|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Flash Vacuum
Pyrolysis (FVP): O-Phenylene Sulfite And Their Substituted Analogs |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Paper Id :
19221 Submission Date :
2024-08-01 Acceptance Date :
2024-08-19 Publication Date :
2024-08-24
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.13777426 For verification of this paper, please visit on
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract |
Objectives: Flash vacuum pyrolysis (FVP) is a technique which allow preparation of many unusual products, which are difficult to synthesize by conventional methods. A range of different experimental set-ups have been described, but the one used here is robust and easily constructed from standard laboratory equipment with the addition of a tube furnace and a simple vacuum line with pump. Despite the high temperatures involved (500-1000 °C). The high vacuum flow conditions mean that each molecule only spends a few milliseconds in the hot zone so the technique is actually quite gentle and sensitive products including chiral compounds can be obtained in good yield without significant decomposition or racemization. Synthesized products could be converted to products of further synthetic utility. Pyrolysis of o-phenylene sulfite analogs give rise to products resulting from loss of SO. The pyrolysis is consistent with the fragmentations in the mass spectrometer, which proceed with initial loss of SO from the molecular ions. Substituted o-phenylene sulfites fragment differently under electron-impact and pyrolytic conditions. DeJongh D.C., Van Fossen R. Y., J. Org. Chem., 1972; 37: 1129-1135 |
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keywords | Flash vacuum pyrolysis (FVP), dimer of cyclopentadienone, o-phenylene sulfite | ||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction | Pyrolysis is as old as chemistry
[1-6]. Pyrolysis was certainly an important ingredient in the methodologies of
the alchemists." Later, particularly during the 1800s, numerous
investigations of 'pyrogenic reactions' were carried out by passing organic
substances through red-hot glass, porcelain, or iron tubes at atmospheric
pressure. Hermann Kolbe in Marburg performed an important series of experiments
demonstrating that acetic acid, which was previously known only as an oxidation
product of organic materials [7-9], could be prepared from the
elements, i.e. by purely non-biological means.
Parallel reactions induced by heat
and by electron impact have attracted much interest in the last few years. Two
examples relevant to this work are o-sulfobenzoic anhydride and
dibenzothiophene 5,5-dioxide. In these cases, mass spectra were used to guide
exploratory studies of pyrolytic reactions. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Objective of study | Gas‐phase
pyrolysis is a special synthetic method that is usually clean, convenient, and
efficient, and that has advantages over other synthetic methods for
accomplishing the same goals. Flow gas‐phase
pyrolysis has long been used to provide a very powerful and useful alternative
methodology in synthetic organic chemistry. Organic chemists have been
performing flash vacuum pyrolysis reactions with the aim of synthesizing new
compounds and/or to study reactive intermediates. An added advantage is that
this technique is effectively free from solvation, hydrogen bonding, and
protonation effects common in solution reactions. Gas‐phase
pyrolysis reactions offer important routes for novel heterocyclization and
selective synthesis. The flash vacuum pyrolysis (FVP) of o-phenylene sulfite
related compounds is an important and high-yielding source of biologically
active compunds. Early research on the pyrolysis of 1-acylbenzotriazoles only
revealed formation of benzoxazoles, while the important formation of
cyanocyclopentadienes was missed. Similarly, previous studies of the pyrolysis
of 1-alkoxycarbonylbenzotriazoles revealed the formation of
2-alkoxybenzoxazoles, 1- and 2-alkylbenzotriazoles. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Review of Literature | Synthesized products
could be converted to products of further synthetic utility. Pyrolysis of
o-phenylene sulfite analogs give rise to products resulting from loss of SO.
The pyrolysis is consistent with the fragmentations in the mass spectrometer,
which proceed with initial loss of SO from the molecular ions. Substituted
o-phenylene sulfites fragment differently under electron-impact and pyrolytic
conditions. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Methodology | The experiment
involves pyrolysis of the simple heterocyclic compound o-phenylene
sulfite[10-11] (1) which is readily prepared by heating
catechol (benzene-1,2-diol) with thiony chloride. When it is subjected to FVP
at 750 °C and 10 -10-* Torr, it first loses sulfur monoxide to give
o-benzoquinone (2) and this then loses carbon monoxide. The
resulting cyclopentadienone (3) is a reactive 1,3-diene, which
readily undergoes Diels-Alder cycloaddition with itself to form a [4 + 2]
dimer. ° The SO fragment eliminated in the first step is an unusual and
unstable oxide of sulfur, which disproportionates by a complex mechanism [12]
to give ultimately SO, and elemental sulfur. The cyclopentadienone dimer (4) will
be purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography. This technique is ideal
for separation of complex mixtures on a scale of 0.1-1 g and involves running the
mixture, applied as a linear band, up a large (20 × 20 cm) TLC plate of silica
or alumina. After visualisation under UV light the component bands can be
scraped off individually and the products extracted from the
support material. The mixture of pyrolysis products was dissolved in methylene chloride and treated as described below. Silica gel was used for TLC. The GC analyses used a thermal conductivity detector. Some of the ions could conceivably arise from pyrolysis in the ion source, followed by ionization. However, metastable ions suggest that this is not happening. Also, the mass spectra are the same from different instruments and at different ion source temperatures. Except where indicated, the diols used in the syntheses of the sulfites were obtained commercially from Aldrich or from Matheson Coleman and Bell. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Result and Discussion |
o-Phenylene sulfite and its ring-substituted analogs were
prepared by a procedure based on one described by Green. The modified procedure
is given below for preparation of o-phenylene sulfite. The data
from the substituted sulfites are given in Table 1. Characteristic
IR absorptions were observed at 1200-1220 cm-1. o-Phenylene sulfite had bp 58° (1.5 mm); ir (neat) 1220, 1240, 1460 cm-1; uv (pentane) Xmax (absorbance) 273 (0.51), 269 (0.575), 265 nm (sh) (0.450); yield, 72%. o-Phenylene sulfite is a strong lachrymator which hydrolyzes to catechol readily.
Table-1 Mass
Spectra: o-Phenylene sulfite (1):
m/e (rel. intensity) 156 (80), 108 (35), 92 (4), 80 (100), 64 (15.5), 63 (16),
52 (80), 51 (31), 50 (25), 48 (14), 39 (14.5), and 38 (11.5). 2-Methyl-o-phenylene
sulfite (7): m/e (rel. intensity) 170 (58), 122 (6), 106 (4), 105
(12), 94 (100), 78( 30), 77 (14), 66 (96), 65 (22), 63 (12.5) , 52 (16), 51
(24), 50 (11), 48 (12), 40 (24), 39 (54), and 38 (14). 4-tert-Butyl-o-phenylene
sulfite (9): m/e (rel. intensity) 212 (25.5), 197 (100), 169 (2),
149 (2), 133 (6.5), 121 (4), 105 (11.5) , 93 (5), 91 (7), 79 (8), 78 (3), 77
(5), 65 (4), 53 (4), 52 (5), 51 (8), 41 (8), and 39 (8.5). 3,5-Di-tert-butyl-o-phenylene
sulfite (10): m/e (rel. intensity) 268 (26), 253 (100), 189 (6.5),
149 (8), 119 (9), 105 (9), 91 (8), 75 (28), and 41 (17). Discussion: Pyrolysis
of o-phenylene sulfite (1), 2-methyl-o-phenylene sulfite (7),
4-tert-butyl-o-phenylene sulfite (9) and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-o-phenylene
sulfite (10) give rise to products resulting from loss of SO.
For these compounds, the pyrolysis is consistent with the fragmentations in the
mass spectrometer, which proceed with initial loss of SO from the molecular
ions. 4-tert-butyl-
(9) and 3,5-di-tert-butyl- (10) substituted o-phenylene sulfites
fragment differently under electron-impact and pyrolytic conditions. Electron
impact leads to loss of a methyl radical from a teri-butyl group, presumably forming
a very stable tertiary benzylic cation or a ring-expanded analog. The molecules
SO and S02 are lost at nearly the same extent from these M —CH3·
ions. Upon pyrolysis of 9 and 10, products
resulting from SO loss are observed. We
have generally observed that there is less similarity between the two processes
as the molecules become increasingly aliphatic. Striking similarity has also
been observed in the case of biphenylylene cyclic sulfites. Electron-impact
fragmentation of biphenylylene-2,2' sulfite leads to competitive losses of SO
and SO2. The importance of the loss of SO increases as the electron
voltage is lowered, until the two losses are nearly equal in importance. In spite of that, major products from the pyrolysis of benzophenone-2,2' sulfite are due to the loss of S02, whereas SO and S02 are lost competitively from the molecular ions with almost the same importance at 70 eV. It seems that the mass spectra of aromatic cyclic sulfites can be used to predict the most probable products of pyrolysis. As aliphatic substituents are added which can lead to very stable cations, the mass spectra are dominated by cleavage to stable ions, whereas the pyrolysis results resemble those of the unsubstituted analogs. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusion |
In the present review we see that, how o-phenylene sulfite and their substituted analogs undergoes pyrolysis, and from dimer products. These dimer products can form different heterocyclic products at various temperatures. Heterocyclic aromatic compounds are known to show a large range of ecotoxic effects, e.g. acute toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, cytotoxicity, photoinduced toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity. Synthetic heterocycles have widespread therapeutic uses such as antibacterial, antifungal, antimycobacterial, trypanocidal, anti-HIV activity, antileishmanial agents, of biochemical systems. The constantly accelerating rate genotoxic, antitubercular, antimalarial, herbicidal, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, muscle relaxants, anti-convulsant, anticancer etc. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Acknowledgement | Author conveys sincere gratitude to all authors for sharing their valuable knowledge and time to create this informative review article. | ||||||||||||||||||||
References |
|