Early Stages: Survey-Based Research

At first, the social science was based mainly upon surveys, this included interviewing people in person, over the phone or sending questions by mail (Bryman, 2016). Though framed around a set of specific data points, these approaches were constantly handicapped by the need to gather and analyze large amounts of data by hand, a slow and painfully tedious process. In the absence of computers, researchers were able to have access only to relatively small data sets that limited the level of depth and breadth of research.

Computer Software: Excel and Advanced Excel

The introduction of new tools such as Microsoft Excel in the 1980s represented a great advancement in data handling for many social scientists. For the first time, there was even the possibility of automating elementary statistical tasks like descriptive statistics and data representation (Lowe, 2018). Having obtained mastery over basic Excel functionalities, researchers had to dwell on more advanced functionalities like macros and pivot tables which Kranz (2018) argues allowed to conduct more complex tasks on bigger datasets. Yet, there were shortcomings of Excel especially dealing with intricate arrangements or making use of more voluminous data sets although it was an improvement.

Specialized Statistical Softwares

As the research questions advanced, invention of such specialized tools like SPSS was made. SPSS stood for the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, and it made it easier for a researcher to perform some complicated analysis of sociological data, regression models and others. Stata is a statistical software package with a user-friendly interface, widely used in social sciences(Field, 2018).

NVivo: Qualitative Data Analysis

In the case of qualitative research which is mostly based on subjectivity such as interviews and open-ended questions on surveys, saw remarkable developments in the form of NVivo software. NVivo enabled researchers to code, group and reconstruct the reoccurring patterns from a great deal of disorganized information (Bazeley & Jackson, 2013). Qualitative researchers had new opportunities to apply systematic approaches to the qualitative aspects of their researches in order to improve its quality. Employing NVivo made it easier for social scientists to do thematic analysis within the context of advanced theories, easing the challenges faced in studying complex societal issues.

The Change of Course towards Programming Languages: R And Python

As the volume and intricacy of data grew, so did the preference of researchers to turn to more flexible and powerful programming languages like R and Python. Both R and Python are free and open-source that come with extensive catalogue of tools for data processing, statistical methods and machine learning (Lantz, 2019). R is best for extensive data as it is mainly used for statistical modeling and graphical representation of information which is paramount in social science complex studies (Kabacoff, 2015). On the other hand, Python has wider scope of usage and introduces the powerful library Pandas for data manipulation and SciPy for higher structures of mathematics (McKinney, 2017).

It is intuitive to appreciate why R and Python would be looking for applications in social science where researchers are dealing with big datasets and requiring a need for mathematical and statistical forecasting. These are the languages that can crunch data that would be tough to SPSS or other traditional tools , which gives new ways for researchers to investigate cause and effect relationships , correlations as well as patterns among data (James et al., 2021).

The era of big data transformed the face of social science research. For social scientists, rather than becoming reliant on small datasets from surveys or interviews, we can now draw upon big data derived from social media, governmental records and real-time sources (Kitchin 2014). It turns schools into laboratories for a type of research on the human species at a depth and scale that was simply unimaginable only twenty years ago.

Researchers are increasingly resorting to machine learning methods to mine large, complex datasets for patterns and trends when analyzing big data. Machine learning algorithms, combined with traditional statistical methods, enable social scientists to make predictions and gain insights from large-scale data sources (Mullainathan & Spiess, 2017). These developments have pushed social science research toward a more data-driven, quantitative approach, allowing for more precise and wide-ranging conclusions.

The discussion on the dynamics of social science research indicates that the profession has been characterized by growth of methods and how the researchers address complex issues. The evolution from basic survey methods to quantitative and qualitative research including Excel, SPSS, NVivo, R and now Python have progressively enhanced the ability of social scientists in data collection, analysis and interpretation. The last two waves, big data and machine learning, are the newest versions of the possibilities in trying to comprehend affiliation at a large scale. It cannot be denied that social science research will become more and more complex as technology advances in the future, with more combinations of qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Technological Trends :AI, Machine Learning and Big Data

It has become apparent that these three prominently identified technologies: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and Big Data are changing the face of social science research by changing how such phenomena are analyzed. These, together with the more conventional approaches like face-to-face and online questionnaires, are augmented by these innovative technologies which yield wider data reach, richer interpretations, and real time analytics. This paper discusses and analyses the specific roles that AI, ML, and Big Data play in improving the efficiency of the research process together with the methods and theories development and the ethical and interpretational issues arising from the application of such technologies.

Artificial Intelligence: Transforming Research Practices in Social Science

Today, AI serves as an important assistant to social sciences by employing techniques for automating monotonous tasks as well as providing a range of hard- and software tools that help improve capabilities in data handling. From this point of view, AI as a service can be used to analyse big data, distil pattern and trends that are otherwise difficult to notice by the researchers. Automated content analysis is another novel avenue where the incorporation of AI in social research has been found prominent. Some of these tools include IBM’s Watson and Google Cloud AI, the tools, that enables the researchers to contemplate and analyze data collected from different sources consisting social notifications, articles and journals. Some of the current social issues such as poverty and unemployment can be solved by extracting pattern and trends out of large amount of text data which this technique allows.. For instance, AI can help to find relationship between various economic ratios and tweets made by people on social networking sites in regard to unemployment. Some of the discourses that has been discussed in the analysis include; those who are unemployed are deemed as lazy while those looking forward to receiving unemployment benefits are also regarded as lazy, jobless rates are very high and alarming especially among the youth due to their inability to secure training experience to secure a job, voting to the parties that assume joblessness is not an issue as they promise to deliver jobs which do not exist, advancement in technology-causes high Further, AI tools encompass visualization tools like tableaus and Microsoft power BI that allows a researcher to present even complex data in an easily understandable structure. These tools improve dissemination of the research findings to policy makers as well as other members of the society, hence increasing the impact of social science research However, with these remarkable efficiencies provided by AI, there are equally significant questions on its transparency and interpretability. They can be automated and the algorithms that are used to power these tools can function like ‘black boxes,’ hiding the actual process of decision making (Burrell, 2016). The use of AI in social science calls for a pointer to other research theories besides dwelling on the algorithms that have been provided by AI, some of the tools that are used in research include IBM Watson, Google Cloud AI, Tableau, Microsoft Power BI.

Machine Learning: Pioneering Predictive Analytics in Social Science

By adding this predictive method, social science research is enriched by a valuable new tool known as machine learning. The use of ML algorithms helps researchers to describe complicated social processes and to more accurately predict situations than the usage of more traditional statistical tools. Such a transition from assumptions made during the selection of a research problem to those generated in the process of analyzing gathered data provides the opportunity to formulate new hypotheses based on patterns in the given data set (Varian, 2014).

For example, the use of ML models has been adopted in criminal just to estimate the rate of recidivism in cases, based on historical records as well as other details of clients. Such predictive models can help policymakers about such populations to design effective interventions for such demographics (Berk et al., 2018). In sociology, ML helps improve friendly networks whereby algorithms can indicate community standards, ideas spread, and social movements. Scientists have the opportunity to explore millions of posts to identify why some stories become popular, which may be useful for theoretical research or immediate use in activism or advertising. Nevertheless, the ML algorithms are a bit tricky since they have interpretability issues. Due to the ‘behind the scenes’ closed door like approach of some of the ML models, the reasons that are used to come up with certain results cannot be explained easily prompting researchers to doubt the results (Lipton, 2016). Consequently, while incorporating the efficiency of ML into social science research, it social scientists have to ensure the results achieved as well as the procedures used in the analysis are perfectly explainable: that is, they must incorporate a high level of interpretability alongside the predictivity all the while focusing on the theoretical rationale of the analysis.ML Software for Social Science Research are scikit-learn, TensorFlow, WEKA.

Big Data: Broadening the Scope of Social Inquiry

Big Data has now become an indispensable tool of the contemporary social scientist, who can analyze online human activity in real time and using big volumes of data. Information overload from social media, transactional records, and the public records allows scientists to perform extra studies that have been inconceivable before (Mayer-Schönberger & Cukier, 2013). Big Data’s biggest strength is its ability to operate in real time. In incidences like the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers deploys Big Data in the determination of mobility, vaccination and health compliance. This enables one to respond adequately and shape policies given the trends, something which is not achievable by other methods (Chin et al., 2020). Furthermore, Big Data facilitates cohort studies in an entire population by tracking the changes in perception, actions and societal trends over time. The suggested benefit of big data is the improved ability of social scientists to gain insights that improve society’s knowledge of the change and trends. Besides the fact that it creates a plenty of opportunities, Big Data poses certain ethic questions. Automated decision-making by means of digital footprints introduce bias since data usually include the views of well-to-do or technologically engaged communities at the expense of minorities (O’Neil, 2016). Furthermore, questions about privacy and Numbers; consents are critical; PDR is a process that calls for balancing the ethical use of personal data within the rights of the data subject in accordance with the Data Protection Laws.

1. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications.
2. Berk, R., Sorenson, S., & Barnes, G. (2018). Forecasting domestic violence: A machine learning approach to help inform arraignment decisions. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(1), 94-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12162
3. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
4. Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine 'thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
5. Chin, V., Ioannidis, J. P., Tanner, M. A., & Cripps, S. (2020). Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19: A tale of three models. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.20160341
6. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
7. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R (2nd ed.). Springer.
8. Kabacoff, R. I. (2015). R in action: Data analysis and graphics with R (2nd ed.). Manning Publications.
9. Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. Sage Publications.
10. Kranz, G. (2018). Advanced Excel skills for researchers: Pivot tables, macros, and beyond. Journal of Research Methods, 4(2), 45-62.
11. Lantz, B. (2019). Machine learning with R (2nd ed.). Packt Publishing.
12. Lipton, Z. C. (2016). The mythos of model interpretability. In Proceedings of the 2016 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2016), New York, NY, USA.
13. Lowe, P. (2018). The evolution of Microsoft Excel in social science research. Computational Social Science Review, 3(2), 88-100.
14. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
15. McKinney, W. (2017). Python for data analysis: Data wrangling with pandas, NumPy, and IPython (2nd ed.). O'Reilly Media.
16. Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.87
17. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
18. Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3