|
|||||||
Environmental Ethics and Ethnicity : An Ecocritical Study of Nadine Gordimer's Novel Julys People |
|||||||
Paper Id :
18106 Submission Date :
2022-07-12 Acceptance Date :
2022-07-20 Publication Date :
2022-07-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.8364153 For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
|
|||||||
| |||||||
Abstract |
Ecocriticism
as a school of thoughts deals with environmental ethics in literature and its
practicability in global level. The exceeding ecological crisis has paved path for the growth of such a theory like Ecocriticism or
Environmental literary Criticism to create consciousness among mass. It aims to
establish an inevitable interdependency and connection between the human and
natural world. The paper aims to accentuate the binaries that exist in the name
of nature and culture through the Gordimer's novel July's People. Nadine
Gordimer being a noble laureate in literature was strong voice behind the
abolition on of Apartheid system in South Africa. The very apartheid policy was an unethical and unnaturally
forced identity upon the native Africans. How a particular ethnicity with a
civilizing mission disapproved and deprived an entire community from their
natural rights resulting in severe retaliation is the highlight of this paper.
Apartheid means aparthood or keeping the aboriginals away from the colonisers
on the basis of their physicality and skin colour. Since these native people
are genetically different from white people they were treated in an inhuman
way. The atrocities they face was inexplicably obnoxious. This kind of racial
discrimination was a particular race's preference of ethnicity over
environmental ethics. It is so because the physiological and genetical
difference in each species is the outcome of natural intervention. It has got
nothing to do with any culture. The geographical location, climatic condition
and the natural habitat one resides in are eminent designing factor behind the creation of any
creature. So it can not be questioned culturally. |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Ecocriticism, Apartheid, colonialism, Racism. | ||||||
Introduction | Ecocriticism as
a concept is corollary to Environmental ethics. It is a philosophy, which
emerged with an intention to protect the environment and make it more
sustainable. The underlying principles of environmental ethics is to drive the
anthropocentric world towards ecocentric practices. As the Mother Nature is
losing its sanctity day by day due to hedonistic consumerism; it is high time
to reinstall the ecological equilibrium. Environmental ethics exercise great
influence on different branch of disciplines such as environmental law,
environmental sociology, ecology, ecotheology, environmental geography, and
environmental literature. Ecocriticism as a school of thoughts adheres to
representation of environmental ethics through literature. It is a study of
literature and environment with a proposed environmental concern. Cheryll
Glotfelty defined ecocriticism in a convincing way as per his words: “the eco
criticism is the study of relationship between literature and environment.”6 It
has got various trajectories of approch across the globe. Ecosophy, Eco
Poetics, Environmentalism, Eco Politics, Deep Ecology and Green Literature are
some of the synonymous phuyosophical branches where intellectuals and writers
have profusely contributed towards the sustainability of nature. Works of
Rachel Carson and Murray Bookchin massively impacted the minds of
environmentalists in particular. The book Silent’s Spring by
Rachel Carson depicted some dire consequences of human actions which will lead
to the doom of the entire earth. Man forgets that he is inseparable part of the
entire life cycle. According to Hether Eaton, The earth does
not belong to man, man belongs to the earth, and all things are connected like
blood which unites one family. Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of
the earth, Man did not weave the web of life he is merely a strand of it.
Whatever he does to the web he does to himself.” (Ecofeminism and Globalism,105) Objectification
of nature and utilization of it to the optimum level is the outcome of
anthropocentricism. Both biotic and abiotic elements have been exploited to the
benefit of human beings, which has led to environmental degradation. Earth is losing
its sustainability. Human being as a part of the whole earth is also no
exception to it. Global warming, low quality air, pollution and natural
disasters are some of the dire situations human beings are struggling with.
This paper aims to portray the clash of environmental ethics and ethnicity from
an ecocritical prospective in Nadine Gordimer’s Novel July’s People.
How a particular ethnicity colonized the entire nature and the native South
Africans in an unethical way is highlighted through this paper. The
colonization process was branded a civilizing mission by the Britishers who
disapproved every other race of humans as lower breed. Aptherthet system of
south Africa was an extreme case of such racial discrimination. Nadine Gordimer
a Nobel Prize recipient was an eminent figure in south Africa, she was a full
fledged social activist and a tremendous writer who inched for the cause of
black south Africans initially her writings were disapproved because of their
boldness and righteous expressions these initial pauses could not stop her from
heading towards the right cause. She was considered as an epic
writer. In the words of Afred Nobel, She have been a great benefit of humanity,
her writings circumnavigated around racial issues. She being a keen observer of
reality picturised society with utmost felicity. Gordimer’s family background
had a political tinge. She was born in a small East Rand mining town adjacent
to Johannesburg. She was born to Jewish migrant, her father, Ishidore Gordimer,
was a watch maker from Lithuania near the Latvian boarder and her mother Hannah
was an English. Gordimer’s enthusiasm in racial and economic disparity in South
Africa was an impact of her parents. As it is said charity begins at home, her
social activism was nourished at home. She was imbued by her mother’s attitude
towards the poverty stricken blacks Africans. She was schooled by her mother
entirely and was put into an ordinary school for minimal education for sake of
qualification. she begin to contemplate reality from a very tender age. At the
beginning of her writing career she attempted short stories at the age of
fifteen she published her first story The Quest for Seen Gold. She
has got many short stories to her credit. Many of her works were banned in
South Africa due to her abject reflections on apartheid systems. Most of her
provocative writings got published in South Africa’s local magazines. She
compiled all her early publications and published once again naming it Face
to Face. Her first novel was The Lying Days which was
published in 1953. The Lying Days is a political fiction
picturizing a young white woman’s political consciousness and her opposition
towards racial divisions. Some of her works like Occasions for Loving,
The Conservationist, Burger’s Daughter, A Spot of Nature and July’s
People were banned under censorship by south African Government. This
was because of her fearless say on apartheid. Despite several such repressions,
she could not me muted. Such repressive steps strengthen her stand against
apartheid. Writers like Bertolt Brecht, Albert Camus, Ernesto Cardenale, Millan
Kundera, Czeslaw Milosz and Ivan Turgenev have influenced her thoughts. She was
politically motivated by some other social and literary activists such as
Walter Benjamin, Earnest Fischer, Antonio Gramsci and Gyorgy Lukacs. Almost all
her works have a social cause and are politically driven. Her works got her
recognition. |
||||||
Objective of study | The paper aims at demonstrating racial abjections that exists in the name of apartheid system in South Africa. Such heinous practice is nothing but negation of environmental ethics. |
||||||
Review of Literature | July’s People, an eminent novel of Gordimer got
published in 1981. In this text, Gordimer has succeeded to a greater extent in
representing post apartheid scenario. How the over exploitation of South
Africans has led to black revolution is picturised in this text. July’s
People displays racial power-play in South Africa. Since the advent of
colonization till 1990s, the process of racial othering was quite active and
pungent. Slavery, oppression and exploitation of black Africans by white
colonizers were common scenes to be witnessed. The retaliation of the blacks to
the white racists was also equally violent. The Negroes’
skin tone contrasts to the European skin tone. The physicality of these two
kinds of human race is completely based on natural surroundings. The
environmental aspects have an impact on living beings. The geographical
location of South Africa is confined to South Atlantics and Indian Oceans. It
has mostly temperate or tepid climates. South Africa lies in the middle
latitudes which spans the tropic and the polar regions. This region generally
has a warm weather and the climatic condition remains same throughout the year.
The geographical location and the climatic condition of South Africa favor a
rich biodiversity. The country is enriched with divergent flora and fauna.
Sometimes the rare of the rarest species are found here. Thus human beings are
no exception to nature’s design. Nature has designed and engineered the South
Africans suitable to the ecological needs. Because of their morphological and
skeletal traits the South Africans are historically grouped as negroids or
congoids. The racial science and anthropometry categorizes human race into
three categories. Those are Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid (Wikipedia). The
negroids are nothing but a kind of biological classification. The craniofacial
traits of these people are different which include a typify skull, a round
nasal cavity, prominent jaw lines and dark skin tone. They have also a
rectangular eye orbit, supraorbital ridge and large megadontic teeth. These
features are generally identifiable from those of Caucasoid and Mongoloid.
Negroes are considered to be one of the most efficient human species as far as
their physical strength and mental agility are concerned. The German
philosopher Hegel researched tremendously on the blacks (Negroes). According to
Hegel: As we have said
before, the Negro represents natural man in all his savagery and unruliness; if
one wants to understand him correctly, one has to abstract from him all human
respect and morality. In this character there is nothing that reminds one of
the human. This is perfectly corroborated by the extensive reports of the
missionaries. Therefore the Negroes get the total contempt of
human beings (Ecofeminism 178). Skin
pigmentation is not just found among Africans. It is also found in some other
groups of humans which are historically not categorized as Negroes. Even in
Asia, we find such human species. Colonizers couldn’t accept these natural
differences and tagged them as natural deformities. According to Vandana
Shiva’s analysis in the text Ecofeminism: From all these
different features we can conclude that the main characteristics of the Negro
are his savagery and unbridledness. This character is not capable of
development and education. As we see them today, so they have always been. The
only connection the Negroes have ever had with Europeans and which they still
have today is that of slavery (178-179). Negroes are
understated as uncivilized. They have no parallelism with the white colonizers.
The native culture of Africa is subjected to rejection by white colonizers. In
the words of colonizers Negroes can only be objectified as mere human resource
for the cause of development. They are simply helping hands in the eyes of
Europeans. The difference in body structure creates barrier among human
species. Difference is the essence of nature’s creation. Abiotic features have
an impact on biotic factors. This simple theory was underrated and relegated to
fringes. These rigid ideologies of white rulers gave birth to apartheid system.
Self-annihilation and over estimation are the reasons behind apartheid which
means a state of separateness. As per Maria Mies’ observations on colonial
culture in the text Ecofeminism: Thus, white
people are considered more valuable than brown and yellow and black peoples;
men are considered more valuable than women; owners of means of production are
considered more valuable than those who work these means. Everything considered
as less valuable was defined as ‘nature’; everything that was valued higher was
defined as ‘human’. And the human being par excellence is the
white man; he has the right to rule over all ‘nature’ and to promote his own
creation— ‘culture’.(178) Apartheid is
nothing but an institutionalized racism, that means discrimination on the basis
of race, is a legal thing in South Africa. It existed from 1948 to 1990s. The
white hegemony encouraged discrimination and exploitation of blacks, coloured,
and Asian South Africans for their own benefits. Apartheid system has wide
sociopolitical and economic impact on the natives. It is categorized into 2
sections such as petty apartheid and grand apartheid. These categories include
segregation of public facilities including housing and employment
opportunities. The minority rulers codified certain racial stratifications
which included many vehement laws and acts. Prohibition of Mixed Marriage Act,
1949, which was renamed as Immorality Act of 1950 made interracial marriages
and sexual relationships illegal. The Population Registration Act, 1950, was
even more humiliating. It divided South Africans into 4 racial groups based on
appearance, ancestry and status. The classifications were ‘black’, ‘white’,
‘coloured’ and ‘Indian’. Each category of people was given a land to reside and
these residential areas were far away from the white residential areas.
Millions of natives had been thrown away from their own lands. They were left
in a state of destitution. These new homelands of the Indigenes were further
divided into different tribal groups. Bantustan or Bantu homeland or in simple
terms homes of black people is an example of it. Relocated natives lost their
identity because they were no longer the citizens of South Africa which was
under white supremacy. Repressive methods to eliminate and mute the voice of
the natives was so intense that apartheid system sustained for half a century
legally in South Africa. This relocating of population is called as slum
clearance in the words of the civilizers. The black inhabitants in white
residential areas were considered as black spots. For example, thousands of
people from Western Cape Town were removed to Transkei and Ciskei just because
Cape Town was over populated with white people. Transkei,
Bophuthatswana, Venda and Ceskei were the other states which were exclusively
meant for the black Africans. These lands were granted to the blacks by
the white rulers. These (TBVC states) were not sovereign; rather they were
controlled by the South African government. People of these areas had no easy
access to South Africa. They were allotted with special passports on some
special occasions. Without proper permission entry into South Africa was
prohibited in the name of illegal immigration. Nevertheless we see so many
references and depiction of apartheid and anti-apartheid in Gordimer’s
writings. |
||||||
Analysis | The story line
of July’s People revolves around a white couple named Smales.
Smales couple belongs to the upper middleclass white society. They witness a
social turmoil in South Africa which was an outcome of apartheid policies.
Black South Africans have waged a war against the white supremacy. As the story
unfolds, we see intensified black retaliation. The rebellious black armies
attacked the white people randomly. These kinds of unfavorable situations make
the Smales leave their residence and move to a safer area and that safer area
has been provided by their black servant named July. Maureen and Bam have a
servant named July, who is a black African. They have a very uncommon and a
cordial relationship with July and that cordiality paid them off at this very
situation of national emergency. The Smales couple moves to July’s remote
village and confirm their safety. The Smales having left with any other option
accepted July’s humble offer. But the offer is quite tough to be handled. This
couple was used to a kind of cozy and comfortable life, but their stay at
July’s home was a contradictory one. Their life has changed drastically because
the kind of adjustment they are undergoing cannot be a part of civilized life.
The very surrounding and living conditions they have are entirely different
from their own. The very first night of the Smales in July’s cottage is like an
adventurous fun trip. But this adventure trip turns nightmarish gradually. The
tribal culture, life style and food habit is a complete new experience for the
Smales. The poverty stricken natives, the insanitary condition and most
importantly their physical difference are reasons of astonishment for the
Smales. The African native language and their broken English are not very
convenient for them. Anyhow their circumstances compel them to make do with the
situation. This engenders a kind of dissatisfaction in the Smales. The
adjustment process is toughening day by day which creates a sense of gap
between the Smales couple. Apart from their adjustment the fellow beings of
July are also suspicious about the white people’s existence in their village.
The blacks cannot comprehend July’s strategy. They are skeptical about the
whites because of their past experiences. July’s mother is baffled with the
thought of Smales staying with them. July’s mother exclaims: His mother made
the stylized, gobbling exclamations that both ward off disaster and attribute
it to fate. What will the white people do to us now, God must save us.— Her
son, who had seen the white woman and the three children cowered on the floor
of their vehicle, led the white face behind the wheel in his footsteps, his way
the only one in a wilderness, was suddenly aware of something he had not known.
—They can’t do anything. Nothing to us any more.—White people. They are very
powerful, my son. They are very clever. You will never come to the end of the
things they can do.— (July’s People 25) July’s mother
ventilates her colonial experience by saying that, the white colonizers
ventured into distant countries and lands for trading. Apart from trading, this
business minded colonizers cunningly became the part of the foreign lands in
the name of civilizing mission. They encroached the lands of the indigenes and
tried to rule them in the name of trade and commerce. This is how they
empowered themselves by oppressing and rejecting the native culture. The
indigenous culture was considered to be nothing but savagery. They were
considered as lesser breeds like other species. Toni Morrison speaks what it
means to be black in the text Origin of Others: “The whites believe
the point being that blacks are useful, not quite like cattle, yet not
recognizably human (5)”. The Smales who landed in July’s land could not get a
conducive atmosphere for interactions. The communication between them and the
natives was an awkward one which is a combination of broken English and native
language. The mud hut with no modern facilities surrounded by pets and muddy
pits was a weird thing for Maureen. These existing circumstances at times filled
the couple with seer helplessness. The Smales tried their best to adjust and be
acquainted with the village traditions and customs. Maureen wanted to
participate with other village women in cultivating spinach whereas; she was
not allowed to do so by July. Arm chair reading was her preferred leisure time
activity but in July’s village, women have no leisure for themselves. Women
used to work around the clock for the maintenance of the family. According to
Karen J Warren observes in the text Ecofeminist Philosophy: In rural areas,
women’s roles are those of the poorest-paid labourers–weeding, hoeing and
carrying water and wood, combined with the traditional family roles of cooking,
child care, health care and reproduction–without even the pay that a labourer
expects. While consciousness of these traditional roles has fostered the idea
that women are in some sense natural custodians of the environment in rural
areas, there is no evidence of this notion and women in rural areas are largely
ill-equipped for it. They are without training, status, access to community‑based
organizations and cooperatives, land and property rights, capital or
environmental institutions that make up the dense fabric of rural life and
control its development.(5) As
per Maureen’s estimation, the village she was in was miles away from
development. The role of male and female in day to day survival was quite
different. All domestic activities such as washing the clothes, cleaning the
pans, arranging food and looking after the children were undertaken by women in
July’s village. These things were an unusual practice for Maureen. As per the
situation’s demand Maureen wanted to extend help to Martha, July’s wife in
these activities. July never allowed mistress to be the part of these ordeals.
Instead, July dictates Maureen to keep herself at bay from these activities.
Bam’s equation with the village folk was not that appreciable. The modernized
life of Bam transformed into a rustic one. Being an architect, he involved in
various developmental programs but here in July’s village, Bam is learning
primitive survival skills. Often, he used to go for bird hunting to satisfy his
desires but now he is using gun to hunt animals for flesh. He goes to shoot
wart hogs with his gun and helped to supply meat to the villagers. He extended
help to July for mending the farming tools and other aids. Apart from that, he
made his own efforts to facilitate the villagers with water tank for better
water supply. Bam’s indulgence in these activities was acknowledged by the
village men. Children followed Bam throughout the day as they saw other
children accompanying the father. Unpredictable things were turning up in the
Smales life. Bam and Maureen’s comfortable and cozy life came to an end. For
days, they could not reciprocate properly. The subtleness of a conjugal
relationship is lost. They feel dispossessed with their life. The only
possessions they were left with were a mini truck and a gun. The adjustment
process was toughening day by day which created a sense of gap between Bam and
Maureen. Initially July
was quite obliged and generous to the Smales family. Gradually his attitude
towards the family started changing. It was the high time to understand that
their servant is no more a servant rather he has turned their master by giving
them shelter. Though many things were unacceptable for them but they were
trying hard to cope-up with. As the Smales had taken shelter in July’s house,
they had to abide by certain norms and conditions. They were feeling the change
of power flow in their relationship, because July was not as obedient as
before. The mini truck named Bakki was frequently used by July for his own
trips. July used to take their vehicle without permission, which was a matter
of annoyance for them. This signified their state of dependence and their power
reversal. Ironically there is an alternation in master slave relationship. On
one fine occasion Maureen sent his son to go to July’s hut and asked him to
meet her. July responded Maureen differently by sending a message to Maureen
that he is ready to receive her in his hut. July’s reluctance to obey Maureen
demonstrates his sense of superiority over them. These small incidents
accumulated anger in Maureen. She was not used to such kind of reactions. It
was a cultural shock for her that whites being ruled by blacks. Maureen
expresses her anger regarding July’s activities: You’ll profit
by others’ fighting. Steal a bakkie. You want that, now. You don’t know what
might have happened to Ellen. She washed your clothes and slept with you. You
want the bakkie, to drive around like a gangster, imaging yourself a big
man, important until you don’t have any money for petrol. There isn’t any
petrol to buy, and it’ll lie there, July, under the trees, in this place among
old huts, and it’ll fall to pieces while the children play in it. Useless.
Another wreck like others.(153) With the theft
of gun, Bam and Maureen’s troubles worsened. Maureen ventilated her anger at
July and accused him for his past misappropriations as well. Maureen after
several vain attempts to adjust in this tribal village was disgusted with the
persisting conditions. Similarly Bam transforms from an optimistic person to a
helpless and passive individual. Maureen and Bam lost love and intimacy between
them because they were in a state of identity crisis. They are no longer what
they were used to be. They were lost somewhere in the radical practices of
blacks because now blacks were uncontrollable .In the words of native Africans: —It’s a war.
It’s not like that, anymore …The blacks have also got guns. Bombs (miming
the throwing of a hand grenade). All kinds of
things. Same as the white army, everything that kills. People have
comeback from Botswana and Zimbabwe, Zambia and Namibia, from
Moçambique, with
guns.— (142) July’s friend
Daniel had stolen the gun of Bam. Despite the Smales interrogation to July, he
remained silent. This very theft was just to let know the white couple that
blacks are able enough to fight back and empower themselves. It is a way to
liberate themselves from the clutches of the white supremacy. In a state of
topsy-turvy, Maureen chases the helicopter’s sound .Without a second thought,
Maureen leaves the hut crossing the river and gliding the huddles, she wishes to
be rescued. She forsakes all her responsibilities of being a wife and a mother.
Instead she flees from the black land where she had landed out of compulsion.
Maureen identified herself with the white culture eventually. Her
quest for identity made her leave the place and the loved ones behind. The
cultural and natural difference between whites and blacks is so wide that it is
hard to overcome it at once. The resentment the blacks nourish against the
whites is quite natural because the long oppressive system has transformed
them. |
||||||
Conclusion |
In July’s People, we have several such descriptions and references where we get a clear cut picture of social and ecological imbalance. The implementation of apartheid policies on blacks is a cultural and natural rejection of natives. The physical difference of the natives is an outcome of natural process, which is questioned culturally. The classism which exists among human races is once again related to cultural difference. Apart from these differences there are references in the text where the women of color and the environment are seen in an exploited state. In all these unjustified human domination, ecofeminism perceives a parallel. Though ecofeminism begins with gender as a category of analysis but gradually it connects gender theory into all kinds of inequitable oppressions. It is because women prove to be a part of every human dominated structure. It is because women belong to every class, race, culture and nature. Apart from gender disparity, women have experienced colonialism, racism and classism. Woman’s indulgence in domestic activities relates her to environment and this relativity makes her realize nature’s degradation. She identifies her state of human dominance to that of the nature. This is how gender turns into a lens to perceive and ponder on various social and ecological issues. South Africa’s apartheid system is a divisive force which is harmful for both society and ecology; and ecofeminism as a praxis endeavors to expel all divisions.
I perceive the ecofeminist traits and ideologies in the works of Nadine Gordimer as she has always portrayed a good quantum of nature and natives living in a perfect harmony. The so called black Africans are the indigenes. They are naturally different from other human species as per the environmental needs. Thus discrimination on this basis is condemnable. By discriminating and rejecting nature’s order, we are simply disrespecting nature. The colonizers belong to a different land and their environmental surrounding and temperature is completely different. The geographical location and climatic condition of Europe is completely opposite to that of South Africa. Hence, their body type is completely different from Africans. Though the external physical features of Homo sapiens are different but to think, contemplate and to express is similar in every kind of human being. In the words of Maria Mies:
Without turning a reciprocal, symbiotic relationship between humans and nature into a one-sided master-and-servant relationship, the bourgeois revolutions would not have been possible. Without turning foreign peoples and their lands into colonies for the White Man, the capitalist economy could not have evolved. Without violently destroying the symbiosis between man and woman, without calling woman mere animal nature, the new man could not have risen as master and lord over nature and women. (Feminism and Ecology 121)
Now it is high time for men to think about a healthy earth by discarding all the capitalistic and profit oriented ideas. For leading a balanced life man should start thinking rationally not only for himself or for his country but also for the entire living community. Ecofeminism ensures healthy thought process and practices in the present generation.
|
||||||
References | 1. Agrawal. K. C.. Envioronmental biology. Agro Botanical Publishers, 1987.
2. Carson, Rachel. Healing the Wounds. Penguin Classics, 2000.
3. Daly, Mary. Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of radical Feminism. Beacon Press, 1990.
4. Diamond, Irene and Gloria Feman Orenstein. Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. Sierra club Books, 1990.
5. Eaton, Heather and Lois Ann Lorentzen. Ecofeminism and Globalization. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2003.
6. Gebara, Ivone. Longing for Running Water. Fortress Press, 1999.
7. Global Warming. The Indian Express. 03 August 2018, p16. Print.
8. Gordimer, Nadine. The Conservationist. Penguin Books, 1975.
9. ---. A Sport of Nature. London and Penguin Books, 1987.
10. ---. Burger’s Daughter. Penguin Books, 1980.
11. ---. The July’s People. Viking Press, 1981.
12. “High altitude responsible for human body shape.” Explore, The Indian Express, 21 June 2018, http://epaper.newindianexpress.com/1705355/The-New-Indian-Express-Bhubaneswar/21.06.2018#page/16/1
13. Kumar and Asija. Biodiversity: Principles and Conservation. Pencraft International. 1998.
14. Mandela, Nelson. Long Walk to Freedom. Abacus, 1994.
15. Mellor, Mary. Feminism and Ecology. Polity P. 1987.
16. Mies, Maria, and Vandana Shiva. Ecofeminism. FernwoodPress; Zed Books; 1993.
17. Plant, Judith, ed. Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. New Society, 1989.
18. Shiva, Vandana: Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. Zed Books, 1988.
19. Starhawk. Truth or dare: Encounter With Power, Authority, and Mystery. HarperCollins, 1988. 20.https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Truth_or_Dare.html?id=oDCjC1Tr0pgC&redir_esc=
Warren, Karen J. Ecological Feminist Philosophies. Indiana UP, 1996.
21. Wikipedia contributors. "Apartheid." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 30 Jan. 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid, Accessed 2 Feb. 2019.
22.Wikipedia contributors. "Human evolution." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2 Feb. 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution, Accessed 2 Feb. 2019.
23. Wikipedia contributors. "Nadine Gordimer." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 23 Jan. 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadine_Gordimer, Accessed 2 Feb. 2019. |