ISSN: 2456–5474 RNI No.  UPBIL/2016/68367 VOL.- IX , ISSUE- IV May  - 2024
Innovation The Research Concept

Ichthyofaunal Diversity of Ghaghara River in and Around Siwan District (Bihar), India

Paper Id :  18937   Submission Date :  2024-05-04   Acceptance Date :  2024-05-19   Publication Date :  2024-05-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.12515883
For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
Jay Prakash Sharma
Research Scholar
Department Of Zoology
Patna University,
Patna,Bihar, India
D. K. Paul
Associate Professor
Department Of Zoology
Patna University,
Patna, Bihar, India
Abstract

Bihar provides considerable potential for the development of inland fisheries and aquaculture, in addition to its abundant aquatic bioresource potential. In order to look into the ichthyofaunal variety of Siwan, Bihar, data were gathered over the course of a year in 2021–2022, with the assistance of knowledgeable local fish growers and fishermen from various parts of the district. Lakes, ponds, irrigation canals, and rivers (Ghaghara, Daha) were the sources of the collections. Sixty-two fish species from twenty families, forty genera, and eight orders were discovered throughout the research period. With 22 species (35.48%), the Order of Cypriniformes was the most dominant, followed by Siluriformes with 20 species (32.25%) and Perciformes with 9 species (14.51%). The current study demonstrated that while SIWAN has a high diversity of fish, appropriate conservation measures are needed to preserve the district's sustainability and species richness.

Keywords Fish diversity, Species Composition, Siwan, Bihar.
Introduction

Numerous factors contribute to the diversity of life on Earth, starting with genes and continuing to the abundance and intricacy of species, life forms, and functional functions. These elements are arranged spatially in biological communities, ecosystems, regions, and beyond (Colwell, 2009). Stated differently, it refers to the diversity and heterogeneity of living things, their genetic variations, and the environments in which they coexist. Rich biodiversity is a result of the varied climate and physical geography. Various viewpoints from people in different fields have led to varied opinions on biodiversity. It has also been referred to as "life" or the "wilderness" on several occasions.

Objective of study

The main objective of this research paper is to study the ichthyofaunal diversity in and around river Ghaghra in Siwan district (Bihar), India.

Review of Literature

The difficulty of finding uncommon species and the underlying complexity of the environmental template make it difficult to quantify patterns of variety at the species level, even when the creatures are known to science. According to Winter and Hughes (1997), biodiversity is the variance in the genetic makeup and life forms of populations, species, groups, and ecosystems. The ability of biological systems to adapt to environmental changes is influenced by biodiversity, which is also necessary for ecosystems to produce goods and services like clean water and nutrient cycling (Rahbek and Colwell, 2011). Bihar provides significant potential for the development of inland fisheries and aquaculture, as well as great potential for aquatic bioresources. About 8.32% of the nation's overall fish diversity comes from the State (Lakra, 2010). In addition to 98.3 lakh ha of flood plain lakes and abandoned water, there are 18,350 km of rivers and canals, 2.36 lakh ha of reservoirs, 61 lakh ha of ponds and tanks that are home to aquatic resources. The state produces 2.11 million tonnes of fish in total from all of its resources (2021–2022). During the last few decades, the fish biodiversity of the state are declining rapidly due to introduction of exotic fish species (Dwivedi and Nautiyal, 2010; Pathak et al, 2011) and anthropogenic environmental degradation like urbanization, damming, abstraction of water for irrigation and power generation and pollution, which have subjected natural water bodies in general and rivers, in particular to severe stress with devastating effects on freshwater fish diversity (Lakra, 2010). The current state of ichthyofaunal variety was to be examined, and the first comprehensive description of fishes in district Siwan (Bihar) was to be provided.

Methodology

Data Collection: The data were collected with the help of local skilled fishermen from different locations, fish   farmers and fish markets from different locations of SIWAN (Fig. 1) for 12 months during 2021-22. The latitude of Siwan, Bihar, India is 26.219621, and the longitude is 84.356658Siwan, Bihar, India is located at India country in the Cities place category with the gps coordinates of 26° 13' 10.6392'' N and 84° 21' 23.9724'' E.


Sources : Rive Map Siwan, 2022

Table 1 : Fish diversity of SIWAN District (BIHAR).

Order

Family

Scientific name

Local/common name

Osteoglossiformes

Notopteridae

Chitala chitala

Moi/ knifefish

Notopterus notopterus

Patra/ featherback

Cypriniformes

Cyprinidae

Amblypharyngodon mola

Dhawai

Aristichthys nobilis

Bighead carp

Aspidoparia morar

Moraki

Catla catla

Bhakur/ Catla

Cirrhinus mrigala

Nain/ Mrigal

Cirrihina reba

Raia

Ctenopharyngodon idella

Grass carp

Cyprinus carpio communis

Common carp

Cyprinus carpio specularis

Common carp

Cyprinus carpio nudus

Common carp

Hypophthalmichthys molitrix

Silver carp

Labeo angra

Rain

Labeo bata

Bata

Labeo calbasu

Karonchh

Labeo dero

Kalabans

Labeo gonius

Kurai

Labeo rohita

Rohu

Osteobrama cotio

Gurda

Puntius chola

Sidhari

Puntius sarana

Barb/ Olive barb

Puntius sophore

Pool barb

Puntius ticto

Ticto barb

Siluriformes

Bagridae

Sperata aor

Whiskered catfish

Sperata seenghala

Giant river-catfish

Mystus bleekeri

Day’s mystus

Mystus cavasius

Gangetic mystus

Mystus menoda

Menoda catfish

Mystus tengra

Tengara

Mystus vittatus

Striped dwarf catfish

Rita rita

Belgagra/ Rita

Siluridae

Ompak bimaculatus

Pabda/butter catfish

Wallago attu

Pahin/ Wallago

Schilbeidae

Ailia coilia

Patasi/ Gangetic ailia

Clupisoma garua

Garua

Eutropiichthys vacha

Vacha

Silonia silondia

Siland

Sisoridae

Bagarius bagarius

Goonch

Gagata cenia

Gagata

 

Clariidae

Clarias batrachus

Mangur

Clarias gariepinus

Bidesi magur

Heteropneustidae

Heteropneustes fossilis

Singhi

Pangasiidae

Pangasius pangasius

Pangas catfish

Perciformes

Channidae

Channa marulius

Sauri

Channa punctatus

Sauri

Channa striatus

Sauri

Anabantidae

Anabas testudineus

Kawai

Ambassidae

Chanda baculis

Chanri

Chanda nama

Chanri

Parambassis ranga

Chanri

Cichlidae

Oreochromis mossambicus

Tilapia

Nandide

Nandus nandus

Dhebari

Clupeiformes

Clupeidae

Gudusia chapra

Suhia

Tenualosa ilisha

Hilsa/ Hilsa shad

Beloniformes

Belonidae

Xenentodon cancila

Kauwa

Synbranchiformes

Mastacembelidae

Mastacembelus armatus

Bam/ Zig-zag eel

Mastacembelus pancalus

Malga/barred spiny eel

Synbranchidae

Amphipnous cuchia

Andhasanp/Cuchia

Mugiliformes

Mugilidae

Rhinomugil corsula

Corsula

 

Sicamugil cascasia

Yellowtail mullet

Tetraodontiformes

Tetraodontidae

Tetraodon cutcutia

Ocellated Pufferfish

Plate-1. Some Important fishes of Ghaghara River (Siwan)

Samples were taken from fish markets, lakes, tanks, rivers (Daha and Ghaghara), and irrigation canals.  The primary river, Ghaghara, runs the whole length of the district from west to east. One of the most significant rivers for catch fishing is this one. After being transported to the lab for additional research, the captured fish were first treated with 8% formalin for 48 hours, and then they were stored in 5% formalin.

Identification of Fishes: Fish identities were determined using either preserved or fresh specimens. The FAO Identification Sheets, Srivastava (2002), Day (1878), Talwar and Jhingran (1991), and ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System) Standard Report were the standard taxonomic keys used to identify them. Fish were gathered, and species-level identification was done.

Result and Discussion

The only freshwater fishing resources found in Siwan were capture fisheries from rivers, nullas, and irrigation canals, as well as culture fisheries from seasonal, permanent and cultural ponds. The majority of the fish species that are currently found in the river are either naturally reproducing or have escaped from the several bodies of water in the area. 62 fish species from 20 Families, 9 Orders, and 41 Genera were discovered during the current research (Table 1). The Order Cypriniformes (22 species) provided the most to the analysis, followed by the Siluriformes (20 species) and the Perciformes (9 species). Beloniformes and Tetraodontiformes shared just one species, whereas Clupeiformes, Mugiliformes, and Osteoglossiformes contributed two species each, and Synbranchiformes shared three (Fig. 2). The Family Cyprinidae included Amblypharyngodon mola, Aristichthys nobilis, Aspidoparia morar, Catla catla, Cirrhinus mrigala, C. reba, Ctenopharyngodon idella, Labeo angra, L. bata, L. calbasu, L. dero, L. gonius, L. rohita, Osteobrama cotio, Puntius chola, Puntius sarana, Puntius sophore, and Puntius ticto were the most abundant order (35.48%) (Fig. 3). The leading genus was Labeo, which had six species, followed by Puntius, which had four species. 20 species (32.25%) were provided by the Order Siluriformes. The Bagridae family of the Siluriformes accounted for 12.9% of all fish species, with the Schilbeidae coming in second at 6.45%, Sisoridae at 3.22%, Clariidae at 3.22%, Siluridae at 3.22%, Heteropneustidae at 1.61%, and Pangasiidae at 1.61%. The Perciformes family provided nine species, or 14.51%.  According to Figure 4, the major families of Perciformes were Channidae (4.83%) and Ambassidae (4.83%), followed by Anabantidae (1.61%), Cichlidae (1.61%), and Nandidae (1.61%).

Species that were prevalent in the district and found in the culture ponds were Catla catla, Labeo rohita, Cirrhinus mrigala, Ctenopharyngodon idella, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, and Cyprinus carpio. In the ponds and rivers, tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and C. carpio were observed. The common fish species in the seasonal ponds were Wallago attu, Clarias batrachus, Puntius spp., and Heteropneustes fossilis. Significant carp and catfish populations in India were also often reported in the rivers and irrigation canals.

The district of Siwan has 62 species of fish, indicating a high degree of fish variety. The riverine system's fisheries rely on a sizable number of species and a variety of fishing gear. The district's declining fish biodiversity is mostly due to habitat degradation, foreign fish invasions, and fishing pressure (Lakra et al, 2008; Lakra, 2010). The fish variety found in this research is lower than that found in previous reports (Pandey, 1999; Dwivedi et al, 2004)—it is 17 species lower in Pandey's 1999 report and 15 species lower in Dwivedi et al's 2007 report. This discrepancy may be due to the huge geographic regions covered in the prior studies. The richness and composition of fish communities are influenced by fishing pressure and environmental stress (Dwivedi and Nautiyal, 2010; Mayank et al, 2011; Kumar, 2012; Tamboli and Jha, 2012). The current study shows that the fish variety in the Siwan area (Bihar) is shifting.

Thirty species are documented in sections of the Ganga River at Allahabad, while reports of the existence of 87 fish species from the eastern portion of Bihar and 111 taxa from Bihar and Bihar exist (Srivastava, 2002; Lakra, 2010). According to Lakra (2010), the river Betwa, which is a tributary of the Ganga basin recognized under the First River - Linking Plan of India, is home to 63 fish species, 20 Families, and 45 Genera. More recently, the NBFGR in BIHAR documented 92 fish species from the Ganga River, representing 58 Genera and 24 Families. 56 species from 20 Families, 42 Genera, and 7 Orders were found in the Gomti River, according to another research (Sarkar et al, 2010). Bihar is home to around 123 different fish species, according to a recent evaluation conducted by NBFGR, Lucknow (Lakra, 2010).

Out of 123 species, around 33% are regarded as decorative, roughly 57% are possible food, and 10% are identified as prospective sport fish when Bihar's use pattern is evaluated (Lakra, 2010). Environmental hazards may arise from both natural and man-made sources, or from a mix of interconnected and cascading effects.  Preservation and wise use of natural resources.


Fig. 2 : Order-wise distribution of fish species.


Fig. 3 : Diagrammatic representation of % contribution in each Order.


Fig. 4 : Diagrammatic representation of the number of species occurring in each Family


Fig. 5 : Diagrammatic representation of the % contribution in each Family.

Following the signing of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, 1992), resources became a worldwide problem. Fish taxa in BIHAR's freshwater resources are alarmingly declining at the moment as a result of several human activities. The overall pool diversity has been linked to a number of factors, including destructive fishing methods (Dwivedi and Nautiyal, 2010), the introduction of exotic species (Singh and Mishra, 2001; Lakra et al, 2008; Pathak et al, 2011), habitat alteration and water diversion (Jagera et al, 2001), low vegetation cover in the catchment areas, siltation, water abstraction, and low water velocity (Mayank et al, 2011); and. Though not much published literature is available on the threat status of fish species of BIHAR, yet it is fact that population of some species is constantly going down and there is an urgent need to protect the same for posterity. According to recent conservation assessment of NBFGR, a total of 20 freshwater fishes are categorized as threatened of which 9 under Endangered and 11 Vulnerable (Lakra, 2010). The Government of Bihar has declared endangered Chitala chitala as a State Fish and planning for its conservation is in process (NBFGR, www.nbfgr.res.in). Due to lack of previous sufficient information on occurrence and abundance of fish species of Siwan, is not possible to quantify the rate of decline in its diversity but this report would be useful as baseline data for any future assessment and conservation plan for fisheries. However, more awareness and motivation is required on the value of indigenous fish diversity and conservation of aquatic resources to ensure the sharing of benefits of its utilization in an equitable manner so that the aquatic ecosystem gets adequate time to recover its natural community structure (Lakra and Pandey, 2009; Lakra, 2010).

Conclusion

The abundant diversity of freshwater fish documented by this investigation can be used to inform ichthyofaunal diversity and management decisions in a scientific practice. Additionally, additional conservation initiatives are urgently needed in the Bihar region in order to preserve this unique freshwater heritage.

References

1. Colwell R K (2009) Biodiversity: Concepts, Patterns, and Measurement, 257-263. (Copyright Document).

2. Day F (1878) Fishes of India. Willium Dawson’s, London U. K. reprint edition, Today and Tomorrow Book agency, Delhi,1(2).

3. Dwivedi A C and Nautiyal P (2010) Population dynamics of important fishes in the Vindnyan region, India. Lambert Academic Publication, Germany.

4. Pandey A C (1999) An annotated list of fish genetic resources of SIWAN district, U. P. Indian J. Fish. 46, 95-100.

5. Mayank P, Arvind Kumar and Dwivedi A C (2011) Alien fish species Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1757) as a powerful invader in the lower stretch of the Yamuna River. Bioved 22, 65-71.

6. Lakra W S, Singh A K and Ayyappan S (2008) Fish Introductions in India: Status, Challenges and Potentials. Narendra Pub. House, New Delhi.

7. Lakra W S and Pandey A K (2009) Fish germplasm resources of India with special emphasis on conservation and rehabilitation of threatened species. In: Aquaculture Management (eds: Goswami U C and Dilip Kumar), 85-104. Narendra Pub. House, Delhi.

8. Lakra W S (2010) Fish biodiversity of BIHAR: issues of livelihood security, threats and conservation. In: National Conference on Biodiversity, Development and Poverty Alleviation (May 22, 2010). 40-45. BIHAR State Biodiversity Board, Lucknow.

9. Kumaran B, Kambala S N and Nadarajan J (2012) Assessment of ichthyofaunal diversity in Giriyampeta Estuary, Yanam (U.T of Puducherry). Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 1 (9), 17-25.

10. Kumar N (2012) Study of ichthyofaunal biodiversity of Turkaulia Lake, East Champaran, Bihar, India. Int. Res. J. Environment Sci. 1 (2), 21-24.

11. Jagera H I, Chandlerb J A, Leplab K B and Winklec W V (2001) A theoretical study of river fragmentation by dams and its effects on white sturgeon populations. Environ. Biol. Fish. 60, 347– 361

12. Dwivedi A C, Tewari N P and Singh K R (2004) Present structure of capture and culture fishery of the SIWAN district (U.P.). Bioved 15, 95-98.