|
|||||||
Resistance through Contemporary Art on Social Violence and Discrimination by Naresh Suna and Rajat Kumar Dhal | |||||||
Paper Id :
17834 Submission Date :
2023-07-13 Acceptance Date :
2023-07-19 Publication Date :
2023-07-23
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
The research work deals with the case study on the
contemporary visual art practices in Odisha on gender violence, atrocity, and
caste discrimination. Rajat Kumar Dhal and Naresh Suna are activists cum
artists of contemporary visual art practice in Odisha, who are practicing on
various types of social issues. Rajat Kumar Dhal is from B.K. College of Art
and Crafts, whereas Naresh Suna is from the Government College of Art and
Crafts, Khallikote. Both had an opportunity to participate in art camps across
India; it helped them to explore many new things that were beyond their
imagination and the art curriculum existing from 1960 to 1990. Rajat Kumar Dhal
deals with the discrimination of women in Odisha, expressed through his
performance art. Naresh Suna explored in his visual art practice through
different kinds of atrocities on Dalit community in Odisha and expressed it
through various pictorial means. |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Contemporary Art, Resistance, Performance Art, Social Issues. | ||||||
Introduction | Contemporary art practices in Odisha emerged at the national
level much later in comparison with other parts of India due to lack of
awareness of the art educational institutions in Odisha. Whoever was getting
passed out from visual art institutions in Odisha, they were engaged in school
jobs and nobody tried to do individual or freelance art practice. Even they did
not wish to travel other parts of India. Also, another reason is that, before
the art institutions were established in Odisha, very few artists received
their training at prestigious art institutions in India, such as Kala Bhawan at
Shantiniketan, Government Art & Craft College, Calcutta, M. S. University,
Baroda and J. J. School of Art, Mumbai. However, they stayed far away from
contemporary art practices. They only participated in the annual art
exhibition, which was organised by Odisha Lalit Kala Akademi, but at the same
time, the historical tradition also played an important role in the modern and
contemporary era. As this study is founded on contemporary visual art
practices, we observe two phases of development, one is the Government College
of Art and Craft at Khallikote from 1960 to 1990 and the other is the B.K.
College of Art and Craft at Bhubaneswar from 1990 to till date. In the
Khallikote phase, so many artists who were appointed as faculty members after
breaking the limitation of their student phase in Khallikote College, but they
preferred to follow the European academic style. The other institution is B.K.
College of Art and Craft paved the way for new thinking through the progressive
artists who themselves were faculty members, who lead the visual art practices
in challenging conditions. The contemporary visual art practices in Odisha in
the city of Bhubaneswar through B.K. College of Art and Craft started changing
slowly towards new methods of art practices during1990s. It was a different
turn of extent. The Government College of Art and Craft, Khallikote was still
following the method of European academic style of art practice, the pioneer
students of B.K. College of Art and Craft attempted to catch the new genre of
visual art practice after getting passed out from the college. Also, there is a
reason, why these students wanted to go beyond the conventional art practice,
which was before 90s? After the establishment of B.K. College of Art and Craft
at Bhubaneswar, some significant faculty from M.S. University of Baroda, Kala
Bhawan of Shantiniketan, Banaras Hindu University, Andhra University of
Vishakhapatnam, Government College of Fine Arts, Chennai, and others from
abroad visited and interacted with the students. Their interaction with
students brought significant changes in their visual art practices. It paved
the ways for different thinking and helped students to move towards a new
destination for their art practices after having their art education at
Bhubaneswar. The impact of globalization and internationalism already brought
changes in the perception of the arts world, which was absent in the government
college. |
||||||
Objective of study | 1. The study of contemporary art practices on various social
issues in Odisha from various perspectives. 2. How it looks into the development of the 1990s. 3. How the artists of the post-1990s began from a distinctly
different set of concerns, especially motivated towards the articulation of
relevant issues from the social context of the state. 4. How they break the language of the medium of pre-1990s
practices and explore new mediums. |
||||||
Review of Literature | The journal of the
‘Odisha Lalit Kala Akademi’ titled ‘Rangarekha’ (1977-90), has publishedthe
regional language, biographical sketches of some of the artists, andreported
the annual activities of the Akademi. In some of these publications, they discuss
the aesthetic qualities of Patta paintings, but never caries any information on
the situation of modern art in Odisha. A monograph on Sarat
Chandra Deboby Dinanath Pathywas published in the year 1992. Here heargues on
Sarat Chandra Debo’s distinctiveness of works and briefly discussed his life
sketch. Durga Prasad Pattnaik’s book on Bimbadhara Varma is a biographical text
and this work hardly describes the history of visual art practice in Odisha. The history of
pre-90s gallery art practices in Odisha has received the attention of very few
scholars and writers. It was Dinanath Pathy, who for the first time mentioned, a
few modern art and artists of Odisha in his edited book titled ‘Let a Thousand
Flowers Bloom’ (2001) from 1950 to 2000. Therefore, one may say that he did not
focus deeply to analyze the emergence of modern art in Odisha, as a
chronological development and did not even provide a proper documentary history
of the then-art practices. Therefore, Dinanath Pathy’s writing is a systematic
detailed analysis, and only an overview lacking any analytical information. According to Gayatri
Sinha, modern art started in Odisha due to the powerful influence of Kolkata by
amalgamations of the ongoing traditional pictorial norms. Moreover, she talks
about the ‘Odisha Lalit Kala Akademi’, which has failed to promote the
development of the modern art movement. She made a good attempt to map out the
history of modern art in Odisha in her analysis. ‘Aesthetics of
Pictorial Language’ was written by Soubhagya Pathy in the year 2006. In this
book, there is a chapter on “Easel Paintings, Installations and Happenings:
Language Alien”, that focuses on the easel paintings borrowed from Western
academics, an introduction of new art language aesthetics. This book showshow
the native art languages have changed with the impact of the modern art
movement of the West. It includes a few artworks (one work from each of the few
artists, between 1990 to 2000). It makes no serious attempt to trace the
trajectory of development as the modern art of Odisha. |
||||||
Main Text |
From the
beginning of 1990 to now, a significant number of artists are produced in
Odisha. Many of them settled in market-oriented cities like New Delhi, Mumbai,
and Baroda, etc. Very few artists preferred to work in Odisha, especially in a
city like Bhubaneswar and other minor cities like Cuttack, Balasore, Bhadrak,
Sambalpur and Berhampur, etc. It may be observed that very few artists are
aware of social issues and depicted in their mainstream visual art practices.
All the renowned artists from Odisha were not conscious of the social issue in
visual art practices or any activism between 1960 and 1990. They were involved
in what they received as art education in their respective institutions and as
many artists are followers of mythology and ritual, they could not explore and
engage themselves with any social issues or attempted to depict through their
art practices. Rajat Kumar
Dhal and Naresh Suna are activists-cum-contemporary visual art practitioners in
Odisha, who are creating works of art on various type of social issues. Rajat
Kumar Dhal is from B.K. College of Art and Craft, whereas Naresh Suna is from
the Government College of Art and Craft, Khallikote. Both had the
opportunity to participate in art camps, workshops, demonstrations,
research grants, exhibitions, and artist-in-residency programmes across India;
it helped them to explore many new things that were beyond their imagination
and the art curriculum which was existing from 1960 to 1990. Rajat Kumar
Dhal deals with the violence on women, expressed through his performance art in
various places in Bhubaneswar as well as other parts of Odisha. Naresh Suna
explored in his visual art creations, different kinds of atrocities on the
Dalit community in the western part of Odisha, and expressed it through various
pictorial means. Art on Women’s
Violence In the context
of contemporary art practices in India, everybody talks about feminism. But
there are few artists, who talk about feminism in Western contexts, not in
Indian contexts. Nowadays, violence affects the lives of a lot of women and
girls in all socio-economic classes in every place in India as well as Odisha.
It cuts across cultural and religious barriers and takes a variety of forms
such as domestic abuse to child marriages, and female circumcision. Violence
against women in India is unreported. The practice of
demanding dowry has spread so much in Indian society and more specifically in
rural areas. Death by burning is often used as punishment for the innocent
young girl who is unable to satisfy the greed of her in-laws. Most of the women
are burnt by their in-laws or take suicide for dowry-related tortures.
Subordination of women has led to violence under this head rise. The incidence
of domestic violence crosses all the barriers of class, caste, income, culture,
and religion and has become a highly underreported crime. Domestic violence is
one of the greatest obstacles to gender equality. It obstructs women to secure
their fundamental rights to equal protection under the law and the right to
life and liberty. The basic reason for violence against women is their inferior
status in a male-dominated society as educationally, economically, politically,
and socially. Besides, there are so many other reasons. Raj Kumar Dhal
is one of the young contemporary artists in Odisha who trained as a painter
from B.K. College of Art. But he engaged with art in different media like
performance art, multimedia art, etc. The basic concept behind all his work is
violence and atrocity against women in Odisha.
The
performance-based art titled Justice (fig. 01), Hang
the Rapist (fig.02) and Ghost Wait for Justice (fig.03)
show rape and murder happened in Odisha.
In the
performance work titled Justice (fig.01), Rajat Kumar himself performed,
dressed up as a bear. He tried to spread the message in public places across
the city of Bhubaneswar through his public performances. At the same time, he
tried to explain, how the animal is more human than real human. Through this
performance, an inscribed surface is pasted on front and back side of his body
“We are more human than the rapists, even the beasts don’t rape.”[1] He tried
to convey his idea that the rapists are more violent than animals. They have no
human sense and responsibility in their life. Rajat Kumar tried to convey his
idea through performance-based art. The ideas of this work are based on the
gang rape incidents that happened in the Puri district of Odisha. In the
performance work of art, titled Hang the Rapist (fig.02), Rajat Kumar Dhal and
his friend Arun Kumar Behera raised their voice and protested against the
government. After the rape incident happened in Odisha, the rapist didn’t get
any punishment. This is a public performance by Dhal and Behera. So, here Dhal
and Behera wrote on their body Hang the Rapist and walk around the city of
Bhubaneswar to awarding strong punishment to the rapists in Odisha. The
performance work titled Ghost Wait for Justice (fig.03), also performance-based
artwork, which deals with the rape victim, who does not get the proper justice
in her life. Work of Art on
Atrocity and Caste Discrimination in Odisha “Most of us have been educated to think of
Dalits as the ancient Brahmanical system intended: as the problematic
people-until the last generation referred to as ‘untouchables’- stigmatized and
discriminated against, at the bottom of the Indian social system, not to be
talked about, or even seen for that matter, thus rendering them invisible as
well as untouchable in much of contemporary discourse and visual imagery.”[2] In the
contemporary situations, everybody talks about human rights and Dalit issues
for publicity, but how many people go through the root of these problems and
implemented properly constitutional rights practically? We often criticise the
upper-caste for the agony of the Dalits but caste-Hindus are equally
responsible for such a situation as for the fact that caste-Hindus is the main
custodian of the Hindu religious practices.
In Indian
contemporary art contexts, many of the artists are involved in celebrating
mythologies and their cultural manifestation through technology and nudes of
narratives. It’s an outright upper-class dominance. From a specifically Indian
perspective, though, there are social problems, but the problem of caste is a
hierarchical system that not only depends on differing levels of power but also
has divisions within levels. From a Dalit artist’s perspective, the main
requirement is necessary to overcome the upper caste dominance, and it is a
greater need to abolish discrimination against Dalits from the caste Hindus.
Recent examples include a Dalit in Balangir district in Odisha in 2012 that was
burned by upper caste people, and another is in Kandhamala district where a lot
of Dalit people were killed by the upper caste people in 2008. Such violence
and discrimination are very rampant in this state, and marginally very few
consider it to be serious but neither the state administration nor the
political managers ever take them seriously as they belong to caste-Hindus who
have always been immune to social realities. In contemporary
art, some artists addressing a social issues, but very few artists pay
attention to Dalit issues. Where are the depictions of Dalits in the fine arts
of contemporary India?[3] For example, Savi Sawarkar is one of the handfuls of
Dalit artists whose work deals with the Dalit issues. He takes references from
the Ambedkarite perspective and represents caste issues and community problems.
He is the first Indian contemporary artist, who brought the Dalit issues to the
public sphere. In India, there are many artists engaged in individual art
practices. But they did not consider their community as a problem and
represented them through art practices. According to Tartakov, “In the modern
and postmodern context, with everybody criticising Colonialism from
Postcolonial perspectives, how many thinkers are criticising Brahmanical
traditions, still rooted in the minds of higher caste society? Indeed, there
was not even much agreement about what work the category of Dalit art in
painting, prints, or sculpture would include. The belief among the artists, I
have talked with, who call themselves Dalits, is that one has to be a Dalit to
do Dalit art. There may be others using Dalit themes and creating art that
addresses the issues of deep and particular interest to Dalits, but that does
not make them Dalits. But what about the art of those who would be considered
Dalits, whose work is devoted to conventional themes that have little or
nothing in particular of the Dalit exercise about them?”[4] Nowadays, we do
not find any exhibitions addressing Dalit issues by contemporary artists in the
private gallery exhibition in India. Because all the private gallery persons
are market-oriented and they did not consider the work which depicts religion
and caste. So, they always focus on that category of work that is selling in
the market. It’s a huge problem in the parameter of contemporary art practice
in India. Also, there is another fact, our visual artists, the mostly
elite-educated and elite-patronized visual artists, we find in the art
galleries of our large cities; have the most part been trained to avoid comment
on public, social issues. The writers in India are encouraged by different
types and levels of publications to write anything and all subjects of personal
and social interest whereas visual artists in India are trained to remain
personal and believe in their social and religion practices. In India, I have
seen a few artists, who are interested to discuss social issues. But, nobody
try to discuss on Dalit issues. Caste consciousness is always rooted in the
mindset of the people, it doesn’t matter whether he is higher caste or lower
caste. If someone is coming from Dalit background, his Dalitness is always in
his mind. That’s why only Dalit background artists dare to bring into the
public, the caste system in Indian society through their work. This caste
consciousness finds in Naresh Suna, who is always discriminated against by a
higher caste from his childhood. So the memory of suffering is seen through his
work. But some Dalit artists are not that conscious about Dalit issues because
they have not suffered as the way suffered other fellow Dalits. Out of many
works of Naresh Suna, this work has selected six works that makes appropriate
context on Dalit issues. As a young artist, Naresh Suna put his best efforts to
make his work of art. The painting titled Untitled (fig.04) and Looking at Each
Other (fig.05), depicts untouchable men and it has to be simply explained as
how Dalits are treated by the upper caste people. Naresh Suna makes a modest
beginning through these works. According to Naresh Suna, “After completion of these
two works, displayed at them at degree college gallery Govt. College of Art
& Craft, Khallikote, for the class assessment. The faculty gave me a
strange warning and they said to me that you should not display these issues.
Nobody provided me any support or encouragement to work on such issues and
display at the college gallery.”[5] It
shows how teachers in art schools behaved as caste-Hindus.
The work titled
Honour of Being Hindu-I (fig.06), Honour of Being Hindu-II (fig.07) and Enemy
(fig.08) deals with the discrimination and atrocity by upper caste on Dalit
people in Odisha. Every month, mostly in the western part of Odisha, a lot of
Dalit people became homeless due to caste-Hindus show of muscle power. The
district administration did not take any strong action against this issue. Now
it is rapidly spreading to other parts of Odisha as well. Some NGOs are much
more active in that area, but that has hardly yielded any results. This work
has made out of ash and charcoal, which is related to the burning of Dalit
people. Burning Dalit people became the order of the day. That’s why Naresh
Suna has made the form of a medal. According to Suna, “Medal in that sense, we
are Dalit people, one day we will be burned alive by upper caste people.”[6]
The work titled
Honour of Being Hindu-II (fig.08) represents the portrait of Dalit people, who
were killed by upper caste people in an incidents in the western part of
Odisha. Whereas, the work titled Inequality (fig.09), deals with the issues of
inequality in food among the people in our society.
“One way to
understand art activism is to track moments in the history of modern Indian art
where it actively sought the provenance of the political. In the indicative
account that follows, a key moment can be located in the Swadeshi movement,
where questions of art, art-making practice, art content, and even the persona
of the artist were subsumed under the sign of the national.”[7] |
||||||
Conclusion |
The art and activism in Odisha is very uncommon. The first
thing is that the mindset of contemporary artists is very complicated to
understand. Most of contemporary artists are belonging to the upper-caste
mindset and they don’t want to raise their voice on Dalit issues through their
art practice. They are the followers of the hegemonic mindset of the
Brahminical system and attitude. The contemporary art scenario in Odisha, the
maximum number of artists belong to the upper caste community, because as
regards to ascending order of the caste system from the ancient period, upper
caste people were always nourished economically, educationally, and socially
for this reason privilege can be dominantly seen in art institution. |
||||||
References | English Books: 1. Biswas, Goutam., Art as Dialouge: Essays in
Phenomenology of Aesthetics Experience, New Delhi, Indira Gandhi National
Centre for Arts and D.K. Printworld (P) Ltd, 1995.
|
||||||
Endnote | 1. This sentence wrote by artists Rajat Kumar Dhal during his time of performance in public place in Bhubaneswar, Odisha in 2010. This is pasted in front and back side on his body. 2, Tartakov, Gary Michael., (ed) Dalit Art and Visual Imagery, P.1, Oxford University Press, India, 2012. 3. Ibid, P.2. 4. Ibid, P.253-236. 5. Interview with Naresh Suna, Bhubaneswar, 01.07.2014. 6. Ibid. 7. Achar, Deeptha., Panikar, Shivaji K., (ed) Articulating Resistence: Art and Activism, P.xx, Tulika Books, New Delhi, 2012. |