike her mind. She says: “Will everyone disown me?, ‘Will I have
to become a sex worker’ is my fate sealed’ , should I kill myself “Praveen
sensed that Laxmi (Raju) as a both ,has a femininity in himself. He accepted it
and never looked at him as odd. He openly said that “you were,you are and you
will always remain Laxmi for me” When laxmi was in class 4th standard, she was
suffering from disphoria, she was in dilemma whether as a Raju, she is a male or
she is a female in a boy’s body. At this critical moment she decided to meet Ashoka Rao who was said to be an expert in deciding the gender particularly to
those who was suffering from identity crisis. In those days Maheswari Garden
was the hub of gay men, where people like Ashoka and his friends often meet and
discuss the issues community. Laxmi spotted the group and saw that these gay
men were also called as ‘homo’,’mamu’,’chhakka’, as she is used to be. He met Ashoka and introduced herself to be a man of feminate nature . Inside her ,there
is a girl in boy 's body which the world consider abnormal and odd Ashoka
motivate that oddity is not in her but in people’s mind and therefore don’t be
discouraged and be continue to her work. Ashoka says: “No, my child you are
absolutely normal. What is normal is the world around us.” The pressure of
getting Raju, married to a girl ,has been made by his parent. Laxmi clearly
denied the idea of getting married because the marriage would ruin two lives: a
girl who would be her life partner and other one Laxmi herself. The reason of
refusal of marriage proposal was that Laxmi as Raju was really not the boy but
inwardly she was the girl. Therefore she was unsuitable for the marriage. Laxmi
says to her father that she would commit suicide if Raju will get married to
anyone else. She says: “Spoil not only
my own life, but also that of woman who would marry me! I would rather kill
myself.” Comments on
Parents or Family People
living in society make harsh comments on the family of transgender and the
transgender. When Raju exposes the activities of femininity, the world taunts
Raju’s father. She says: “Mr Tripathi talks so much about the family name and
this and that but he could n’t keep his own son under control. He went and
joined Hijra. He was plagued with this kind of talk for years together.”But his
father never expressed his anger to Raju nor demotivates him ever. Once in an
interview his father is asked, “Don’t you ashamed that you’re Brahmin and your
eldest son is Hijra” He replied in a positive way that transgender can be
anyone’s son or daughter because it is not our identity. He says, ”Why should I
feel ashamed. No educated or woman goes into their son’s or daughter’s bedrooms
to see what they are doing there.”“My child is not handicapped, my child is not
mentally challenged, my child is different, his sexuality is different and that
doesn’t bother me. No body throws away a desi ghee laddoo, whether it comes out
perfectly round or misshapen. My child is not and will always be my
child.” Acceptance of
Gay community Laxmi met
Ashoka Row Kavi at Maheshwari Garden. He was a gay guy who wanted to include
Laxmi into his community of MSM (Male sex Male). But Laxmi did not stay long in
that community, however, she was insearch of an identity confirmation who she was.
Vijay Nair, Goda Bai, brought laxmi into the quere world and accepted her
through the ceremony of Haldi Kumum. She wanted to be the part of that
community because she was in a search for an identity to call her own. Goda Bai
made Laxmi the part of that community. She says: “This girl is Miss Thane. From
today, she’s christened as Miss Thane and this is your Haldi Kumkum ceremony.”
Laxmi aligned herself with the Kotis, effeminate persons to search her
identity. Godas are not allowed to meet gay men because it becomes the matter
of stigma to gay men. “Gay men wouldn’t interact too much with other
Kotis. We had more of a hi-bye equation then, Goda and I because as a hard-core
gay man, youy would never want to be even seen talking to a koti.” Goda saw
Laxmi evolving into femininity more and more. She is being a transgender
specially trans-woman. Therefore, Laxmi could not resist herself from being
Goda and moves on to be a trans-woman. It is her complete and absolute identity
which she was searching for her existence she says: “And then, ofcourse I
finally became Hijra – within the Hijra community is where I found the greatest
self aligniment and self identification. And till date, that is how I see
myself – as Hijra.” In Indian
culture especially Hindu convention hijra community is considered as sub gods
higher than mortals, - men, women, saints, and sadhus. We as the third gender
are integral part in social order in ancient and Middle Ages. Hijras were
visible and present in the society but Britishers made them out-casted. No
religion was against them nor any period in history disfavored. None can wipe
out Hijra’s existence and beings from society. Laxmi says: “So no body, I
believe, can wipe us out and deny our existence. Society wants to marginalized
us – law of the land of home came into being during British rule over
India.”Hijras are believer and worshiper of Shiv sakti, enrgy on Ardhnareshwar
– male and female – existence in one’s energy. Shakti, the mother, can never
leave her child. Hijras are the family of Mahadev Kutumb. All the outcasts like
Daanvas, Pischachinis, Bhoots are the family or Kutumb of Shiva. Therefore,
they all were Baaratis on Shiva’s marriage with Parvati, the daughter of Daksha
The Prajapati. It is supposed that who soever is deserted by Daksha, the king,
takes shelter under Shiva. Shiva is the sheltergiver to each and every
outcasted. Laxmi says:“ Whoever he thought was misfit in society – sought
shelter with Mahadev, who did not believe in any system. And that is why
he has daanvas, pishachinis, bhoots – all the
outcast – everyone under him.” Laxmi,at the age of ten, during Mahashiv Ratri
Parv, got married to Shivain temple by wearing a mangalsutra bought for money
from the shop. She made Shiva her husband forever, and caretaker. She was under
divine protection. She states: I was married to him! For years after that Shiva
is my Husband! In A way, I initiated myself as a devadasi then!.” Ganesh
sawant aka Gauri is a name who is also a trans-guy from the high class family
his father is an assistant commissioner of police. For the respect of the
family he can’t be a Hijra but Ganesh is acquainted with Laxmi since they both
met at Maheshwari Garden days of being gay. He is a boy
with male body and a girl inside his maharstrian family is an orthodox and he
tells a lie to parents that he is going to attend pooja and party stealing the
blouse of his sister and saree of his mother to wear it for his inner
satisfaction of female identity which he wants to expresss in these words:
Later he joined the hijra community and change his name and became gauri and
transwoman she wentin gender confermation surgery. On the T.v show ‘Sach Ka
Samna’ Laxmi was asked whether she had been physically aused. She gave an
affirmative answer – if the family particularly father had not been a support
to raju, he would have been selling his body in the market involved in sex
working for bread and butter. She says: “If it weren’t for him, I would have
been standing in a brothel, selling my body. I would have been HIv position by
now.” Sexual abuse is a man-made hellish misfortune done to the transgender in
the civilized society. Transgender is vulnerable in the hands of male
dominance. Besides it, a boy who is girlish in nature is also vulnerable by the
sex performer. Raju who is six years old, is a weak and feminine in demeanor
sexually exploited by his own cousin in a wedding party. At this age when he is
totally unaware what the sex means, he is penetrated by his cousin. He feels
intense pain and faints for the first time. He expresses the trauma of the
first rape done to hi is unforgettable ever. He says:“He went on raping me
during the course of that wedding, and even brought in another cousin and
friends. I was in constant pain, there was a burning, I can never describe and
never ever forget… I never thought they would ever dream of hurting
me.” Sufferings: Transgender
life is replete with sufferings and pains. The life for third gender becomes
unbearable when the biological family, gives the third gender when they
disclose their identity of Hijra before them. The family rejected them because
they became frightened by the social taunting volleyed to the family’s respect.
Even educated person don’t understand the pangs and psychological confusion of
their children they are facing. Laxmi says that as Ganesh becomes Gauri, his
father gives him up in the name of professional honour that an assistant
commissioner has a hijra son that has joined the hijra community. Laxmi
quotes: “Gauri’s family disowned her. She ‘d lost her
mother at a young age, and her father simply asked her to leave home one day
because he couldn’t take cross-dressing and the taunts of his social and
professional circles anymore.’ Laxmi’s biological family adopted Gauri as a
member of his family Where Gauri often came and asked Laxmi’s mother to cook
lunch or dinner to take rest in Laxmi’s bedroom. Now, Gauri is the director of
Sakshi Char Chowghi, a community-based (hijra and TG based) HIV/ AIDS
organization. |
||||||
Methodology | The qualitative approach would be adopted in this research study. The research would follow various methods such as content analysis, textual analysis, in depth study, and close reading interpreting, comparing and contrasting primary sources selected for analysis. The data would be gathered for analysis by the method of primary sources under which autobiography would be studied closely. The secondary sources would also be employed for analysis, which includes online-material, research articles and library materials concerning to the identity of transgender in India. Queer theory would be employed as a tool and technique to discuss the transgender identity in autobiographies. |
||||||
Conclusion |
Laxmi Narayan Tripathi voices her personal narrative of being a transwoman from a male body in the autobiography named ‘Red Lipstick’. Laxmi discribes her journey from Raju to Laxmi a transwoman. In order to get the inner identity She has to suffer physical torture, mental agonies and social taunts and many tribulations. In this course of identity establishment Laxmi encountered the identity-crisis of being who she really is either male or female. By joining Gay community, Goda and ultimately Hijra community, She feels satisfaction that such identity of inner self she had been searching for. She got it and became what she longed for. The autobiography ‘Red Lipstick’ is the revelation of self identity and its regaining against the inhuman society that treats transguys as abnormal and odd. |
||||||
References | 1. Airton, Lee Ph.D. ‘Gender Your Guide’ (2019)
2. Beauvoure, Simon De. ‘Second Sex’ (1948)
3. Butler, Judith. ‘Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1990)
4. Butler, Judith. ‘Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex (1993)
5. Cudden, J.A. ‘Literary Terms and Literary Theory’ (2013)
6. Oxford Dictionary
7. Foucault, Michael. ‘History of Sexuality’ (1976)
8. Feinberg, Leslie. ‘Transgenders Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman’ (1996)
9. Halberstam, Jack. “Female Masculinity’(1998)
10. Prosser, Jay. ‘Second Skins: The Body Narratives of Transsexuality (Gender and Culture Series) (1998)
11. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. ‘Between Men’ (1985)
12. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. ‘Epistemology to the Closet’ (1991) (XIII) Stryker, Susan. ‘Transgender History’ (2008) |