|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leakage Inventory Model without Shortages
under Fuzzy Parameters |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper Id :
18023 Submission Date :
2023-08-14 Acceptance Date :
2023-08-22 Publication Date :
2023-08-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10061133 For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract |
In this paper, an attempt has been made to develop a simple leakage inventory model without shortages with instantaneous or finite production rate under fuzzy environment. In the present day scenario, it is difficult to decide the exact annual demand rate and hence a major difficulty is faced by a decision maker to forecast the demand. Also, in any inventory system, goods in stock may subject to deterioration or leakage. Deterioration of goods refers to decrease in quality whereas quantity remains more or less the same. On the other hand, leakage refers to loss in quantity whereas the quality remains unchanged for a certain period of time. Leakages in the inventory system may be considered to be very small, not detectable by the management immediately and hence it is difficult to decide the exact leakage rate. The objective of this paper is to consider these variable parameters and determine the optimal economic order quantity (EOQ) to maximize the annual total profit. So, fuzzy inventory models have been proposed considering fuzzy leakage rate and fuzzy annual demand rate to estimate the total profit per unit time. Signed distance method is used for defuzzification. Numerical examples are provided to support the results of the proposed models. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Leakage , Deterioration , EOQ, Fuzzy inventory model, Defuzzification. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction | In an inventory system dealing with liquid or gaseous stock, leakage is a realistic and common phenomenon. Leakage may be defined as the process in which material (liquid or gas) is lost through a leak in the storage facility or in transit. This reduces the quantity of stock and hence the loss due to this leakage can’t be ignored while developing or discussing the economic order quantity (EOQ) or production order quantity (POQ) inventory models. In literature, many inventory models referring to deterioration under different conditions and circumstances have been developed. As an extension of inventory models of deteriorating items, numerous works on perishable items, evaporating items, imperfect items, etc. have been formulated. After all, deterioration, perishment of goods, evaporation, leakage etc. all refer to the loss of the value of the stock either qualitatively or quantitatively. It is so important to maintain the optimum level of inventory. Sometimes it is easier said than done. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Objective of study | The present study pertains to a mathematical model
that can be implemented for the successful running of a factory of production
facility where there may be loss of resources/raw materials due to leakage is
the storage facility involved. Understanding such associated problem will definitely
help in the optimization of operations thus maximizing profitability of the
entire establishment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of Literature | Taleizadeh [1] considered an EOQ model with partial backordering and advance payments for an evaporating item. So, considering leakage as analogous to deterioration, Tomba and Geeta [2] developed a leakage inventory model having no shortages with uniform demand rate and instantaneous production rate. In developing the models, there are many assumptions and parameters which are considered to be fixed and have exact values. But in reality, these assumptions seem to be unrealistic since they are generally vague and imprecise, sometimes even it is impossible to determine the exact value. In this context, fuzzy inventory models are discussed as an extension of the traditional or crisp inventory models. Yao and Lee [3] solved the inventory model with shortages by fuzzifying the order quantity using extension principle. Lee and Yao [4] also discussed production inventory problems by defuzzifying demand quantity and production quantity considering triangular fuzzy numbers. Chang [5] developed a fuzzy production inventory for fuzzy product quantity using a triangular fuzzy number. Yao and Su [6] studied the fuzzy inventory model with backorder for fuzzy total demand based on interval-valued fuzzy set. Chang [7] discussed the EOQ model with imperfect quality items by applying the set theory considering fuzzy defective rate and fuzzy annual demand. Mahata [8] applied fuzzy set theory in an EOQ model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering. Jaggi et al. [9] studied a fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with initial inspection and allowable shortage under the condition of permissible delay in payments. Patro et al. [10], in their paper, discussed an EOQ model for fuzzy defective rate with allowable proportionate discount. Chen and Ouyang [11], in their paper extended an ordering policy for deteriorating items with allowable shortage and permissible delay in payment to fuzzy model by fuzzifying the carrying cost, interest paid rate and interest earned rate simultaneously based on the interval-valued fuzzy numbers and triangular fuzzy numbers. Chang et al. [12] discussed a fuzzy mixed inventory model involving variable lead-time with backorder and lost sales using probabilistic fuzzy set and triangular fuzzy number. They used two methods of defuzzification. In this paper, we investigate the leakage inventory model based on the Tomba and Geeta model (TG-model) [2] incorporated with a fuzzy leakage model [13] by considering demand rate and leakage rate as triangular fuzzy numbers and the model is used to find the optimal order quantity and the minimum total cost per unit time in fuzzy environment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main Text |
1. Theoretical basis of the model : Tomba and Geeta [2] developed a deterministic leakage inventory model without shortages having uniform demand rate with instantaneous production. They assumed the lead time of an order quantity q to be zero in developing their model. According to their model, total holding cost = htq/2, where h and q denote the holding cost per unit quantity per unit time t and order quantity per run respectively.
Fig. 1. Instantaneous production leakage inventory without shortage. 2. Definitions and Preliminaries To extend the TG- model to fuzzy environment, the following definitions and preliminaries are taken into account: 2.1 Fuzzy point
2.2 α-level fuzzy point
2.3 Triangular fuzzy number 2.4 α-level fuzzy interval
2.5 α-cut of a fuzzy set
2.6 Decomposition principle
2.7 Signed distance (as in Yao and Wu [13])
3. Fuzzy leakage inventory model
4. Numerical example and sensitivity analysis To illustrate the applicability of the model, the example from Tomba and Geeta [2] is considered. The crisp inventory system has the data: demand rate ϕ=600 units per unit per year, holding cost h = Rs10, setup cost s = Rs100 per order, leakage rate ψ = 10 units per unit per year. Then, the optimal order quantity q* = 108 and the minimum cost per year Cmin= Rs1104. In our fuzzy model, instead of taking the demand rate and leakage rate as fixed quantity, we assumed them to be imprecise and hence represented by triangular fuzzy numbers = (600−Δ1, 600, 600+Δ2) and = (10−Δ3, 10, 10 + Δ4) respectively in accordance to our fuzzy model. The optimal order lot size q* and minimum total cost Z* for various sets of Δ1, Δ2, Δ3, Δ4 are summarized in Table 1. Relative variation between fuzzy case and crisp case for the optimal lot size q* and minimum total cost Z* is also calculated as and respectively, where q*and Z* denote the optimal order quantity and minimum total cost in crisp sense respectively. Table 1. Optimal Solution for the proposed model with fuzzy demand rate and fuzzy leakage rate.
From the above Table 1, we observed that 1. for fixed Δ1 and Δ2, the demand rate is constant and with the increase in variation of Δ3 and Δ4,the optimal lot size q* increases and minimum total cost Z* decreases. Hence, Relq increases and RelZ decreases. 2. for fixed Δ3 and Δ4, both the optimal lot size q* and minimum total cost Z* increases and hence both Relq and RelZ increases. From the discussed example and the sensitivity analysis of the results from Table 1, we cannot exactly ascertain the better results of the model in the two different environments. But still, the one in fuzzy sense will be more reliable as it incorporates real-life situations and conditions with wide range of variability. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusion |
In this paper, we have discussed a leakage inventory model in
fuzzy environment and compared it with its traditional model in crisp sense by
considering different data. The main parameters of the model, namely the demand
rate and the leakage rate are assumed to be triangular fuzzy numbers. The
optimum results are obtained by using signed distance method of
defuzzification. It is observed that for different sets of fuzzy demand rate
and fuzzy leakage rate, the optimum ordering quantity and minimum total cost
are almost more or less with that obtained in crisp environment. Also,
uncertainties that are prevalent in real inventory problems are highlighted in
this fuzzy model and from the sensitivity analysis by taking different values
of Δ1, Δ2, Δ3 and Δ4 the variations or the effect of uncertainties the optimum
ordering quantity and minimum total cost are analyzed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References | 1. Taleizadeh A A.: An EOQ model with partial backordering
and advance payments for an evaporating item. International Journal of
Production Economics, 155(C), 185-193 (2014). 2. Tomba I, Geeta O.: Some deterministic leakage inventory
models. Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences, 27(2), 267-276 (2008). 3. Yao JS,: Lee HM. Fuzzy inventory without backorder for
fuzzy order quantity and fuzzy total demand quantity. Computers and Operations
Research, 27, 935-962(2000). 4. Lee HM, Yao JS.: Economic production quantity for fuzzy
demand quantity and fuzzy production quantity. European Journal of Operational
Research, 109,203-211 (1998). 5. Chang S.: Fuzzy production inventory for fuzzy product
quantity with triangular fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107,37-57
(1999). 6. Yao JS, Su JS.: Fuzzy inventory with backorder for fuzzy
order quantity. Information Sciences, 93,283-319 (1996) 7. Chang HC.: An application of fuzzy sets theory to the EOQ
model with imperfect quality items. Computers & Operations Research,
31,2079-2092(2004). 8. Mahata GC.: Application of fuzzy sets theory in an EOQ
model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering. International
Journal of Services and Operations Management, 14(4), 466-490 (2013). 9. Jaggi CK, Anuj S, Mandeep M.: A fuzzy inventory model for
deteriorating items with initial inspection and allowable shortage under the
condition of permissible delay in payment. International Journal of Inventory
Control and Management, 2(2), 167-200, (2012). 10. Patro R, Mitali MN, Acharya M.: An EOQ model for fuzzy
defective rate with allowable proportionate discount. OPSEARCH, 56, 191-215
(2019). 11. Chen LH, Ouyang LY. Fuzzy inventory model for
deteriorating items with permissible delay in payment. Applied Mathematics and
Computation, 182, 711-726 (2006). 12. Chang HC, Yao JS, Ouyang LY.: Fuzzy misture inventory
model with variable lead time based on probabilistic fuzzy set and triangular
fuzzy number. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 39, 287-304(2004). 13. Yao JS, Wu K.: Ranking fuzzy numbers based on
decomposition principle and signed distance. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116,
275-288 (2000). |