|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An Empirical Study on NEP 2020 with Special Reference to Measure its Awareness Among Academicians and Students |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper Id :
18781 Submission Date :
2024-03-03 Acceptance Date :
2024-03-13 Publication Date :
2024-03-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.11064717 For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/remarking.php#8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract |
Change is Universal, it is quite essential for the
progressive society and so is important for the education sector. An
all-inclusive and comprehensive framework was need of an hour for the
transformation of our education system, which can be achieved byputting efforts
towards adopting updated learning methodology an advance learning process in
the form of discussion and analysis-based learning rather than the content
based. The National Education Policy 2020 is designed by integrating both
traditional and modern education system from elementary education to higher and
vocational training. While The NEP has revised the pedagogical structure in an
effort to attain cognitive development and ensure quality education for all. There
has been quite a high expectations from NEP among educationist, academicians
andstudents,since the NEP has now been implemented nation-wide in this paper
author is going to explore about its awareness among academicians and students
and measure their level of acquaintances related to each aspect of NEP draft.
An extensive survey in the form of questionnaire from various academicians has
been conducted to analyse and evaluate the same. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | NEP, Pedagogical Structure, Cognitive Development, Elementary Education. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction | It has replaced the previous National policy on Education 1986.The policy is a result of anextensive study to provide in all- inclusive framework for Primary education to higher as well as vocational training in both rural and urban India. The aim of the policy is to transform India’s education system by the year 2030. In the year 1950 a planning commission was appointedto frame the blueprint of different aspects of life including education.In 1961, the Union government formed the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) as an autonomous organisation that would advise both the Union and state governments on formulating and implementing education policies. The Kothari Commission was formed by Govt of India on 14th July 1964 in order to review the present state of education system then that commission consisted of twenty members who were the experts of u kusa Japan Sweden and France.The result of the commission concluded that Indian education system did not prepare the learners for their career path and the change is needed f or the future improvement. In order to understand India’s new education Policy 2020. We must first go through the history of Indian education system post-independence. Understand the national policy on education1986. In the year (1964 – 66), University Grants Commission and the Kothari Commission developed the proposals to modernise India’s education system.. The National Policy on Education (NPE) was adopted by Parliament in May 1986. A committee was set up under the chairmanship of Acharya Ramamurti in May 1990 to review NPE and to make recommendations for its modifications. That Committee submitted its report in December 1990. 3 A committee was set up in July 1991 under the chairmanship of Shri N. Janardhana Reddy, Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, to make recommendations regarding modifications to be made in the NPE on the basis of the recommendation of the committee.
Under the National Policy on Education (NPE), 1986 envisaged to conduct of a common entrance examination on all India basis for technical education. Three – Exam Scheme (JEE and AIEEE at the National Level and the State Level Engineering Entrance Examinations (SLEEE) for State Level Institutions with an option to join AIEEE). After long gap of 34 years in the year 2019, the then Ministry of Human Resource Development and now the Ministry of Education released a Draft New Education Policy 2019, which was followed by a number of public consultations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Objective of study | 1. To examine the set goals of the policy. 2. To check the awareness of people towards the NEP proposals. 3. To evaluate its implementation and execution plan.
4. To recommend any improvement required to strengthen the policy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of Literature | 1. An Empirical Study on NEP 2020 [National Education Policy] with Special Reference to the Future of Indian Education System and Its effects on the Stakeholders: JMEIT It is an empirical study on the National Education Policy 2020 and its effects on the Indian education system and its stakeholders. The author conducted a survey of 1000 respondents, including students, parents, teachers, and educationalists, to assess their awareness and opinions on the NEP 2020. empirical study on the National Education Policy 2020 and its effects on the Indian education system and its stakeholders. The author conducted a survey of 1000 respondents, including students, parents, teachers, and educationalists, to assess their awareness and opinions on the NEP 2020. 2. Venkateshwarlu, B. (2021). A critical study of NEP 2020: Issues, approaches, challenges, opportunities and criticism. Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal, 10(2), 1-10. 3. Kumar, A. (2021). New education policy (NEP) 2020: A roadmap for India 2.0. In W. B. James, C. Cobanoglu, & M. Cavusoglu (Eds.), Advances in global education and research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–8). USF M3 Publishing. 4. International Journal of Business and Management Research. (n.d.). Submit article. Retrieved from https://ijbmr.forexjournal.co.in/submit-article.php This article analyzes the NEP 2020 and its impact on higher education in India. It also discusses the challenges and opportunities of implementing the policy, such as the funding, infrastructure, teacher training, and digital divide. The article suggests that the NEP 2020 is a step in the right direction, but its success will depend on the government’s ability to address the hurdles of implementation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hypothesis | Ho- More than 50% of the people ae not aware about the NEP proposals. H1- More than 50% of the people are aware about the NEP Proposals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Methodology | Since this is an empiricalstudy , the data collection sources are Primary
and secondary and has been collected from Govt website, published articles etc. Survey method was used to conduct the study by the set of
questionnaire comprised of demographic dividend and general
awareness about draft of NEP 2020. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling |
A
random sampling was conducted in an University and a total sample size was 30
in which 21 respondents participated in the survey and completed the
questionnaire. Significance of the study 1.
This study holds significance as it would help to understand the major
highlights of the NEP 2020. 2.
It would also provide an insight into the basic awareness level of the NEP
drafts among the academicians and students. 3.
Animportant steps at the University or school level can be taken to educate the
people about its major highlights and about its implementation programs in the
coming years. 4.
Importance of formative years- Recognising the importance of
formative years the policy has made provisions for the necessary learning
condition like nutritious food and experts in various discipline. 5.
Vocational courses in school curriculum – Introduction of vocational courses to
the school curriculum will encourage the disadvantaged sections to
add value in the education. 6.
Universal education- expansion of the universal education from the age of 6- 14
years to 3- 18 years has been the remarkable step in the education system. 7.
Three language formula – The suggestion has been made to teach in 3 languages
mother tongue / local languages, which has made this policy different
from all the previous amendments. This will help in breaking the illogical
hysteria towards English medium schools.
8.
Recognition of socio-economically backward areas – The need of such communities
have been recognised and its inclusion in the main stream has been the most
important steps taken for over all development of the society. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis |
1. Approval- It has been approved by the Union Cabinet of India on
July 28th 2020. It aims to provide flexibility in the curriculum,
focus on vocational training with internships during the school, it also
promotes the use of technology in education, and ensure continuous teacher
training and professional development. Ever since it has released, it has
become the debatable topic among stakeholders, some finds it a major reform
and some are raising concerns about its implementation. 2. Approach- This
policy has a very clear vision i.e transforming
theIndian traditional rote- learning education approach to the
cognitive and analytical based learning . It facilitates skill development and
creativity. 3. Early child
care and education –A research states that over 85%
of a child’s cumulative brain development occurs prior to the age of 6. Acknowledging
the same it is ensured under the policy thathealthy brain development and
growth would the prime focus and hence the current form of 10+2 structure is
planned to be transformed to new 5+3+3+4 structure so the early
childhood care is implemented from the age of 3 years. 4. Foundational
literacy- There has been a various reports published, that states there are
large no of students who have not attended foundational literacy and numeracy.
The Priority of the education system is to achieve universal
foundational literacy and numeracy in primary school by 2025 and for which A
National Curricular and Pedagogical Framework for Early Childhood Care and
Education (NCPFECCE) will be developed by NCERT in two parts (0-3 and 3-8).4 5. Pupil teacher
Ratio- The (PTR) will be kept under 30:1
at the level of each school and 25:1 for socio-economically backward areas.
In addition to midday meals a nutritious and energising breakfast
will be provided for productive study of cognitive subject. 6. Improving
GER( Gross enrolment ratio)– There has been a
significant amount of drop out after Grade 5 and Grade 8 as per the
report which has deprived the previous policy to attain its set goals, this
policy targets to achieve 100% Gross Enrolment Ratio in preschool to secondary
level by 2030. 7. Holistic
approach– Students will be offered a wide choice of subjects
and discipline, the progress card will be redesigned with 360 degree approach, which would reflect the uniqueness of each students. 8. Higher
education- Higher education plays a very prominent role
in human development as a whole. It contributes towards sustainable livelihoods
as India moves towards a knowledge economy, higher education aspirants will
increase in numbers. There has been a major problems
in our existing policy and hence NEP has brought various reforms by ending the
fragmentation of higher education and transforming higher education
institutions into large multidisciplinary universities, colleges, and HEI
clusterswith the aim of having 3000 students each. The undergraduate degree will be
of 3 or 4-year duration, with multiple exit options within this period, with
appropriate certifications with the digital establishment of ABC ( Academic
Bank Credit) 1.
Socio-economically disadvantaged group (SEDGs)- The major attraction of the policy is the inclusion of disadvantaged
groups such astransgenders, inorder to enhance the gender balance,
an appropriate fund is allotted for the education to such groups. 2. Minimum
qualification- By 2030, the minimal degree
qualification for school teachers would be the 4-year integrated
B.Ed. offered by multidisciplinary HEIs. 3. Higher
Education Commission of India (HECI)- Under this policy government’s move is to set up the Higher Education
Commission of India (HECI)as a single umbrella body for the entire
higher education (excluding medical and legal education). Both private and
public higher education institutions will be governed by the same set of
norms for regulation, accreditation and academic standards.5 Challenges to be
faced by NEP 2020 With various
opportunity comes different challenges which needs to be addressed on priority
basis to achieve the set goals. 1. The insufficient teachers
training institutions in the country can impose a major challenge in successful
implementation of the policy as the institutes which is presently running is
for profit motive and is insufficient to cater the needs
of quality teachers training. 2. To break the monopoly of the
English medium and coaching classes culture is not the easy task specially
where education has been commercialised till such an extent , it will require
lots of effort and political will. 3. The policy is criticised for
no exam till 7th and 8th std which will result
tothe no outcome of the learnings ,and it can prove to be the major drawback of
the policy.6 4. The introduction of the free
breakfast will add on extra fiscal burden on the government who is already
facing the issues with inefficient mid-day meal scheme. 5. The increase in the budget
spent on education to 6 % of the GDP might not be as effective as there has
been an increase demand for budget expenditure on defence and other sectors
too. The previous commission on education had also failed to achieve the set
target. 6. The gap between the skills and
knowledge imparted and the job availability will pose a potent challenge
specially when we are in the era of Artificial Intelligence .1 Data analysis
and Interpretation As per the survey Data was
collected on the basis of the responses collected on the various questions put
up in the questionnaire. Demographic and personal
Information
1.
The survey was conducted in which total of 33.3% male and 66.7% Female had participated to answer the NEP related awareness question. Total responses collected was 21, that shows people has been quite not interested in the survey even after belonging to the academic field, which clearly is not a good sign. 2. Age group
Maximum participants in the survey belongs to the age group of 29 years to 39 years which accounts for 42.9%, where as 38 % falls under the age group of 18 years to 28 years followed by 19% of the participants fall under 39 and above category. That shows most of the youngsters were covered in the survey and their participation shows there participation shows, they have been quite enthusiastic about the New policies related to the education. 3. Education
Maximum participants that is 47.6 % was post Doctorate, 33.3% was graduate and 14.3% belonged to the other professional courses. As the researcher expected to get the Maximum participants from the Doctorate and post Doctorate category which is an essential elements of this awareness research. 4. Awareness about new Education Policy
When asked about if they are aware about the New education Policy and have heard about it, majority of them that is 95.2 % participants were aware about the implementation of the NEP. Which is quite a positive response. 5. NEP system
When asked about the new system which has replaced the old one almost 81% of the participants answers the question correctly, which is quite satisfactory as it states that people are well versed with the most basic foundation of the policy. 6. When asked about std from which the vocational course is introduced.
Only 42.9% of the participants could only answer it correct, which means most of the people who belong to the education sector has not read the draft completely and is less informed, that certainly put question on their zeal to be updated, and their least interest in its significance and importance. 7. When asked about the stages at which student assessment is proposed in the new policy.
Only 47.6% of the participants could give the correct answer, which is again a disappointment as these were the major highlights in the NEP and is expected to be known by the post Doctorate candidates. Alsoits unawareness raises question on their assessment mechanism if the NEP has been implemented in the institute. 8. Question on Pupil Teacher ratio in the proposed NEP.
52.4% participants could give the correct ratio, rest had two different options which was again not satisfying while measuring the awareness, as such question forms a part of general awareness to the participants who belongs to the education sector. 9. Target of achieving the Gross enrolment ratio by which year Only 57% of participants could give correct answer, which was expected to be known by maximum participants as by far many seminars have been conducted on the same on various platforms. That shows respondents have less access or less motivation towards attending the National and International Seminars on the current issues. Hypothesis testing Two samples Fishers t- test is applied Male- 15 Female- 6 Sample 1 Population mean = 50 % which is 9 Sample 2 population mean = 50% which is 6 Assumed population mean Table 1.1
Table 1.2
Degree of Freedom ,df= 21-1= 20 t1 + t2= 0.187 The tabulated value of t for 20 df at 5 % level of significance for two tailed test is 2.086 since the calculated value t i.e 0.187, is less than the tabulated value of t, hence Null hypothesis may be accepted at 5 % level of significance.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Findings |
1. During the survey it was found
that people are not aware about the basic drafts of the policy which forms as a
basic general knowledge for academicians. A study conducted in through Random
sampling in an university resulted into less than 50% of the people are aware
about the same. 2. It targets to achieve the 100%
Gross Enrolment ratio by 2030. 3. Due to its tri language
approach it has given importance to the diverse culture and language of India
and also it would break the stereotype, language is not the matter of
knowledge. It has provided an option for the students to study Sanskrit and
other ancient languages. 4. During the survey it was found
that people are not aware about the basic drafts of the policy which forms as a
basic general knowledge for academicians. 5. Focusing on the physical
education, subjects such as yoga, music, dance and horticulture, sculptors
would make the child proficient from the childhood. 6. The new education policy has
four steps, Foundation stage, preparatory stage, Middle stage and secondary
stage. 7. National educational
technological farm will be formed to promote digital education to cater the
need of E- education of both school and higher education. 8. Assessment and Evaluation :
The NEP 2020 proposes a shift towards a competency-based approach to assessment
and evaluation, which is a positive step towards promoting holistic development
and reducing rote learning. 9. Teacher Training and
Development: The policy's focus on continuous professional development and
multi-disciplinary training for teachers, which is a positive step taken under
the policy.
10. Multilingualism: The NEP 2020
emphasizes the importance of vocational education and skill development, which
is a positive step towards addressing the employability challenges in India. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusion |
The NEP 2020 has been approved by the Government of India and
intends to change the entire Indian education system to meet the needs of 21st century effectively and efficiently, it will be
implemented successfully in coming years and will surely bring the India on the
map of merit countries gain, with aim to provide universalize pre- primary education to all and higher education to all, it
has made amendments in the Right to Education Act 2009 by extending the age
limit ranges from 3 years to 18 years which quite a welcoming step. However it
has observed that many academicians and students at university level are yet
not fully aware about its basic fundamentals, which need to be taken care by
university or colleges to promote and educate its teachers and professors by
conducting various National and state level seminars and persuading teachers by
nominating them to attend seminars and add special credit for the same. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suggestions for the future Study | 1. In order to cater the need of education and health Asha worker should also be engaged in the Anganwadi program. Anganwadi should be first converted into the kids zone with better infrastructure. 2. For the age group of 8 years and 11 years, bagless education should be promoted by adopting moral stories as the way of educating children. 3. Internships which have been introduced in the early schooling which is given through the vocational training should be in various areas of our country to make the child aware about its geographical status and environment. 4. In order to promote the concept of employment education the 50% of the evaluation should be made on the basis of local arts promotion culture and small cottage industry. 5. To fulfil the gap between the skill education and job availability, government should also take initiative to ensure an optimum job opportunity available for college pass outs in different streams. 6. It is also recommended to spend more on R & D (Research and development) as compared to other countries, India has allotted very less budget for the same. 7. Since the new policy has put more emphasis on the sports, R&D and culture , government should arrange the funds for the universities to create the basic infrastructure for successful implementation of such plans. 8. Both the central and state government should shake hands to increase the Gross enrolment ratio by providing special packages to the universities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References | 1. Venkateshwarlu, B. (2021). A critical study of NEP
2020: Issues, approaches, challenges, opportunities and criticism. Peer
Reviewed and Refereed Journal, 10(2), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i2.3640 2. International Journal of Business and Management Research. (n.d.). Submit article. Retrieved from https://ijbmr.forexjournal.co.in/submit-article.php. 3. Kingdon, G. G., Chaudhary, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2021). India’s new national education policy: Evidence, challenges, and opportunities. RISE Programme. 4. Muralidharan, K., & Singh, A. (2021, October 14). India’s New National Education Policy: Evidence and Challenges. RISE Programme Insight Note. 5. Kumar, A. (2021). New education policy (NEP) 2020: A roadmap for India 2.0. In W. B. James, C. Cobanoglu, & M. Cavusoglu (Eds.), Advances in global education and research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–8). USF M3 Publishing. 6. Kumar, A. (2021). New education policy (NEP) 2020: A roadmap for India 2.0. In W. B. James, C. Cobanoglu, & M. Cavusoglu (Eds.), Advances in global education and research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–8). USF M3 Publishing. |