ISSN: 2456–5474 RNI No.  UPBIL/2016/68367 VOL.- IX , ISSUE- VII August  - 2024
Innovation The Research Concept

Analysis and Interpretation of Ozone Layer Depletion and Its Significants: A Review

Paper Id :  19204   Submission Date :  2024-08-19   Acceptance Date :  2024-08-24   Publication Date :  2024-08-25
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.13365673
For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
Vijay Kumar Chaudhary
Associate Professor
Department Of Chemistry
Dayanand Vedic College
Orai ,Uttar Pradesh, India
Harsh Kumar Garg
Assistant Professor
Department Of Chemistry
Dayanand Vedic College, Orai
Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
In this research article, a study has been done on halogen-containing ozone layer depleting substances. And the number of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), chlorine and bromine are emissions caused by ozone layer depletion and in which years has also been displayed year by year. It is clear from this study that due to awareness across the world, the emission of ozone depleting substances has reduced. The ozone layer is predicted to recover almost completely by the middle of the twenty-first century if ODS (Ozone depleting substances) emissions continue to drop. The lengthy recovery period is brought on by the sluggish rate at which natural processes remove ODS from the environment. The ozone layer acts like an umbrella over the earth due to which harmful rays do not reach the earth.
Keywords Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Chlorine and Bromine.
Introduction

The atmosphere only contains trace levels of ozone. However, ozone is essential to agricultural and ecological sustainability, as well as human health. The stratosphere, or layer of the atmosphere over 10 kilometers (6 miles) above the surface, is home to the majority of Earth's ozone. The stratospheric "ozone layer," which protects Earth's surface from the Sun's harmful UV rays, contains about 90% of the atmospheric ozone.

The ozone layer in the stratosphere shields life on the planet from solar UV radiation. During the latter part of the 20th century, compounds that deplete the ozone layer and include halogenated substances. The ozone layer was depleting due to halogen-containing ozone-depleting substances (hODSs) from human activity, primarily in the form of chlorofluorocarbons. The most obvious sign of ozone depletion was the ozone hole over the South Pole, but between 60° S and 60° N, total column ozone was decreasing1.

Ozone layer monitoring by the middle of the 1980s proved that depletion was in fact happening. Unexpected at the time of discovery, the most significant ozone loss was discovered to be occurring over Antarctica every spring. Because of how extensive and concentrated the ozone depletion occurs in this area; the loss is frequently referred to as the "ozone hole." In other parts of the world, including the Arctic and the northern and southern mid-latitudes, there has also been evidence of ozone layer depletion.

Naturally, extremely intense solar UV radiation regularly splits oxygen molecules, creating ozone in the stratosphere. This ozone is being spontaneously destroyed by catalytic reactions mostly involving nitrogen and hydrogen oxides, while it is also being carried pole ward and downward by the air movements in the stratosphere. Ozone depletion increases by the release of a number of compounds created by humans, including methyl bromide, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, long-lived chlorofluorocarbons, and halons that contain bromine. This was first seen in the late 1970s and has resulted in a decrease in the protective stratospheric ozone layer, especially in latitudes between medium and high. (WMO, 2014)2. By way of surface-emitted ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) such hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), chlorine and bromine are transported to stratosphere. The levels of bromine and chlorine in the troposphere peaked in 1997 and 1993, respectively, as a result of the actions implemented under the Montreal Protocol. (WMO,2018)3.

Fig:1 Representation of ozone layer concentration in Troposphere and Stratosphere in atomosphere.

The "ozone layer," a thin layer of bluish gas located 20 to 50 kilometers above Earth's surface, envelops our globe. The triatomic allotrope of oxygen is called ozone (03).  If all of the ozone were to be brought down to the Earth's surface, it would only form a thin, 3 mm-thick rings around the planet. Because the stratosphere's ozone layer protects the Earth's surface from ultraviolet (UV) radiation produced by the Sun, it is commonly referred to as the "ozone shield." The industrial pollution is destroying it, and how the international community has addressed this issue by implementing corrective measures in recognition of the serious repercussions of global ozone loss.4 (Fig: 1)


Objective of study
In this research article, a study has been done on halogen-containing ozone layer depleting substances.
Review of Literature

The largest record was set by the O3 hole over the Arctic in 2020, and the largest, deepest, and most persistent ones were among the ones over the Antarctic in 2020 and 2021. In actuality, the electron-induced reaction (CRE) model driven by cosmic rays accurately anticipated these data, contrary to what was expected from photochemical models.5-8As will be demonstrated by the observed data in this study, all-season low-temperature cyclones are centred at an altitude of about 15 km above the tropics (30°N–30°S), where the temperatures are low at 190–200 K and the cosmic rays ionisation strength peaks. The latter are chilly enough to create tropical stratospheric clouds (TSCs), which are similar to polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs), which are necessary for surface reactions that result in an O3 hole. They are comparable to those in the polar stratospheric vortex over Antarctica during the winter.8This should result in a distinct active halogen evolution for the tropical lower stratosphere: in the absence of stable chlorine/bromine reservoirs (HCl and ClONO2) due to their rapid destruction on TSC surfaces, there is no ClO dimer (Cl2O2) and O3-depleting reaction cycles are much more effective in the presence of constant intense sunlight. Consequently, halogen-catalyzed processes are far more effective at destroying tropical O3, and even modest concentrations of active halogen can significantly reduce the amount of ozone over the tropics throughout the year. Well-observed are the O3 holes across the Arctic and Antarctica.9-11As stratospheric chlorine is processed on the surfaces of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs), it is transformed from reservoir forms (such as HCl and ClONO2) to active, ozone-destroying forms (ClOx = ClO + 2Cl2O2). Because PSCs need low temperatures (≤195 K) to form, the amount of ozone depletion in the Arctic varies greatly between years.12-13

Ozone recovery, or healing, has been observed in the upper stratosphere and the lower stratosphere during Antarctic springtime as a result of the delayed decline in the overall loading of these halogens that followed. Although there is a substantial reported inter annual fluctuation that has prevented its discovery thus far, some recovery is also expected in Arctic ozone.14-16Arctic winter year 2019/20 experienced a sustained period of low temperatures in the lower stratosphere and a
stable vortex that persisted into late March 17. The circumstances facilitated an unparalleled expansion of the PSC region18, significant levels of ozone depletion reaching up to 2.8 parts per million by volume and consequently diminished total column values17,19.

The forcing was constrained by greenhouse gases, and the impact of increased solar activity and tropospheric ozone precursors was ignored, so the results obtained are incomplete. To get total column ozone (TCO) evolution from 1900 to 2100, built and applied a statistical model that takes into account ozone-depleting chemicals, human greenhouse gases, and natural processes that influence ozone.20-22

The main cause of the Antarctic ozone hole and stratospheric ozone depletion was an increase in the number of CFCs in the atmosphere. In retaliation, countries decided to phase down worldwide CFC production by 2010. This included production for dispersive purposes, which would eventually release the chemicals into the atmosphere. Refrigerants, foam-blowing agents, and aerosol sprays are a few examples of CFC dispersive applications. The phase-out has prevented significant more ozone layer depletion in the stratosphere, and global warming because long-lived CFCs have potential for thousands of times more global warming than carbon dioxide over a 100-year time horizon.23-26

Analysis

The most recent year for which consolidated global statistics are available is 2022, when concentrations of the three primary greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide—reached record high measured levels (1984–2022). The three greenhouse gas concentrations continued to rise in 2023, according to real-time data from certain places. Greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere show how emissions from sources other than humans, including natural sinks, and human activity, are balanced. Since the industrial revolution, human activity has been the primary cause of the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, which has led to climate change. The calculation of global average mole fractions of greenhouse gases, sometimes known as the "concentration" in the atmosphere, is based on in situ observations obtained at various locations via the Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) Programme of WMO and partner networks.

The most recent year for which consolidated global statistics are available is 2022, during which the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases reached previously unheard-of heights. The globally averaged concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) were, respectively, 150%, 264%, and 124% of pre-industrial (1750) levels, at 417.9 ± 0.2 ppm, 1923 ± 2 ppb, and 335.8 ± 0.1 ppb. Following 2021, the rate of growth in CH4 was the second highest on record, while the rate of increase in N2O was the highest. At 2.2 ppm, the rate of CO2 growth was marginally lower than the 2.46 ppm 10-year average27. At 2.2 ppm, the rate of CO2 growth was marginally lower than the 2.46 ppm per year, the ten-year average.  The growth rate of CO2 is often lower in years that begin with La Niña, like 2022, and higher in years that begin with El Niño, like 2016.28 Levels of CO2, CH4, and N2O continued to rise in 2023, according to real-time data from particular places, such as Mauna Loa29 (Hawaii, United States of America) and Kennaook /Cape Grim30 (Tasmania, Australia).

Sr. No.

Years

1.

1986

2.

1989

3.

1990

4.

1991

5.

1992

6.

1993

7.

1994

8.

1995

9.

1996

10.

1997

11.

1998

12.

1999

13.

2000

14.

2001

15.

2002

16.

2003

17.

2004

18.

2005

19.

2006

20.

2007

21.

2008

22.

2009

23.

2010

24.

2011

25.

2012

26.

2013

27.

2014

28.

2015

29.

2016

30.

2017

31.

2018

32.

2019

33.

2020

34.

2021



Fig. 2. Representation Of Year Wise Emission Of Ozone Layer Depleting Substances In World.

Hydrochlorofluorocorbons (HCFCs)

Chlorine and bromine, which deplete the ozone layer, are absent from hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Certain HFCs have a significant potential to cause global warming, much as persistent CFCs and HCFCs. The Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which was ratified in 2016 and went into effect in 2019, establishes deadlines for the reduction of particular HFCs' production and consumption. The Kigali Amendment was created to prevent unchecked radiation forcing growth in the ensuing decades, even if the radiation forcing caused by HFCs is currently negligible. Certain nations provide the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) with annual emission estimates of HFCs since HFCs were added as one group to the Kyoto Protocol's 1997 gas basket. The Kigali Amendment mandated more reporting on HFC emissions and consumption as well as manufacturing. The main reason HFC-23 is treated differently is that it is mostly released into the atmosphere as a waste product of the HCFC-22 manufacturing process. As more Parties ratify this Amendment, this reporting will get more comprehensive.31

Since the phasedown of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) have become more widely produced and utilized in various applications, including refrigeration, air conditioning, and foam blowing. Apart from the emissions that arise from these applications, certain HFCs, specifically HFC-23, are also discharged as by-products while producing other substances. Long-lived HFCs are strong greenhouse gases even though they are safe for the stratosphere's ozone layer and typically have lower radiative efficiencies than the most prevalent ODSs.

Methyl Chloroform

1,1,1-trichloroethane, an organic molecule with the chemical formula CH3CCl3, is also referred to as methyl chloroform and chlorothene. It is a 1,1,2-trichloroethane isomer. Once, vast amounts of this colorless, sweet-smelling liquid were produced industrially to be used as a solvent. Its use is being phased out quickly since it is classified as an ozone-depleting compound under the Montreal Protocol32.

For a while now, there has been a great deal of worry about urban air pollution, and laws have been put in place to restrict the emissions of dangerous compounds. Concerns about the potential depletion of stratospheric 03 due to specific halocarbons being released have also been raised more recently, and measures to restrict their release rates are currently being taken. Substances classified as potentially dangerous to the troposphere and stratosphere are not classified according to the same criteria, and in fact, the criteria are more likely to be opposed.33

Methyl Bromide

Methyl bromide is an odorless, colorless gas that is used to treat a wide range of pests in shipping and agricultural, including as rats, nematodes (also known as roundworms), weeds, fungus, and insects. Before planting crops, agricultural growers sterilize the soil by injecting methyl bromide around two feet into the ground. After a treatment, the soil is quickly covered with plastic tarps, but between 50 and 95 percent of the methyl bromide eventually finds its way into the sky.

In order to stop pests from entering the country, methyl bromide is also used to treat imported items including logs, grapes, and asparagus. Official quarantine requirements for overseas shipments are frequently satisfied via treatments.
One hazardous material is methyl bromide. It is especially harmful at the treatment site since it evaporates quickly into the atmosphere. High levels of methyl bromide exposure in humans can damage the skin, eyes, lungs, and central nervous system in addition to causing respiratory and central nervous system problems.

Methyl bromide in the atmosphere causes the ozone layer to thin, increasing the amount of UV radiation that reaches the surface of the planet. According to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, methyl bromide is classified as a Class I ozone-depleting substance (ODS).34

Carbon Tetrachloride

Historically, carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) has been employed as a feedstock for the synthesis of various chemicals, including chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), as well as a solvent and cleaning agent. Since 2010, the Montreal Protocol has prohibited the manufacturing and use of CCl4 for dispersive purposes; nevertheless, it is still produced for some approved exemptions and for use as a nondispersive feedstock. Since it is believed that almost all CCl4 produced is later consumed, recycled, or destroyed, these substrate uses are unregulated35.The gas is recognized as an air toxin that depletes the ozone layer; it makes up between 10 and 15 percent of the substances that cause this depletion in the atmosphere nowadays. Consequently, production has been prohibited worldwide for an extended period of time for applications that cause CCl4 to leak into the environment.

Regional opposite modeling studies are comparatively less sensitive to uncertainties in the CCl4 lifetime than global emissions estimation utilizing atmospheric data and models. They can also assist in addressing the geographical origin of the variations between emission predictions derived from the Environment Program of the United Nations production and feedstock reports and the actual global mole fraction obtained figures. Few regional opposite modeling studies of CCl4 emissions have been conducted, spanning some of the world's most economically active regions. These studies use observations of CCl4 in conjunction with a transport model and an inference statistical method to estimate emissions. Year wise emission of carbon tetrachloride is mention in table -1.

Halons

The main purpose of halon is to put out fires. It is used in both portable and built-in fire extinguishers. There have been several documented applications as tracers for investigations of circulation in buildings and the atmosphere. Bromine, which is present in all halons, has the ability to degrade ozone 40–100 times more effectively than chlorine. Thirty to forty percent of the Antarctic ozone hole is caused by the combined effects of chlorine and bromine in the stratosphere. Chlorine is mostly obtained via halons and methyl bromide1. Halon-2402 (C2Br2F4), halon-1301 (CBrF3), and halon-1211 (CBrClF2) are the most widely utilized halons. Compared to the CFCs, the halons have a different, albeit simpler, numbered system. The total quantity of carbon atoms is represented by the first digit from the left, followed by the amount of fluorine atoms, the lots of chlorine atoms, and the number of bromines atoms2.

In Western Europe and the Western Hemisphere, portable fire extinguisher systems are the main applications for halon-1211. Systems for floods that contain fire and explosives employ halon-1301. The former Soviet states, China, Japan, and Russia all employ halon-2402 as a fire extinguisher agent. While other groups are developing viable substitutes, there are currently no drop-in halons available.


Conclusion

Use of several kinds of banned substances. Among these are methyl bromide (MB), methyl chloroform (TCA), bromochloromethane (BMC), corbon tetrachloride (CTC), hydrobromofluorocabons (HBFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and other fully halogenated (CFCs).
In the case of a particular triple (year, nation, chemical), EU (European Union) set missing data to zero. This is because of technological limitations that allow us to use our Grapher stacked are charts to plot this variable.
Individual consumption is not documented by EU members; instead, consumption is reported collectively for all member states. When a year's export or destruction totals are negative, it indicates that stocks were the source of the excess export or destruction over the year's total output and imports.

In the EU, substances that have the potential to destroy the stratosphere's ozone layer are being phased out. Ozone-depleting substances (ODS) have been successfully reduced in consumption since 2010 according to the Ozone Regulation; altogether, more chemicals are exported and destroyed than are produced.

References
  1. WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 416, 2014.
  2. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2014. Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2014. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/assessments/ozone/2014/.
  3. WMO (2018). World Meteorological Organization (WMO)/United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2018 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No 58. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization. 588.
  4. S K Pathak, N J Mason, Our Shrinking Ozone Layer, Resonance, p. 72-80, December 2002.
  5. A. Witze, “Rare ozone hole opens over the arctic - and it’s big,” Nature 580, 18–19 (2020).
  6. WMO, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2018 (WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018).
  7. Q.-B. Lu and L. Sanche, “Effects of cosmic rays on atmospheric chlorofluorocarbon dissociation and ozone depletion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 078501 (2001).
  8. Q.-B. Lu, “Fingerprints of the cosmic ray driven mechanism of the ozone hole,” AIP Adv. 11, 115307 (2021).
  9. O. B. Toon and R. P. Turco, “Polar stratospheric clouds and ozone depletion,” Sci. Am. 264, 68–74 (1991).
  10. J. C. Farman, B. G. Gardiner, and J. D. Shanklin, “Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction,” Nature 315, 207–210 (1985).
  11. G. L. Manney et al., “Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011,” Nature 478, 469–475 (2011).
  12. Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., & Gonzalez, R. (2018). Polar stratospheric cloud climatology based on CALIPSO spaceborne lidar measurements from 2006 to 2017. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 10881–10913. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10881-2018.
  13. Chipperfield, M. P., Dhomse, S., Hossaini, R., Feng, W., Santee, M. L., Weber, M., et al. (2018). On the cause of recent variations in lower stratospheric ozone. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 5718–5726. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078071
  14. Newchurch, M. J., Yang, E.-S., Cunnold, D. M., Reinsel, G. C., Zawodny, J. M., & Russell, J. M. (2003). Evidence for slowdown in stratospheric ozone loss: First stage of ozone recovery. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D16), 4507. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003471
  15. Solomon, S. (1999). Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history. Reviews of Geophysics, 37, 275–316. https://doi. org/10.1029/1999RG900008
  16. Chipperfield, M. P., Bekki, S., Dhomse, S., Harris, N. R. P., Hassler, B., Hossaini, R., et al. (2017). Detecting recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer. Nature, 549, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23681
  17. Lawrence, Z. D., Perlwitz, J., Butler, A. H., Manney, G. L., Newman, P. A., Lee, S. H., & Nash, E. R. (2020). The remarkably strong Arctic stratospheric polar vortex of winter 2020: Links to record-breaking Arctic Oscillation and ozone loss. Journal of Geophysical Research, 125, e2020JD033271. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033271
  18. DeLand, M. T., Bhartia, P. K., Kramarova, N., & Chen, Z. (2020). OMPS LP Observations of PSC variability during the NH 2019-2020 season. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL090216. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090216
  19. Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Santee, M. L., Froidevaux, L., Lambert, A., Lawrence, Z. D., et al. (2020). Record-low Arctic stratospheric ozone in 2020: MLS observations of chemical processes and comparisons with previous extreme winters. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL089063. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089063
  20. Lamarque, J.-F.; Hess, P.; Emmons, L.; Buja, L.; Washington, W.; Granier, C. Tropospheric ozone evolution between 1890 and 1990. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 110, D08304.
  21. Lean, J. Evolution of Total Atmospheric Ozone from 1900 to 2100 Estimated with Statistical Models. J. Atmos. Sci. 2014, 71, 1956–1984.
  22.  Egorova, T.; Schmutz, W.; Rozanov, E.; Shapiro, A.I.; Usoskin, I.; Beer, J.; Tagirov, R.V.; Peter, T. Revised historical solar irradiance forcing. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 615, A85.
  23. Braesicke, P. & Neu, J. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2018 Vol. 58 (World Meteorological Organization, 2019).
  24.  Newman, P. A. et al. What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 2113–2128 (2009).
  25. Chiodo, G. & Polvani, L. M. New insights on the radiative impacts of ozone-depleting substances. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL096783 (2022).
  26.  Polvani, L. M., Previdi, M., England, M. R., Chiodo, G. & Smith, K. L. Substantial twentieth-century Arctic warming caused by ozone-depleting substances. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 130–133 (2020).
  27. Trewin, B.; Cazenave, A.; Howell, S. et al. Headline Indicators for Global Climate Monitoring, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 2021 102 (1), E20–E37. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0196.1.
  28. Betts, R. A.; Jones, C. D.; Knight, J. R. et al. El Niño and a Record CO2 Rise. Nature Clim Change 2016, 6 (9), 806–810. https:// doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3063
  29. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. https://gml.noaa.gov/ ccgg/trends/mlo.html. Measurements at Mauna Loa were interrupted by a volcanic eruption and the measurement site was temporarily relocated to Maunakea observatories 21 miles to the north.
  30. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). Latest Kennaook / Cape Grim greenhouse gas data. The latest greenhouse gas (GHG) data updated monthly from one of the cleanest air sources in the world. https://www.csiro. au/greenhouse-gases/.
  31. WMO (World Meteorological Organization), 2022: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022.
  32. Manfred Rossberg, Wilhelm Lendle, Gerhard Pfleiderer, Adolf Tögel, Eberhard-Ludwig Dreher, Ernst Langer, Heinz Rassaerts, Peter Kleinschmidt, Heinz Strack, Richard Cook, Uwe Beck, Karl-August Lipper, Theodore R. Torkelson, Eckhard Löser, Klaus K. Beutel, Trevor Mann "Chlorinated Hydrocarbons" in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2006, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/14356007.a06_233.pub2.
  33. McCONNELL, J. C., & SCHIFF, H. I. (1978). Methyl Chloroform: Impact on Stratospheric Ozone. Science, 199(4325), 174–177.
  34. WMO (World Meteorological Organization), 1987: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1987.
  35. Ozone-DepletingSubstances (ODSs) and other gases of interest to the Montreal Protocol,Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014.